¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Date

Re: Problem with eBay seller SV4401A: CAUTION11 #buying

 

Similar story on AliExpress out of China on a few orders. In this scam the vender would issue a FedEx tracking number that would show delivered, after some time. However, in conversation on line with FEDEX, their records showed the package contained a trivial item (customs declaration on shipment) and that it was delivered to some other address. In my case, all my transactions are paid via PAYPAL. I disputed the charge with PAYPAL, supplying PAYPAL with a transcript of the conversation with the FEDEX agent. Paypal soon agreed with me and imitated a chargeback to AliExpress, giving me the funds again.

Lester B Veenstra K1YCM M?YCM W8YCM 6Y6Y W8YCM/6Y 6Y8LV (Reformed USNSG CTM1)
lester@...

452 Stable Ln
Keyser WV 26726 USA

GPS: 39.336826 N 78.982287 W (Google)
GPS: 39.33682 N 78.9823741 W (GPSDO)


Telephones:
Home: +1-304-289-6057
US cell +1-304-790-9192
Jamaica cell: +1-876-456-8898

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Stuart Landau via groups.io
Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2022 5:13 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [nanovna-users] Problem with eBay seller SV4401A: CAUTION11 #buying

I purchased a model SV4401A 8-inch VNA from eBay seller Hui3165 on Oct 24 because their price was much lower than any other supplier. I followed the tracking on SpeedPAK Standard from China to my home. It was supposed to have been given to the United States Postal Service for final delivery on the afternoon of November 4, but never arrived; I was there. I checked with the postal service and letter carrier the next day and was told that they never had it.

I contacted the seller immediately but was told that it had been delivered. On November 6 I opened a case with eBay. On November 11, eBay said because the tracking said that it had been delivered, they closed the case. Not only that, but eBay dropped my transaction on my purchase list so that I could not give negative feedback. I told my bank what had happened and they stopped payment on my credit card. Hopefully, that will not be challenged by eBay. The seller no longer lists the VNA.

In the meantime, the seller also showed two other negative feedbacks describing a similar story to mine. The buyers did not receive their packages and were left "hanging in the wind" during the same time period. I believe that the seller had hacked the SpeedPAK tracking. Their tracking showed an error with the USPS chain of custody. The seller, who currently has 136 listings has only 48 sales in six months. Their feedback percentage now is only 71.4% positive and I am unable to leave my negative feedback. I blame both the seller and eBay for how I have been treated.

Please be aware of this seller, or any other who has a very low price on a new item, compared to others.

Stuart K6YAZ
Los Angeles, California


Re: Problem with eBay seller SV4401A: CAUTION11 #buying

 

I agree, Paypal is UNSCRUPULOUS, disagree?? Read the story about the guy that made a huge buy of 18650 li-ion cells and then got SCREWED by Pay@$#^ because they (Pay@#$^) wanted to hold the payments 6 MONTHS after he had GREAT success selling them. The seller did NOT like that arrangement so he wrote every buyer and told them to ask for their money back, which they did. Pay@#$^ took that one in the shorts.? I NEVER leave any money in Pay@#^ and wish there was an alternative to them.

Mike C.

Sand Mtn GA

On 11/23/2022 5:37 PM, Costin R wrote:
Yes, I think we need to use payment methods that offer protection for
unscrupulous sellers.
And PayPal is a good example.

?n joi, 24 nov. 2022 la 00:33, John<ve3kkqve3kkq@...> a scris:

I realize that this bit of advice is too late, but always buy from the
OFFICIAL vendor.

I had a similar experience with a "really good deal" on a Chinese VHF
mobile radio.
I was very excited to receive my new rig on the projected delivery date...
disappointment soon ensued.
Investigation soon revealed that my rig was indeed delivered... to an
address in Montreal, Quebec, Canada. I lived in Fort Erie, Ontario, Canada
at that time.
I did not have the presence of mind to cancel the card transaction, so I
was out $50, that should have set off alarm bells at the get-go, does now.

I hope you get the card charg cancelled in time.

John
VE7KKQ

On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 2:12 PM Stuart Landau via groups.io <stuartl73=
[email protected]> wrote:

I purchased a model SV4401A 8-inch VNA from eBay seller Hui3165 on Oct
24
because their price was much lower than any other supplier. I followed
the
tracking on SpeedPAK Standard from China to my home. It was supposed to
have been given to the United States Postal Service for final delivery on
the afternoon of November 4, but never arrived; I was there. I checked
with
the postal service and letter carrier the next day and was told that they
never had it.

