¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Date

Re: Is there a known ch0 input protection mod? #problem #nanovna

 

Hi Jim/Dave, I too have used these mini-circuits limiters, mostly the
ones in a higher range 20/30MHz to 3000 and 6000MHz on commercial SA's
observing multiple 6MHz wide QAM carrier systems with 10 to >100
carriers. Haven't observed any excessive third order IM (IP3). Of
course you have to be aware of the total power produced by the sum of
the carrier powers. Referencing the data sheet (attached) for this
particular limiter, the VSWR is pretty good with highs of 1.44 at
0.2MHz and 1.4 at 3K with mostly less than 1.1 between those
extremities.
The packaging is great, hardly larger that a normal SMA attenuator,
and at $49/ea ordered direct from mini-circuits, it won't break the
bank. Might be a good solution for those who would prefer not to do
surgery on their NanoVNA/TinySA circuit boards.

-----------------------------------------From: "Jim Lux"
To: [email protected]
Cc:
Sent: Friday February 4 2022 3:50:39PM
Subject: Re: [nanovna-users] Is there a known ch0 input protection
mod? #problem #nanovna

On 2/4/22 2:00 PM, W0LEV wrote:
> Device from MiniCircuits: VLM-33W-2W-S+
>
> URL:
/> >
> Rated from 0.200 through 3000 MHz in a 50-ohm system. It's marketed
as a
> spectrum analyzer protector.
>
> Dave - W?LEV

That looks like the ticket. One thing to check - if you put two
signals
in (with the sum of signals being < limiting threshold) is there any
IMD.

For NanoVNA, which is single frequency at a time, this would be ok,
but
for a spectrum analyzer or receiver protector, maybe not.

I suspect that this has one of the TVS parts we're talking about
inside,
but just in case it's just a diode or something, you want to check.
(It
is sold for protecting SAs, so it's probably not going to introduce
IMD,
but...)

> On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 8:19 PM Roy J. Tellason, Sr.
> wrote:
>
>> On Friday 04 February 2022 07:43:31 am Michael wrote:
>>> Search on "How not to damage your NanoVNA when measuring SWR" in
>>> Youtube. Good video basically TVS + Back to Back diodes, series
resistor
>>> and good description of functions. Also applies to TinySA.
>>>
>>> Michael (GW7BBY/GB2MOP)
>> Good video, that. I wonder, though, how necessary that protection
>> network is if you make it a point to ground the cable to the
antenna to
>> discharge static buildup, and you don't plan to leave the Nano
connected?
>>
>>
>> --
>> Member of the toughest, meanest, deadliest, most unrelenting --
and
>> ablest -- form of life in this section of space, a critter that
can
>> be killed but can't be tamed. --Robert A. Heinlein, "The Puppet
Masters"
>> -
>> Information is more dangerous than cannon to a society ruled by
lies.
>> --James
>> M Dakin
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>





Links:
------
[1] /g/nanovna-users/files
[2]
/g/nanovna-users/leave/8706519/4866111/1865567994/xyzzy


Re: Is there a known ch0 input protection mod? #problem #nanovna

 

On 2/4/22 2:00 PM, W0LEV wrote:
Device from MiniCircuits: VLM-33W-2W-S+

URL:

Rated from 0.200 through 3000 MHz in a 50-ohm system. It's marketed as a
spectrum analyzer protector.

Dave - W?LEV
That looks like the ticket. One thing to check - if you put two signals in (with the sum of signals being < limiting threshold) is there any IMD.

For NanoVNA, which is single frequency at a time, this would be ok, but for a spectrum analyzer or receiver protector, maybe not.

I suspect that this has one of the TVS parts we're talking about inside, but just in case it's just a diode or something, you want to check.? (It is sold for protecting SAs, so it's probably not going to introduce IMD, but...)




On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 8:19 PM Roy J. Tellason, Sr. <roy@...>
wrote:

On Friday 04 February 2022 07:43:31 am Michael wrote:
Search on "How not to damage your NanoVNA when measuring SWR" in
Youtube. Good video basically TVS + Back to Back diodes, series resistor
and good description of functions. Also applies to TinySA.

