Keyboard Shortcuts
ctrl + shift + ? :
Show all keyboard shortcuts
ctrl + g :
Navigate to a group
ctrl + shift + f :
Find
ctrl + / :
Quick actions
esc to dismiss
Likes
- Nanovna-Users
- Messages
Search
Hi Jim/Dave, I too have used these mini-circuits limiters, mostly the
ones in a higher range 20/30MHz to 3000 and 6000MHz on commercial SA's observing multiple 6MHz wide QAM carrier systems with 10 to >100 carriers. Haven't observed any excessive third order IM (IP3). Of course you have to be aware of the total power produced by the sum of the carrier powers. Referencing the data sheet (attached) for this particular limiter, the VSWR is pretty good with highs of 1.44 at 0.2MHz and 1.4 at 3K with mostly less than 1.1 between those extremities. The packaging is great, hardly larger that a normal SMA attenuator, and at $49/ea ordered direct from mini-circuits, it won't break the bank. Might be a good solution for those who would prefer not to do surgery on their NanoVNA/TinySA circuit boards. -----------------------------------------From: "Jim Lux" To: [email protected] Cc: Sent: Friday February 4 2022 3:50:39PM Subject: Re: [nanovna-users] Is there a known ch0 input protection mod? #problem #nanovna On 2/4/22 2:00 PM, W0LEV wrote: > Device from MiniCircuits: VLM-33W-2W-S+ > > URL: /> > > Rated from 0.200 through 3000 MHz in a 50-ohm system. It's marketed as a > spectrum analyzer protector. > > Dave - W?LEV That looks like the ticket. One thing to check - if you put two signals in (with the sum of signals being < limiting threshold) is there any IMD. For NanoVNA, which is single frequency at a time, this would be ok, but for a spectrum analyzer or receiver protector, maybe not. I suspect that this has one of the TVS parts we're talking about inside, but just in case it's just a diode or something, you want to check. (It is sold for protecting SAs, so it's probably not going to introduce IMD, but...) > On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 8:19 PM Roy J. Tellason, Sr. > wrote: > >> On Friday 04 February 2022 07:43:31 am Michael wrote: >>> Search on "How not to damage your NanoVNA when measuring SWR" in >>> Youtube. Good video basically TVS + Back to Back diodes, series resistor >>> and good description of functions. Also applies to TinySA. >>> >>> Michael (GW7BBY/GB2MOP) >> Good video, that. I wonder, though, how necessary that protection >> network is if you make it a point to ground the cable to the antenna to >> discharge static buildup, and you don't plan to leave the Nano connected? >> >> >> -- >> Member of the toughest, meanest, deadliest, most unrelenting -- and >> ablest -- form of life in this section of space, a critter that can >> be killed but can't be tamed. --Robert A. Heinlein, "The Puppet Masters" >> - >> Information is more dangerous than cannon to a society ruled by lies. >> --James >> M Dakin >> >> >> >> >> >> Links: ------ [1] /g/nanovna-users/files [2] /g/nanovna-users/leave/8706519/4866111/1865567994/xyzzy |
On 2/4/22 2:00 PM, W0LEV wrote:
Device from MiniCircuits: VLM-33W-2W-S+That looks like the ticket. One thing to check - if you put two signals in (with the sum of signals being < limiting threshold) is there any IMD. For NanoVNA, which is single frequency at a time, this would be ok, but for a spectrum analyzer or receiver protector, maybe not. I suspect that this has one of the TVS parts we're talking about inside, but just in case it's just a diode or something, you want to check.? (It is sold for protecting SAs, so it's probably not going to introduce IMD, but...) On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 8:19 PM Roy J. Tellason, Sr. <roy@...> |
Seems like the cost of the protection device plus shipping pretty much equals the cost of the NanoVNA and more than the cost of a TinySA.?
