¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Date

Re: Is my off brand a Brick?

 

Hi John -

I have cone to Wits end.
I guess that we both know better:

Buildtime Jul 22 2019 -- 17:23:01
That is very old firmware, and some firmware that old did not do touchscreen calibration well

I have no idea what version may be good for this hardware level - version
Avoid version that includes the phrase "NanoVNA-H4"
For example, this one should be fine:


I run QRP's firmware, e.g.


Re: Alibaba ordering

 

Hi Herb,

The first impression:
- the opening of the USB-C socket had to be widened.
- the menu switch did not work for the first time (the menu is called without a marker).
- I charged the battery and turned it on.
In this case, you receive an error message: "error: si5351_init failed"
Solution: Turn it on first, then leave it on the charge.
Then I unpacked to look inside.
At the edge I grabbed the pcb - without ESD - it didn't turn on after assembly, only the version window.
I disassembled it - just as I gripped the panel to the edges and then reassembled it - it works after powering on. The menu switch works.
I couldn't find a reason. The existence of ESD is important.
I'll continue the test tomorrow.

73, Gyula


Re: characteristic impedance

 

Can you download:

73, Gyula


Re: How to find the right ferrite toroid for a receiving antenna balun?

 

Did you actually read the information there?? Here's an exact snip from DJ0IP's site:


*? begin quote? ***

Before going on to the next page on Advanced Theory, it is a good idea to study the following presentation by *Jim Brown, K9YC,* entitled /*"Coaxial Transmitting Chokes"*/.

*DOWNLOAD HERE: *


[ Practical CMC Chokes ]

The solutions suggested by Jim, K9YC (above) are technically the best, but can be expensive to implement. ?Sometimes you don't need the very best.

***? end quote? *** ***


*And I guess I have to say it again .... K9YC's 2018Cookbook.pdf is an update to the information contained in the link above and has his most recent recommendations and discussions of theory.**
*

*Dave, AB7E*

On 1/27/2020 11:56 AM, David Eckhardt wrote:
A far more extensive treatment of all topics related to this, and many
others, which is well based in good engineering practices and faithful to
the physics of EM can be accessed at the following URL. Dig, there is a
*LOT* of good information here.



I'd suggest a complete read of all things pertaining to baluns and chokes
on this site. It's quite extensive.

Dave - W?LEV

On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 6:24 PM stone_ridge_road <xdavid@...>
wrote:

K9YC's RFI-Ham.pdf file is an older one with a lot of good information,
but K9YC wrote the 2018Cookbook.pdf paper specifically to update the
information on common mode chokes. He no longer uses some of the
information in the earlier paper, and he now strongly recommends only
#31 for common mode chokes for any of the HF bands.

Type 31 ferrite was specifically developed by Fair-Rite to have the kind
of internal loss at HF that the other cores don't.

73,
Dave AB7E


On 1/27/2020 9:43 AM, Randall Steffens II via Groups.Io wrote:
I think Dave meant to link this document by K9YC -
. It¡¯s the one where he compares a number of
different types (#43, #61, #73, #78, etc) and why he often prefers #31. But
he has good things to say about #43 as well! Also #61 and #73 in some
circumstances. This document is a GREAT read!!
Randy
NC8U





Re: Is my off brand a Brick?

 

Hi John,

PuTTY didn't work for me either, but I didn't research the cause. However, Terra Term worked for the first time, try it.

73, Gyula HA3HZ


Re: How to find the right ferrite toroid for a receiving antenna balun?

 

A far more extensive treatment of all topics related to this, and many
others, which is well based in good engineering practices and faithful to
the physics of EM can be accessed at the following URL. Dig, there is a
*LOT* of good information here.



I'd suggest a complete read of all things pertaining to baluns and chokes
on this site. It's quite extensive.

Dave - W?LEV

On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 6:24 PM stone_ridge_road <xdavid@...>
wrote:


K9YC's RFI-Ham.pdf file is an older one with a lot of good information,
but K9YC wrote the 2018Cookbook.pdf paper specifically to update the
information on common mode chokes. He no longer uses some of the
information in the earlier paper, and he now strongly recommends only
#31 for common mode chokes for any of the HF bands.

