¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Date
Re: cal isolation
Yes, just declare the cal complete without doing the isolation. Dave - W?LEV -- Dave - W?LEV
By W0LEV · #31466 ·
Re: cal isolation
does that mean i just leave both ports open and skip to the next step?.
By tekguy la · #31465 ·
Re: cal isolation
Many times, it's appropriate to skip the isolation cal. Even professionally, HP (the 8753C) gives one the choice to specifically skip isolation. If you do conduct the isolation cal, terminate both
By W0LEV · #31464 ·
Re: cal isolation
tekguy, You should connect 50 ohm loads to both connectors. If you have an attenuator of 10 dB or more, that can be used as a reasonable 50 ohm load. --John Gord
By John Gord · #31463 ·
Re: H4 Shielding?
Oops, my fault. The correct link is https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sVoxQtiV7cY&t=6s <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sVoxQtiV7cY&t=6s>. The short video lasts for 6:25. Many apologies, Robin,
By G8DQX list · #31462 ·
cal isolation
Hi,what do i do during the cal when it gets too the isolation?,ive seen a few vids but its not clear,do i connect the 50 ohm load to ch 0 or leave nothing connected to that port,or put the load on ch
By tekguy la · #31461 ·
Re: nano vna small one is it the F
The-F model has a 4 inch screen with either the rocker switch or pushbuttons depending upon models. Hugan made an original VanoVNA that was small and had the rocker switch. *Clyde K.
By Clyde Spencer · #31460 ·
Re: H4 Shielding?
interesting as much as i look my old eyes can't find that part at what timestamp in the video does he do that
By fxkl47BF · #31459 ·
nano vna small one is it the F
hi Ive a authentic hugen vna years old still works fantasticand ive just switched it back on, ive had this problem before and Roger Need told we what to do. i only use this for swr tests and need to
By MM6iXE · #31458 ·
Re: H4 Shielding?
Garry, 'twas ever thus! /Caveat emptor!/ 2 things: 1) you might have had better luck with the antenna if there had been a coax choke immediately before the antenna feed. Even with lots of radials,
By G8DQX list · #31457 ·
Re: Strange "Scatter" Sweep Traces
The fat traces are just reflecting noise within the system. Do an average to mostly eliminate the "grass". Dave - W?LEV -- Dave - W?LEV
By W0LEV · #31456 ·
Re: Strange "Scatter" Sweep Traces
That's exactly what it would be.
By Jim Lux · #31455 ·
Re: Strange "Scatter" Sweep Traces
Chuck, given the amount of green on the traces, it looks as if there have been several measurements taken at each frequency. What the graph then shows is the variation from one measurement, at a
By G8DQX list · #31454 ·
Re: Strange "Scatter" Sweep Traces
Dave, The S21 data shows up under the Marker Data for all S11 sweeps. The software does that...not me...8^) I'm selecting only S11 options. I showed only 1 marker for my question. Two others at 28.1
By Chuck Carpenter · #31453 ·
Re: Strange "Scatter" Sweep Traces
"W0LEV" <davearea51a@...> wrote: I suspect that the S21 value is just the leakage or noise level in the through path detector. -- Brian G8SEZ
By Brian Morrison · #31452 ·
Re: Strange "Scatter" Sweep Traces
How did you measure S21 on a dummy load? A dummy load is a single port device. Possibly you have attenuators which are 2-port devices? Actually, the data doesn't look too bad at all for HF or even
By W0LEV · #31451 ·
Strange "Scatter" Sweep Traces
Puzzled? I'm checking several dummy loads and get some sweep traces as shown in the attached: If I were to see only the marker data I would conclude I have a good device. But the strange traces
By Chuck Carpenter · #31450 ·
Re: New member question #nanovna
Same here. I use my NanoVNA H4 for a lot of things, but I have used it in analyzing and tuning antennas for all the ham bands from 475 kHz through 1296 MHz. Zack W9SZ wrote:
By Zack Widup · #31449 ·
Re: New member question #nanovna
For outdoor use, the NanoVNA-F screen is much more readable. I started with a 2.8 inch -H and could not read it outdoors to tune my vertical antenna. I had to go inside and to the other end of the
By DougVL · #31448 ·
Re: New member question #nanovna
Nano VNA-F works fine for me. -- ALVARO, EA8ARX
By ?lvaro Felipe Hern¨¢ndez · #31447 ·