¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Date
Re: NanoVNA software developers wanted #hacking
Link added in /g/nanovna-users/wiki/Mods-and-Design-Notes
By Oristo · #6556 ·
Re: Looking for firmware with battery indicator, 1500 and big font
Sorry, I'm not following the group regularly. Is there any firmware with battery indicator, 1500 MHz and big font ?
By Eko Wa · #6555 ·
Re: NanoVNA software developers wanted #hacking
I think that cho45 should disable Bluetooth during nanoVNA measurements to avoid both power and interference problems.
By Oristo · #6554 ·
Re: NanoVNA software developers wanted #hacking
Check out the work of cho45 will help you. https://lowreal.net/.page/20190905/3 hugen
By Hugen · #6553 ·
Re: T-Check for my nanoVNA - Results look excellent below 150 MHz and acceptable up to 300 MHz
Hello Kurt, This 'ListType=Lin' parameter was necessary :-) Question: where did you found that parameter 'ListType=Lin'? I looked in specification touchstone_ver2_0.pdf, and in VNWA_HELP_36.7.8.pdf
By Rudi · #6552 ·
Re: NanoVNA software developers wanted #hacking
Short note. All these links are either for Widoze or CLI or for yet another development tool besides Eclipse. But it does help to get some ideas. Thanks
By vaclav_sal <vaclav_sal@...> · #6551 ·
Re: NanoVNA software developers wanted #hacking
Nice, but I am after adding the bluetooth externally. Like to ask if it would make more sense to add processor internally supporting wireless commodification. I have not done any research if such
By vaclav_sal <vaclav_sal@...> · #6550 ·
Re: Voltage sensing diode
Just calibrated by setting vbat_offset so that the indicated voltage on the Version screen = measured battery voltage. Fully charged reading (LED1 not blinking) now 4140mV with vbat_offset set to 950.
By Nick · #6549 ·
Re: T-Check for my nanoVNA - Results look excellent below 150 MHz and acceptable up to 300 MHz
Hi Rudi Correct about R&S T-Check, no way to get it to run on W10 Kind regards Kurt -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: [email protected] <[email protected]> P? vegne af Kurt Poulsen
By Kurt Poulsen · #6548 ·
Re: T-Check for my nanoVNA - Results look excellent below 150 MHz and acceptable up to 300 MHz
Hi Rudi I did export a s2p file from latest version 1.5 of the NanoVNA-saver and it was imported right away in the VNWA It is in the format RI meaning real Imaginary S parameter so why you have no
By Kurt Poulsen · #6547 ·
Re: VBAT resistor voltage divider, polynomial fitting, VBAT sampling
Well...that's 3 for 3...thanks for taking the time to write and explain. -- On the banks of the Piscataqua Rich NE1EE
By Rich NE1EE · #6546 ·
Re: Chasing ghosts??? #internals #calibration
There is evidence in the Open and Load calibration measurement of something weird happening when going into harmonics mode, it is if the ratio of the reference signal and the measurement signal
By Erik Kaashoek · #6545 ·
Re: Chasing ghosts??? #internals #calibration
So I did the same coax stub comparison between the V2 and the xaVNA (see attached). The measurements agree to about 0.1dB and those ripples are either physical or artifacts of my cal kit. The coax
By OwO · #6544 ·
Re: Chasing ghosts??? #internals #calibration
If my hypothesis is correct then that means the impedance of the DUT at say 250MHz will affect the measurement at 750MHz. A possible way to check is to measure a resonator with a sharp dip at 250MHz
By OwO · #6543 ·
Re: Chasing ghosts??? #internals #calibration
The NanoVNA plot of the coaxial stub shows a few ripples that are unphysical (see attached image). It is unlikely the loss of the coax suddenly increases like that with frequency, and as your home
By OwO · #6542 ·
Re: NanoVNA-Saver 0.1.5
Hi Bryan, thank you for looking into this! I have user selectable scaling on the list for probably the next release, but I hadn't yet realized, that there might be cases where a cable would show a
By Rune Broberg · #6541 ·
Re: NanoVNA-Saver 0.1.5
Hi Herb, I hope someone will be able to help you with the understanding - And I will be following along the thread closely, as I too am not entirely certain what it's telling me ;-) I have put the
By Rune Broberg · #6540 ·
Re: errors of "error" models
Dear GIN & PEZ I must, unknowingly, have asked a very wrong question. Apologies for that. The reason for asking was the simplification to the formula G=m/s I was assuming, probably very wrong, that
By Erik Kaashoek · #6539 ·
Re: errors of "error" models
Thank you GIN & PEZ; Your post #6529 #73': On the sine qua non Core Uncertainty of AnyVNA - incl. NanoVNA - System (the message #73 is withdrawn mainly because its conclusion is too weak) Seems to add
By Gary O'Neil · #6538 ·
Re: T-Check for my nanoVNA - Results look excellent below 150 MHz and acceptable up to 300 MHz
Hello Kurt, After reading T-Check.pdf from you from 2010-01-31, I tried http://www.hamcom.dk/VNWA/T-Check_HD_Install.zip under Windows 10-64 The Installation files are from 1997. When trying to start
By Rudi · #6537 ·