开云体育

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 开云体育

Locked Re: McAFee Virus Scanner Objects to nanoSaver download from GitHub

Michael Robinson
 

I'm gonna play Devil's Advocate here and suggest that all supposed virii
are manufactured by the antivirii companies to induce the fear of a viral
attack on your computer in order to sell you their ready-made solution for
the virii in question. This includes Microsoft products, as well. Time to
use a little common sense here, folks. I am slowly making the transition
to Linux OS's. Currently using Linux Mint Cinnamon, Debian 12.9.0 with the
Mate Desktop and Kali Linux. No viruses detected by Clam AV.

Michael L Robinson, KC0TA

“In the beginning of a change the Patriot is a scarce man, and brave, and
hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, the timid join him, for then it
costs nothing to be a Patriot.” ― Mark Twain

When Tyranny becomes Law, Revolution becomes Duty!






On Sun, Mar 23, 2025 at 8:48?PM Gary H Thompson via groups.io <garythomjw=
[email protected]> wrote:

That’s great! I do a lot of computer work too. Back in the day, my wife
would play the ‘ghost buster’ song and call me the virus buster.
Glad you got it fixed!

--
Sent from Canary ()

On Sunday, Mar 23, 2025 at 8:14 PM, William French - AA1BF via groups.io
<bill.french.epsom@... (mailto:bill.french.epsom=
[email protected])> wrote:
My grandson cleared the "McAfee" pop-ups on my computer today.
He is a computer services professional.
He did what was stated above, clearing cookies and related stuff from the
Chrome browser and the problem went away. He said that he has to do this
a
couple
of times a week for some of his clients.

On Sun, Mar 23, 2025 at 6:20?PM Chuck Cole via groups.io <cncole=
[email protected]> wrote:

Gary, you're probably right, but MacAfee is the only ID I could find in
many intrusions and I could not find anything to block. I examined and
searched extensively.

On Sun, Mar 23, 2025 at 6:03?PM Gary H Thompson via groups.io
<garythomjw=
[email protected]> wrote:

It’s probably not McAfee, it’s a virus that try's to get you to go to
their site, thinking you are going to McAfee. The message is the
virus.
Clear your browser cookies and browser history and reboot. If that
诲辞别蝉苍’迟
work, use Google to find other things to try. If you clicked on the
popup
and went to their site, anything you entered is now compromised. Call
your
bank and credit card and let them know what happened.






--
Chuck Cole K4TZO













Locked Re: McAFee Virus Scanner Objects to nanoSaver download from GitHub

 

That’s great! I do a lot of computer work too. Back in the day, my wife would play the ‘ghost buster’ song and call me the virus buster.
Glad you got it fixed!

--
Sent from Canary ()

On Sunday, Mar 23, 2025 at 8:14 PM, William French - AA1BF via groups.io <bill.french.epsom@... (mailto:bill.french.epsom@...)> wrote:
My grandson cleared the "McAfee" pop-ups on my computer today.
He is a computer services professional.
He did what was stated above, clearing cookies and related stuff from the
Chrome browser and the problem went away. He said that he has to do this a
couple
of times a week for some of his clients.

On Sun, Mar 23, 2025 at 6:20?PM Chuck Cole via groups.io <cncole=
[email protected]> wrote:

Gary, you're probably right, but MacAfee is the only ID I could find in
many intrusions and I could not find anything to block. I examined and
searched extensively.

On Sun, Mar 23, 2025 at 6:03?PM Gary H Thompson via groups.io <garythomjw=
[email protected]> wrote:

It’s probably not McAfee, it’s a virus that try's to get you to go to
their site, thinking you are going to McAfee. The message is the virus.
Clear your browser cookies and browser history and reboot. If that
诲辞别蝉苍’迟
work, use Google to find other things to try. If you clicked on the popup
and went to their site, anything you entered is now compromised. Call
your
bank and credit card and let them know what happened.






--
Chuck Cole K4TZO









Locked Re: McAFee Virus Scanner Objects to nanoSaver download from GitHub

 

My grandson cleared the "McAfee" pop-ups on my computer today.
He is a computer services professional.
He did what was stated above, clearing cookies and related stuff from the
Chrome browser and the problem went away. He said that he has to do this a
couple
of times a week for some of his clients.

On Sun, Mar 23, 2025 at 6:20?PM Chuck Cole via groups.io <cncole=
[email protected]> wrote:

Gary, you're probably right, but MacAfee is the only ID I could find in
many intrusions and I could not find anything to block. I examined and
searched extensively.

