开云体育

Hi Norbert On the contrary I see better results. It is all about the calibration so show us a picture of calibration settings and give information about what you are using for calibration Kind regards

Hi Gabriel Nice to hear you about experiments with the tuning of cal kit parameters which my great hobby. You may find interst in finding the fringe C for the open using the program FEMM which does

BNC on 900 MHz is just so so, on a measurement device it is an absolute no no! I will happily stay with SMA for most of my RF work, and u.fl if it needs to be small. Op 24-1-2020 om 00:38 schreef

Howdy Bob, I don't know if it would be worth the cost, but cell-phone repair techs are always fixing those tiny connectors. There's some youtube videos. Most don't use a tiny-point iron for fine-pitch

Hi Rune, after calibration with the nanovna saver software, I connected a 35cm long semi rigid coax to CH0. I am wondering, that at full reflection the response moves over the perimeter of the smith

Thanks Bob,you are right it was bought with no battery. Not up to working with SMD size components and soldering so have bought a 5V power bank and will run it from that when in the field. Regards &

Hi Oristo, Good work on the driver wiki page. For better new-user understanding, you might consider adding something like: "There are 3 possible drivers that may appear in Device Manager: 1 -

I heard from the customer that they've finished testing half of the first batch. I think it will become available right after the holidays, so in just over a week. "On some of her other projects she

Just seen on Twitter a version with BNC connectors. https://qrznow.com/new-network-vector-analyzer-fxnano-0-5-900-mhz/ Kleibe PP2KR

Greetings to everyone, Good work on the new boards, I will surely get one when they reach market. Have you checked if mounting passives upside down makes any difference in this design or does that

On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 09:24 AM, dwabbit wrote: " any update on a release yet. im holding off on a few 2.4ghz projects as I will be needing the use of a vna @2.4ghz to do some antenna testing "

Larry, Thanks for posting this. I bookmarked that "Engineer's Garage" site. Lots of interesting stuff to read... Roger

That display looks like the one that hugen is using on his new H4 version of the nanovna. Is the LCD and touch surface broken or just the touch surface? It looks like it's a 3.9inch diagonal.Remove

any update on a release yet. im holding off on a few 2.4ghz projects as I will be needing the use of a vna @2.4ghz to do some antenna testing cheers

Thanks Larry, looks like the links to the device and its photo did not made it to the main post.

On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 08:22 AM, hwalker wrote: Steve, I believe no one has replied to the original post because it is hard to find members with both devices. NanoVNA-F owners are pretty satisfied

On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 07:21 AM, Steven Greenfield AE7HD wrote: " ... difference between nanoVNA-F and nanoVNA-H4..." I am also interested in the difference.

The bit of plastic is nothing more than a handle to remove the screen protector. Battery charging is indicated by flashing blue LED.? If it flashes, battery is charging.? If steady on, fully

I subscribe to 'The Engineer's Garage' newsletter and thought folks here might be interested in this article. It's mostly for surface mount devices but is still useful info.

What touchscreen is broken - the generator or the Nanovna? You have not indicated the model of the generator, the size of its screen, etc.