开云体育

Thanks Herb, I can see for me for now there will be a steep learning curve, right now I would rather throw it out the window, but just like everything else you start at the bottom and start trying to

On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 09:57 AM, David Shrum wrote: ... for now the only thing I'm interested in is the SWR of the antenna I'm checking. .. ========================================================

On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 09:50 AM, Birdman wrote: Can somebody with the new H4 units tell me if the fonts are BIGGER than the small display? OR, is the font the same size, you just get more stuff on

Get NanoVNA-Saver and use your PC and you will have an easier time viewing the SWR chart only. John GalwayKH6JTE

First thanks to the moderators for adding me. As the title of my message says, I'm new also to the AURSINC Vector Network Analyzer (bought on Amazon). I have watched a couple of YouTube videos about

I know this has been asked before, but I can’t seem to find a proper answer to the question. Can somebody with the new H4 units tell me if the fonts are BIGGER than the small display? OR, is the

Only if you tune it right... On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 12:46 PM, Birdman<ccarrara@...> wrote: Will this antenna make beer??? -- Regards, Chris

Will this antenna make beer??? -- Regards, Chris

Tuning the “CB” antenna will be EXACTLY like any other antenna, just follow the docs in the wiki for the rest of them. There’s definitely a learning curve though, the nice smart folks on this

On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 02:44 AM, <mcebokli@...> wrote: What about the new SAA2? Any practical eperience yet? On paper it's much better than either F or H4.

Received NanoVNA from Tindie yesterday. Delivery to Russia took 9 days. Everything is working, PC software too. Unfortunately calibration kit is not included - i'am going to buy it separately.

On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 11:42 PM, Dave wrote: ? I just got a shipment of boards from JLCPCB that were shipped last Saturday. ==================================================================== Are

Thanks for highlighting this, it is good to know I do not need to be super precise with this - I have kind of got distracted from making my current radio to seeing if I could actually get a really

On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 08:08 PM, Hernán Freschi wrote: Nanovna-saver seems to show a flat line. ========================================================== If NanoVNA-saver is giving you a correct

Thank you very much for your suggestions - I really appreciate them and have learnt a lot from reading about the various ideas people have offered and from doing my experiments. I have just re-done

For my nanoVNA version H3.2? I measured Returnloss on CH1: -55dB on 1 MHz, and -33dB on 30 MHz. More than good enough for measurements on those transformers. Have you ever tried your VNA measurements

What about the new SAA2? Any practical eperience yet? On paper it's much better than either F or H4.

Your ship confirmation from Tindie should have included a tracking number (in my case, of the form LW...9 digits...CN). This form of tracking number is accepted by usps.com (which in my case shows

Neal: ? I just got a shipment of boards from JLCPCB that were shipped last Saturday. Dave - WB6DHW

Nanovna-saver seems to show a flat line. 1. I'm not sure now. I never noticed this before, because I always used this at over 100MHz. The problem appears when the sweep starts at low frequencies. 2. I