¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Date

Re: Dipole antenna with Low Z0 feed point Impedance

 

1:2 would mean SWR 0.5
A SWR less then one is impossible.

73
Peter, DJ7WW


-----Original-Nachricht-----
Betreff: Re: [nanovna-users] Dipole antenna with Low Z0 feed point Impedance
Datum: 2024-11-12T16:48:32+0100
Von: "Siegfried Jackstien via groups.io" <siegfried.jackstien@...>
An: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>

some rigs are not that happy with 1:2 SWR
dg9bfc sigi

Am 12.11.2024 16:10 schrieb "Warren Allgyer via groups.io" <allgyer@...>:




You have a resonant antenna with an SWR of 2:1 which is completely
inconsequential at 40 and 20 meters. There is no functional reason to do
anything to correct this; you will see no improvement in transmit or
receive from doing so. I understand the intellectual and experimenter's
challenge in achieving an SWR closer to 1:1 but your rig will work fine at
that SWR and you achieve nothing other than satisfaction of doing it.
Personally, I would spend my time and effort elsewhere where it might make
a difference.

Warren Allgyer - WA8TOD










?


Re: Audio frequency version of a NanoVNA

 

On Tue, Nov 12, 2024 at 09:33 AM, Manfred Mornhinweg wrote:


ARTA-LIMP is an old, good, well-known example.
It appears to be going away:
"March, 5, 2024; Important notice:

The lifetime of ARTA development has come to an end.

After more than twenty years of ARTA software development I decided to stop development and take care of myself.

I have fullfilled my promise that ARTA users will get free update to all versions 1.x.x.....
The ARTALABS web site will be active until February, 2025. The last version and support files will be available for download."


Re: Dipole antenna with Low Z0 feed point Impedance

 

Consider the case of a 100 foot long, 50 ohm coax feedline on 20 meters. And let's look at three different types of coax. Below are the losses for 100 feet with a VSWR of 1:1

RG58 - 1.55 dB
RG8X - 1.10 dB
LMR400 - 0.47 dB

If we assume a VSWR of 2:1 those losses become:

RG58 - 1.88 dB - increase of 0.33 dB
RG8X - 1.31 dB - increase of 0.21 dB
LMR400 - 0.58 dB - increase of 0.11 dB

A 2:1 balun will likely have more loss than the loss caused by the 2:1 VSWR.

Warren Allgyer - WA8TOD


Re: Dipole antenna with Low Z0 feed point Impedance

 

Other than the 2:1 reading on the SWR meter what negative effect have you experienced. 55 years worth of rigs, tube and solid state, I have never experienced an ill effect from a 2:1.

Warren Allgyer - WA8TOD


Re: Dipole antenna with Low Z0 feed point Impedance

 

some rigs are not that happy with 1:2 SWR
dg9bfc sigi

Am 12.11.2024 16:10 schrieb "Warren Allgyer via groups.io" <allgyer@...>:




You have a resonant antenna with an SWR of 2:1 which is completely
inconsequential at 40 and 20 meters. There is no functional reason to do
anything to correct this; you will see no improvement in transmit or
receive from doing so. I understand the intellectual and experimenter's
challenge in achieving an SWR closer to 1:1 but your rig will work fine at
that SWR and you achieve nothing other than satisfaction of doing it.
Personally, I would spend my time and effort elsewhere where it might make
a difference.

Warren Allgyer - WA8TOD








Re: Dipole antenna with Low Z0 feed point Impedance

 

You have a resonant antenna with an SWR of 2:1 which is completely inconsequential at 40 and 20 meters. There is no functional reason to do anything to correct this; you will see no improvement in transmit or receive from doing so. I understand the intellectual and experimenter's challenge in achieving an SWR closer to 1:1 but your rig will work fine at that SWR and you achieve nothing other than satisfaction of doing it. Personally, I would spend my time and effort elsewhere where it might make a difference.

Warren Allgyer - WA8TOD


Re: Audio frequency version of a NanoVNA

 

On Tue, Nov 12, 2024 at 01:42 AM, Donald S Brant Jr wrote:

Only if the PC sound card provides phase information. I do not know whether or
not they do.
A basic PC sound interface is simply a group of analog-digital and digital-analog converters. They operate at least in 16 bit resolution, while many have 24 bits. The sample rate is settable, at least to 48kHz, often to 96kHz or more. Usually sampling is coherent between channels, so that accurate phase information can be obtained. The signal/noise ratio usually is somewhere between 80 and 120dB.

