Keyboard Shortcuts
ctrl + shift + ? :
Show all keyboard shortcuts
ctrl + g :
Navigate to a group
ctrl + shift + f :
Find
ctrl + / :
Quick actions
esc to dismiss
Likes
- Nanovna-Users
- Messages
Search
Re: NanoVNA Saver or firmware bug???
I have been dealing with this since the last upgrade. I do not have this
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
issue with NanoVNA by eddy555. It is quite annoying but harmless. Jim Barber KJ7JGB Phone: 503.547.9524 <> On Sat, Jul 17, 2021 at 1:01 AM Nick <g3vnc@...> wrote:
Original NanoVNA 2.8" screen |
Re: Resistor measurements
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Sun, 18 Jul 2021 at 16:43, Manfred Mornhinweg <manfred@...> wrote:
High value resistors will become capacitive at high frequencies, while low |
Re: Resistor measurements
On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 10:13 AM, Zack Widup wrote:
There is possibly even more important effect - nanoVNE does NOT measure impedance as an absolute value - it compares the current one with what you have declared as 50+j0 at the time of calibration. If what you used for calibration is not an ideal 50ohm, all the measures after that are invalid, or at least have inherited some "shift" in value. If you used some of high quality (usually means expensive :)) 50ohm terminators, you are much closer to getting reliable results :) |
Re: Resistor measurements
High value resistors will become capacitive at high frequencies, while low value ones will become inductive.
Both the series inductance and the parallel capacitance of a resistor will of course have an increased effect as the frequency rises, but depending on the resistor's value, and its type/construction/size, one or the other will become problematic first, as you raise the frequency. So for each type and physical size of resistor, there is a certain range of values that tend to remain resistive to the highest frequencies, while those above degrade into capacitors and those below into inductors. The higher the frequency of operation, the narrower the usable resistance range becomes. RF circuits are usually designed so that only resistors inside this sweet range are used in RF-carrying paths. With the kind of quarter watt carbon film resistors I used for many years, and in the range of frequencies I use in my ham activities, typically values from about 15 to 200 ohm work best. Using carbon film resistors in the tens of kiloohm range at RF is futile, and so is the use of resistors around 1? and below. SMDs are much better at RF than leaded resistors, and the smaller they are, the better. This extends the range of resistance values that can be used at a given frequency. If the resistor is so small that you can't see it, let alone handle it, then it's probably pretty good at UHF! Say, 0201 size. Thin film SMD resistors are better in this regard (but also less common and more expensive) than the usual thick film resistors. Wired metal film and metal oxide resistors are made in the same way as wired carbon film ones: Thin resistive layer applied to ceramic rod, spiral-cut to value. Only the resistive material changes. But I suspect that metal film ones, given the lower specific resistance of their material, may get more turns cut into them, and thus become slightly more inductive. At least my measurements with the NanoVNA tend to show slightly higher inductance for metal film resistors, compared to carbon film or metal oxide film. And lastly, series inductance and parallel capacitance are not the only problems at RF. Change of resistance value happens too, as correctly stated by Zack at the beginning of this thread. I really enjoy using the NanoVNA now to test every part that goes into my circuits. This has removed a lot of surprises and head-scratching. When I started building RF stuff while still at school, I didn't even suspect anything about all these real-world effects. As a result, my RF circuits often had some strange behavior which I didn't expect nor couldn't explain. The NanoVNA came out about 40 years too late for me... And I think that many people share this thought! |
Re: NanoVNA Saver or firmware bug???
Yes. Replacing those defaults in VNA.py fixes it...
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
# return 27000000, 30000000 return 1000000, 100000000 Of course this is just a bodge! Looks like this is a NanoVNA-Saver problem. I will investigate further. On Sat, Jul 17, 2021 at 03:54 PM, DiSlord wrote:
|
Re: Resistor measurements
Try measuring higher resistance carbon resistors at RF. The shunt C of somewhere under 1 pF becomes the issue as frequency is increased. My first investigation into this was with the ancient HP(Boonton Radio Corp design) 250B RX meter back years ago (maybe in the '80's). The lead inductance is swamped out by this shunt C. The 250RX meter could indicate the Cp down to tenths of a picofarad and the Rp up to 100 k. I still have the old beast and use it and an old GR-821. I was using them to investigate the dielectric properties of PVC at RF when there was a discussion about how lossy it is at RF (not what I found). I didn't see the value of chucking a piece of the stuff into a microwave oven at 2.45 GHz when we were concerned <30 MHz. I wound up figuring out how to determine the dielectric constant along with the loss tangent of the PVC and for other materials.
