开云体育

the two nanoVNA-H and H4 compared. -- *73, Lucio I0LYL Rome, Italy*

The screen size of the first NanoVNAs is barely usable unless people have very good vision. I know Hugen has a screen slightly less than 4”, and the NanoVNA-F has a 4.3” screen. Is anybody working

On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 01:08 PM, Larry Rothman wrote: From Hugen's github F303 branch, starting at line 169, you can see the list of all the (current) on-screen menu commands:

On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 12:26 PM, Birdman wrote: Can anyone tell me if the font is any bigger on the 4" over the 2.8"? I know the screen is bigger, but is the font bigger, or is it the same? And yes,

From Hugen's github F303 branch, starting at line 169, you can see the list of all the (current) on-screen menu commands: https://github.com/hugen79/NanoVNA-H/blob/F303/ui.c

On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 11:41 AM, Jos Stevens wrote: " ..I misread the date, sorry abt that, 18/01/2020 is the latest firmware indeed for the -H and the -H4..."

Please desist from adding to this particular OT branch on this thread. I will terminate the thread if this branch continues, as the thread itself, on topic, is useful but this branch is not. If you

Can anyone tell me if the font is any bigger on the 4" over the 2.8"? I know the screen is bigger, but is the font bigger, or is it the same? And yes, I know there is another firmware vers with bigger

Please review this Wiki page: /g/nanovna-users/wiki/drivers#Cannot-load-new-firmware3AC2A0-STM32-BOOTLOADER After any recommended changes, the main Wiki page will be updated to point

One reason I can see for it being done is those of use that get the messages via email have no idea why someone edited or what they changed. All we get is a number of copies of seemingly the same

Hi Herb, You are right , my fault, there isn't, I misread the date, sorry abt that, 18/01/2020 is the latest firmware indeed for the -H and the -H4. That is one of my questions, the compatibility of

Hi Brian - 1) .. are incomplete, in that many will need to install the appropriate STM drive. 2) There is already an entry at /g/nanovna-users/wiki#Help "check for wrong driver"

On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 10:52 AM, Jos Stevens wrote: " I know there is a version dated 25/01/2020 for the -H " ============================================= Where do you see the version dated

Hi Hugen, Yesterday I received the NanoVNA-H, very nice device. The NanoVNA Menu Structure Map that was included did not match the actual structure, I saw more menu items. is there a document that

I wanted to document a solution to this problem that I found on the Wilderness Labs website. I will quote their steps directly so that we have an archive of the STM32 BOOTLOADER driver issue: 1)

Maybe, but I 'm not sure. However, thank you for your answer. As for me, I would be absolutely happy if this little line R+/-jX appeared on the NanoVNA-H screen. ))) 73!

IMO, text lines already obscure too much of plots, discouraging me from simultaneously displaying more than 2 plots; I would very much want any additional lines to be defeatable.

On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 09:19 AM, Andy UA3RAW wrote: Oristo wrote: I very much appreciate being able to select my 10kHz - 1 MHz stimulus calibration and e.g. check components or capacitance of short

...associated with some frequency, presumably selected by marker, of which there may be several?

Ok, Dave! I understand. Thanks!