Re: NanoVNA V2
hello, there is also the opensource project: https://hforsten.com/improved-homemade-vna.html 30mhz up to 6ghz, the project is around 300 euros. I'm not saying to make it the same but it can be a
By
Gufo Rosso
·
#6525
·
|
Re: T-Check for my nanoVNA - Results look excellent below 150 MHz and acceptable up to 300 MHz
Hello Kurt, Yes I know that the curve is not so very good. But it was just a priciple test for the procedure chain: NanoVNA-saver .S2P file save to a T-Check curve with minimal effort, with free
By
Rudi
·
#6524
·
|
Re: T-Check for my nanoVNA - Results look excellent below 150 MHz and acceptable up to 300 MHz
Hi Erik Thank you for the spreadsheet I did mistakenly comment your T-Check to Reuters and did right away see the mistake I imported your s2p file after modification of the header, as a surplus S at
By
Kurt Poulsen
·
#6523
·
|
Re: T-Check for my nanoVNA - Results look excellent below 150 MHz and acceptable up to 300 MHz
Hi Reuter I had to modify your header to import the s2p file. There was a S too much ! ListType=Lin (This addition was probably not needed) # HZ S RI R 50 (at the end of this line there was a S too
By
Kurt Poulsen
·
#6522
·
|
Re: errors of "error" models
#73 : erik@... - 5 November 2019 : /g/nanovna-users/message/6495 Dear Erik, Thank you very much indeed for your interest in our work and also for the chance you give us to explain it
By
gin&pez@arg
·
#6521
·
|
Re: NanoVNA-Saver 0.1.5
Hope someone can give me some insight on the TDR impedance measurement display. I have attached TDR impedance displays for two cable assemblies. The first cable assembly was made up of a 0.3m length
By
hwalker
·
#6520
·
|
Re: Your NanoVNA version
Thank you, that is usefull information for everyone! I haven't decided what to do. I might fix my nanoVNA, buy another or wait for the announced "nanoVNA 2.0". My version isn't completely dead but the
By
necessaryevil86@...
·
#6519
·
|
Re: NanoVNA software developers wanted
#hacking
Eventually, but getting something built first in a "friendly" IDE, then whittling to fit, might be faster. Also, with Bluetooth, local display becomes highly optional.
By
Oristo
·
#6518
·
|
Re: T-Check for my nanoVNA - Results look excellent below 150 MHz and acceptable up to 300 MHz
Hello Erik, Now it works, see the attached diagram: NanoVNA_T-Check.png Thanks again for the very good spreadsheet. 73, Rudi DL5FA
By
Rudi
·
#6517
·
|
Re: NanoVNA software developers wanted
#hacking
Actually, read the whole thread, including /g/nanovna-users/message/1795 With all the features stuffed into the current firmware, builds are starting to overflow storage. You'll need
By
Larry Rothman
·
#6516
·
|
Re: NanoVNA software developers wanted
#hacking
/g/nanovna-users/message/1508
By
Oristo
·
#6515
·
|
Re: NanoVNA software developers wanted
#hacking
Oops, just found this article: https://wonderfulengineering.com/10-best-bluetooth-modules-for-arduino/ .. which recommends HC-06: "use it simply for a serial port replacement" ~ US$1.40
By
Oristo
·
#6514
·
|
Re: NanoVNA software developers wanted
#hacking
I mean to rip the BT module out of the device... Also, I just had a quick look at the pin mapping of the F072 as used in the NanoVNA.? PINS 30 & 31 (not currently used) can be remapped to USART1_TX &
By
Larry Rothman
·
#6513
·
|
Re: T-Check for my nanoVNA - Results look excellent below 150 MHz and acceptable up to 300 MHz
Hello Erik, Thank you very much for your provided spread sheet. At the moment I am still fighting with the decimal point/comma topic :-( 73, Rudi DL5FA
By
Rudi
·
#6512
·
|
Re: NanoVNA software developers wanted
#hacking
I do not find hacks turning ELM327 into BT bridge; cheap HC-05 has good Arduino support, https://components101.com/wireless/hc-05-bluetooth-module but wants substantial code. A "smart" BT LE shield is
By
Oristo
·
#6511
·
|
Re: NanoVNA software developers wanted
#hacking
Yes, but SPI to USB host would be simpler than trying to add Bluetooth to nanoVNA firmware https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01EWW9R1E
By
Oristo
·
#6510
·
|
Re: NanoVNA software developers wanted
#hacking
Actually, I was thinking a little more on what uses a serial to BT bridge: every one of those really cheap OBD2 BT car diagnostic readers has one built-in. Those readers cost $5 and up so the BT
By
Larry Rothman
·
#6509
·
|
Re: NanoVNA software developers wanted
#hacking
Oristo, All Vaclav needs to do is use one of the unused serial ports on the chip and use a BT to serial module. I was looking at the F072 specs and it appears the serial pin I was thinking if using is
By
Larry Rothman
·
#6508
·
|
Re: NanoVNA software developers wanted
#hacking
Hi Vaclav - Unless you find a Bluetooth dongle that supports USB OTG, I think that this is doomed. I found no 64-pin STM32 chip, as in nanoVNAs, that does USB OTG,
By
Oristo
·
#6507
·
|
Re: Now What
Herb, thanks very much. I assume the two devices are different enough that the manual for the smaller one will not be of help. I almost purchased the smaller one but thought why not get the larger
By
Andrew Baer, M.D. <ambaer52@...>
·
#6506
·
|