¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Date

Re: Measure Inductance?

 

Try this YouTube video

*Clyde K. Spencer*

On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 9:14 AM Joe WB9SBD <nss@...> wrote:

Can anyone help me with this?

I have the connector(s) but the "Set up The Calibration"
I know how to do the calibration for when measuring SWR. the open,
short, Load.

This video for when doing SWR is fantastic!



Is there one detailed like this step by step for when measuring an
inductor?

Joe WB9SBD

On 8/14/2021 6:29 PM, Bob Albert via groups.io wrote:
First put an adapter on the SMA connector and set up the calibration.
Go to Smith Chart. Select your frequency range. Short the test leads and
see how much residual inductance there is. Then connect the unknown. Move
the marker to whatever frequency you like and it will read out directly.
Bob
On Saturday, August 14, 2021, 02:58:37 PM PDT, Joe WB9SBD <
nss@...> wrote:

I have a NanoVNA-H4.
Using this, what is the best accurate way to measure the inductance of a
coil?

Joe WB9SBD


















Re: Measure Inductance?

 

Can anyone help me with this?

I have the connector(s) but the "Set up The Calibration"
I know how to do the calibration for when measuring SWR.? the open, short, Load.

This video for when doing SWR is fantastic!



Is there one detailed like this step by step for when measuring an inductor?

Joe WB9SBD

On 8/14/2021 6:29 PM, Bob Albert via groups.io wrote:
First put an adapter on the SMA connector and set up the calibration.? Go to Smith Chart.? Select your frequency range.? Short the test leads and see how much residual inductance there is.? Then connect the unknown.? Move the marker to whatever frequency you like and it will read out directly.
Bob
On Saturday, August 14, 2021, 02:58:37 PM PDT, Joe WB9SBD <nss@...> wrote:
I have a NanoVNA-H4.
Using this, what is the best accurate way to measure the inductance of a
coil?

Joe WB9SBD











Re: SMA connector pulled off of cable.

 

I don't order ham gear from Amazon. No idea what you might get. I go to Joel at RF Connection () for my wire and connector needs. A small businessman who supports the ham community.


Re: SMA connector pulled off of cable.

 

Good place for an RF probe.


Re: SMA connector pulled off of cable.

 

Is HRO in China now???


Re: SMA connector pulled off of cable.

 

Thanks everyone, just ordered a few different ones on Amazon. Was hoping I could find them at my local HRO, but no luck.


Re: danger measuring antenna

 

High Tension. The plate voltage, or anode voltage in the UK. In old circuit
diagrams you'll see it labelled HT.

Andy.

On Wed, 18 Aug 2021, 22:12 Kent Borg, <kentborg-nanovna@...> wrote:

On 8/18/21 10:06 AM, Andy G4KNO wrote:

To get to the condition where (in this case) the antenna side of the
capacitor is at ground potential at the same time as the plate side is at
HT potential requires the capacitor to be charged until that condition is
achieved.

HT?


-kb








Re: danger measuring antenna

 

On 8/18/21 10:06 AM, Andy G4KNO wrote:

To get to the condition where (in this case) the antenna side of the
capacitor is at ground potential at the same time as the plate side is at
HT potential requires the capacitor to be charged until that condition is
achieved.

HT?


-kb


Re: danger measuring antenna

 

You beat me to it, Dave.

There seems to be confusion about how capacitors work. Just because you
have a DC blocking capacitor present doesn't on its own mean there's zero
volts on the other side.

To get to the condition where (in this case) the antenna side of the
capacitor is at ground potential at the same time as the plate side is at
HT potential requires the capacitor to be charged until that condition is
achieved. The only way that can happen is if the antenna side has some sort
of DC path to ground, to complete the circuit and allow current to charge
the capacitor.

