开云体育

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 开云体育

Wellbrook traced-out loop amp schematics uploaded to Photos


 

开云体育

I made a folder in Photos just now and uploaded the schematics for ALA1530LN, ALA100LN, FLG100LN that I've traced out in the past. There should be complete info there for anyone to be able to make their own. The original leaded 2SK715 jfets are now unobtainable, but there are two SMD equivalents that work just as well, with the 2SK932 preferred since its typical yfs is the same as the 2SK715. One should be able to make one of these for around $50--maybe less. On eBay I see a Chinese seller claims to be selling an ALA1530LN or an ALA100LN for a very high price of around $250, for the loop amp alone! I have no idea if it's a direct clone of the Wellbrook.

/g/loopantennas/album?id=296460.??? The name of the folder is "Wellbrook official traced-out schematics ALA1530LN, ALA100LN, FLG100LN".

73,

Steve AA7U

On 7/17/2024 2:15 PM, Paul V Birke via groups.io wrote:

Dear Martin

I thought Steve Ratzlaff did some "unpotting" amongst others

Maybe we need to find out what they found.

I remember seeing results from at least two "unpottings"

best wishes

Paul


 

I wish those diagrams works, if my Wellbrook ALA100M someday stop working I will be totally lost, the urban noise in my location is very high. ? It would be nice that somebody in this group could sell them mounted or al least in kit , if allowed.


 

When looking to DigiKey, the 2SK715 are there offered by Rochester Electronics. BTW, has anybody tested more powerfull J-FETS like the popular J310?


 

Perhaps the Onsemi CPH3910 could be used as a substitute? It is cheap and in stock at Mouser.?


 

Hi Steve,
?
There has been a bit of variation in the build of the Wellbrooks.
?
The one I took apart had two 82pF capacitors, each one connected across half of the transformer primary. I suspect they were originally intended to provide better rejection of strong FM broadcast signals, but it was a "happy accident" that they also improved the performance on the upper HF bands.
?
The core material was closer to N30 (u' 4,300) (Epcos ) rather than 73 mix (u' 2,500) , which would tie in with the FG100LN additional transformer, that used something like the higher permeability x38 material (u' 10,000). My thinking is that the Epcos N30 cores would also have possibly been easier to obtain in the UK, when the Wellbrook was initially designed, as RS were pretty much the only big electronic parts supplier at the time, and was used by nearly everyone.
?
Using back to back diodes across the loop terminals is fine, however that is not true for other types of antenna, with higher feed point impedances.
?
I have tried CPH3910 fets and they work, but a lot depends upon your requirements for frequency coverage.
?
Regards,
?
Martin


 

Steve,
?
Thanks for doing this. It would be a shame to lose these designs now that Andy is gone.
?
I added a folder and two files illustrating T1:
?
?
Could you take a look and see if I have it correct?
?
Thanks!
--
===================================================================
Mike M


 

开云体育

Hi Mike,

One would need a full schematic with the T1 transformer labeled per your drawing to be able to say if you have it correct or not. My schematic in the files doesn't have transformer numbering on it, just phasing dots.

Steve

On 7/21/2024 7:07 AM, Mike M via groups.io wrote:

Steve,
?
Thanks for doing this. It would be a shame to lose these designs now that Andy is gone.
?
I added a folder and two files illustrating T1:
?
?
Could you take a look and see if I have it correct?
?
Thanks!
--
===================================================================
Mike M


 

Steve,
?
Schematic added:
?
?
Also, I notice that the 2SK715 had four ranks for IDSS and the 2SK932 has two ranks for IDSS.? Any idea of which rank was used by Wellbrook?
?
Thanks again.
--
===================================================================
Mike M


 

Mine added too, derived separately, useful for comparison purposes.
?
?
?
On Sun, Jul 21, 2024 at 04:26 PM, Mike M wrote:

Schematic added:


 

开云体育

Hi Mike,

Yes, it appears your numbering matches with the proper phasing of the one-turn feedbacks. But RV1 is 100 ohms ("100R"), not 100 k ohms. That pot is set so both Source sides are the same voltage.

All the 2SK715s that Andrew Ikin used were of the highest Idss version, "W", from the Sanyo datasheet, in the 3 different ALA1530LNs that my group opened up and traced out.

Steve

On 7/21/2024 9:26 AM, Mike M via groups.io wrote:

Steve,
?
Schematic added:
?
?
Also, I notice that the 2SK715 had four ranks for IDSS and the 2SK932 has two ranks for IDSS.? Any idea of which rank was used by Wellbrook?
?
Thanks again.
--
===================================================================
Mike M


 

The phasing dots of the transformer are a key piece of information in the circuit diagram and crucial for proper functioning of the amplifier.
?
regards
Fred
?


 

开云体育

Thank you. I should note that my group opened and traced out 3 different ALA1530LNs and all had a single 82 pF cap across the two loop inputs. Apparently you had a variation if yours had two 82 pF? caps in series across the two loop inputs as your schematic shows (and the midpoint of them not going to common/ground either).

Steve

On 7/21/2024 9:58 AM, Martin - Southwest UK via groups.io wrote:

Mine added too, derived separately, useful for comparison purposes.
?
?
?
On Sun, Jul 21, 2024 at 04:26 PM, Mike M wrote:
Schematic added:


 

开云体育

Martin, on your schematic you've got the resistor feeding the 2 x 1N4148s as 500K, whereas Steve has it at 1K.

Should it have been 500R?