Michael (GW7BBY/GB2MOP)
Good video, that. I wonder, though, how necessary that protection
network is if you make it a point to ground the cable to the antenna to
discharge static buildup, and you don't plan to leave the Nano connected?


--
Member of the toughest, meanest, deadliest, most unrelenting -- and
ablest -- form of life in this section of space, a critter that can
be killed but can't be tamed. --Robert A. Heinlein, "The Puppet Masters"
-
Information is more dangerous than cannon to a society ruled by lies.
--James
M Dakin






Re: stm 32 boot loader

 

I will try it again ? thank you for the support, I thought i was doing something wrong


Re: Is there a known ch0 input protection mod? #problem #nanovna

 

Seems like the cost of the protection device plus shipping pretty much equals the cost of the NanoVNA and more than the cost of a TinySA.?
Max

On Friday, February 4, 2022, 04:35:10 PM CST, W0LEV <davearea51a@...> wrote:

The device from MiniCircuits I sent out about 15-minutes ago is designed
for the requested purpose.? I bought one about 3 months ago.? It is not a
discounted product.? Again, Minicircuits VLM-33W-2W-S+

Dave - W?LEV

On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 10:31 PM Joe St. Clair AF5MH <saintc@...>
wrote:

I have always assumed that the "Not recommended for new designs" warning
implied only that the part was old and planned for obsolescence by the
manufacturer. That is important information if you are planning a large
volume production that will require long term access to the part. But for
one-off design for my own use, I have always ignored this.





--
*Dave - W?LEV*
*Just Let Darwin Work*


Re: Bad calibration on nanovna-saver #calibration #firmware #docs

 

Clear your calibration on the device, measure your standards
while the device is in an uncalibrated state.
Essentially check if your standards and device are functioning properly.

On Fri, 4 Feb 2022 at 11:13, Markus Lemke <dl1dsn@...> wrote:

Hi,
I'm facing the same issue with my new NanoVNA V2 and NanoVNA Saver version
V0.3.10 under Win64.

In 9 out of 10 calibration attempts I get the following error message:
¡°two of short, open and load returned the same values at frequency ...¡±

This is really annoying - does anybody have an idea if this is a hardware
or a software issue on my device?
Calibration on the device itself works fine but with the V0.3.10 on the PC
it's a nightmare.

BR,
Markus






Re: Is there a known ch0 input protection mod? #problem #nanovna

 

The device from MiniCircuits I sent out about 15-minutes ago is designed
for the requested purpose. I bought one about 3 months ago. It is not a
discounted product. Again, Minicircuits VLM-33W-2W-S+

Dave - W?LEV

On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 10:31 PM Joe St. Clair AF5MH <saintc@...>
wrote:

I have always assumed that the "Not recommended for new designs" warning
implied only that the part was old and planned for obsolescence by the
manufacturer. That is important information if you are planning a large
volume production that will require long term access to the part. But for
one-off design for my own use, I have always ignored this.





--
*Dave - W?LEV*
*Just Let Darwin Work*


Re: Is there a known ch0 input protection mod? #problem #nanovna

 

I have always assumed that the "Not recommended for new designs" warning implied only that the part was old and planned for obsolescence by the manufacturer. That is important information if you are planning a large volume production that will require long term access to the part. But for one-off design for my own use, I have always ignored this.


Re: Is there a known ch0 input protection mod? #problem #nanovna

 

Device from MiniCircuits: VLM-33W-2W-S+

URL:

Rated from 0.200 through 3000 MHz in a 50-ohm system. It's marketed as a
spectrum analyzer protector.

Dave - W?LEV

On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 8:19 PM Roy J. Tellason, Sr. <roy@...>
wrote:

On Friday 04 February 2022 07:43:31 am Michael wrote:
Search on "How not to damage your NanoVNA when measuring SWR" in
Youtube. Good video basically TVS + Back to Back diodes, series resistor
and good description of functions. Also applies to TinySA.

Michael (GW7BBY/GB2MOP)
Good video, that. I wonder, though, how necessary that protection
network is if you make it a point to ground the cable to the antenna to
discharge static buildup, and you don't plan to leave the Nano connected?


