Success in automatic bridge and calibration error correction calculation
#internals
#calibration
After calibration with the correct calibration error parameters, a 1 meter cable connected to the reference plane with short and open at its other end, should give perfect circles spiraling inwards in
By
Erik Kaashoek
·
#6066
·
|
Re: a place to compare features?
QRP RX recently updated his README: https://github.com/qrp73/NanoVNA-Q/blob/master/README.md
By
Oristo
·
#6065
·
|
Re: NanoVNA does not want to start -solved
Bob, https://www.aliexpress.com/wholesale?catId=0&initiative_id=SB_20191030105308&SearchText=IP5303 But be careful - some vendors charge big $$ for shipping.
By
Larry Rothman
·
#6064
·
|
Re: NanoVNA does not want to start -solved
Where to buy IP5303?
By
Bob Albert <bob91343@...>
·
#6063
·
|
Re: Voltage sensing diode
Thanks for the image, KVR5 Your hand is steadier for soldering than mine.. @QRP - does the small red mark next to it signify bad hardware?
By
Oristo
·
#6062
·
|
Re: has anybody tested hf traps
That's exactly what I do at LC. "You can also connect trap to hot ends of both CH0 and CH1 and do S21 measure without need for coil adapter. It worked for me when I was unable to detach trap from
By
Igor - PY3IG
·
#6061
·
|
Re: NanoVNA questions
IF your reply DID NOT start with put-down I would reply....
By
vaclav_sal <vaclav_sal@...>
·
#6060
·
|
Re: NanoVNA questions
IF you would have looked in the Files and Wiki sections of the forum - all of your questions would have been answered except #1.There is no trademark - only a copyrighted name, owned by edy555. Check
By
Larry Rothman
·
#6059
·
|
Re: usb controled rf generator.
Sure, but one fixed LPF suffices, rather than LPF tracking swept square wave.
By
Oristo
·
#6058
·
|
NanoVNA questions
Before purchase I would like to have the following answered / verified Is ¡°NanoVNA¡± a trade mark? (verify) Is ¡°NanoVNA¡± open source ¨C both hardware and software ? (verify) ¡°NanoVNA ¡° is
By
vaclav_sal <vaclav_sal@...>
·
#6057
·
|
Re: CH0 LOGMAG and CH1 LOGMAG after CAL RESET (with no calibration)
connect it to CH0, leave CH1 open
By
QRP RX
·
#6056
·
|
Re: CH0 LOGMAG and CH1 LOGMAG after CAL RESET (with no calibration)
There is a testing of hardware, to make sure that it provides adequate measurements. With calibration enabled possible hardware issues will be hidden by calibration. This is why I asked for screenshot
By
QRP RX
·
#6055
·
|
Re: CH0 LOGMAG and CH1 LOGMAG after CAL RESET (with no calibration)
Do the same with load on CH0 and CH1
By
QRP RX
·
#6054
·
|
Re: CH0 LOGMAG and CH1 LOGMAG after CAL RESET (with no calibration)
Cross-talk will change, but better than none. FWIW, CH1 precision is less critical; I use uncalibrated 50 Ohm BNC with SMA adapter.
By
Oristo
·
#6053
·
|
Re: usb controled rf generator.
Hi Hmm, putting two signals into a mixer generates more than one single sinusoidal signal. Bo
By
Bo, OZ2M
·
#6052
·
|
Re: usb controled rf generator.
As an alternative to mixing and LPF for lower RF, grab an eBay AD9959 board: https://www.eevblog.com/forum/rf-microwave/all-you-need-to-know-about-the-chinese-ad9959-ebay-board/msg2205405/ .. and
By
Oristo
·
#6051
·
|
Re: CH0 LOGMAG and CH1 LOGMAG after CAL RESET (with no calibration)
I have only 1 50 O at this point...more on order. I wish that we had a vetted supplier of low cost terminators. I can do one port at a time if that is useful. Not sure when to expect the others...have
By
Rich NE1EE
·
#6050
·
|
Re: usb controled rf generator.
I think such filters add more cost than starting with sinusoid-generating chips, e.g. /g/nanovna-users/message/5979
By
Oristo
·
#6049
·
|
Re: usb controled rf generator.
Hi Oristo A square wave can be expressed as an infinite number of odd harmonic sinusoidal signals. Thus, a LPF a bit above the fundamental frequency can do the job. Bo
By
Bo, OZ2M
·
#6048
·
|
Re: edelay vs ELECTRICAL DELAY and other fun
#internals
Hi Larry - That can be scripted using my Python utility with multiple scanraw invocations, but current issues are measurement noise and repeatability.
By
Oristo
·
#6047
·
|