I contacted the seller immediately but was told that it had been
delivered. On November 6 I opened a case with eBay. On November 11, eBay
said because the tracking said that it had been delivered, they closed
the
case. Not only that, but eBay dropped my transaction on my purchase list
so
that I could not give negative feedback. I told my bank what had happened
and they stopped payment on my credit card. Hopefully, that will not be
challenged by eBay. The seller no longer lists the VNA.

In the meantime, the seller also showed two other negative feedbacks
describing a similar story to mine. The buyers did not receive their
packages and were left "hanging in the wind" during the same time
period. I
believe that the seller had hacked the SpeedPAK tracking. Their tracking
showed an error with the USPS chain of custody. The seller, who currently
has 136 listings has only 48 sales in six months. Their feedback
percentage
now is only 71.4% positive and I am unable to leave my negative
feedback. I
blame both the seller and eBay for how I have been treated.

Please be aware of this seller, or any other who has a very low price on
a
new item, compared to others.

Stuart K6YAZ
Los Angeles, California










Re: Problem with eBay seller SV4401A: CAUTION11 #buying

 

Yes, I think we need to use payment methods that offer protection for
unscrupulous sellers.
And PayPal is a good example.

?n joi, 24 nov. 2022 la 00:33, John <ve3kkqve3kkq@...> a scris:

I realize that this bit of advice is too late, but always buy from the
OFFICIAL vendor.

I had a similar experience with a "really good deal" on a Chinese VHF
mobile radio.
I was very excited to receive my new rig on the projected delivery date...
disappointment soon ensued.
Investigation soon revealed that my rig was indeed delivered... to an
address in Montreal, Quebec, Canada. I lived in Fort Erie, Ontario, Canada
at that time.
I did not have the presence of mind to cancel the card transaction, so I
was out $50, that should have set off alarm bells at the get-go, does now.

I hope you get the card charg cancelled in time.

John
VE7KKQ

On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 2:12 PM Stuart Landau via groups.io <stuartl73=
[email protected]> wrote:

I purchased a model SV4401A 8-inch VNA from eBay seller Hui3165 on Oct
24
because their price was much lower than any other supplier. I followed
the
tracking on SpeedPAK Standard from China to my home. It was supposed to
have been given to the United States Postal Service for final delivery on
the afternoon of November 4, but never arrived; I was there. I checked
with
the postal service and letter carrier the next day and was told that they
never had it.

I contacted the seller immediately but was told that it had been
delivered. On November 6 I opened a case with eBay. On November 11, eBay
said because the tracking said that it had been delivered, they closed
the
case. Not only that, but eBay dropped my transaction on my purchase list
so
that I could not give negative feedback. I told my bank what had happened
and they stopped payment on my credit card. Hopefully, that will not be
challenged by eBay. The seller no longer lists the VNA.

In the meantime, the seller also showed two other negative feedbacks
describing a similar story to mine. The buyers did not receive their
packages and were left "hanging in the wind" during the same time
period. I
believe that the seller had hacked the SpeedPAK tracking. Their tracking
showed an error with the USPS chain of custody. The seller, who currently
has 136 listings has only 48 sales in six months. Their feedback
percentage
now is only 71.4% positive and I am unable to leave my negative
feedback. I
blame both the seller and eBay for how I have been treated.

Please be aware of this seller, or any other who has a very low price on
a
new item, compared to others.

Stuart K6YAZ
Los Angeles, California










Re: Problem with eBay seller SV4401A: CAUTION11 #buying

 

I realize that this bit of advice is too late, but always buy from the
OFFICIAL vendor.

I had a similar experience with a "really good deal" on a Chinese VHF
mobile radio.
I was very excited to receive my new rig on the projected delivery date...
disappointment soon ensued.
Investigation soon revealed that my rig was indeed delivered... to an
address in Montreal, Quebec, Canada. I lived in Fort Erie, Ontario, Canada
at that time.
I did not have the presence of mind to cancel the card transaction, so I
was out $50, that should have set off alarm bells at the get-go, does now.

I hope you get the card charg cancelled in time.

John
VE7KKQ

On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 2:12 PM Stuart Landau via groups.io <stuartl73=
[email protected]> wrote:

I purchased a model SV4401A 8-inch VNA from eBay seller Hui3165 on Oct 24
because their price was much lower than any other supplier. I followed the
tracking on SpeedPAK Standard from China to my home. It was supposed to
have been given to the United States Postal Service for final delivery on
the afternoon of November 4, but never arrived; I was there. I checked with
the postal service and letter carrier the next day and was told that they
never had it.