What limits the peak charging current is the HT source impedance and the
resistance of the choke. Peak charging current occurs at t=0 because the
plate side of the capacitor starts at ground potential. However, when you
first turn on the PA it takes time for the HT voltage to come up, so the
peak charging current is lower and doesn't occur at t=0. You'd have to know
all the time constants to work out the max, and when it occurs.

If the capacitor suddenly goes short-circuit the current is just determined
by the HT source impedance and the resistance of the choke. This will be
more than for normal switch-on. I would have thought a quick-blow fuse
would go before the choke, but the choke would need to be rated for more
than the plate current in normal operation. Otherwise you can't come up
with a fuse value that doesn't blow in normal operation but does blow
before the RF choke melts and goes open-circuit.

As a teenager I built a linear using 813s. It didn't have an RF choke on
the output, but it did have the DC blocking capacitor. The load variable
capacitor used to tick away all the time because it would arc due to the HT
on it. The load capacitor doesn't need the same voltage rating as the tune
capacitor, so 2.5kV was too much for it. The arc would cause the capacitor
to discharge to ground potential again, then it would charge up again. I
never understood this at the time, and it's fortunate I never touched the
antenna!

73 Andy, G4KNO.


On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 5:16 PM David Eckhardt <davearea51a@...>
wrote:

If you look at the typical pi-network configuration of these vintage
transmitters, there is nothing for the final plate blocking capacitor to
work against. Therefore, it will never charge to the DC potential as a
dipole or other balanced antenna is a DC open circuit. Heaven forbid
should a bird light across the center insulator of such an antenna fed by
such a transmitter. That choke does two things: 1) gives something the
plate blocking capacitor can work against to charge so there is no DC
potential on the feedline, and 2) serves as a 'fuse' as Jim Lux has
described. Of course, the DX-40 has no fuse ! The unit I just received to
resurrect - my novice transmitter - has been modified with the addition of
a fuse - good work. My original from Heath some 61 years ago did not
contain a fuse on the chassis. Oh........., I forgot, it did, but it was a
bit dangerous. The AC plug contained cartridge fuses in both sides of the
AC plug. They were exposed to contact at the line cord end of the AC plug
- open to a rather "awakening" experience.

Dave - W?LEV

On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 3:48 PM Jim Lux <jim@...> wrote:

On 8/18/21 8:25 AM, Victor 4X6GP wrote:
Those chokes were rated at 125 ma or 300 ma at the most. If the plate
blocking capacitor were to short, they would burn out before the primary
fuse blew. Whatever the function is supposed to be, it couldn't protect
against a shorted blocking capacitor.

I'm not so sure - if you're building a 3kV, 0.5 A supply (1.5 kW DC
power) then you'd be putting in something that can suck up half an amp
for at least long enough to trigger the overcurrent protection. A 300mA
choke can probably take twice that for a short time. And remember, it
doesn't have to be a very good choke while the fault exists - it can
melt the form, it can saturate (if it has an iron core), etc. It just
has to last longer than it takes the fuse or breaker to trip.


I would think, for instance, that the choke could be comparable to the
plate choke from the power supply - both have to be able to potentially
stand off the entire HV power supply (if the tube or surroundings arcs
to ground).









--
*Dave - W?LEV*
*Just Let Darwin Work*






Re: Will ch1 show an antenna signal?

 

NanoVNA measure point in small bandwidth range (up to 4k) and lost if signal not in this range, so for 400 points (H4, 101 for H) max span for see something 400*4k = only 1.6MHz, better if set 1M.
Second problem sweep speed not so fast.


Re: RF Active Probe

 

That is 0.75pf in parallel with 10M¦¸ resistor.

Like a scope probe but lower capacitance. Not sure why if you are going
to the trouble to build that

why you couldn't go with a higher resistance and more gain.

?????????????????????????????????? Mikek

On 8/18/2021 1:59 PM, Donald S Brant Jr wrote:
That 0.75pF is 4K¦¸ at 50MHz, way down from 10M¦¸....
73, Don N2VGU



--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.


Re: Will ch1 show an antenna signal?