Type 31 ferrite was specifically developed by Fair-Rite to have the kind
of internal loss at HF that the other cores don't.

73,
Dave AB7E


On 1/27/2020 9:43 AM, Randall Steffens II via Groups.Io wrote:
I think Dave meant to link this document by K9YC -
. It¡¯s the one where he compares a number of
different types (#43, #61, #73, #78, etc) and why he often prefers #31. But
he has good things to say about #43 as well! Also #61 and #73 in some
circumstances. This document is a GREAT read!!

Randy
NC8U





--

*Dave - W?LEV*
*Just Let Darwin Work*
*Just Think*


Re: Is my off brand a Brick?

 

Oristo,
I have cone to Wits end.

I tried the clearconfig 1234 command and got the proper reply -- Config and all cal data cleared.
I did a power off/on but see the same screen. Back into PUTTY for touchcal command. No change on the display, still no touch screen action, the same screen as before.
PUTTY went to the next line but no ch> prompt. Power off/on and I tried tough touchtest --- same result, no change in display and no touchpad response.
Other commands I tried: stat -- average -96 -119
rms 22822 0
awd 1

Info:
Kernel 4.0.0
Compiler GCC 4.5.1 20160919
Arch ARM 6-M
Corvan Cortex - M0
Port Info Preemption through NMI
Board NanoVNA devices
Buildtime Jul 22 2019 -- 17:23:01

version -- returns only "?"

I am guessing from this state the only action remaining on the try list is to reload the microcode. I have no idea what version may be good for this hardware level - version.

John
TI4JWC


Re: How to find the right ferrite toroid for a receiving antenna balun?

 

K9YC's RFI-Ham.pdf file is an older one with a lot of good information, but K9YC wrote the 2018Cookbook.pdf paper specifically to update the information on common mode chokes.? He no longer uses some of the information in the earlier paper, and he now strongly recommends only #31 for common mode chokes for any of the HF bands.

Type 31 ferrite was specifically developed by Fair-Rite to have the kind of internal loss at HF that the other cores don't.

73,
Dave? AB7E

On 1/27/2020 9:43 AM, Randall Steffens II via Groups.Io wrote:
I think Dave meant to link this document by K9YC - . It¡¯s the one where he compares a number of different types (#43, #61, #73, #78, etc) and why he often prefers #31. But he has good things to say about #43 as well! Also #61 and #73 in some circumstances. This document is a GREAT read!!

Randy
NC8U



Re: characteristic impedance

Bob Albert
 

Thanks Larry; I got the 7-zip but still can't get the file for the nano.
Bob

On Monday, January 27, 2020, 10:02:50 AM PST, Larry Rothman <nlroth@...> wrote:

Bob - it's not the downloaded files. If you're trying to unpack the archive using the built-in Windows utility - it won't work.Windows is only licensed for ZIP files, not RAR.
As Oristo said, download and install 7-zip from his link.
It's a great program to have as it allows you to go inside of ISO images as well as 30 other packing formats, RAR included.
Regards,Larry

? ? On Monday, January 27, 2020, 12:41:05 p.m. GMT-5, Bob Albert via Groups.Io <bob91343@...> wrote:

? That one is also no good.
Bob
? ? On Monday, January 27, 2020, 09:37:49 AM PST, Oristo <ormpoa@...> wrote:?

> No luck with that link.
..
Please download from:
On e.g. Windows Chrome browser, right-click and select [ Save link as... ]


Re: characteristic impedance

Bob Albert
 

Does not download, just gives me a screen of gibberish.
Bob

On Monday, January 27, 2020, 09:53:29 AM PST, Oristo <ormpoa@...> wrote:

Hi Bob -

Please download from:
That one is also no good.
Is nanoVNAPartner0.20.rar not downloaded?
If it is, what utility are you using to unpack it.
(FWIW, I use )
What operating system?


Re: characteristic impedance

 

Bob - it's not the downloaded files. If you're trying to unpack the archive using the built-in Windows utility - it won't work.Windows is only licensed for ZIP files, not RAR.
As Oristo said, download and install 7-zip from his link.
It's a great program to have as it allows you to go inside of ISO images as well as 30 other packing formats, RAR included.
Regards,Larry

On Monday, January 27, 2020, 12:41:05 p.m. GMT-5, Bob Albert via Groups.Io <bob91343@...> wrote:

That one is also no good.
Bob
? ? On Monday, January 27, 2020, 09:37:49 AM PST, Oristo <ormpoa@...> wrote:?

