开云体育

Dear Fraser had a look and look at the specs I think there is a big clue in the gain as it is only 10 dB to me that indicates a David Norton Noiseless Amplifier and likely very close to what Dallas

CORRECTION..... it. OOOOPs, I forgot the url for Universal ! Here are some urls related to the DX-1 and a review :-) http://www.universal-radio.com/catalog/sw_ant/1246.html

Hello, This email message is a notification to let you know that a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the loopantennas group. File : /dx1.pdf Uploaded by : frasercastle

Ref the DX-One and "what is it" I see that Universal sell it so there web site gives a good view of it. I will upload the PDF instructions and specs to the files area for Group comment. Cheers Fraser

Hi All, A new question to ponder for the Group. I own an RF Systems DX-ONE Pro MKII and have tried to establish exactly what it is from the manufacturer.... they are staying silent :-( For those not

Click! (and save web page) The higher-resolution image obtained then zooms quite well in Irfanview - it looks a bit blue-fringed, like a slightly out-of-focus scan of a ballpoint pen original, but

Allegation of involvement in a conspiracy is not what I would call "civil" - more like "civil-actionable". How fortunate for Mr Ikin that he put his allegation into a private email and not publicly to

Patrick, I couldn't agree more :-) Fraser

Fraser <fraser.castle@...> wrote: Thanks for the information William. Having slept on this matter, and mellowed a little, I have the following personal comments.... Is it time to draw a line

<note from Moderator: Please, everyone remember to trim> ...big snippage... <Moderator...> to be The active dipole(s) referred to here can be found in the article "Some of my favorite small

and some other members are conspiring to breach Wellbrook Communications Copyright of one of its loop antenna designs. I must remind you that Wellbrook Communications owns the design Copyright and all

Thanks for the information William. Having slept on this matter, and mellowed a little, I have the following personal comments.... Is it time to draw a line under this copyright, IPR & Patent issue ?

I've just put my own Loop Preamp that I designed in 2006 in the Group's Photos section. It's a balanced preamp and is neither a Norton circuit nor a common-base circuit. I adapted it from an Ulrich

Good day all, I think the concept of the copyright and a patent are getting equal billing or confused here. A copyright is a form of protection for original works of authorship fixed in a tangible

Dave, Thanks for the input and advice Fraser

Andy's note seems appropriate to me. (It's called due dilgence.) Of course he is concerned...he designed the circuit and makes a living selling them. Whether one believes his work is copyright-able or

Thanks, it really never occured to me to click on the image (doh), but it indeed comes up large enough to (barely) make out the grainy diagram. (The power supply filter doesn't do as well.) (I was

I respectfully suggest you should try one of the Wellbrook antennas before expressing an opinion on how some other antenna would stack up against it. -- Jay

Hi All, I Have read and re read the veiled threat from Andy Ikin and it doesn't sit well with me. This is the first time a group to which I have belonged has been accused of attempting to commit an

--- In loopantennas@..., "Fraser" <fraser.castle@...> wrote: .... > I can understand Andy Irkins concern however. From what has been said, > Wellbrook is a very small business and we are