I contacted the seller immediately but was told that it had been
delivered. On November 6 I opened a case with eBay. On November 11, eBay
said because the tracking said that it had been delivered, they closed the
case. Not only that, but eBay dropped my transaction on my purchase list so
that I could not give negative feedback. I told my bank what had happened
and they stopped payment on my credit card. Hopefully, that will not be
challenged by eBay. The seller no longer lists the VNA.

In the meantime, the seller also showed two other negative feedbacks
describing a similar story to mine. The buyers did not receive their
packages and were left "hanging in the wind" during the same time period. I
believe that the seller had hacked the SpeedPAK tracking. Their tracking
showed an error with the USPS chain of custody. The seller, who currently
has 136 listings has only 48 sales in six months. Their feedback percentage
now is only 71.4% positive and I am unable to leave my negative feedback. I
blame both the seller and eBay for how I have been treated.

Please be aware of this seller, or any other who has a very low price on a
new item, compared to others.

Stuart K6YAZ
Los Angeles, California






Re: Problem with eBay seller SV4401A: CAUTION11 #buying

 

Unfortunately, such situations have also appeared on Aliexpress. Fictitious
tracking numbers, seen only by them. Shopping in China has become an
adventure. The biggest loss I took was 120 USD, but I have an acquaintance
who lost more than 1000 USD. She was convinced by the seller to give up the
dispute also with fake tracking logs.
It's a shame that platforms like Aliexpress and Ebay allow such frauds to
happen.

?n joi, 24 nov. 2022 la 00:13, Stuart Landau via groups.io <stuartl73=
[email protected]> a scris:

I purchased a model SV4401A 8-inch VNA from eBay seller Hui3165 on Oct 24
because their price was much lower than any other supplier. I followed the
tracking on SpeedPAK Standard from China to my home. It was supposed to
have been given to the United States Postal Service for final delivery on
the afternoon of November 4, but never arrived; I was there. I checked with
the postal service and letter carrier the next day and was told that they
never had it.

I contacted the seller immediately but was told that it had been
delivered. On November 6 I opened a case with eBay. On November 11, eBay
said because the tracking said that it had been delivered, they closed the
case. Not only that, but eBay dropped my transaction on my purchase list so
that I could not give negative feedback. I told my bank what had happened
and they stopped payment on my credit card. Hopefully, that will not be
challenged by eBay. The seller no longer lists the VNA.

In the meantime, the seller also showed two other negative feedbacks
describing a similar story to mine. The buyers did not receive their
packages and were left "hanging in the wind" during the same time period. I
believe that the seller had hacked the SpeedPAK tracking. Their tracking
showed an error with the USPS chain of custody. The seller, who currently
has 136 listings has only 48 sales in six months. Their feedback percentage
now is only 71.4% positive and I am unable to leave my negative feedback. I
blame both the seller and eBay for how I have been treated.

Please be aware of this seller, or any other who has a very low price on a
new item, compared to others.

Stuart K6YAZ
Los Angeles, California






Problem with eBay seller SV4401A: CAUTION11 #buying

 

I purchased a model SV4401A 8-inch VNA from eBay seller Hui3165 on Oct 24 because their price was much lower than any other supplier. I followed the tracking on SpeedPAK Standard from China to my home. It was supposed to have been given to the United States Postal Service for final delivery on the afternoon of November 4, but never arrived; I was there. I checked with the postal service and letter carrier the next day and was told that they never had it.

I contacted the seller immediately but was told that it had been delivered. On November 6 I opened a case with eBay. On November 11, eBay said because the tracking said that it had been delivered, they closed the case. Not only that, but eBay dropped my transaction on my purchase list so that I could not give negative feedback. I told my bank what had happened and they stopped payment on my credit card. Hopefully, that will not be challenged by eBay. The seller no longer lists the VNA.

In the meantime, the seller also showed two other negative feedbacks describing a similar story to mine. The buyers did not receive their packages and were left "hanging in the wind" during the same time period. I believe that the seller had hacked the SpeedPAK tracking. Their tracking showed an error with the USPS chain of custody. The seller, who currently has 136 listings has only 48 sales in six months. Their feedback percentage now is only 71.4% positive and I am unable to leave my negative feedback. I blame both the seller and eBay for how I have been treated.

Please be aware of this seller, or any other who has a very low price on a new item, compared to others.

