Locked
Re: Is this Wellbrook wide aperture loop faulty?
It is a good reference documents as it covers the majority of the design criteria for such an antenna. Interesting the performance of the final design is pretty close to that of the popular PA0RDT and
By
Martin - Southwest UK
·
#15686
·
|
Locked
Re: Is this Wellbrook wide aperture loop faulty?
Historically in the early days of coax, 50 Ohms was preferred for better power handling and 75 Ohms for lower loss. Over time 50 Ohms became the de-facto standard for transmitters and 75 Ohms for
By
Martin - Southwest UK
·
#15685
·
|
Locked
Re: Is this Wellbrook wide aperture loop faulty?
Hello Simon, Saturday, January 1, 2022 Who is Mary and will your wife mind, that is what I want to know? ;) Happy New Year. The divorce courts are backlogged so you will have time to hide some of the
By
Chris Wilson
·
#15683
·
|
Locked
Re: Is this Wellbrook wide aperture loop faulty?
Quote ¡°Whilst I realize there's no such thing as perfection in an imperfect world,¡± I beg to different..my Wife is allowing me to put up a top band 20m vertical with all its associated stuff, plus
By
Simon
·
#15682
·
|
Locked
EZNEC Antenna Simulation Software - FREE
The owner/developer (W7EL) of the well known EZNEC antenna analysis software has just retired and is now offering it for free to the amateur radio community. With this software you can simulate the
By
Roger Need
·
#15681
·
|
Locked
Re: Is this Wellbrook wide aperture loop faulty?
Hello Alan and Martin, Saturday, January 1, 2022 I should be able to give this a go tomorrow and will report back. Thanks. One downside of the loop's relocation and my making it a smaller
By
Chris Wilson
·
#15680
·
|
Locked
Re: Is this Wellbrook wide aperture loop faulty?
Hi Alan, OK, if this is problematic, then I'm not sure how the test I was thinking of can be achieved. My intention was to leave the loop in place with the ends shorted, so that the differential mode
By
Martin - Southwest UK
·
#15679
·
|
Locked
Re: Is this Wellbrook wide aperture loop faulty?
Martin As Andrew said shorting the input is not a good idea and will not do what you think it will. Leaving the terminals open will but you need to disconnect both terminals.? The amplifier is a
By
Alan
·
#15678
·
|
Locked
Re: Is this Wellbrook wide aperture loop faulty?
Hi Chris, Happy New Year. I managed to take a listen today, and it's pretty good, and certainly a lot more sensitive than it originally was. The signal levels seem correct and the noise floor is now
By
Martin - Southwest UK
·
#15677
·
|
Locked
Re: Is this Wellbrook wide aperture loop faulty?
Hi Larry, Yes that's a good cable. My main reason for suggesting 75 Ohm sat TV cable is that it's about the cheapest double screened coax that is readily available. But if you are really keen to use
By
Martin - Southwest UK
·
#15676
·
|
Locked
Re: Is this Wellbrook wide aperture loop faulty?
Hi Tomasz, I have standardised on using 'F' connectors on all cables that carry both DC and RF, as this helps prevent accidentally connecting cables with DC onto a receiver input. Sometimes I use
By
Martin - Southwest UK
·
#15675
·
|
Locked
Re: BOG Antenna Size Question
The optimal length for a BOG for 80 meters for good RDF is about 200 to 250 feet. if you are space limited, try a VE3DO loop. vertical dimension is about 10 feet and horizontal length is between 20 to
By
Mike Irizarry
·
#15673
·
|
Locked
Re: Is this Wellbrook wide aperture loop faulty?
Hello all, Just want to jump in regarding RG-58, etc... I highly recommend this double-shielded RG-58 substitute, https://messi.it/en/catalogue/50-ohm-cables-ham-radio/ultraflexibles/hyperflex-5.htm
By
Larry Davis
·
#15672
·
|
Locked
Re: Is this Wellbrook wide aperture loop faulty?
Good question But why not just use a 50r plug? Unless missing something here..obviously does not matter about the slight swr difference, just as long as 50r plug fits 75r cable. Simon
By
Simon
·
#15671
·
|
Locked
Re: Is this Wellbrook wide aperture loop faulty?
[email protected]> wrote: Hi Martin, What about connectors for these cables? AFAIK for TV cables they make mainly Fs and BNCs, out of which only the latter are of any use for our purposes (not too
By
Tomasz Lemiech <szpajder@...>
·
#15670
·
|
Locked
Re: Is this Wellbrook wide aperture loop faulty?
Hi Chris, That's excellent news, your perseverance has paid off, so well done for sticking with it. The downside is that your KiWi has now become more popular, so it's difficult to obtain an available
By
Martin - Southwest UK
·
#15668
·
|
Locked
Re: How to improve your rx capabilities in an urban area..( or any area)
Hi Simon, Try G3TXQ Don't worry, it happens to the best of us. Rather too often in my case........ Regards, Martin
By
Martin - Southwest UK
·
#15667
·
|
Locked
Re: How to improve your rx capabilities in an urban area..( or any area)
Hi Martin Opps how did i get that wrong!!!?? I was even looking at the filters at the time.. Apologies to g3tso, espically if still with us!! G3TSQ NOT G3TSO.. Sorry peoples ( getting old i guess)
By
Simon
·
#15666
·
|
Locked
Re: Is this Wellbrook wide aperture loop faulty?
Hello Martin, Alan, Andrew Ikin and all that contributed to this lengthy thread. Friday, December 31, 2021 Sincerest thanks to all, I moved the loop into the woods yesterday and today found 135 feet
By
Chris Wilson
·
#15665
·
|
Locked
Re: Is this Wellbrook wide aperture loop faulty?
For receive purposes there is really very little difference between the two. In practice neither the signal source (generator) or the receiver (load) are likely to be an exact 50 Ohm match, and in
By
Martin - Southwest UK
·
#15664
·
|