> No luck with that link.
..
Please download from:
On e.g. Windows Chrome browser, right-click and select [ Save link as... ]


Re: characteristic impedance

 

Hi Bob -

Please download from:
That one is also no good.
Is nanoVNAPartner0.20.rar not downloaded?
If it is, what utility are you using to unpack it.
(FWIW, I use )
What operating system?


Re: characteristic impedance

 

On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 04:32 PM, Kurt Poulsen wrote:
Remember to set a frequency span e.g. 0.05 to 500Mhz then calibrate and save
to e.g. location 0. Then follow the steps described in the right side I see
you missed that
Hello Kurt,
Sorry, I can not make it to work.

Can you please tell me, what is the length of your coax cable and what type.
I guess that your dip was at 500 MHz, right? But then a span of just 500 MHz is strange for me.
It looks like, that I have a misunderstanding, but where?

The program nanoVNA Partner behaves strange, if you do not make it right on the first try.
I need to close it and restart after each try.

73, Rudi DL5FA


Re: characteristic impedance

Bob Albert
 

That one is also no good.
Bob
On Monday, January 27, 2020, 09:37:49 AM PST, Oristo <ormpoa@...> wrote:

> No luck with that link.
..
Please download from:
On e.g. Windows Chrome browser, right-click and select [ Save link as... ]


Re: characteristic impedance

 

No luck with that link.
..
Please download from:
On e.g. Windows Chrome browser, right-click and select [ Save link as... ]


Re: How to find the right ferrite toroid for a receiving antenna balun?

 

On Mon, 27 Jan 2020 16:13:31 +0000, you wrote:

All the data he presents in the referenced paper uses 31 material.
..........
Amidon recommends material 26.
Suppose they know why.

Please do not look up old data from 1945 publications,
go for the modern technology of today.
Material 43 is out, 73 is out,
they do not cover the whole range from 160 to 6 meters.
Not even in combination.

OE8UWW


Re: characteristic impedance

Bob Albert
 

No luck with that link.
Bob
On Monday, January 27, 2020, 12:02:04 AM PST, Gyula Molnar <gyula.ha3hz@...> wrote:


Bob Albert
2:43am? #10292

Kurt, I went there and downloaded the file but am told it's corrupted.
Bob
Hi Bob,

Please download from:
neb sent it to me for testing, which I gladly did.
Since I didn't get a detailed description, there are a few things I had to figure out ... but it still works :-)

73, Gyula


Re: How to find the right ferrite toroid for a receiving antenna balun?

 

I think Dave meant to link this document by K9YC - .
It¡¯s the one where he compares a number of different types (#43, #61, #73, #78, etc) and why he often prefers #31.
But he has good things to say about #43 as well!
Also #61 and #73 in some circumstances.
See also
for "The Measurement Setup For Chokes"
and "Winding Guidelines".


Re: Is my off brand a Brick?

 

Yes, Oristo,
I had found that sane 'workaround' last night.
I will give it a test today.
John
TI4JWC


Re: How to find the right ferrite toroid for a receiving antenna balun?

 

I think Dave meant to link this document by K9YC - . It¡¯s the one where he compares a number of different types (#43, #61, #73, #78, etc) and why he often prefers #31. But he has good things to say about #43 as well! Also #61 and #73 in some circumstances. This document is a GREAT read!!

Randy
NC8U

On Jan 27, 2020, at 8:13 AM, David Eckhardt <davearea51a@...> wrote:

All the data he presents in the referenced paper uses 31 material. The
type of choke I referred to is shown in Figure 3 of the paper. I see
nothing nixing 43 or other material (31 and 73) in the paper. He does
present variation of ?r with temperature. Any and all my the chokes
(Figure 3 or 9) do not heat more than 10 C or so above ambient with
5-minutes of key down time at 1 kW. However, a lower ?r is needed for
bifilar wound common mode chokes which is shown in Figure 9.

