Re: Make menu buttons/font larger?
Hi w3wtw,
Several solutions are possible.
The easiest is to wear glasses.
Last year, when development was in its infancy, there was firmware that used larger letters. Then during development, it was
By
Gyula Molnar
·
#20857
·
|
Re: Problem with NanoVNA Saver 0.2.2.1
Dear Gyula,
thanks for the goal-oriented hint ... now everything works fine!!
Best 73s de DL6RDE, Charlie
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: [email protected] <[email protected]>
By
Karl-Heinz Merscher <karlheinz.merscher@...>
·
#20856
·
|
Re: Problem with NanoVNA Saver 0.2.2.1
Hi Charlie,
I think there is only a shortcoming in the use of the program.
When you want to measure something and have already drawn the graph, you can make the measurement data visible with the
By
Gyula Molnar
·
#20855
·
|
Triband antenna
Hi, new user so thanks for your patience.
Calibrated and confirmed appropriate procedure per reference videos.
Did a wide sweep, and then resonant sweeps for two different triband antennas and found:
By
Kj7trf
·
#20854
·
|
Re: Make menu buttons/font larger?
hugen has recently released a version of DiSlord's v1.0.45, with larger font, for H & H4 (with a few other changes too):
https://github.com/hugen79/NanoVNA-H/releases/tag/1.0.45
Not sure if this
By
cdmackay
·
#20853
·
|
Tone control capability
Is there a capability to control the tone used in the sweep or CW? Iv been using it as a tone generator, but I'd like to be able to control the tone freq and level.
Thanks a ton,
John
By
John Brent - VA3HQB
·
#20852
·
|
Re: Pitfalls of measuring components with the NanoVNA
#measurement
Roger:
I very much like the S11 phase vs impedance phase chart you did up for us. This sure makes the difference easy to understand :-)
Following along...
--
VE6WGM
By
Gregg Messenger VE6WGM
·
#20851
·
|
Re: Pitfalls of measuring components with the NanoVNA
#measurement
I am happy with where this thread has gone. The information is excellent and clearly laid out, and did not digress into anarchy and mayhem :-)
Thank you Roger (and others).
If anyone observes any
By
Gregg Messenger VE6WGM
·
#20849
·
|
Re: Pitfalls of measuring components with the NanoVNA
#measurement
This next post is about measuring inductors and self-resonance. I have an old multi-layer choke in my junk box and I measured it with the NanoVNA. My goal is to post some graphs of the results and
By
Roger Need
·
#20848
·
|
Re: Pitfalls of measuring components with the NanoVNA
#measurement
Hi Roger et al,
Ooooppppssss .... I think I blindly stepped into something .... or 'stepped onto' something ... :)
I guess it is going to take me awhile to understand that issue .... and the shape
By
tinkera123
·
#20847
·
|
Re: Pitfalls of measuring components with the NanoVNA
#measurement
Roger-
Your latest message very clearly described the differences between a reflection coefficient phase angle and the phase angle associated with a complex impedance.
Sounds like most of the
By
Ray Anderson
·
#20846
·
|
Re: Problem with NanoVNA Saver 0.2.2.1
You are using an ancient version, see if it is the same
with the recent one.
karlheinz.merscher@...> wrote:
By
Dragan Milivojevic
·
#20845
·
|
Re: Pitfalls of measuring components with the NanoVNA
#measurement
Roger, you are indeed correct. I also appreciated Arie's comment. Gregg is
also correct for the reflected signal measurement - and in saying that this
is related to the V/I/phase in the DUT; indeed
By
Stan Dye
·
#20844
·
|
Problem with NanoVNA Saver 0.2.2.1
Hello,
I recently have problems to display Marker 1, Marker 2, Marker 3 and so on .
The graphs are shown but I miss the Marker 1, Marker 2, Marker 3 . values
(see yellow colour)
Anybody out
By
Karl-Heinz Merscher <karlheinz.merscher@...>
·
#20843
·
|
Re: Pitfalls of measuring components with the NanoVNA
#measurement
This is a friendly group and I do not wish to get into some kind of argument with others. If I have posted something in this group which is wrong or confusing please quote what I said and tell me why
By
Roger Need
·
#20842
·
|
Re: Pitfalls of measuring components with the NanoVNA
#measurement
Arie,
Thank you for your comment. That is exactly the misunderstanding I was referring to in my previous post. I am also on Facebook and I have seen several posts there that stated that the "S11
By
Roger Need
·
#20841
·
|
Re: Pitfalls of measuring components with the NanoVNA
#measurement
Hi Manfred,
You note that you cannot use NanoVNA Saver under Windows XP.
I inherited a laptop running Windows XP from my daughter.
I just tried that if I copy the NanoVNA-App to the C: / root
By
Gyula Molnar
·
#20840
·
|
Re: Pitfalls of measuring components with the NanoVNA
#measurement
I don't need to "prove" you wrong. Without phase, reactance just becomes a
non-dissipative circuit element that doesn't do much outside of resistive
losses. One can't have a reactive component
By
W0LEV
·
#20839
·
|
Re: Pitfalls of measuring components with the NanoVNA
#measurement
If you explore NanoVNA-App you will find lots of things. Right click on the graph window to find numerous options. Clicking on the text in the upper left corner of the graph window will allow you to
By
Jim Shorney
·
#20838
·
|
Re: Pitfalls of measuring components with the NanoVNA
#measurement
Roger,
I didn't know about that software. I just downloaded it, but it doesn't seem to work with standard firmware, and I'm hesitant about changing to a different firmware, given that the stock one
By
Manfred Mornhinweg
·
#20837
·
|