 

On 8/18/21 11:51 AM, Mikek wrote:
Can I connect an antenna to ch1 and expect to see any signals?
I wouldn't think so. It's *sort* of like a spectrum analyzer - except it's got a few kHz measurement bandwidth, and if you're scanning 200-620, you've got steps every 4 MHz. The odds of you actually landing on a live signal are kind of low.


I did a scan, 200MHz to 620MHz of a TV antenna and had no trace.
Is the signal just to small? Would a 20 db amp be enough to put it on the screen?
Nope - it's more a "probability of intercept" thing. Aside from VNAs not really being designed for this, it's the bandwidth vs step size problem.

This is a difference where people who are used to "sweeper + spectrum analyzer" sorts of measurements get fouled up - the VNA *sort of* does the same thing, but on a sweeper+SA you can set the measurement bandwidth really wide on the SA (and all it does is add noise).? You don't get that sort of choice on a VNA.? They tend to be very narrow band (narrower the better, really).


I want to compare two antenna to see frequencies (channels) they are weak on.
It seem like it would show a signal, but probably something I don't understand about the operation, this will help me learn.
You want the $50 spectrum analyzer - then you can set the resolution bandwidth really wide, and you'll see the signals.? If you're looking for TV, digital TV is a sort of flat pedestal about 4-5 MHz wide.? So a resolution bandwidth of 5 MHz would be a good choice.? Then it's all about noise figure.? Most spectrum analyzers don't have great NF, but then, neither do TVs.


Re: RF Active Probe

 

That 0.75pF is 4K¦¸ at 50MHz, way down from 10M¦¸....
73, Don N2VGU


Re: Will ch1 show an antenna signal?

 

No? ?The Nano looks at the amplitude and phase of the signal it generates.
You might see some minor amplitude variations of a strong external signal, but the Nano would nave no idea what frequency it was on.?
Wrong tool for that job.? ?Hey, I currently own 7 Spectrum Analyzers and consider that TinySA very cute, and cheap!? And unlike the others, fits in my pocket!? ? Kent On Wednesday, August 18, 2021, 01:51:38 PM CDT, Mikek <amdx@...> wrote:

Can I connect an antenna to ch1 and expect to see any signals?
I did a scan, 200MHz to 620MHz of a TV antenna and had no? trace.
Is the signal just to small? Would a 20 db amp be enough to put it on the screen?
I want to compare two antenna to see frequencies (channels) they are weak on.
? It seem like it would show a signal, but probably something I don't understand about the operation, this will help me learn.
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Mikek


Re: Will ch1 show an antenna signal?

 

The NANOVNAs are not suited for this application. A spectrum analyzer is.
Take a visit to the following site:



Dave - W?LEV

On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 6:51 PM Mikek <amdx@...> wrote:

Can I connect an antenna to ch1 and expect to see any signals?
I did a scan, 200MHz to 620MHz of a TV antenna and had no trace.
Is the signal just to small? Would a 20 db amp be enough to put it on the
screen?
I want to compare two antenna to see frequencies (channels) they are weak
on.
It seem like it would show a signal, but probably something I don't
understand about the operation, this will help me learn.
Mikek





--
*Dave - W?LEV*
*Just Let Darwin Work*


Will ch1 show an antenna signal?

 

Can I connect an antenna to ch1 and expect to see any signals?
I did a scan, 200MHz to 620MHz of a TV antenna and had no trace.
Is the signal just to small? Would a 20 db amp be enough to put it on the screen?
I want to compare two antenna to see frequencies (channels) they are weak on.
It seem like it would show a signal, but probably something I don't understand about the operation, this will help me learn.
Mikek


Re: RF Active Probe

 

The specs say 0.75 pf and 10M¦¸.

On 8/18/2021 6:35 AM, roncraig1@... wrote:
This probe is just a capacitor input coupled FET source follower with a voltage regulator to run the FET. Input capacitance loading in in 10-15 pF range.