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Max On Friday, February 4, 2022, 04:35:10 PM CST, W0LEV <davearea51a@...> wrote:
The device from MiniCircuits I sent out about 15-minutes ago is designed for the requested purpose.? I bought one about 3 months ago.? It is not a discounted product.? Again, Minicircuits VLM-33W-2W-S+ Dave - W?LEV On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 10:31 PM Joe St. Clair AF5MH <saintc@...> wrote: I have always assumed that the "Not recommended for new designs" warning-- *Dave - W?LEV* *Just Let Darwin Work* |
Re: Bad calibration on nanovna-saver
#calibration
#firmware
#docs
Clear your calibration on the device, measure your standards
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
while the device is in an uncalibrated state. Essentially check if your standards and device are functioning properly. On Fri, 4 Feb 2022 at 11:13, Markus Lemke <dl1dsn@...> wrote:
Hi, |
The device from MiniCircuits I sent out about 15-minutes ago is designed
for the requested purpose. I bought one about 3 months ago. It is not a discounted product. Again, Minicircuits VLM-33W-2W-S+ Dave - W?LEV On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 10:31 PM Joe St. Clair AF5MH <saintc@...> wrote: I have always assumed that the "Not recommended for new designs" warning-- *Dave - W?LEV* *Just Let Darwin Work* |
I have always assumed that the "Not recommended for new designs" warning implied only that the part was old and planned for obsolescence by the manufacturer. That is important information if you are planning a large volume production that will require long term access to the part. But for one-off design for my own use, I have always ignored this.
|
Device from MiniCircuits: VLM-33W-2W-S+
URL: Rated from 0.200 through 3000 MHz in a 50-ohm system. It's marketed as a spectrum analyzer protector. Dave - W?LEV On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 8:19 PM Roy J. Tellason, Sr. <roy@...> wrote: On Friday 04 February 2022 07:43:31 am Michael wrote:--Search on "How not to damage your NanoVNA when measuring SWR" inGood video, that. I wonder, though, how necessary that protection *Dave - W?LEV* *Just Let Darwin Work* |
This part is still stocked at Mouser, Digikey, RS, Farnell, etc. Many thousands available. Not recommended for new (high volume) designs, but upgrading your nanoVNA is a no-brainer to me.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Op 4-2-2022 om 17:51 schreef Jim Lux: On 2/4/22 8:36 AM, N2MS wrote:I missed the trigger voltage. The Infineon triggers at 6.1 volts and clamps at a lower voltage depending upon current. I'll look for an equivalent or order the Infineon.The Bourns part is more for telco and data applications. Ethernet, for instance, has a transformer isolation which is pretty robust to transients of short duration. I don't know that I'd use a part with 25V holding voltage on Ethernet which might be PoE at 48V, though <grin>. |
Re: stm 32 boot loader
So, I have noticed the device will connect in either of two ways. This can be seen in windows device manager.
Depending upon whether the device is powered up in DFU mode, or just powered up normally with the USB cable attached. If you are powering the device up normally. It will show up under the heading of: COM & LPT as a device attached to a com port (VNASaver Mode). But, when in DFU mode, it is not under COM & LPT, but rather it is listed under the heading of Universal Serial Bus Controllers (in Device Manager) (See the Attachments). The most difficult issue I struggled with were twofold. First windows loaded the wrong driver, and kept insisting what it loaded was the Best Driver (according to windows) of course it didn't attach to the VNA. I had to use a program called Zadig to get the correct driver loaded. The second issue was the fact the USB cable the device came with was apparently defective. Once I changed the cable all was well in both DFU, and normal modes. I hope this helps someone. 73's |
On Friday 04 February 2022 07:43:31 am Michael wrote:
Search on "How not to damage your NanoVNA when measuring SWR" inGood video, that. I wonder, though, how necessary that protection network is if you make it a point to ground the cable to the antenna to discharge static buildup, and you don't plan to leave the Nano connected? -- Member of the toughest, meanest, deadliest, most unrelenting -- and ablest -- form of life in this section of space, ?a critter that can be killed but can't be tamed. ?--Robert A. Heinlein, "The Puppet Masters" - Information is more dangerous than cannon to a society ruled by lies. --James M Dakin |
On 2/4/22 8:36 AM, N2MS wrote:
I missed the trigger voltage. The Infineon triggers at 6.1 volts and clamps at a lower voltage depending upon current. I'll look for an equivalent or order the Infineon.The Bourns part is more for telco and data applications. Ethernet, for instance, has a transformer isolation which is pretty robust to transients of short duration. I don't know that I'd use a part with 25V holding voltage on Ethernet which might be PoE at 48V, though <grin>. When you find a new part, let us all know.? Low C and low voltages are a tough combination to find. |
Re: Nanovna-H4, looking for a case this will fit in.