Mike - M0MLM


From: Martin - Southwest UK via groups.io [mailto:martin_ehrenfried@...]
Date: Sunday, 21 July 2024 at 5:58 pm
Subject: [loopantennas] Wellbrook traced-out loop amp schematics uploaded to Photos

Mine added too, derived separately, useful for comparison purposes.
?
?
?
On Sun, Jul 21, 2024 at 04:26 PM, Mike M wrote:
Schematic added:
_


 

Martin, just a remark, in your wire numbering scheme of the input transformer two wires of different windings carry the same number "4".
?
Regards
Fred


 

Hi Martin,
?
On your schematic, at the junction of C1 (82pF) and C2 (82pF) they need to be grounded, or it will oscillate.
?
Everett N4CY
?

In a message dated 7/21/2024 11:58:32 AM Central Daylight Time, martin_ehrenfried@... writes:
?

Mine added too, derived separately, useful for comparison purposes.
?
?
?
On Sun, Jul 21, 2024 at 04:26 PM, Mike M wrote:
Schematic added:


 

I asked Andrew Ikin one time if he could share what core he used in his preamps for the transformers. He told me he uses the Fair-Rite 2873000302, same as I've shown on my schematic. (Amidon "BN73-302"). That's what Everett and I always use too. Note this is a conductive core, and with the small gauge magnet wire needed for the transformers, it's easy to abrade the coating when winding, so the wire touches the core. You do not want any wire to touch the core--the circuit's IMD will severely degrade, particularly for the T2 output transformer. Use a multimeter set to ohms with one probe to the core and the other probe to any of the (stripped) wire ends--there should be infinite ohms, otherwise you need to rewind it and try again! We always use a thin Teflon tubing spacer when we wind the transformers so the wire doesn't abrade when winding. We buy it on eBay, from China. The proper size is "9L 3.0 x 3.4 mm". Here's one seller of it:

(I have no experience with the cores that Martin mentioned.)

Steve

On 7/21/2024 9:26 AM, Mike M via groups.io wrote:
Steve,
Schematic added:
/g/loopantennas/files/Wellbrook%20T1/schematic.pdf
Also, I notice that the 2SK715 had four ranks for IDSS and the 2SK932 has two ranks for IDSS.? Any idea of which rank was used by Wellbrook?
Thanks again.
--
===================================================================
Mike M


 

Martin,
?
Comparing your schematic to Steve's I see a few differences:
  • The secondary of T2 is directly connected to ground in Steve's and through capacitors in yours.
  • 1.2k to ground at the output.
  • As noted, 41pF instead of 82pF across loop.
  • As noted R4 is 500k instead of 1k.
  • R1 at input.
  • Extra ferrite beads.
I assume R1 is to bleed of static charge. What is R6 for?
?
Are all of the differences from tracing a different unit or are some things your own changes?
--
===================================================================
Mike M


 

Steve,
?
Thanks! Yes, that is an "R", not a "k" on the trimmer on closer inspection!
--
===================================================================
Mike M


 

Hi Mike,
?
On Sun, Jul 21, 2024 at 08:19 PM, Mike M wrote:
?
Comparing your schematic to Steve's I see a few differences:
?
  • The secondary of T2 is directly connected to ground in Steve's and through capacitors in yours.
That's how it was

  • 1.2k to ground at the output.
2.7K ? I don't know why it was there, but I double-checked when I saw it, and it was definitely present.

  • As noted, 41pF instead of 82pF across loop.
The input transformer was actually 3 + 3 turns centre tapped, but the tap wasn't connected to anything.

  • As noted, R4 is 500k instead of 1k
That is a mistake, the part was damaged during the reverse engineering process of boiling the assembly to remove the epoxy. I couldn't check with a multimeter as it had snapped in half, and the coloured bands were unclear. I assume it was actually a much lower value, and 1K or 500R is probably more likely.

  • R1 at input
Static bleed, as the loop is "floating" above ground. The input transformer centre tap was not grounded or connected to anything else.

  • Extra ferrite beads.
That's how it was

  • I assume R1 is to bleed of static charge. What is R6 for?
?
I have no idea why it was there. As the unit was hand made on stripboard, it may have been meant to be connected somewhere else in the circuit. Or maybe it's serving some other purpose during assembly and test ?
?
  • Are all of the differences from tracing a different unit or are some things your own changes?
I produced the circuit diagram directly from what I saw and measured in a faulty unit I had been given. I carefully picked the resin away from the circuit board after boiling it for an hour to soften the material.
?
The transformers were the most difficult part to understand, as the binocular cores were full of resin. I had to cut the windings and count the number of wire ends to determine the number of turns. I measured the resistance and reactance curves of the ferrite material using a VNA, and compared it with test windings on same sized cores using different materials. It was similar to 73 mix, but a closer fit to N30. The wire numbering in my diagram is incorrect, as there are two number 4's.
?
It could be that my unit was an earlier version, in comparison to the ones that others have taken apart, due to the "kitchen table" construction, slight differences and errors have probably crept into each build, and the design may also have "evolved" slightly over time.
?
I will revise the diagram and repost it to correct the mistakes.
?
Regards,
?
Martin


 

Hi Steve,
?
OK, if that's what Andrew said he used, I'll happily accept that.
?
The cores in mine were different to 73 mix, but he may have changed makes or suppliers over time, or perhaps more likely, Fair-Rite may have changed the formulation, as they have done with other mixes.
?
In the UK, it used to be quite difficult to get hold of different Ferrite materials, unless you bought directly and in quantity. Fair-Rite only became easily available a few decades ago, when the main distributors started stocking their product range.
?
?
On Sun, Jul 21, 2024 at 07:42 PM, Steve Ratzlaff wrote:

He told me he uses the Fair-Rite 2873000302