The (very inexpensive) sound chip that comes on the mainboard of my computer offers 10 audio channels, which can be configured quite freely as inputs or outputs, with lots of options. A lot of measuring can be done with that, including full VNA functionality. It's just a matter of what the software does.

I have set up my audio chip to provide a stereo line input, a stereo line output, a mono microphone input with separate power supply, and a quadrophonic output for speakers. These four logical audio devices operate completely separate and independently. For example, I can use my line input and output to measure the impedance of an RLC circuit over the audio range with LIMP software, while at the same time listening to music through the speaker outputs with a music player program.

In contrast to desktop computers, the internal audio support of laptop computers tends to be very limited, mainly due to lack of enough audio connectors. But cheap USB audio interfaces are available, and many of them offer a stereo output and a stereo input, so an impedance analyzer can be built around one of those interfaces, using just an extremely simple circuit, which could be as basic as a single resistor and a few connectors. If more input channels are wanted, to make a full two-port VNA with reference sampling, one can use two of those cheap USB audio interfaces, or a single, more expensive one, that has enough inputs in a single unit.

More expensive sound interfaces usually include a DSP chip, differential audio connections, high quality connectors, etc.

Most of the audio measurement software available seems to be centered around speaker and room acoustics measurements, but can also be used in general electronics work. ARTA-LIMP is an old, good, well-known example. Daqarta is also worth looking into, but it's payware whose free features are too limited to be really useful. EasyLCR is a soundcard LCR meter software that works well, but just on a single frequency. And there is a very good program for those who need an audio spectrum analyzer, with a real heap of bells and whistles included: Spectrum Lab, by DL4YHF. There are also many audio oscilloscope programs, but any plain and simple music editing software that allows viewing the waveform can be used as an audio storage oscilloscope with almost unlimited memory. Since I'm old fashioned, I use Cool Edit Pro...

People using the PC sound system for measurements are often at first hindered by Windows mixing input and output audio channels in software, without asking the user. This "feature" can be turned off, but the relevant settings were very well hidden by Microsoft. For those who have stumbled across this problem, here is the recipe, which works fine in my setup of Windows 10:

Right-click on loudspeaker icon in taskbar.
Open sound settings.
At Output, Speakers, choose Device properties.
Choose Additional device properties.
Select Levels.
There you can set up the mix of sources for the speaker outputs. Set to zero all the ones you do not want to directly feed through into the audio output.

My feeling is that with PCs being so common, and almost all of them having audio support, there is little point in building any sophisticated special hardware for audio measurements. Just using an existing PC and suitable software provides high quality measurements, on the cheap. So that's what I use: The PC sound chip in the audio range, and the NanoVNA in the RF range, starting right above audio.


Re: What does means the "DRSTX" on the left screen

 

Hi Steve

Thank you Steve, helpful link.

73's Nizar


Re: What does means the "DRSTX" on the left screen

 

You might consult the docs for a start.
From the beginners guide:

look at number 4

Steve
N5TIN


Re: Only 9 vertical graduation on 4'' H4 version !!

 

It seems you might look at the scale settings items


Re: What does means the "DRSTX" on the left screen

 

I believe it¡¯s a summary of operating modes/settings for diagnostic use


What does means the "DRSTX" on the left screen

 

Hi All
What does mean the "DRSTX" on the left side of screen ?
73's Nizar


Re: Audio frequency version of a NanoVNA

 

For measurements in the audio-frequency range, you might want to look at the Scimpy software package. It was designed as a means of using a PC sound card, and a simple resistive divider network, to measure the impedance of loudspeaker drivers.

The software calculates and shows and can store the magnitude, and phase, of the speaker impedance (standard .ZMA file format) If I recall correctly, this is enough information to allow the calculation of the resistive and reactive components of the impedance, and hence generate a Smith chart.

This won't help you look above the frequency range your sound card can handle, but it's quite useful within its limitations.