I use a Hills Bros. "case" as in the photo.? The label is glued along only one vertical seam and so removes easily.? You'll have to clean up a little glue residue.? There's room for some padding and cables along with the nanoVNA or one of the inexpensive VOMs from Harbor Freight.? A little mechanical protection, no shielding, but pretty cheap if you generate them anyway for the product inside.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
73, Maynard W6PAP On 1/16/22 11:45 AM, rkennyjr via groups.io wrote:
Here is the one I am using for my H4. |
I missed the trigger voltage. The Infineon triggers at 6.1 volts and clamps at a lower voltage depending upon current. I'll look for an equivalent or order the Infineon.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Mike N2MS On 02/04/2022 11:08 AM Jim Lux <jim@...> wrote: |
Re: stm 32 boot loader
Last night I upgraded the firmware on my H4 successfully on my Win10
machine. I followed the instructions exactly as given in the Absolute Beginner's Guide, downloading Dfuse_Demo_v3.0.6 from the website. The included stm32 driver worked fine, but I had to follow the manual installation instructions from the Guide, disconnecting the nano while installing the driver. Don't be confused by the statement on the website that Dfuse Demo has been superceded - the download button on that page still gets the current Dfuse Demo version. Note that after I installed the driver, the little yellow warning triangle ?? disappeared from the driver entry as seen in device manager - but the line for the driver also seemed to disappear, or it moved somewhere that I didn't see, but the nano connected fine in dfu mode. Stan On Fri, Feb 4, 2022, 2:10 AM Nick M via groups.io <w7nik= [email protected]> wrote: Any ides why the win 8 driver does not work on the windows 10 , i tried 64 |
On 2/4/22 7:59 AM, N2MS wrote:
I checked this Infineon diode on Mouser and it shows "Not recommended for new design:Very different parts.? The Infineon part triggers at a few volts. The Bourns part triggers at 250V, and then clamps to 25V. By the time the Bourns part triggers, your front end is dead. On 02/04/2022 8:38 AM Reinier Gerritsen <r.gerritsen@...> wrote: |
I checked this Infineon diode on Mouser and it shows "Not recommended for new design:
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
<> Has anyone used this Bourns part: <> It has low capacitance the the 0603 size with solderable ends may be easier to solder to the connector. Mike N2MS On 02/04/2022 8:38 AM Reinier Gerritsen <r.gerritsen@...> wrote: |
Re: Bad calibration on nanovna-saver
#calibration
#firmware
#docs
I get the same error,! I use the calibration assistant . If I do it with out the assistance I get the error .
The software is the issue, if I do the device no problem. I cannot upgrade the firmware anymore because the driver for Dfu mode does not work any more , I guess there is no more support ! ;( |
Solved this problem a few years ago. I protected my nanovna V2.2 with a TVS diode: ESD101B102ELE6327XTMA1, a 5.5V TVS bi-directional diode from Infineon, 0.1 pF capacitance.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Soldered directly at the input on the pcb. I did not see any difference in return loss matching. You could introduce a series capacitor to prevent DC connection related failures. I think (not for sure) that the TX port does not have one, but the RX port does. Had to replaced the input switches in 3 different nanovnaV2.2? units failing in a timespan a few days. All units back to life now. Reinier Op 4-2-2022 om 03:13 schreef Lukasz Olszewski: So, after years of almost constant use (I got nanovna 2 the moment I could) I fried channel 0 because of my stupidity :-( I connected it to an antenna switch that had a short that send +12V DC from relay coil supply right to ch0. Of course this fried the infamous MXD8641 switch chip. The chip is not available from any electronics distributors here in Europe, but I found some on Aliexpress. Unfortunately it'll take months to arrive and I need my nanovna now. So, the official store being out of stock I bought a "black and gold" clone. It arrived in two days. Great. |
Search on "How not to damage your NanoVNA when measuring SWR" in Youtube. Good video basically TVS + Back to Back diodes, series resistor and good description of functions. Also applies to TinySA.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Michael (GW7BBY/GB2MOP) On 04/02/2022 02:13, Lukasz Olszewski wrote:
So, after years of almost constant use (I got nanovna 2 the moment I could) I fried channel 0 because of my stupidity :-( I connected it to an antenna switch that had a short that send +12V DC from relay coil supply right to ch0. Of course this fried the infamous MXD8641 switch chip. The chip is not available from any electronics distributors here in Europe, but I found some on Aliexpress. Unfortunately it'll take months to arrive and I need my nanovna now. So, the official store being out of stock I bought a "black and gold" clone. It arrived in two days. Great. |
to navigate to use esc to dismiss