Stuart K6YAZ
Los Angeles, California


Re: Determining OCFD total length and split points #circuit

 

On 11/23/22 4:28 AM, Barry K3EUI wrote:
Just to check ¡ª¡ª
The resonant frequency of any dipole (center fed, OCF, or end-fed) is determined only but the TOTAL length of the wire, and not be WHERE you feed it.
(And maybe how high above ground or other nearby conductors).
Altering the feed point location only changes the input IMPEDANCE.
Center feds are typically 30-80 ohms (depending on height above ground).
OCF I¡¯ve seen at 200 to 600 ohms.
End-feds can be thousands of ohms.
Typically you see 1/3, 2/3 split (45 ft, 90 ft) for a 135 ft long wire, which puts the impedance around 400 ohms.
I think some argue that for a 120-140 ft overall length, based on the harmonics but you can try different locations depending on the BALUN ratio.
I ran some quick NEC models, results attached. The R doesn't change a lot until you get outside, say, 0.3 to 0.7 split point (0.5 in middle).
This was a dipole "cut" for 10 MHz resonance.

And the resonance point does change (i.e. there's some X as you move off the resonance), but it's not huge (the phase is < 10 degrees). Several plots attached for various ranges of split point


Re: Determining OCFD total length and split points #circuit

 

On 11/23/22 8:53 AM, W0LEV wrote:
The OCF set of wires is NOT a balauced (differential mode) source/load!
Why use a balun? A balun is a circuit element intended to transform
differential mode (dipole) to common mode (coax). An RF choke consisting
of multiple turns of coax through an appropriate toroid or a number of
clamp-on ferrites on the coax at the feed point are appropriate, but not a
"balun" as such. The proposed "fixes" will choke common mode currents on
the external surface of the coax shield.
Dave - W?LEV
One might want a transformer (which could serve as a balun or RF choke) on an OCF dipole, because the resistive impedance at resonance is typically quite high, compared to 50 ohms. OTOH, if the feedline is the *right* length and type, maybe it's ok.

You need an RF choke (or the functional equivalent) if you don't want your feedline interacting with the antenna. On the other hand, for casual use, you may not care - if the feedline (exterior) radiates, and you make a QSO as a result, it's all good.

There's more than one antenna out there that the feedline is an essential part of the radiating structure.

Traditionally, folks like to prevent the feedline from radiating because:
1) it can be unpredictable - it's hard to know if the system is working with simple instrumentation.
2) it can cause RFI and safety problems due to proximity (feedlines are close to people and victim equipment)
3) it can result in increased losses - imagine a radiating field line immersed in vegetation, the vegetation gets warm, and the power doing that isn't radiating.
4) the interaction of the field from the feedline and the field from the dipole (off center or not) can cause nulls and lobes. That can be good (lobe in good direction, null in noise source direction) or bad (null in the direction you want to communicate)
5) a variant of 4, if your feedline radiates, it also receives, and if you have a noise maker next to the feedline, that can be a problem


Re: Determining OCFD total length and split points #circuit

 

The OCF set of wires is NOT a balauced (differential mode) source/load!
Why use a balun? A balun is a circuit element intended to transform
differential mode (dipole) to common mode (coax). An RF choke consisting
of multiple turns of coax through an appropriate toroid or a number of
clamp-on ferrites on the coax at the feed point are appropriate, but not a
"balun" as such. The proposed "fixes" will choke common mode currents on
the external surface of the coax shield.

Dave - W?LEV

On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 12:29 PM Barry K3EUI <k3euibarry@...> wrote:

Just to check ¡ª¡ª
The resonant frequency of any dipole (center fed, OCF, or end-fed) is
determined only but the TOTAL length of the wire, and not be WHERE you feed
it.
(And maybe how high above ground or other nearby conductors).

Altering the feed point location only changes the input IMPEDANCE.
Center feds are typically 30-80 ohms (depending on height above ground).
OCF I¡¯ve seen at 200 to 600 ohms.
End-feds can be thousands of ohms.

Typically you see 1/3, 2/3 split (45 ft, 90 ft) for a 135 ft long wire,
which puts the impedance around 400 ohms.
I think some argue that for a 120-140 ft overall length, based on the
harmonics but you can try different locations depending on the BALUN ratio.