|
Re: Replacing lost SMD "load / terminating resistor "
On 7/17/21 4:06 PM, Anne Ranch wrote:
OK, I will freely admit I have no clue where I put the ones which came with the unit.Sure.. Hook it up and see if it presents a reasonable match (uncalibrated, even) Will that work?SMA terminations or SMA loads. And beside e-bay - what is reasonably priced source of them in very small quantity - 1 (one) 50 Ohms each ? |
Re: Resistor measurements
On 7/17/21 2:38 PM, Matthew Chambers NR0Q via groups.io wrote:
So a 50ohm metal film probably is going to be a horrible choice forMaybe, maybe not - 50 ohms is a low resistance. They cost pennies, if you have one, hook it up directly to the NanoVNA and see.? You could solder it to a SMA jack and use a barrel to connect it. Chip resistors are almost all low inductance - and even cheaper (although you probably need to buy 100 of them). Harder to solder a wire onto.
|
Re: Resistor measurements
A long time ago I spent too much time going around just getting the part.
They cost more back then when money wasn't worth a lot. Recently I needed an attenuator and went to Amazon. They seem to have a nice assortment, probably not good from DC to daylight, but in your choice of connectors. How many contacts would have missed giving someone else your grid square? I don't sell for Amazon or like their politics, but I like to play radio. Good luck on your project. On Sat, Jul 17, 2021, 6:37 PM Roger Need via groups.io <sailtamarack= [email protected]> wrote: On Sat, Jul 17, 2021 at 02:39 PM, Matthew Chambers NR0Q wrote:with a |
Re: Replacing lost SMD "load / terminating resistor "
Anne Ranch
Official name SMA connectors.
Please note how many are being purchased... Makes me feel better - hope I am not the only one loosing mine.... PS Partial success - found SMA to PL adapter , have original cable and plenty of PL adapters / hardware . DONE. |
Re: Replacing lost SMD "load / terminating resistor "
William Smith
73, Willie N1JBJ On Jul 17, 2021, at 7:06 PM, Anne Ranch <anneranch2442@...> wrote: |
Replacing lost SMD "load / terminating resistor "
Anne Ranch
OK, I will freely admit I have no clue where I put the ones which came with the unit.
Secondly - I am not looking to measure stuff to 3 decimal points precision - I just want to see the "resonant point (s) "" of an HF antenna. With that said I have plenty of resistors I can jury-rig 50 Ohms load with. Will that work? It is the "open" which will be challenge HI HI If not what do you call those tiny , missing , SMD 50 Ohm load plugs? And beside e-bay - what is reasonably priced source of them in very small quantity - 1 (one) 50 Ohms each ? PS Anybody wants to trade RG6 plugs / connector / Y splitter ? |
Re: Resistor measurements
On Sat, Jul 17, 2021 at 02:39 PM, Matthew Chambers NR0Q wrote:
For HF frequencies the effect of resistor lead inductance will have a very small affect on calibration. Roger |
Re: Resistor measurements
So a 50ohm metal film probably is going to be a horrible choice for
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
calibrating my NanoVNA on HF at the end of a coax run not terminated with a coaxial connector (terminated with lugs to fasten to my vertical) On Sat, Jul 17, 2021, 12:19 <roncraig1@...> wrote:
Not hard to imagine that a nichrome wire wound power resistor will have a --
The content of this email is confidential and intended for the recipient specified in message only. It is strictly forbidden to share any part of this message with any third party, without a written consent of the sender. If you received this message by mistake, please reply to this message and follow with its deletion, so that we can ensure such a mistake does not occur in the future. Please do not print this email unless it is necessary. Every unprinted email helps the environment. |
Re: Resistor measurements
Carbon film resistors are made by depositing a thin carbon film on a substrate, and then a laser cuts a spiral into the film to achieve the desired resistance. That spiral cut will make the resistor slightly inductive.
Carbon comp resistors, on the other hand, are typically non-inductive, however the leads will introduce some inductance at higher frequencies. 73 de Albert KK7XO |
Re: Resistor measurements
Not hard to imagine that a nichrome wire wound power resistor will have a lot of series inductance.
Metal film resistors are carbon ink coated ceramic forms. After firing they are trimmed to value with a barber-pole spiral trim cut either by laser or diamond cut wheel. The spiral trim gives them more series inductance. More inductance the greater the spiral trim length to get a given batch to resistance value so varied RF performance between same value part. Chip resistors are made similarly but triming is usually inter-digital cuts from each side. Some are trimmed by a small sand blaster to one side of ink. Chip resistors are better for RF performance then leaded metal film resistors. Best for RF performance are old carbon composition resistors with their core carbon brick. Hard to get and expensive these days. |
to navigate to use esc to dismiss