On Sun, Mar 23, 2025 at 6:03?PM Gary H Thompson via groups.io <garythomjw=
[email protected]> wrote:

It’s probably not McAfee, it’s a virus that try's to get you to go to
their site, thinking you are going to McAfee. The message is the virus.
Clear your browser cookies and browser history and reboot. If that
诲辞别蝉苍’迟
work, use Google to find other things to try. If you clicked on the popup
and went to their site, anything you entered is now compromised. Call
your
bank and credit card and let them know what happened.






--
Chuck Cole K4TZO






Locked Re: McAFee Virus Scanner Objects to nanoSaver download from GitHub

 

Gary, you're probably right, but MacAfee is the only ID I could find in
many intrusions and I could not find anything to block. I examined and
searched extensively.

On Sun, Mar 23, 2025 at 6:03?PM Gary H Thompson via groups.io <garythomjw=
[email protected]> wrote:

It’s probably not McAfee, it’s a virus that try's to get you to go to
their site, thinking you are going to McAfee. The message is the virus.
Clear your browser cookies and browser history and reboot. If that 诲辞别蝉苍’迟
work, use Google to find other things to try. If you clicked on the popup
and went to their site, anything you entered is now compromised. Call your
bank and credit card and let them know what happened.






--
Chuck Cole ?K4TZO


Locked Re: McAFee Virus Scanner Objects to nanoSaver download from GitHub

 

It’s probably not McAfee, it’s a virus that try's to get you to go to their site, thinking you are going to McAfee. The message is the virus.
Clear your browser cookies and browser history and reboot. If that 诲辞别蝉苍’迟 work, use Google to find other things to try. If you clicked on the popup and went to their site, anything you entered is now compromised. Call your bank and credit card and let them know what happened.


Locked Re: McAFee Virus Scanner Objects to nanoSaver download from GitHub

 

For me, MacAfee *is* the invasive virus. I must take careful steps to
ignore and remove their notices!
I will only use Win10. Win11 has suggested I buy new software when what I
have ain't broke.
Will use Linux exclusively if /when Win10 no longer runs.

73,

Chuck K4TZO

On Sun, Mar 23, 2025 at 11:06?AM Steve Withnell via groups.io
<steve.withnell@...> wrote:

I've tried downloading nanoSaver to Win11Pro and McAfee snatches the .exe
into quarantine. I'm using the github download:



I tried using a Win10 machine and nanoSaver runs, but MacAfee wants to
remove a virus.

Anyone got a clue on what is going on?






--
Chuck Cole ?K4TZO


Re: Running NanoVNA Saver (or other software) on Linux

 

SUSO ………. sudo perhaps ?

On Sun, 23 Mar 2025 at 20:05, k6whp via groups.io <k6whp=
[email protected]> wrote:

My apologies for being so dense but I cannot seem to unpack the advice
given here. I am running Linux Mint 21.0 something and have been able to
install other packages handily, but cannot get my head around what it takes
to install NanoVNA-saver per the instructions here.

Per your instructions..

<11:44|~> Suso apt-cache search nanovna
Suso: command not found
<11:44|~>sudo apt-cache search nanovna
[sudo] password for whp:
<11:45|~> {{{{nothing occurred after password negotiated}}}}

..howeverr, none of this worked out so, in looking for alternatives, I
found this, and was able to bring saver up.

panda@vika:~$ history
1 sudo apt update
2 sudo apt install python3-pip
3 pip3 install

4 echo 'export PATH=$PATH:/home/panda/.local/bin' >> ~/.bashrc
5 source ~/.bashrc
6 NanoVNASaver


Now my question is how does one connect to the NanoVNA like one would do
searching out the Com port on Windows?


--
William, k6whp
--------------------
"Cheer up, things could get worse. So I cheered up and things got worse."






Re: Running NanoVNA Saver (or other software) on Linux

 

Disregard all of above. Found this..

panda@vika:~$ history
1 sudo apt update
2 sudo apt install python3-pip
3 pip3 install
4 echo 'export PATH=$PATH:/home/panda/.local/bin' >> ~/.bashrc
5 source ~/.bashrc
6 NanoVNASaver

Change "panda" to your home -- such as .home/panda/ for me became /home/whp/

The rest works and, once installed, entering "NanaoVNASaver" does the trick. It comes up with "/dev/ttyACM1 (H4)" in port (in my case).

Much simpler.

--
William, k6whp
--------------------
"Cheer up, things could get worse. So I cheered up and things got worse."


Locked Re: McAFee Virus Scanner Objects to nanoSaver download from GitHub

 

Something in the newer versions of Saver is falsely triggering McAfee virus signatures. I tell the quarantine to restore the file, then put it on the list to ignore while scanning.
Some other virus scanners also have problems with it, but some do not.
Stan


Locked Re: McAFee Virus Scanner Objects to nanoSaver download from GitHub

 

Even without MacAfee, my laptop running Windows 11 will always say that any
Ham software I try to install is untrustworthy. I thought it may be because
ham software authors are unable to get the software certified due to low
potential usage compared to other general use software. Same problem occurs
when I try to visit the older and quite popular ham websites as well. All
are blocked by my antivirus, mostly because they are http rather than
https.

