Re: SAA2N reviews
Hi Hugen, Is this your product? https://aliexpi.com/WNTK
By
Ash
·
#17137
·
|
Re: SAA2N reviews
We are very sorry, there are many countries where we have not found a more suitable logistics solution. This has led to many countries temporarily unable to deliver or need to pay too high logistics
By
Hugen
·
#17136
·
|
Network Analysis Webinar: Master Network Analysis Fundamentals by Keysight
#webinar
#training
https://app.assetsdes.endeavorb2b.com/e/er?s=1904481191&lid=111270&elqTrackId=4d65cd145105459da62b93ff3d336308&elq=1fdc22ca93bf4b2bbb68486d527adb9b&elqaid=32735&elqat=1&utm_rid=CPG05000005028441&utm_c
By
Gary W9TD
·
#17135
·
|
Off Topic: Open AMBE DSTAR
Off topic, but posting in case any of the software/firmware gurus on this list might want to contribute. Help is needed with a software version of the DSTAR AMBE encoder/decoder (patent has
By
Mike Allred
·
#17134
·
|
Re: Bluetooth HC5 and nanoVNA-H
Status and enable on the HC05 aren't needed. Only Vcc, Gnd, Rx , and Tx need to be connected. And Rx and Tx are probably labeled from the perspective of the module they are on so probably need to be
By
Dave VE3LHO
·
#17133
·
|
Re: errors of "error" models
#109 : reply to a newcomer = | From: "** ***" <*@gmail.com> | Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2020 08:43 | Subject: Re: S-Parameter Uncertainties in Network Analyzer Measurements = |
By
gin&pez@arg
·
#17132
·
|
Re: Bluetooth HC5 and nanoVNA-H
"How does a 6 pin module plug into a 4 pin socket?" There are so many possible responses! [ Not "answers" ] - Using a 'hardware multiplexing socket' (still to be developed) - Very carefully - with
By
DougVL
·
#17131
·
|
Half wave dipole over perfect gorund
Here is the figure from Carter paper (1932). Piero, I0KPT
By
Piero Tognolatti
·
#17130
·
|
Re: Dipole length
[email protected]> wrote: I would disagree with that - it would also be ABSOLUTELY correct if the reference impedance was 5000x100=500000 ohms. ?????? But both in amateur radio and
By
Dr. David Kirkby, Kirkby Microwave Ltd
·
#17129
·
|
Re: Bluetooth HC5 and nanoVNA-H
How does a 6 pin module plug into a 4 pin socket? Larry, K4MLA
By
k4mla
·
#17128
·
|
Re: Dipole length
On 9/2/20 6:19 PM, Jim Lux wrote: > On 9/2/20 4:53 PM, AG6CX wrote: >> The chart of impedance varying with height above ground has been around since at least 1928 or so, first published by Carter in
By
Jim Lux
·
#17127
·
|
Re: Dipole length
Sort of.. the sine integral is zeroth order spherical Bessel, the distinction is that the usual ordinary Bessel is based on circular coordinates. So, they're similar, but not the same -see the plot
By
Jim Lux
·
#17126
·
|
Re: Dipole length
The chart of impedance varying with height above ground has been around since at least 1928 or so, first published by Carter in IEE Transactions. I¡¯ll post the original paper, with math, when I find
By
AG6CX
·
#17125
·
|
Re: SAA2N reviews
The message was intended for Hugen since Magie does not respond. Yes, I know about other groups, already a member of all of them :)
By
Dragan Milivojevic
·
#17124
·
|
Re: Mutual Impedances Re: [nanovna-users] Dipole length
The ¡°method of images¡± is given in some (all?) undergraduate EM Fields texts. I distinctly rememeber that it is treated in Collin and Plonsey. In those treatments the method is treated
By
Dave Daniel
·
#17123
·
|
Re: SAA2N reviews
Because it¡¯s not released yet? On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 12:36 PM David Eckhardt <davearea51a@...> wrote:
By
Tripp, WT5A
·
#17122
·
|
Re: Mutual Impedances Re: [nanovna-users] Dipole length
Thank you, Jim Lux!!! When in question, consult a good reference, not hearsay or snake oil! Kraus (undergrad) and Balanis (grad level) in any edition are golden in this respect. For an excellent
By
W0LEV
·
#17121
·
|
Re: Dipole length
So, who drives even an end-fed half-wave (EFHW) with a 3000 or 5000 source impedance directly???!!! The center of my Smith Charts is 50-ohms, unless I normalize it to something else like 75, 300, or
By
W0LEV
·
#17120
·
|
Mutual Impedances Re: [nanovna-users] Dipole length
Kraus Chapter 10 discusses mutual impedance and gives the plot - somewhere I'm sure, the "image theory" is developed, but not in that chapter. ARRL Antenna Book chapter 8 gives same plot (Fig 20 in
By
Jim Lux
·
#17119
·
|
Re: Dipole length
I'd disagree with this one - this is ABSOLUTELY correct, but only if "the other" side is (normally expected) 50ohm source (TX) :)
By
Miro, N9LR
·
#17118
·
|