Barry k3eui







--
*Dave - W?LEV*
*Just Let Darwin Work*
--
Dave - W?LEV


Re: #nanovna-saver #nanovna-saver

Bob Snyder
 

Um sich abzumelden, klicken Sie auf den Link unten in dieser E-Mail, wo es hei?t: Unsubscribe

On 11/23/22 02:12, Peter, DG4EK wrote:
Bitte nichts mehr Schicken
mein Mann ist Tod

Am 19. November 2022 15:19:17 MEZ schrieb N4RFC<Bob@...>:
Found the problem. From a post on github () I found that the settings for antialiasing had been depreciated.

By editing /usr/share/glib-2.0/schemas/org.gnome.settings-daemon.plugins.xsettings.gschema.xml and removing:

</schema>
<schema id="org.gnome.settings-daemon.plugins.xsettings.deprecated">

Then sudo glib-compile-schemas /usr/share/glib-2.0/schemas. This fixed the problem starting NanoVNA-Saver on Ubuntu 22.04.






Re: Determining OCFD total length and split points #circuit

 

On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 02:29 PM, Don - KM4UDX wrote:


How can we use the mighty nanoVNA to identify total length of a Off Center Fed
Dipole (OCFD)?
You MIGHT be able to do it with 2 measurements. Use the TDR function to measure one section (lelement) and then the other section. I assume that you would have to reverse the NanoVNA's connection to the co-ax (or other leadin) between measurements. Then compare the difference in lengths.

If you have some spare wire and coax, it might be easiest to test the method with some wire and coax at ground level first.
--
Doug, K8RFT


Re: #nanovna-saver #nanovna-saver

 

Mein herzlichstes Beileid... Sie m¨¹ssen die emailgruppe verlassen damit da keine Mails mehr ankommen.
Dg9bfc sigi

Am 23.11.2022 11:12 schrieb "Peter, DG4EK" <info@...>:




Bitte nichts mehr Schicken
mein Mann ist Tod

Am 19. November 2022 15:19:17 MEZ schrieb N4RFC <Bob@...>:
Found the problem.? From a post on github
() I found that the settings
for antialiasing had been depreciated.

By editing
/usr/share/glib-2.0/schemas/org.gnome.settings-daemon.plugins.xsettings.gschema.xml
and removing:

? </schema>
? <schema id="org.gnome.settings-daemon.plugins.xsettings.deprecated">

Then sudo glib-compile-schemas /usr/share/glib-2.0/schemas.? This fixed
the problem starting NanoVNA-Saver on Ubuntu 22.04.





--
Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Ger?t mit K-9 Mail gesendet.








Re: Determining OCFD total length and split points #circuit

 

... You have to feed ocf with a 1 to 4 and a good choke
Measure over a halfwave (or multiple of) cable (to see same resistance as on feedpoint).
Easy as baking cakes.
DJ0IP made several dozen ocfd versions and messured them (different lengths and split ratios).
And he 3xacrly explains that antenna.
Cwntre loaded ocfd adds a few more bands with low swr. So you also should think about that.
Dg9bfc sigi

Am 23.11.2022 15:07 schrieb Jim Lux <jimlux@...>:




On 11/23/22 4:28 AM, Barry K3EUI wrote:
Just to check ¡ª¡ª
The resonant frequency of any dipole (center fed, OCF, or end-fed) is
determined only but the TOTAL length of the wire, and not be WHERE you
feed it.
(And maybe how high above ground or other nearby conductors).

Altering the feed point location only changes the input IMPEDANCE.
Center feds are typically 30-80 ohms (depending on height above ground).
OCF I¡¯ve seen at 200 to 600 ohms.
End-feds can be thousands of ohms.

Typically you see 1/3, 2/3 split (45 ft, 90 ft) for a 135 ft long wire,
which puts the impedance around 400 ohms.
I think some argue that for a 120-140 ft overall length, based on the
harmonics but you can try different locations depending on the BALUN
ratio.

Barry k3eui
Getting back to the original question - can you use the NanoVNA to
determine where the feed point is in an offcenter dipole:

NanoVNA can easily determine resonant frequency (where X=0).
Once you've got that, you'll know R at the resonance.
The question is whether there is a consistent relationship between R and
"split point"?? If R = 72, then you know it's in the middle of the
dipole.? But If there's droop in the dipole, that changes the R (e.g.
120 degrees gives you about 50 ohms; and diameter of the wires changes
the resistance as you move out.

So the short answer might be "maybe" -
You could build a model in NEC, and then iterate it until R matches what
you measured. Somewhere around, I have a plot of R vs split for a dipole
from a series of modeled scenarios. I'll look for it.

