开云体育

Same problem here!

"I've also found the same general idea very useful in measuring the relative coupling between my various ham antennas so that I can decide if I need to worry about protecting receivers on a given

I have an SAA2N that has been working fine. Yesterday I was using it to measure a long run of coax, and it was working fine. Then it just started acting like it was not sending a signal out of port 0.

Last winter I did a lot of UHF antenna debugging for a wireless microphone installation project in my small basement by using the through mode of the VNA and measuring the loss/gain between the

IMHO, the best choice for editable documents is Markdown. Sure it has limitations, eg it’s cumbersome to include images. Also PDF is more editable than it looks. This requires specialized software

Yes, Flex-Weave, AWG #14, from DavisRF is what I used. Dave - W?LEV <hornpipe112@...> wrote: -- *Dave - W?LEV* *Just Let Darwin Work*

Right. But both of these are rather resource-intensive, take a while to load, and make me not want to bother with the document in question. -- Member of the toughest, meanest, deadliest, most

Docx is not an open standard. OpenDocument is and it is an international standard.

Both Open Office and Libre Office (free programs) can open docx files. Zack wrote: <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>

we're sort of getting off nanovna here, so if the moderators want to kill it, fine. The problem with pdf is that it's not editable. .docx and LaTeX are both editable forms, with varying degrees of

I've run nothing but linux here since 1999... -- Member of the toughest, meanest, deadliest, most unrelenting -- and ablest -- form of life in this section of space, ?a critter that can be killed but

Agreed. I _can_ open those docx files, but won't for the most part bother... -- Member of the toughest, meanest, deadliest, most unrelenting -- and ablest -- form of life in this section of space, ?a

Folks, use the online document translate/conversion site that I use: /g/nanovna-users/message/16761 Works great.

I was also opening these docx files in OpenOffice, on my good old Windows XP. But like Jean-Denis comments, the format gets screwed up, the colums don't align. Using PDF is much better. Probably

From what I understand SAA2N has better dynamic range than the 1.5GHz nanoVNA and thus is better for duplexer and cavity filter tuning.

Regarding the two 3D-printed tools I posted, use 0.15 mm (or 0.2 mm) layer height, and 100 % infill when slicing for 3D-print.

I had the same problem with the U.FL connectors https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hirose_U.FL . I modelled a small tool to solve the problem, thinking it should be used to connect, and then removed. When

I have posted on this before a month or so ago. You will need a very thin nut, otherwise the control buttons will disappear. Also those nuts are vey difficult to find and I would probably cut up the

Hi Jean-Denis I'm not in thrall to paid for uSoft stuff. docx opens fine with 'open office' on my win7 pc, but I agree, docx is not the best for universal use. On the group I run we try to upload

Hi Dave Thank you for your really helpful reply. Puts a lot into perspective. My comment on wire was not directed to metric/imperial - that's a minor inconvenience, just means using wire tables- but