Re: Audio frequency version of a NanoVNA

 

There have been a couple of audio VNA's (AVNA) in QEX. Here is mine:

This is not a commercial product, but rather a construction project with a PCB, etc. It covers 10 Hz to 40 kHz with S11, S21 and a bunch more stuff. There is a pretty good pdf instruction book to see how to use it.
The bad news is that the Teensy 3.6 microcontroller/DSP is no longer available. The good news is that there is a redo planned for the project using the Teensy 4.1, that is available. See the groups.io for more:
/g/AVNA1/topic/new_version_of_avna_with/109504643
This is not for everyone as some assembly is required, but the end result is an instrument that is very parallel to RF VNA's.
I believe there is a sound card version of an AVNA around, but I have no personal experience with it.
73, Bob W7PUA


Re: Audio frequency version of a NanoVNA

 

There was an article in Jan/Feb 2024 QEX describing using a spectrum analyzer with tracking generator and two mixers, which is essentially the scheme I described above. They used a 30 to 31MHz sweep and a 30MHz LO.
73, Don N2VGU


Re: Audio frequency version of a NanoVNA

 

On Mon, Nov 11, 2024 at 07:58 PM, Manfred Mornhinweg wrote:


Smith charts, I don't know. I don't use them much myself, as for most
situations I find standard X/Y charts more practical. But of course it's
perfectly feasible to write VNA software for the PC sound system, that
generates Smith charts too.
Only if the PC sound card provides phase information. I do not know whether or not they do.
73, Don N2VGU


Re: Audio frequency version of a NanoVNA

 

On Mon, Nov 11, 2024 at 11:11 AM, Neil Preston W0NRP wrote:


Is there any practical way to make a VNA that provides the same measurements
over the frequency range of ~10 Hz to maybe 1 MHz?
I have seen articles describing ham use of, and there are commercial versions of, UPconverter/DOWNconverter products for using low(er)-frequency VNAs to measure higher-frequency and even waveguide components.
All of these, however, use a sample of the analyzer's local oscillator with which to lock the up/downconverter.

Perhaps some clever ham could devise a hack to do the reverse, DOWNconvert the VNA port 1signal with a mixer and after passing the resulting audio frequency signal through the device being tested, UPconvert the AF signal using another mixer and the same LO and feed it to VNA port 2. Likely some filtering and/or image-reject mixers would be needed. I am not certain whether correct phase relationships would be preserved going through the mixers, though.

Another problem would be that the IF filters in the VNA may be too wide for audio use; there may be software workarounds for this.

73, Don N2VGU


Re: Audio frequency version of a NanoVNA

 

an oscilloscope would be a much better option. Particularly those that have the audio range.

Otherwise, could divider circuits, say a 10 or 20 to 1 ratio be used to measure audio frequencies? Obviously you'd have to read the NanoVNA with the ratio in mind, but perhaps that is an option one could explore.


Regards

Colin

On 2024-11-11 5:58 p.m., Manfred Mornhinweg wrote:
Since the NanoVNA covers from 10kHz up, one can use the sound system of a PC with suitable software to provide the lower frequency coverage. Even the most basic sound chip in a PC will cover 20Hz to 20kHz, and often the low frequency coverage extends to a few Hz. Some better audio cards also offer coverage beyond the audio range, to 40kHz or even more.

Software like ARTA-LIMP allows making useful measurements.

Smith charts, I don't know. I don't use them much myself, as for most situations I find standard X/Y charts more practical. But of course it's perfectly feasible to write VNA software for the PC sound system, that generates Smith charts too.





Re: Audio frequency version of a NanoVNA

 

Since the NanoVNA covers from 10kHz up, one can use the sound system of a PC with suitable software to provide the lower frequency coverage. Even the most basic sound chip in a PC will cover 20Hz to 20kHz, and often the low frequency coverage extends to a few Hz. Some better audio cards also offer coverage beyond the audio range, to 40kHz or even more.

Software like ARTA-LIMP allows making useful measurements.

Smith charts, I don't know. I don't use them much myself, as for most situations I find standard X/Y charts more practical. But of course it's perfectly feasible to write VNA software for the PC sound system, that generates Smith charts too.


Re: Tuning a Firestick NGP antenna

 

On Mon, Nov 11, 2024 at 12:06 PM, Michael Robinson wrote:


Essentially, using
RG-58 (50 ohms) at multiple half-wavelengths with zero volts at each end
removes the coax from the equation
ODD half-wavelengths of ANY impedance transmission line will repeat the impedance presented at the far end. It is not confined to RG-58 or to 50¦¸ line.
73, Don N2VGU