Or you could use 4nec2 or one of the other tools









Re: Determining OCFD total length and split points #circuit

 

On 11/23/22 4:28 AM, Barry K3EUI wrote:
Just to check ¡ª¡ª
The resonant frequency of any dipole (center fed, OCF, or end-fed) is determined only but the TOTAL length of the wire, and not be WHERE you feed it.
(And maybe how high above ground or other nearby conductors).
Altering the feed point location only changes the input IMPEDANCE.
Center feds are typically 30-80 ohms (depending on height above ground).
OCF I¡¯ve seen at 200 to 600 ohms.
End-feds can be thousands of ohms.
Typically you see 1/3, 2/3 split (45 ft, 90 ft) for a 135 ft long wire, which puts the impedance around 400 ohms.
I think some argue that for a 120-140 ft overall length, based on the harmonics but you can try different locations depending on the BALUN ratio.
Barry k3eui
Getting back to the original question - can you use the NanoVNA to determine where the feed point is in an offcenter dipole:

NanoVNA can easily determine resonant frequency (where X=0).
Once you've got that, you'll know R at the resonance.
The question is whether there is a consistent relationship between R and "split point" If R = 72, then you know it's in the middle of the dipole. But If there's droop in the dipole, that changes the R (e.g. 120 degrees gives you about 50 ohms; and diameter of the wires changes the resistance as you move out.

So the short answer might be "maybe" -
You could build a model in NEC, and then iterate it until R matches what you measured. Somewhere around, I have a plot of R vs split for a dipole from a series of modeled scenarios. I'll look for it.

Or you could use 4nec2 or one of the other tools


Re: Determining OCFD total length and split points #circuit

 

Just to check ¡ª¡ª
The resonant frequency of any dipole (center fed, OCF, or end-fed) is determined only but the TOTAL length of the wire, and not be WHERE you feed it.
(And maybe how high above ground or other nearby conductors).

Altering the feed point location only changes the input IMPEDANCE.
Center feds are typically 30-80 ohms (depending on height above ground).
OCF I¡¯ve seen at 200 to 600 ohms.
End-feds can be thousands of ohms.

Typically you see 1/3, 2/3 split (45 ft, 90 ft) for a 135 ft long wire, which puts the impedance around 400 ohms.
I think some argue that for a 120-140 ft overall length, based on the harmonics but you can try different locations depending on the BALUN ratio.

Barry k3eui


Re: #nanovna-saver #nanovna-saver

 

Bitte nichts mehr Schicken
mein Mann ist Tod

Am 19. November 2022 15:19:17 MEZ schrieb N4RFC <Bob@...>:

Found the problem. From a post on github () I found that the settings for antialiasing had been depreciated.

By editing /usr/share/glib-2.0/schemas/org.gnome.settings-daemon.plugins.xsettings.gschema.xml and removing:

</schema>
<schema id="org.gnome.settings-daemon.plugins.xsettings.deprecated">

Then sudo glib-compile-schemas /usr/share/glib-2.0/schemas. This fixed the problem starting NanoVNA-Saver on Ubuntu 22.04.





--
Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Ger?t mit K-9 Mail gesendet.


Re: Determining OCFD total length and split points #circuit

 

this is a really good article on ocfd at various different places.
seems you can select from about 20% to over 33%.
All depends on your prefered frequencies.


There is no definative 'point' each of us has differing requirements.
My own is aout 1/3 - 2/3 ... but that is as much to fit it into the space(s) available.
Have fun...


Re: Determining OCFD total length and split points #circuit

 

OCFD puts the feedpoint at 5/8lambda from one end. That would be about 81-82ft for a 80m antenna.

Stephen W9SK

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Don - KM4UDX
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2022 11:30 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [nanovna-users] Determining OCFD total length and split points #circuit

Hello! How can we use the mighty nanoVNA to identify total length of a Off Center Fed Dipole (OCFD)?

Or

Normally a 80m dipole is about 130 feet the sides are 130/2. Can the nano measure the total length or the sides? An OCFD moves the split point from 50/50 to some other point. Can the NanoVNA determine or infer the split point?

Thank you nanoVNA experts!


Determining OCFD total length and split points #circuit

 

Hello! How can we use the mighty nanoVNA to identify total length of a Off Center Fed Dipole (OCFD)?

Or

Normally a 80m dipole is about 130 feet the sides are 130/2. Can the nano measure the total length or the sides? An OCFD moves the split point from 50/50 to some other point. Can the NanoVNA determine or infer the split point?

Thank you nanoVNA experts!