I wound several of these bifilar CM chokes (Figure 9) on 43 material. One
was wound with a double insulation of two different ¦År's which, due to the
insulation, increased the inter winding capacitance to a point where the
high ?r combined with increased ¦År precipitated a resonance near 6 MHz.
When connected to my antenna system at legal power, it arced badly - no
surprise. Most of the CM bifilar chokes I wound and tested using 43
material showed resonances above 50 MHz. Once again, between the VNA and
in practice at legal limit, I proved to my self the red iron powder cores
are best for this type of CM choke (Figure 9) at HF. That is what is now
in place in my antenna system - 450-foot long doublet fed with parallel
conductor transmission line. For the chokes illustrated in Figure 3, yes,
the higher ?r ferrites are more applicable.

I should comment that the final solution in my application drastically
reduced the noise picked up by the feedline (open wire) from the
(unfortunately) new appliances inside the house (built in 2014). These
days, ALL appliances contain multiple SMPS's which come from China with
absolutely no attention paid to EMC/RFI. The advice given in the paper
regarding installation of a CM choke or current balun at the feedpoint and
at the shack end of the feedline is golden. Try it. You will be amazed at
the noise reduction.

Dave - W?LEV

On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 3:54 AM stone_ridge_road <xdavid@...>
wrote:


I agree that this topic is outside the general outlines for this list,
but then again I didn't bring it up. For anyone who would actually like
to understand what makes a good common mode choke, though, I refer them
to K9YC's paper (which is based both upon theory and careful VNA
measurements on over 250 samples) that explains why types 73 and 43 are
not good choices.



73,
Dave AB7E



On 1/26/2020 6:30 PM, David Eckhardt wrote:
I rest my recommendations on measuring many using the HP 8753C vector
network analyzer. For current baluns, the high ? materials yield more L
per turn and, consequently, offer more choking capability. 73 and 43
material are great for these applications. Bifilar wound common mode
chokes are a whole different ball of wax. Again, I refer my
recommendations to many hours of winding and measuring with the HP 8753C.

This is off topic forthe NANOVNA site and, likely, should be taken
elsewhere.

Dave - W?LEV

On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 12:19 AM stone_ridge_road <
xdavid@...>
wrote:

That's not really a very good suggestion. As K9YC has s stated a
zillion times on the TowerTalk reflector, type 31 material is pretty
much the only really good material for a common mode choke at HF ...
primarily because it has considerable internal loss and the other
materials don't.

Also, the number of turns is fairly important ... "as many as you can"
isn't necessarily a good idea because you're trying to optimize the
combination of the interwinding capacitance and the coil inductance to
create a tuned circuit for the range of interest. As K9YC has pointed
out, a poorly chosen combination can actually act a series tuned circuit
and totally defeat its purpose. He doesn't even recommend coax for the
chokes any more ... simple paired windings of #12 THHN actually works
better due to shorter lengths and lower interwinding capacitance.

Don't take my word for it, I'm only the messenger. Jim has done a ton
of work, both theoretical and experimental, to support his arguments.
It's all available on his website.

Dave AB7E


On 1/26/2020 3:45 PM, David Eckhardt wrote:
I presume your are using coaxial cable? To make a choke (current)
'balun', I'd use a ferrite with high permeability (43, 75, 71, or 35
material). This configuration should consist of winding coaxial cable
multiple times (as many as you can get without overlapping) through the
large core. Even ferrites aimed at reducing EMC will work fine as they
have a very large ? and loss within the ferrite material. This type
of
'balun' forms an inductive (reflective) choke for common mode currents
on
the outside of the coaxial braid. For bilaterally wound common mode
chokes
at HF, the red powdered iron core (? of 10) is best, but start with the
current choke.

Dave - W?LEV

On Sun, Jan 26, 2020 at 10:11 PM rickstealey via Groups.Io
<rickstealey=
[email protected]> wrote:

Have you looked at your antenna impedance? Unless it is a terminated
antenna such as a Beverage the feedpoint Z is going to vary all over
the
place, nowhere near 450 ohms. Ex: when it is 1/2 wavelength long it
is
a
high z, and when it is a quarter wave it will be around 50 ohms IF it
has a
counterpoise. A receiving antenna does not really have to be well
matched
to your feedline to be effective.
Rick








--

*Dave - W?LEV*
*Just Let Darwin Work*
*Just Think*