73
Jon, VU2JO

On Sun, Mar 23, 2025 at 8:36?PM Steve Withnell via groups.io
<steve.withnell@...> wrote:

I've tried downloading nanoSaver to Win11Pro and McAfee snatches the .exe
into quarantine. I'm using the github download:



I tried using a Win10 machine and nanoSaver runs, but MacAfee wants to
remove a virus.

Anyone got a clue on what is going on?






Locked McAFee Virus Scanner Objects to nanoSaver download from GitHub

 

I've tried downloading nanoSaver to Win11Pro and McAfee snatches the .exe into quarantine. I'm using the github download:



I tried using a Win10 machine and nanoSaver runs, but MacAfee wants to remove a virus.

Anyone got a clue on what is going on?


Re: Running NanoVNA Saver (or other software) on Linux

 

I just installed it in Kubuntu 24.04 from the repository via Synaptic package monitor with no errors. It executes and comes with the expected screen but I would have to go to the room with the physical machine to test operation and it's past my bedtime...

On Sun, 23 Mar 2025 03:38:18 +0000
"M0CNL via groups.io" <m1cxz.m0cnl@...> wrote:

Try doing a
$ Suso apt-cache search nanovna
See what that shows (if anything) as the naming may be slightly different or not included in your versions repo.

Away from a Debian based machine right now so cannot check the actual name of the package.

Just searched the package repo and it’s there in:
24.04LTS
24.10
And plucky
Called nanovna-saver in all of them
--

73

-Jim
NU0C


Re: Running NanoVNA Saver (or other software) on Linux

 

Try doing a
$ Suso apt-cache search nanovna
See what that shows (if anything) as the naming may be slightly different or not included in your versions repo.

Away from a Debian based machine right now so cannot check the actual name of the package.

Just searched the package repo and it’s there in:
24.04LTS
24.10
And plucky
Called nanovna-saver in all of them

________________________________
From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of k6whp via groups.io <k6whp@...>
Sent: Sunday, March 23, 2025 1:39:42 AM
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [nanovna-users] Running NanoVNA Saver (or other software) on Linux

Saw this:

Install Howto
Update the package index:
$ sudo apt-get update
Install nanovna-saver deb package:
$ sudo apt-get install nanovna-saver

Did this:
<17:23|~>sudo apt-get update

Got this:
....
Get:67 jammy-security/universe Translation-en [207 kB]
Get:68 jammy-security/universe amd64 DEP-11 Metadata [125 kB]
Get:69 jammy-security/universe amd64 c-n-f Metadata [21.7 kB]
Get:70 jammy-security/multiverse amd64 DEP-11 Metadata [208 B]
Reading package lists... Done
N: Skipping acquire of configured file 'main/binary-i386/Packages' as repository ' vscodium InRelease' doesn't support architecture 'i386'
E: Failed to fetch 403 Forbidden [IP: 79.143.189.67 443]
E: The repository ' focal InRelease' is no longer signed.
N: Updating from such a repository can't be done securely, and is therefore disabled by default.
N: See apt-secure(8) manpage for repository creation and user configuration details.

Did this:
<17:25|~>sudo apt-get install nanovna-saver
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Reading state information... Done
E: Unable to locate package nanovna-saver
<17:26|~>

Sorry to be lame; what am I missing?

--
William, k6whp
--------------------
"Cheer up, things could get worse. So I cheered up and things got worse."


Re: Running NanoVNA Saver (or other software) on Linux

 

Yes, it runs under Linux (e.g. on a Raspberry Pi, or for that matter, on MacOS)
You can download the source from the git repo, or I think there’s a package you can apt-get

On Mar 22, 2025, at 16:47, k6whp <k6whp@...> wrote:

?Have been searching the threads for this item and am wondering if..

(1) NanoVNA Saver has a port to Linux or can be run under Wine on Linux?
(2) Are there any other NanoVNA software packages that run under Linux?

Thank you in advance.

--
William, k6whp
--------------------
"Cheer up, things could get worse. So I cheered up and things got worse."





