开云体育

That case looks really nice. Looks like it will keep a lot more dirt and grime out of the NanoVNA. Looking forward to hearing a price on them I'd be interested if the price isn't too high.

And before anybody says it... what else is boxing day for?? LOL!

Set your frequency source for 9.804 MHz and see if it shows up. Vince - K8ZW. -- K8ZW http://www.metalworkingfun.com http://www.hamradio.fun

Just knocked up a case this afternoon in the mancave. This case uses the existing screws in the nanovna, so should be easy to pop together like a six piece jigsaw :-) Acrylic/polycarbonate cut with

#95.3: On the Sufficient Conditions for Identical Measurements Using Two Substantially Different VNAs - Our Research has been Completed Hello, - - - - - - (c) gin&pez@arg (cc-by-4.0) 2019 : start - -

Thanks Dave, and all the others who answered. Well, I don't need to use the nano as a scalar spectrum analyzer, for this I already have a Rigol. I was just puzzled by the fact that moving the

49jhanl@... wrote: Usually caused by not being in the group which owns the tty ports (including the USB ones). Add your username to the dialout group. Since it's that ridiculous pseudo-security

It Is a permission thing with the port. I had the same problem. But I can't find the answer by : Searching my mail Searching the forum's mail Searching the web Searching my desk for where I wrote it

/g/nanovna-users/topic/34079496#2165 -- NanoVNA Wiki: /g/nanovna-users/wiki/home NanoVNA Files: /g/nanovna-users/files Erik, PD0EK

Hi Gabriel, you are telling us a good news about the new VNA. I want to know the final price of the VNA, whether it has a case?

My NanoVNA-Saver app. on Ubuntu 16.04 identifies /dev/ttyACM0 as the serial connection, but it does not appear to connect. Same NanoVNA runs fine on Win 10. Is this a permission problem, and if so,

For example, the SWR plot is scalar - no sign or complex portion involved. Use the the analyzer's own frequency source, Channel 00, and inspect Channel 01 response. Ignore the sign. You have a scalar

#95.2 - In Practice : Non-Identical Measurements Using Two Substantially Different VNAs ? - Two Differences of Measurements may be proved Enough

A new NanoVNA-F just arrived for my ham club today. We already have several NanoVNA's of different manufacture and are happy with their performance but some of the members wanted a unit with a larger

Alberto, The short answer is that the NanoVNA only looks at 101 narrow frequencies evenly spaced from the Start to the Stop frequency. In this case, about every 200kHz. --John Gord

Maybe, or better, surely, something is escaping me.... I connected CH1 of the nanoVNA to a calibrated generator, set to -20 dBm, 10 MHz output. I set the nanoVNA for a Center Frequency of 10 MHz. The

#95.1 : On a Sufficient Condition for Identical Measurements Using Two Different VNAs Hello, Well, we think that this "phenomenon", that may looking as a rather unexpected one, but in fact we searched

Nice trick. w.

Hi, probably the easiest way to obtain the characteristic wave resistance of a coax cable is the Lambda/8 method: (After an OSL CAL for the roughly expected frequency range:) Connect a piece of open

#95: On a Sufficient Condition for Identical Measurements Using Two Different VNAs Hello, - - - - - - (c) gin&pez@arg (cc-by-4.0) 2019 : start - - - - - - Allow us, please, to announce that we just