On the other hand... (Copied from under Fair Use provisions):
In June 2011, Judge Philip Pro of the District of Nevada ruled in Righthaven v. Hoehn that the posting of an entire editorial article from the Las Vegas Review Journal in a comment as part of an online discussion was unarguably fair use. Judge Pro noted that "Noncommercial, nonprofit use is presumptively fair. ... Hoehn posted the Work as part of an online discussion. ... This purpose is consistent with comment, for which 17 U.S.C. ¡ì 107 provides fair use protection. ... It is undisputed that Hoehn posted the entire work in his comment on the Website. ... wholesale copying does not preclude a finding of fair use. ... there is no genuine issue of material fact that Hoehn's use of the Work was fair and summary judgment is appropriate." On appeal, the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled that Righthaven did not even have the standing needed to sue Hoehn for copyright infringement in the first place.
73
-Jim
NU0C
On Sat, 21 Dec 2019 17:19:09 -0600
"Jim Shorney" <jshorney@...> wrote:
No, it does not. It covers Fair Use quoting, which is the point.
73
-Jim
NU0C
On Sat, 21 Dec 2019 17:24:01 -0500
"Dave Daniel" <kc0wjn@...> wrote:
But that does not include wide re-publication .
DaveD
Sent from a small flat thingy
On Dec 21, 2019, at 17:10, Jim Shorney <jshorney@...> wrote:
It is allowed as "Fair Use".
"In its most general sense, a fair use is any copying of copyrighted material done for a limited and ¡°transformative¡± purpose" (fair use of the first sentence of the above web page).
73
-Jim
NU0C
On Sat, 21 Dec 2019 21:07:00 +0000 (UTC)
"Bob Albert via Groups.Io" <bob91343@...> wrote:
Quoting is always at the discretion of the copyright holder. Any part of a copyrighted work is protected.
Bob
On Saturday, December 21, 2019, 12:57:02 PM PST, W5DXP <w5dxp@...> wrote:
Isn't it OK to quote copyrighted articles as long as one credits the source? How about just quoting the parts that are not already common knowledge?
Jim Shorney