Re: New topic for the Five County Digi Training Net VarAC V6.2.4

 

Dear Mr.Berry,

Hiii. Am VU2BOA handle Sam from South India. Just purchased Nanovna - H.
Just wanted to know how the return loss of an antenna is done using Nanovna
-H. Will be highly thankful if you can kindly share.

Kind regards,
VU2BOA - Sam

On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 5:52 PM Barry K3EUI <k3euibarry@...> wrote:

READ BELOW about VAR AC

I would like to suggest that tonight¡¯s *Five County Digital Training net*
(7 pm Nov 21) finishes up our discussion of the *Nano VNA* apparatus. We
have covered the basics over the last few nets: calibration over a
frequency range, measuring reflection coefficient and return loss (dB)
leading to SWR. We covered Smith Charts and dealt with questions about
antenna resistance, reactance, impedance and resonance. I¡¯ve shown some
graphs from my own antennas on HF. We briefly touched on PHASE and what it
shows about resonance.

I always use Nano VNA SAVER to create CAL files and save antenna files.
My Nano VNA is now three years old, and has never failed.

Let¡¯s finish this topic Nano VNA tonight on our net.
Come prepared with questions YOU have about your Nano VNA.
Share your graphs of your own antennas with SCREEN SHARE.

My Zoom link: Monday Nov 21 at 7 pm (will be on by 6:45 pm)



The next topic I would like to explore is VAR AC.
This is a new and rapidly evolving application that offers some tremendous
possibilities, including the new ¡°broadcast¡± (non ARQ) mode for VARA.

There are TWO VARA modems: VARA for HF SSB and VARA FM for fm (VHF/UHF)

In the next week, please download the latest VARA modem (EA5HVK web page)
and download and install and configure VAR AC for your radio and sound card.
Be careful with the CAT (rig control) and with PTT (send mechanism).
You have a few options depending on your radio and sound card.

If using a SignaLink, your PTT choice is VOX.
Set the DLY know to nearly minimum to shorten the ¡°hang-time¡± (Tx back to
Rx)

We can continue to use Zoom to talk about this topic, and for those within
a few hundred miles of Phila PA we can use 80m SSB (around 3584 kHz) to
communicate with each other, as well as use 2m FM via the 147.270 and
147.060 repeaters if you live in the Phila area and can hear/hit those
machines.

We may have to adjust the 80m digi frequency based on QRM at the time.
There are a few Winlink stations now operating in the 3580 to 3585 kHz
region, including W1AW Winlink VARA on 3582.5 kHz (VFO dial frequency in
upper sideband mode) and W1AW CW bulletins on 3581.5 kHz. There also are
some NBEMS nets from Midwest as well in the 3582 to 3585 kHz region.

Looking forward to a new topic: VAR AC
Read the description below.

Maybe we can get the author (4Z1AC) to join us soon on a Zoom link (from
Israel) if we meet at a time more suitable for Israel.

73
Barry k3eui
West Chester PA (near Philly)
Nov 21


*Subject:* *VarAC V6.2.4 is here! With Broadcasts (Group chat), Linux/Pi
compatibility, SNR graphs, VarAC RIG profiles, Chat translate and more!*
*Reply-To:* iradirad@...



?

Hi VarACiers! I thought we would take some time off from developing after
the launch of V6 which was a true game changer. But I must admit i
? ? ? ?
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?




































VarAC V6.2.4 is here



With Broadcasts (group chat), Linux/Pi compatibility, SNR graphs, VarAC
RIG profiles, Chat translate and more!














































Hi VarACiers!







I thought we would take some time off from developing after the launch of
V6 which was a true game changer. But I must admit it was hard to keep
our
hands off the keyboard ?







This is by far the richest VarAC release ever. Lots of new features,
enhancements and also huge infrastructure upgrade for future scale.







BUT one of the game changers in this version is the BROADCAST features
which allows you to send asynchronous (non ARQ) messages to one or to
ALL.
This allows for the first time a GROUP CHAT! Broadcasts are using the
same
good old protocol that is used by packet radio and APRS - the X25
protocol.







In addition, beyond the many other new features we developed (see list
below), we also implemented a SQL based database (Sqlite) for Vmails
(first), and soon for other features. Upon startup, VarAC will convert
your existing mailbox from the VarAC_mailbox.mbx file into the new
VarAC.db SqLite DB file.



This opens up huge opportunities, for software developers who want to
integrate their software with VarAC and extend the echo-system. More
features will soon utilize this SqLite DB.







