开云体育

Thanks, this is what I was looking for.

/g/nanovna-users/message/7441 -- NanoVNA Wiki: /g/nanovna-users/wiki/home NanoVNA Files: /g/nanovna-users/files Erik, PD0EK

See http://www.gunthard-kraus.de/ 73 Arie PA3A Op 24-12-2019 om 14:23 schreef Piotr Wozniak:

Hi Gunthard, In your file you refer to "Calibration data for the NanoVNA with the supplied SOLT - Calibration set". I spent hours trying to find this file, without success. Could you (or someone else)

Thank you Erik! 73 Arie PA3A Op 24-12-2019 om 09:20 schreef erik@...:

#93: On the Simplified Virtualization of the General Picture Hello, - - - - - - (c) gin&pez@arg (cc-by-4.0) 2019 : start - - - - - - Allow us, please, to continue with the finalization of our picture:

Two thoughts here: 1) A great time for two or three or more hams getting together and jointly buying a subscription to QEX, AND making it available to their club. And you can jointly purchase the DVD

@Erik, PD0EK - 24 December 2019: /g/nanovna-users/message/8615 /g/nanovna-users/message/8614 Dear Erik, Allow us, please, to carefully reserve ourselves from

To help understanding the impact of the various terms of the complete G formula /g/nanovna-users/message/8459 I plotted a 1000 point zero to 900MHz uncalibrated measurement of the SOL

Gin@Pez Not sure I do understand what you try to say. If the correction polynomials have a physical underpinning (L for short, C for open) would you still call it an excuse? And its less work to enter

@Gary O'Neil, N3GO : 24 December 2019 /g/nanovna-users/message/8610 Dear Gary, Alright then ! Now we see... Well, allow us, please to avoid any further discussion on such matters,

#92: Our General Picture of [TheLeastVNA] Hello, Allow us, please, to inform you that we just uploaded our general picture of a 4-port [LeastVNA] at:

Hi, I resent the email to Luc which he has recieved OK now. FYI I am new member to the group and a new owner of a nanoVNA and I must say there is a wealth of information to be found for this excellent

GIN&PEZ; In reply to Post #8585 regarding my post @Gary, N3GO 22 December 2019 - /g/nanovna-users/message/8572 My question was regarding the results you posted in # 8521. #90.01 :

Thanks all. I'll try adding the scan. I am away from my shack for Xmas Possibly worth a low priority software update Rune if you agree the interface needs to be clearer. 73 Dick

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turtles_all_the_way_down

If one needs a spectrum analyzer on the cheap, try the AirSpy (full units to 1.8 Ghz - not the HF+ or Discovery) for around $200. SpectrumSpy is included with the SDR# download at no cost. It is the

Larry Rothman wrote: Just did this to one owned by a friend. His Chromebook wasn't even that old yet, with a January 2019 date on the bottom. Yet they were already making noises about it going EOL

look in the trash folder and all mail sent, could still be there. Tom Sides KI7FTK cell 602-499-9562 skype: Thomas Sides 4243 e. st Charles ave Phx AZ 85042

As the owner of two nanoVNAs and two lab grade VNAs I have run comparisons between them.? They all do their intended job well, and can be very useful in testing hardware, as well as providing a