--
Member of the toughest, meanest, deadliest, most unrelenting -- and
ablest -- form of life in this section of space, a critter that can
be killed but can't be tamed. --Robert A. Heinlein, "The Puppet Masters"
-
Information is more dangerous than cannon to a society ruled by lies.
--James
M Dakin





--
*Dave - W?LEV*
*Just Let Darwin Work*


Re: Is there a known ch0 input protection mod? #problem #nanovna

 

This part is still stocked at Mouser, Digikey, RS, Farnell, etc. Many thousands available. Not recommended for new (high volume) designs, but upgrading your nanoVNA is a no-brainer to me.

Op 4-2-2022 om 17:51 schreef Jim Lux:

On 2/4/22 8:36 AM, N2MS wrote:
I missed the trigger voltage. The Infineon triggers at 6.1 volts and clamps at a lower voltage depending upon current. I'll look for an equivalent or order the Infineon.
The Bourns part is more for telco and data applications. Ethernet, for instance, has a transformer isolation which is pretty robust to transients of short duration. I don't know that I'd use a part with 25V holding voltage on Ethernet which might be PoE at 48V, though <grin>.

When you find a new part, let us all know.? Low C and low voltages are a tough combination to find.






Re: stm 32 boot loader

 

So, I have noticed the device will connect in either of two ways. This can be seen in windows device manager.
Depending upon whether the device is powered up in DFU mode, or just powered up normally with the USB cable
attached. If you are powering the device up normally. It will show up under the heading of: COM & LPT as a device
attached to a com port (VNASaver Mode). But, when in DFU mode, it is not under COM & LPT, but rather it is listed
under the heading of Universal Serial Bus Controllers (in Device Manager) (See the Attachments). The most difficult
issue I struggled with were twofold. First windows loaded the wrong driver, and kept insisting what it loaded was the
Best Driver (according to windows) of course it didn't attach to the VNA. I had to use a program called Zadig to get
the correct driver loaded. The second issue was the fact the USB cable the device came with was apparently defective.
Once I changed the cable all was well in both DFU, and normal modes.
I hope this helps someone.
73's


Re: Is there a known ch0 input protection mod? #problem #nanovna

 

On Friday 04 February 2022 07:43:31 am Michael wrote:
Search on "How not to damage your NanoVNA when measuring SWR" in
Youtube. Good video basically TVS + Back to Back diodes, series resistor
and good description of functions. Also applies to TinySA.

Michael (GW7BBY/GB2MOP)
Good video, that. I wonder, though, how necessary that protection network is if you make it a point to ground the cable to the antenna to discharge static buildup, and you don't plan to leave the Nano connected?


--
Member of the toughest, meanest, deadliest, most unrelenting -- and
ablest -- form of life in this section of space, ?a critter that can
be killed but can't be tamed. ?--Robert A. Heinlein, "The Puppet Masters"
-
Information is more dangerous than cannon to a society ruled by lies. --James
M Dakin


Re: Is there a known ch0 input protection mod? #problem #nanovna

 

On 2/4/22 8:36 AM, N2MS wrote:
I missed the trigger voltage. The Infineon triggers at 6.1 volts and clamps at a lower voltage depending upon current. I'll look for an equivalent or order the Infineon.
The Bourns part is more for telco and data applications. Ethernet, for instance, has a transformer isolation which is pretty robust to transients of short duration. I don't know that I'd use a part with 25V holding voltage on Ethernet which might be PoE at 48V, though <grin>.

When you find a new part, let us all know.? Low C and low voltages are a tough combination to find.


Re: Nanovna-H4, looking for a case this will fit in.

 

I use a Hills Bros. "case" as in the photo.? The label is glued along only one vertical seam and so removes easily.? You'll have to clean up a little glue residue.? There's room for some padding and cables along with the nanoVNA or one of the inexpensive VOMs from Harbor Freight.? A little mechanical protection, no shielding, but pretty cheap if you generate them anyway for the product inside.

73,

Maynard
W6PAP

On 1/16/22 11:45 AM, rkennyjr via groups.io wrote:
Here is the one I am using for my H4.



It has some padding, and pockets for cables, etc.

...Bob / AA2FD




Re: Is there a known ch0 input protection mod? #problem #nanovna

 

I missed the trigger voltage. The Infineon triggers at 6.1 volts and clamps at a lower voltage depending upon current. I'll look for an equivalent or order the Infineon.