Over a limited freq range it provides a high impedance input.



--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.


Re: danger measuring antenna

 

If you look at the typical pi-network configuration of these vintage
transmitters, there is nothing for the final plate blocking capacitor to
work against. Therefore, it will never charge to the DC potential as a
dipole or other balanced antenna is a DC open circuit. Heaven forbid
should a bird light across the center insulator of such an antenna fed by
such a transmitter. That choke does two things: 1) gives something the
plate blocking capacitor can work against to charge so there is no DC
potential on the feedline, and 2) serves as a 'fuse' as Jim Lux has
described. Of course, the DX-40 has no fuse ! The unit I just received to
resurrect - my novice transmitter - has been modified with the addition of
a fuse - good work. My original from Heath some 61 years ago did not
contain a fuse on the chassis. Oh........., I forgot, it did, but it was a
bit dangerous. The AC plug contained cartridge fuses in both sides of the
AC plug. They were exposed to contact at the line cord end of the AC plug
- open to a rather "awakening" experience.

Dave - W?LEV

On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 3:48 PM Jim Lux <jim@...> wrote:

On 8/18/21 8:25 AM, Victor 4X6GP wrote:
Those chokes were rated at 125 ma or 300 ma at the most. If the plate
blocking capacitor were to short, they would burn out before the primary
fuse blew. Whatever the function is supposed to be, it couldn't protect
against a shorted blocking capacitor.

I'm not so sure - if you're building a 3kV, 0.5 A supply (1.5 kW DC
power) then you'd be putting in something that can suck up half an amp
for at least long enough to trigger the overcurrent protection. A 300mA
choke can probably take twice that for a short time. And remember, it
doesn't have to be a very good choke while the fault exists - it can
melt the form, it can saturate (if it has an iron core), etc. It just
has to last longer than it takes the fuse or breaker to trip.


I would think, for instance, that the choke could be comparable to the
plate choke from the power supply - both have to be able to potentially
stand off the entire HV power supply (if the tube or surroundings arcs
to ground).









--
*Dave - W?LEV*
*Just Let Darwin Work*


Re: danger measuring antenna

 

On 8/18/21 8:25 AM, Victor 4X6GP wrote:
Those chokes were rated at 125 ma or 300 ma at the most. If the plate blocking capacitor were to short, they would burn out before the primary fuse blew. Whatever the function is supposed to be, it couldn't protect against a shorted blocking capacitor.
I'm not so sure - if you're building a 3kV, 0.5 A supply (1.5 kW DC power) then you'd be putting in something that can suck up half an amp for at least long enough to trigger the overcurrent protection.? A 300mA choke can probably take twice that for a short time.? And remember, it doesn't have to be a very good choke while the fault exists - it can melt the form, it can saturate (if it has an iron core), etc. It just has to last longer than it takes the fuse or breaker to trip.


I would think, for instance, that the choke could be comparable to the plate choke from the power supply - both have to be able to potentially stand off the entire HV power supply (if the tube or surroundings arcs to ground).


Re: danger measuring antenna

 

Those chokes were rated at 125 ma or 300 ma at the most. If the plate blocking capacitor were to short, they would burn out before the primary fuse blew. Whatever the function is supposed to be, it couldn't protect against a shorted blocking capacitor.

73,
Victor, 4X6GP
Rehovot, Israel
CWops #5
Formerly K2VCO

On 18/08/2021 2:40, Brian D wrote:


"David Eckhardt" <davearea51a@...> ( davearea51a@... ) wrote:


I
remember my Novice transmitter, the Heathkit DX-40. It had a
large-valued
RF choke from the back of the PL-259 to chassis. The sole
purpose of that
RF choke was to keep voltages from building up on the
feedline - same as
the resistor in question.
Manly to prevent dangerous voltages on the feedline due to breakdown in
the
plate capacitor leaking HT onto the feedline, essential on high power
valve
PAs.