¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Date
Re: I added copper shields and it didn't turn out as expected ...
C26 and C27 connect to the output of the transmission mixer. Do not expect a lot of sensistivity for noise going back into the output, especially because of C32 and C33 removing all HF. Most unwanted
By Erik Kaashoek · #5411 ·
Re: I added copper shields and it didn't turn out as expected ...
I believe the main function of the shielding in this design is to improve isolation between the signal source and the SA612 receivers (so, to W5DXP¡¯s question, I doubt there¡¯s much improvement at
By Jeff Anderson · #5410 ·
Comparing nanoVNA with similar hardware home build VNA #internals
To better understand the performance of the nanoVNA I did a small comparison with my home build VNA. This home build VNA uses the same SI5351, the same three SA612 mixers but instead of an embedded
By Erik Kaashoek · #5409 ·
Re: I added copper shields and it didn't turn out as expected ...
this is because shield installed incorrectly, it affects circuit performance. Shield is needed. But this PCB has some design mistakes which makes proper shield installation more hard. Probably this is
By QRP RX · #5408 ·
Re: NanoVNA-Saver 0.1.3
Hi Bryan, there's a 0.3.1 out now - as far as I can tell, it only reverses the sign of "group delay", so not a big change. I don't think it should affect your measurements, but I thought I would
By Rune Broberg · #5407 ·
NanoVNASharp MOD v3 released
NanoVNASharp MOD v3 is released: https://www.rtl-sdr.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=4881&p=12524#p12524 Whats new: - added CAPTURE button, which allows to get screenshot from the NanoVNA - completely
By QRP RX · #5406 ·
Re: Calibration oddity
This bug is fixed in the NanoVNASharp MOD v3: https://www.rtl-sdr.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=4881&p=12524#p12524
By QRP RX · #5405 ·
Re: Who has used the nanoVNA wiki to find information? #wiki
I did
By Carmine Caira · #5404 ·
Re: I added copper shields and it didn't turn out as expected ...
QRP RX, There is no easy way (impossible) to make two sections under the larger shield and have any sort of continuous solder line to the board, so perhaps I'll just take it off. I'll take your other
By Mike_nano · #5403 ·
Re: I added copper shields and it didn't turn out as expected ...
Question: If the NanoVNA is used only for HF, are the shields necessary?
By W5DXP <w5dxp@...> · #5402 ·
Re: Newbie
You could do what I did when I got my Nano back in June - use a very thin cellphone battery.It's perfectly safe and there are a couple of photos in the photo section of the forum:
By Larry Rothman · #5401 ·
Re: Newbie
Excellent information. Thanks for taking the time to provide this information. Tom Stiles
By hamrad45 · #5400 ·
Re: Saving multiple Cal data
Hi Nan - Thanks for heads up; I was unaware of any differences, other than between two ("AA") and four trace versions. Unlike commercial software and firmware, open source developers typically do not
By Oristo · #5399 ·
Re: Who has used the nanoVNA wiki to find information? #wiki
I surely did.. BR-Nan-vk2krn
By Nan · #5398 ·
Re: Saving multiple Cal data
Thanks to all for your responses. The "Reset" menu option got me very confused but its clearer now. For example, Recall 1 and Reset only clears Register 1 and not "ALL" Cal data as I originally
By Nan · #5397 ·
Re: Who has used the nanoVNA wiki to find information? #wiki
Me too. -- Regards, Martin - G8JNJ
By Martin · #5396 ·
Re: errors of "error" models
#66: Public Invitation : #66 Hello, Allow us, please, to generally express our clear point of view on these extraordinary stupid demands expressed by impotent members of this group, by addressing in
By gin&pez@arg · #5395 ·
Re: Measuring ferrite beads #test-jig
Hi Jim There is no substitute to hard work. Besides I have a Magic Wand ? Kind regards Kurt -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: [email protected] <[email protected]> P? vegne af
By Kurt Poulsen · #5394 ·
Re: I added copper shields and it didn't turn out as expected ...
Also it seems that this PCB layout is not good. Because it don't allow to place shield edge on safe distance from c26, c27. Also it looks that there is impedance problem with wire to SMA connector.
By QRP RX · #5393 ·
Re: I added copper shields and it didn't turn out as expected ...
ideald shield should be soldered with no gap. Because any gap leads to ground loop. Longer gap leads to higher noise. Did you see these through holes on the pcb ground? These holes are named "vias",
By QRP RX · #5392 ·