Mike N2MS

On 02/04/2022 11:08 AM Jim Lux <jim@...> wrote:


On 2/4/22 7:59 AM, N2MS wrote:
I checked this Infineon diode on Mouser and it shows "Not recommended for new design:

<>

Has anyone used this Bourns part:

<>

It has low capacitance the the 0603 size with solderable ends may be easier to solder to the connector.

Mike N2MS
Very different parts.? The Infineon part triggers at a few volts. The
Bourns part triggers at 250V, and then clamps to 25V.

By the time the Bourns part triggers, your front end is dead.


Re: stm 32 boot loader

 

Last night I upgraded the firmware on my H4 successfully on my Win10
machine. I followed the instructions exactly as given in the Absolute
Beginner's Guide, downloading Dfuse_Demo_v3.0.6 from the website. The
included stm32 driver worked fine, but I had to follow the manual
installation instructions from the Guide, disconnecting the nano while
installing the driver. Don't be confused by the statement on the website
that Dfuse Demo has been superceded - the download button on that page
still gets the current Dfuse Demo version.

Note that after I installed the driver, the little yellow warning triangle
?? disappeared from the driver entry as seen in device manager - but the
line for the driver also seemed to disappear, or it moved somewhere that I
didn't see, but the nano connected fine in dfu mode.

Stan

On Fri, Feb 4, 2022, 2:10 AM Nick M via groups.io <w7nik=
[email protected]> wrote:

Any ides why the win 8 driver does not work on the windows 10 , i tried 64
bit and still no luck .
I am trying to get to the dfu mode , and the driver in the device manager
is not found.
do we have wiin 10 smt32bootloader ?






Re: Is there a known ch0 input protection mod? #problem #nanovna

 

On 2/4/22 7:59 AM, N2MS wrote:
I checked this Infineon diode on Mouser and it shows "Not recommended for new design:

<>

Has anyone used this Bourns part:

<>

It has low capacitance the the 0603 size with solderable ends may be easier to solder to the connector.

Mike N2MS
Very different parts.? The Infineon part triggers at a few volts. The Bourns part triggers at 250V, and then clamps to 25V.

By the time the Bourns part triggers, your front end is dead.




On 02/04/2022 8:38 AM Reinier Gerritsen <r.gerritsen@...> wrote:

Solved this problem a few years ago. I protected my nanovna V2.2 with a
TVS diode: ESD101B102ELE6327XTMA1, a 5.5V TVS bi-directional diode from
Infineon, 0.1 pF capacitance.
Soldered directly at the input on the pcb. I did not see any difference
in return loss matching. You could introduce a series capacitor to
prevent DC connection related failures. I think (not for sure) that the
TX port does not have one, but the RX port does.
Had to replaced the input switches in 3 different nanovnaV2.2? units
failing in a timespan a few days. All units back to life now.
Reinier



Re: Is there a known ch0 input protection mod? #problem #nanovna

 

I checked this Infineon diode on Mouser and it shows "Not recommended for new design:

<>

Has anyone used this Bourns part:

<>

It has low capacitance the the 0603 size with solderable ends may be easier to solder to the connector.

Mike N2MS

On 02/04/2022 8:38 AM Reinier Gerritsen <r.gerritsen@...> wrote:


Solved this problem a few years ago. I protected my nanovna V2.2 with a
TVS diode: ESD101B102ELE6327XTMA1, a 5.5V TVS bi-directional diode from
Infineon, 0.1 pF capacitance.
Soldered directly at the input on the pcb. I did not see any difference
in return loss matching. You could introduce a series capacitor to
prevent DC connection related failures. I think (not for sure) that the
TX port does not have one, but the RX port does.
Had to replaced the input switches in 3 different nanovnaV2.2? units
failing in a timespan a few days. All units back to life now.
Reinier


Re: Bad calibration on nanovna-saver #calibration #firmware #docs

 

I get the same error,! I use the calibration assistant . If I do it with out the assistance I get the error .
The software is the issue, if I do the device no problem.