PLEASE UPGRADE:



1. This version requires VARA 4.6.5!



2. Relay notifications only works between VarAC 6.2.4 version.







Now lets dig in:







New features in V6.2.4



*

VarAC Broadcasts - Sending an asynchronous message to a user or to ALL.
(Requires
VARA 4.6.5)


*

SNR Live graph - see SNR reports of you and your QSO partner on a live
graph.


*

Pi/Linux compatible mode - Full support of VarAC on Linux/Raspberry using
WINE. Read THIS (

) for more details.


*

Translation - "right click text -> Translate" in the data stream and it
will show a google translate result.


*

Edit VMails - that are waiting in your outbox


*

VarAC profiles - easily switch between different VarAC configurations for
different RIGs. (Settings -> Switch profile)


*

VarAC Cluster - run multiple VarACs with different ini & rigs while
sharing
resources. Great for VMail relays across different bands. Read THIS (

) tutorial for more details.


*

QSO Summary - showing summary data upon disconnection.


*

Clean VARA buffer - clear a message that is already in the VARA buffer
but
yet to be sent. Requires a VARA license (requires VARA 4.6.5)



















Highlights to some of the new features:







Broadcasts & Clear VARA Buffer





























SNR graphs





























Enabling Linux compatible mode & Block Vmail parking





























Profile switch





























But that's not all. There are many more things that we have changed /
improved in VarAC V6.2.4:







Enhancements/Changes



*

Block VMail parking - Prevent your VarAC from receiving 3rd party VMails
(under settings)


*

Removing personalized away messages to save traffic.


*

Closing com ports upon VARA modem disconnect.


*

Reported ADIF Mode is no longer controlled by the user. It's now hard
coded as DYNAMIC.


*

Showing a warning if trying to start a connection on a busy frequency.


*

Showing a warning if setting a callsign that is too long under "My
information" screen.


*

Small arrows above the frequency indicator are now tied to the slot
system
and will move you between slots.


*

Change in 17m Calling frequency. Moved from 18.106 to 18.107.


*

Allowing the use of <LOC> tags in welcome messages.


*

Reducing welcome message to 50 characters.


*

Reducing max Vmail message size to 300 characters.


*

Mailbox is now implemented using a SqLite DB (VarAC.db file). This opens
new opportunities for software integrations for developers.


*

Not showing non-500Hz CQ/Beacons if intercepted on a calling frequency.


*

Disable VarAC <-> VARA KISS connection with VarAC.ini parameter:
VarahfEnableKissInterface






?



Have fun!



73, Irad 4Z1AC and the VarAC team.




Important note: if you upgrade from an older VarAC version then:

*

YOU MUST Upgrade your VARA version to 4.6.5


*

Download the VarAC Zip file.


*

Unpack to a temporary directory.


*

Copy ONLY the VarAC.exe file to your existing VarAC installation
directory.

















*Download VarAC V6.2.4* (

)
















P.S: With great features, come great bugs... so we did a lot of cleanup
on
some very annoying bugs you've reported:







Bug fixes



*

Locking field on the call-history screen for read-only.


*

VARA-FM - closing the modem screen upon VarAC Closing.


*

VARA-FM - changing the VARA ports automatically based on port numbers
selected in the VarAC settings screen.


*

VARA-FM - Fixing the "WRONG" message on the VARA command log upon VarAC
Startup


*

Mailbox rows where too tight. Extended their height for better
viewability.


*

Added 500ms wait time before queueing up a new message to be sent to
overcome some VARA modem dead locks.


*

Not sending relay notification with callsigns that are longer than 6
characters (AX25 protocol limit)


*

Using the mouse wheel on the slot selector slider now moves one slot at a
time


*

When receiving a VMail with a full callsign (Like 4Z1AC/P) it ended up in
parking and not in inbox.


*

Free form QSY ("#") did not allow a sniffing or QSY to a manually
inserted
frequency.


*

Pausing beacon while sniffing another non-CF frequency.


*

When a corrupted packet is received, performing a clean disconnection.


*

While invited to QSY, and when not using frequency control through cat
(but manually) your VarAC kept showing you are on the CF and killed your
link when CF time limit exceeded.


*

When the CF is busy, and trying to connect on a slot, VarAC didn't let
you
continue with the connect sequence.


*

When disabling Vmail relay notifications, VarAC still changed the
VARA.ini
kiss port number.


















*VarAC website* (

)


























*You've received this email because you are a subscriber of this site (

).*
*If you feel you received it by mistake or wish to unsubscribe, please
click here (

).*