Re: nanovna saver manual
I use PrintScreen but SnagIt is another good tool. They allow you to select the area that you want to print.On this topic, is there a way to copy and print the whole thread for a topic? This would be
By
Doug <jdkearney@...>
·
#31764
·
|
Invitation to present to the McKinney Amateur Radio Club
Hello Nanovna user group. I have subscribed to this group and have followed many great issues onto resolution. Allow me to introduce myself, my name is Larry Land (Ki5oez), VP of the McKinney, Texas,
By
Larry
·
#31763
·
|
Re: bALUN Common mode reject Z measurement
Sorry folks, I¡¯ve got no explanation for the butcher job my cut and paste formulas on Gamma, rho, and angle turned out to be. The bits were from the attached article, link below.
By
AG6CX
·
#31762
·
|
Re: Through calibration
#calibration
Correct. For thru the cables are connected together. For isolation I connect a 50 ohm load is to each cable. Mike N2MS
By
Mike N2MS
·
#31761
·
|
Re: Through calibration
#calibration
For the S11 calibration (Open, Short, Load), it does not matter whether there is a cable attached to the second port or not. For the Isolation and Thru calibration, the cables should be attached to
By
Stan Dye
·
#31760
·
|
Re: Through calibration
#calibration
Bryan, Yes. I use it to check the characteristics of my ferrites. In addition, I have different sizes of Fair-Rite 31 43 and 61 cores so I can compare the unknown cores to the Fair-Rite products. Mike
By
Mike N2MS
·
#31759
·
|
Re: nanovna saver manual
Assuming you are running on Windows, you can a) select the window you want to share, b) press ALT-PrintScreen on your keyboard. This will put a copy of the window on your windows clipboard, so you can
By
Stan Dye
·
#31758
·
|
Re: Through calibration
#calibration
Hi Mike. Thanks for the reply. Just to be clear, you calibrate at the end of the S11 cable (with both cables in place). Then you connect them together for the through part of calibration. Regards.
By
Bryan Curl
·
#31757
·
|
Re: Through calibration
#calibration
I perform a calibration with the cables in place. I have a S11 cable with two alligator clips, input and ground and a S21 cable with one input alligator clip The S11 clips are separated for the open
By
Mike N2MS
·
#31755
·
|
nanovna saver manual
Is there a manual for the nanovna saver software. I am trying to take a screen view to email to others for opinions Neil G3RIR
By
Neil Ackerley
·
#31753
·
|
Through calibration
#calibration
I have two short cables with alligator clips that I use for looking at baluns, transformers wound on toroids, tuned circuits and what not. When calibrating should i just tune the the s11 side or
By
Bryan Curl
·
#31751
·
|
Re: NanoVNA L/C Match
Didn't know that, it's easy uj design a filter from the measured impedance. You need to check the Q or bandwidth and also harmonic suppression.
By
F4WCV
·
#31750
·
|
Re: help with calibration
The first thing to check is if something is amiss in the calibration process you are using. One common mistake is that you need to reset the cal before doing a new one. You can also verify the cal
By
Stan Dye
·
#31749
·
|
Re: bALUN Common mode reject Z measurement
Sorry - looks like I might have transposed some gammas and rhos. What I ness as by was not reproducible on my non-Greek iPhone: Here¡¯s what I had in mind for Gamma = rho angle theta : Reflection
By
AG6CX
·
#31748
·
|
Re: bALUN Common mode reject Z measurement
Regarding an excerpt from your post (perhaps missing a word or two?) ¡°I use toroidal bifilar wound common mode chokes (CMCs) in my antenna feed system. I have a 450 set of wires fed with parallel
By
AG6CX
·
#31747
·
|
help with calibration
I have a VNA SAA-2N. It will not calibrate (it says it does) but with a 50 ohm load the swr is significantly high. (i have tried another set of standards)
By
AJC
·
#31746
·
|
Re: S-Band NanoVNA - SMA Connector Care
And the cool thing is, with the connector saver, the effects of the saver are incorporated in th
By
Jim Lux
·
#31745
·
|
Re: NanoVNA-App in app calibration problem (bug?)
#calibration
#nanovna-app
I saw that, but didn't realize they were coming in late. I'd get a few, and it just seemed that list traffic was slow.
By
Jim Lux
·
#31744
·
|
Re: NanoVNA L/C Match
The result worked out GREAT! I did an experiment with my (adjustable) 80m antenna. The lowest SWR that I was getting was 1.62:1 at resonance (I can adjust the 80m antenna resonant frequency simply by
By
Michael Foerster
·
#31743
·
|
Re: NanoVNA-App in app calibration problem (bug?)
#calibration
#nanovna-app
On 3/5/23 3:23 PM, Roger Need via groups.io wrote: > OneOfEleven developed the NanoVNA App for personal use and after moving on to other projects kindly posted it as open source for the community to
By
Jim Lux
·
#31740
·
|