Re: Running NanoVNA Saver (or other software) on Linux

 

Saw this:

Install Howto
Update the package index:
$ sudo apt-get update
Install nanovna-saver deb package:
$ sudo apt-get install nanovna-saver

Did this:
<17:23|~>sudo apt-get update

Got this:
....
Get:67 jammy-security/universe Translation-en [207 kB]
Get:68 jammy-security/universe amd64 DEP-11 Metadata [125 kB]
Get:69 jammy-security/universe amd64 c-n-f Metadata [21.7 kB]
Get:70 jammy-security/multiverse amd64 DEP-11 Metadata [208 B]
Reading package lists... Done
N: Skipping acquire of configured file 'main/binary-i386/Packages' as repository ' vscodium InRelease' doesn't support architecture 'i386'
E: Failed to fetch 403 Forbidden [IP: 79.143.189.67 443]
E: The repository ' focal InRelease' is no longer signed.
N: Updating from such a repository can't be done securely, and is therefore disabled by default.
N: See apt-secure(8) manpage for repository creation and user configuration details.

Did this:
<17:25|~>sudo apt-get install nanovna-saver
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Reading state information... Done
E: Unable to locate package nanovna-saver
<17:26|~>

Sorry to be lame; what am I missing?

--
William, k6whp
--------------------
"Cheer up, things could get worse. So I cheered up and things got worse."


Re: Running NanoVNA Saver (or other software) on Linux

Michael Robinson
 



Michael L Robinson, KC0TA

“In the beginning of a change the Patriot is a scarce man, and brave, and
hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, the timid join him, for then it
costs nothing to be a Patriot.” ― Mark Twain

When Tyranny becomes Law, Revolution becomes Duty!






On Sat, Mar 22, 2025 at 6:47?PM k6whp via groups.io <k6whp=
[email protected]> wrote:

Have been searching the threads for this item and am wondering if..

(1) NanoVNA Saver has a port to Linux or can be run under Wine on Linux?
(2) Are there any other NanoVNA software packages that run under Linux?

Thank you in advance.

--
William, k6whp
--------------------
"Cheer up, things could get worse. So I cheered up and things got worse."






Running NanoVNA Saver (or other software) on Linux

 

Have been searching the threads for this item and am wondering if..

(1) NanoVNA Saver has a port to Linux or can be run under Wine on Linux?
(2) Are there any other NanoVNA software packages that run under Linux?

Thank you in advance.

--
William, k6whp
--------------------
"Cheer up, things could get worse. So I cheered up and things got worse."


Re: Measurement correction for Zc Coax caracteristic Impedance

 

OK, yes, I can see that.

Zack

<>
Virus-free.www.avg.com
<>
<#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>

On Fri, Mar 21, 2025 at 4:17?PM Team-SIM SIM-Mode via groups.io <sim31_team=
[email protected]> wrote:

Hi Zac
Sorry, Here i meant by coax resonant freq the freq that Give 1/4 lamda
electrical length or zero impedance on smith diagram , coax supposed
without terminaison .
73s






Re: Measurement correction for Zc Coax caracteristic Impedance

 

Hi Zac
Sorry, Here i meant by coax resonant freq the freq that Give 1/4 lamda electrical length or zero impedance on smith diagram , coax supposed without terminaison .
73s


Re: using an adjacent RAIN GUTTER for HF bands

 

Rain gutter: i sometimes use my (horizontal) rain gutter, with its two
vertical downspouts, as an antenna, at low power such as for WSPR. I feed
it with a 9:1 balun (for 20 meters) and with a 1:1 balun (with an added L-C
match) for 40 meters. Inside the apartment is a 10-meter-long radial on the
floor.

It's not my best antenna of course but it works somewhat, especially on
20-meter WSPR.

I used the nanoVNA to check it out. Also SimNEC. ... On 14 MHz and higher
(HF) with the 9:1 it is fine. I use only about 5 watts into it, because the
feedpoint is not bolted to the metal gutter. The wire is wrapped around a
lag bolt which i screw into the tight space between the gutter and the
wooden eaves. Every so often i turn the lag bolt and squirt some oil into
the joint.

I would say it's not much better or worse than my indoor mag loops at 5
watts.

Orrin WN1Z


El vie, 21 mar 2025 a la(s) 12:36?p.m., Barry K3EUI via groups.io
(k3euibarry@...) escribió:

*
*

*
*

* Multi-Band HF Vertical*

*
*

*In an effort to get a VERTICAL ANTENNA up for the 20/17/15/10 meter
bands, I tried setting up a 14 ft vertical antenna*

*made from old aluminum tubing, mounted 3 ft above ground, adjacent to a
20 ft vertical aluminum rain gutter - mounted just inches from it for
close coupling.*

*Set up three radials - two were 13 feet and one was 33 ft. **No
matching of any kind.*

*
*

*Results were surprising as the rain gutter makes this vertical into a
reasonable multi-band vertical for 20/15/10 meters.
*

*Cost was almost nothing.*

*Fed with 50 ft of RG8X and a coax choke at the input to the antenna
terminal.*


*I'll have to try it out this weekend on 20/15/10m digital and see if it
radiates a low-angle DX signal.*

*de k3eui barry*