I cannot upgrade the firmware anymore because the driver for Dfu mode does not work any more , I guess there is no more support ! ;(


Re: Is there a known ch0 input protection mod? #problem #nanovna

 

Solved this problem a few years ago. I protected my nanovna V2.2 with a TVS diode: ESD101B102ELE6327XTMA1, a 5.5V TVS bi-directional diode from Infineon, 0.1 pF capacitance.
Soldered directly at the input on the pcb. I did not see any difference in return loss matching. You could introduce a series capacitor to prevent DC connection related failures. I think (not for sure) that the TX port does not have one, but the RX port does.
Had to replaced the input switches in 3 different nanovnaV2.2? units failing in a timespan a few days. All units back to life now.
Reinier

Op 4-2-2022 om 03:13 schreef Lukasz Olszewski:

So, after years of almost constant use (I got nanovna 2 the moment I could) I fried channel 0 because of my stupidity :-( I connected it to an antenna switch that had a short that send +12V DC from relay coil supply right to ch0. Of course this fried the infamous MXD8641 switch chip. The chip is not available from any electronics distributors here in Europe, but I found some on Aliexpress. Unfortunately it'll take months to arrive and I need my nanovna now. So, the official store being out of stock I bought a "black and gold" clone. It arrived in two days. Great.

What is not so great is that I managed to fry the same chip in the new nanovna in less than a day and this time no DC was involved. In fact there was nothing I could think of that could've caused it other than ESD.

So I did, what anyone else would. I butchered my previous nanovna to get the mxD8641 chip from it and I fixed the new one, but now I'm worried. If it broke in a day of use while my old one lasted years. Perhaps new chips have worse ESD protection? As such some sort of input protection should be possible to add. I would much prefer to install some extra parts inside than have to use a dingle etc. So I'm thinking of adding two back to back diodes as protection.

However, why reinvent the wheel. Perhaps someone has already found a good solution for this. If there is one please let me know.

What do you do to protect your nanovna?

For a proper Tektronix spectrum analyzer I have I use a DC block dongle and a pin diode dongle that shorts anything over 10dB to ground. Both are quite bulky.

I still have 3 more chips I can salvage from the old nanovna. I have to make do with them until my purchase comes from China. Please don't suggest I use personal ESD protection as a solution, because I'm working with vacuum tube amplifiers that have 5kV plus voltages. A grounded strap on my wrist, or a grounded mat is the last thing I would want to have around those things.




Re: Is there a known ch0 input protection mod? #problem #nanovna

 

Search on "How not to damage your NanoVNA when measuring SWR" in Youtube. Good video basically TVS + Back to Back diodes, series resistor and good description of functions. Also applies to TinySA.

Michael (GW7BBY/GB2MOP)

On 04/02/2022 02:13, Lukasz Olszewski wrote:
So, after years of almost constant use (I got nanovna 2 the moment I could) I fried channel 0 because of my stupidity :-( I connected it to an antenna switch that had a short that send +12V DC from relay coil supply right to ch0. Of course this fried the infamous MXD8641 switch chip. The chip is not available from any electronics distributors here in Europe, but I found some on Aliexpress. Unfortunately it'll take months to arrive and I need my nanovna now. So, the official store being out of stock I bought a "black and gold" clone. It arrived in two days. Great.

What is not so great is that I managed to fry the same chip in the new nanovna in less than a day and this time no DC was involved. In fact there was nothing I could think of that could've caused it other than ESD.

So I did, what anyone else would. I butchered my previous nanovna to get the mxD8641 chip from it and I fixed the new one, but now I'm worried. If it broke in a day of use while my old one lasted years. Perhaps new chips have worse ESD protection? As such some sort of input protection should be possible to add. I would much prefer to install some extra parts inside than have to use a dingle etc. So I'm thinking of adding two back to back diodes as protection.

However, why reinvent the wheel. Perhaps someone has already found a good solution for this. If there is one please let me know.

What do you do to protect your nanovna?

For a proper Tektronix spectrum analyzer I have I use a DC block dongle and a pin diode dongle that shorts anything over 10dB to ground. Both are quite bulky.

I still have 3 more chips I can salvage from the old nanovna. I have to make do with them until my purchase comes from China. Please don't suggest I use personal ESD protection as a solution, because I'm working with vacuum tube amplifiers that have 5kV plus voltages. A grounded strap on my wrist, or a grounded mat is the last thing I would want to have around those things.