Re: Transmission Line Tools
Roger's TLW also runs in Wine on Linux.
By
Jim Allyn - N7JA
·
#17319
·
|
Re: Transmission Line Tools
Transmission Line Details seems to run just fine under Wine in Linux.
By
Jim Allyn - N7JA
·
#17318
·
|
SAA-2N: Product Review
[Note: I posted the following SAA-2N review on the V2 users group. The attached stock photo is only representative of the internals of the SAA-2N and the warped faceplate shown does not appear to be
By
hwalker
·
#17317
·
|
Re: NanoVNA vs. MFJ-259B Antenna Analyzer
OneOfEleven, Any objective reading would infer the "glee" over MFJ being "peed-off." They're not. And...sales do not seem to be hurt much as they can't keep up manufacturing production of their A-As.
By
K4FMH
·
#17316
·
|
Re: NanoVNA vs. MFJ-259B Antenna Analyzer
Carson, Read any manual for a MFJ A-A..you'll see the section on calibration. MFJ sells calibration sets for their MFJ259/269 A-As. Frank K4FMH --- Frank M. Howell, PhD Professor Emeritus, Mississippi
By
K4FMH
·
#17315
·
|
Re: Transmission Line Tools
Perdad, The download link that I gave from the ARRL is missing a couple of files. I have put everything required in one zip file. I have verified that it now runs on Windows 7 and windows 8.1 (64 bit
By
Roger Need
·
#17314
·
|
Re: NanoVNA vs. MFJ-259B Antenna Analyzer
Why would I be disappointed ? I was only thinking the obvious. It's far better to share love, not hatefulness, xx
By
OneOfEleven
·
#17313
·
|
Re: Has OneOfEleven gone again?
Am I missing something here?
By
chzeman_groups.io@...
·
#17312
·
|
Re: NanoVNA vs. MFJ-259B Antenna Analyzer
I would have to say the NanoVNA is probably putting a hurt on MFJ's sales of analyzers. Chris N9XCR
By
chzeman_groups.io@...
·
#17311
·
|
Re: NanoVNA vs. MFJ-259B Antenna Analyzer
OneOfEleven, I can say for certain that Martin Jue is not peed-off, as you put it, over the NanoVNA. He's been designing the next generation of the MFJ antenna analyzer line for the past two years.
By
K4FMH
·
#17310
·
|
Re: NanoVNA vs. MFJ-259B Antenna Analyzer
Hi Carson Well, knowing what I know about the NanoVNA's, I'd rather trust one rather than an analogue meter like the MFJ's, not because the MFJ's don't work (because they do!) but because a VNA gets
By
OneOfEleven
·
#17309
·
|
Re: Where did OneOfEleven go
OK, thank you all. Ignacio EB4APL -- El software de antivirus Avast ha analizado este correo electr¨®nico en busca de virus. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
By
EB4APL
·
#17308
·
|
Re: Order of calibrating
In NanoVNA no matter Order of calibrating All calculation made after you press done button On press Open/Short/Load/Isoln/Thru made only measure anc remember calibration data. After press Done, this
By
DiSlord
·
#17307
·
|
Re: NanoVNA vs. MFJ-259B Antenna Analyzer
Thanks for sharing this - I just joined this group today! I had heard several times how the NanoVNA wasn't that accurate, so I was surprised to see how it compared to the MFJ analyzer. Thanks for
By
Carson Morton
·
#17306
·
|
Re: Definition of resonance
Yes, this has been a good learning exercise. Remember that I made the test-setup to intentionally get some weird results to see if those could be handled by an antenna tuner and describe how. And yes,
By
Torbj?rn Toreson
·
#17305
·
|
Re: Where did OneOfEleven go
It's updated on a regular basis - so make sure you have a look at the current version about once per day.
By
Larry Rothman
·
#17304
·
|
Re: Where did OneOfEleven go
https://github.com/OneOfEleven/NanoVNA-H/tree/master/Release -- Brian
By
Brian Morrison
·
#17303
·
|
Re: Where did OneOfEleven go
Hi, Where I can download NanoVNA-App for Windows?? I'm trying to find it several days but I can't. Thank you, Ignacio, EB4APL -- El software de antivirus Avast ha analizado este correo electr¨®nico
By
EB4APL
·
#17302
·
|
Re: NanoVNA vs. MFJ-259B Antenna Analyzer
Yes, indeed! Again, the NANOVNA's are the best piece of test equipment to enter the amateur market (and some professional use as well) since the hand-held DMM. And, again, its a wonderful educational
By
W0LEV
·
#17301
·
|
Re: Need help
For an open/short the VSWR is (mathematically) infinity. Displaying that is a practical limitation. Instead, you might look at dB(|S11|) or the Return Loss which should be right around 0dB after a
By
af5fx
·
#17300
·
|