Keyboard Shortcuts
ctrl + shift + ? :
Show all keyboard shortcuts
ctrl + g :
Navigate to a group
ctrl + shift + f :
Find
ctrl + / :
Quick actions
esc to dismiss
Likes
- Nanovna-Users
- Messages
Search
Re: Calibration issue causing ripples in SWR?
#calibration
aparent1/kb1gmx
Always perform a reset before setup and SOL.
I have a piece of that DX400max 50ft long I do not see that oddity. That cable would have to be really poor to get that result. Several possible things, adaptors, connectors, or cable was kinked. also the load at the other end? If using a intermediate cable check it and all adaptors. Generally if called with a 51 ohm load and its used at the far end of the cable its should not be as pronounced as you show. Remotely possible is the cable is really off spec or someone substituted 75 ohm material. Allison ----------------- No direct email, it goes to bit bucket due address harvesting in groups.IO |
Re: Frequency error
As the TCXO frequency is out of tolerances, it's certainly a defect component.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
As i wrote, i ordered the Nanovna-H at "Wish". I've read, but too late, that this was not the best solution... The solution, for me, is to ask to a known friend, well equipped and trained for small SMD components replacement to do the work. Now, i must find an equivalent or compatible component. Rudi Le 21.05.2020 ¨¤ 17:41, hugen@... a ¨¦crit?:
The NanoVNA-H we produced should not have such a large deviation. Can we provide PCB pictures and test pictures? If it is the version we made, we can provide a new one for free. |
Re: Calibrating to a long coax?
#applications
#calibration
#measurement
aparent1/kb1gmx
DR Kirkby,
That would be a corner case and a very very long cable. Typical cables used ran maybe as long as 100M, so we haven't reached a radar mile yet. Usually we have no reason to make sudden frequency range changes but have in the past. Most of the expensive VNA/PNAs the dwell times, numbers of points are programmable and that also dictates the sweep rates. However, as HP/Agilent/Keysight has noted you can tell the machine to do ill advised things and get the deserved nebulous results. More typical would be a piece of RG400 10M long. We used a lot of specially made cables that were ferrite loaded. Bench cable are typical 1M commercial made like minicircuits ULC-1M-NMNN (1 meter cables). or ULC-6FT-NMNN (6ft). Costly but quality when using 6ghz PNA in the 5700mhz range. The payback is quality commercial cables have good useful lifetimes. Often they can be found used or surplus in good condition. Allison ----------------- No direct email, it goes to bit bucket due address harvesting in groups.IO |
Re: Frequency error
Try update firmware to my last version and check
/g/nanovna-users/files/Dislord%27s%20Nanovna%20-H%20Firmware As i remember old Hugen (and edy555 < 0.6) firmware not fully correct select settings for SI5351 But for freq > 300 MHz error bigger * harmonic range |
Frequency error
With a loop, i was able to measure the TCXO frequency and found
25.997748 MHz instead of 26MHz ! This error correspond to ~ -86ppm, not too far of the output error of -85.5 ppm at 100MHz CW ! As i'm not able to replace the TCXO (+/- 2.5 ppm Max according the data-sheet...), i must look for an other solution. Unit return to the vendor "Wish" seems impossible. A 1st and last experience, not with NanoVNA-H but Wish ! Rudi |
Re: [Measuring] Is there an easy way to measure balun loss?
Thanks for sharing will look into it !
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 02:35 PM, <gaionim@...> wrote:
|
Re: Review of NanoVNA-H v3.4
#nanovna-h_v3dot4
Please read the forum WIKI and notes in the forum FILES sections.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
You need to install the latest version of firmware for the model of Nano you purchased. On Thursday, May 21, 2020, 11:03:31 a.m. GMT-4, marxtech@... <marxtech@...> wrote:
I just got my Nanovna-Hv3.4 from amazon seesii.? I was ready to return it because the back states frequency:50k-300MHz.? I am looking for the 10KHz starting frequency. Now I see your expert review.? Thanks so much! How do I access the lowered starting frequency? Rolf KC6HTR |
Re: Review of NanoVNA-H v3.4
#nanovna-h_v3dot4
I just got my Nanovna-Hv3.4 from amazon seesii. I was ready to return it because the back states frequency:50k-300MHz. I am looking for the 10KHz starting frequency.
Now I see your expert review. Thanks so much! How do I access the lowered starting frequency? Rolf KC6HTR |
Re: Calibrating to a long coax?
#applications
#calibration
#measurement
REF: /g/nanovna-users/message/13681
Hello, again. Well, after the Special Interest shown here, we would like to inform you that, in direct contrast with what Gary O'Neil, N3GO believed on 2009-09-30 - in the "Errors of error models. Who is following this and who is confused" thread, at his message: /g/nanovna-users/message/3492 - that is that: "They appear to have done limited testing of their math model", there are plenty Measured Results by a VNA under these Most Interesting Extreme Conditions created by many Open- and Short- circuited loads, which were produced by purposely constructed for that reason Special Antennas, and we plan to present some of these results, as soon as possible, within the frame of discussion: "errors of "error" models". Sincerely, gin&pez@arg |
Frequency error
I'm a little bit disappointed; i measured a CW 100MHz output from my NanoVNA-H received one week ago.
The reference of my frequency meter is a 5MHz G3RUH GPSDO and i get a 99.99144 MHz (~ -85.5 ppm error); same result with a calibrated SDR receiver. I'm not able to measure the TCXO output frequency. At my non professional point of vue, 2 possibilities: -1- The TCXO is totally out of specifications. -2- Something is wrong with the Si5351A-B-GT frequency programming command. Can somebody explain what is wrong with my NanoVNA ? Thank you in advance for your help. Rudi |
Re: Oscillator 26MHz
Thank you for your quick reply and data-sheet's link.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Rudi Le 21.05.2020 ¨¤ 12:23, hugen@... a ¨¦crit?:
|
Re: Calibration issue causing ripples in SWR?
#calibration
The 50 ohms cables as far as I remember were rated by different
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
manufacturers as 50 to 52 ohms years ago, so my guess is that 51 ohms is on the ballpark. It is also a standard resistor value. Try to find out the cable impedance, it seems to me to be the culprit. Find the frequency where the cable is lambda/4 as a RF short circuit with the end of the cable physically open. Set half the frequency found before on the VNA and read the reactance, that is the cable?s impedance. I am writing by heart, a mistake might have slipped... Jos¨¦, CO2JA On 5/21/20, ed@... <ed@...> wrote:
After calibrating, I connected my nanovna to my VHF antenna via a brand new |
Calibration issue causing ripples in SWR?
#calibration
After calibrating, I connected my nanovna to my VHF antenna via a brand new 75 foot length of 50ohm DX400MAX coax. The SWR measurement oscillates up and down every 4MHz or so (see attached). These correspond exactly to the half-wavelength harmonics of the cable. Looking at the smith chart, it is clear that the impedance is tracing a circle around about 45 ohms rather than the constant-SWR circle centered at 50 ohms, resulting in a frequency-dependent SWR.
Is there is a good way to determine whether this is a problem with my nanovna, with the calibration standard, or with the cable? One note: the calibration standard load measures 51 ohms DC resistance, which seems like a problem to me. Should my standard be exactly 50 ohms dc resistance? |
Re: saver software linux
Bob- thanks will give that a try.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Dan KC2STA On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 3:32 PM Bob Solimeno <kc2jav@...> wrote:
I've been able to install the NanoVNA-Saver on Ubuntu 20.04 using the --
Dan Ziolkowski KC2STA SKCC #4290T Ubuntu LINUX |
to navigate to use esc to dismiss