Keyboard Shortcuts
Likes
Search
Keying Relay Buffer Debate
开云体育My amp was new last week. It came with that version. Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone -------- Original message -------- From: "Al Womelsdorf via groups.io" <ahw609@...> Date: 7/12/20 9:09 PM (GMT-06:00) Subject: Re: [la1k] Keying Relay Buffer Debate Also as to the comment about my antenna, note that it is usually running through the HF-AUTO, which continuously shows a matched SWR of 1.1 or better, and never something like 1.8. And I use a direct connect cable from my FT-DX3000. I am rapidly loosing confidence in the so-called great support by Palstar. I wish I had the ability to put up a completely different antenna to try, but I do not. |
开云体育Its beta from Palstar. Not on their website as of yet. It didn’t make a difference for me so I think your fine with 1.05. ? From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Steve Shep
Sent: July 12, 2020 8:17 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [la1k] Keying Relay Buffer Debate ? My amp was new last week. It came with that version. ? ? ? Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone ? ? -------- Original message -------- From: "Al Womelsdorf via groups.io" <ahw609@...> Date: 7/12/20 9:09 PM (GMT-06:00) Subject: Re: [la1k] Keying Relay Buffer Debate ? I see some of you are running firmware 1.07b. How did you get that version? The latest version on the web site is 1.05k, which is what I have. |
开云体育Only write ? From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of davenlr@... ? Can you only write to the firmware chip, or can you download/backup the firmware and send it to another user? |
It's true that there is no need to institute a keying delay in this amp.? There are built in timers in the LA1K that prevent hot switching.?? Here's what happens... 1, Amp senses the keying line going to ground, (nothing happens, you may see "Wait" on the display) 2. At first sign of RF amp reads the frequency, switches to the appropriate Low Pass filter. 3. When it verifies filter selection it signals to close the T/R relay. 4. When T/R closure is verified, ONLY then does it allow RF to be applied to the devices. ?? This all happens in 8 to 15 milliseconds.? So applying an additional delay in the Xcvr only slows the process down.? There is excellent reason for keying delay to be built in to some radios since many amps out there do not employ such a sophisticated timing sequence and can be hot-switching all of the time. 73, Dennis N0SP On 7/11/2020 at 12:46 PM, mmang2758@... wrote:
Would like to get a discussion going on if it is necessary to use a Keying Relay Buffer when using the Palstar LA1K Amp. I called Palstar this week and talked with one of their technicians and told him I was planning on getting an LA1K amp in the near future.? I told him that I am using an Icom IC-7300. My question to the tech was do I need to use a Keying Buffer in between the LA1K and the IC-7300. |
开云体育Hi Dennis ... What you say is true if you operate CW with the transceiver in semi (vox-type) break-in mode where the relays are held closed throughout the duration of the transmission. ?It is not true if you operate the transceiver in full QSK break-in mode where the relays need to close during element/character transmission but need to open inbetween them. ? In this case an external electronic T/R switch is mandatory unless you want an early demise to your amp’s relays. As clearly stated in the operating manual, the LA-1K is not designed to be a QSK-capable amp. 73, Kent ?K9ZTV On Jul 13, 2020, at 7:34 AM, Dennis via <pegasus9000@...> wrote:
|
Chuck Scott
Al and All:
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Related to this... I had an issue during Field Day this week. The net result of my testing shows that the problems were external to the Palstar equipment (HF-AUTO, LA-1K), but the symptoms were as many have been reporting. For reference, I ran the HF-AUTO in BYPASS mode for the event but stuck to frequencies and antennas that are, or should be, within spec for the LA-1K. This leads me to believe that my LA-1K is properly reporting SWR events and that I do have some kind of issue with the cabling to my PRO-67B antenna. That's not a surprise because I last reworked that about 15 years ago and at that time had not fully converted to a more reliable solder/crimp approach to the connectors. Everything I've done since taking that approach has proven to be highly reliable. I think the problem is that the LA-1K can see these SWR events and properly acts on them, but as we've seen it doesn't always display them. The video posted a while ago is a good example where there was only one frame or two in the video where the LA-1K was showing a high SWR, but you'd never know that if you watched the video at normal speed. My events are similar but they never happen with my dummy load selected at the output of the HF-AUTO -- only when it's feeding one of my antennas. (OK, perhaps a contact in the HF-AUTO, but I'm not convinced of that.) So on a test bench the Amp and Tuner would probably test fine, but the lack of more information on what it sees in normal operation could be the real problem. Just about every other piece of equipment I've used in the past might just cruise through such short transient events and I wouldn't have a clue there was even a problem. Perhaps the LA-1K is simply much better, perhaps too good, at detecting these events. Personally I'd like to see if they do happen. So, is it possible that many Hams do have short SWR events at higher power that we've all ignored in the past? Should we continue to ignore them or should the equipment get much better at reporting them? The LA-1K might be able to give us more information and make a better decision regarding what constitutes a "trip" event. Or, perhaps it's doing the right thing and we just need to get better about our RF plumbing. Personally, I'd like to know and deal with it rather than simply press on with ignorance. Chuck - N8DNX On 7/12/2020 1:17 PM, Al Womelsdorf via groups.io wrote:
Interesting. I am also having the same bypass issue, but only when I am using fldigi to send some message. 80m is the worst example, and is totally useless. In addition I am using the HF-AUTO tuner, which is always showing an SWR in the range 1.05 to 1.1, and the amp is showing SWR in the range of 1.2 to 1.3 when things are working correctly, but it does jump up to 1.8 and then instantly goes into bypass mode. Major PITA. Discussions with Mark did not elicit any comments about this being a known problem, basically stated it had something to do with my antenna, but I could always send the units in to be checked out. Also I tried adding a Palomar (?) choke balun to see if that helped (I already have a loop of coax at the antenna and many beads at both ends) and that made no difference other than to increase my normal SWR about .02 or so. Tried skipping the HF-AUTO and my antenna is natively about 1.6, and it still kicks out. |
开云体育Hi Kent, ? I never represented the amp as being suitable for full QSK. Very unwise to do so.? As long as the TX key line remains grounded once RF is first applied the relays dont release and there is no delay or relay clattering..? Only when the key line becomes ungrounded does the process start again. Dennis Sent from my T-Mobile 4G LTE Device -------- Original message -------- From: "Kent Trimble, K9ZTV" <k9ztv@...> Date: 7/13/20 08:26 (GMT-07:00) Subject: Re: [la1k] Keying Relay Buffer Debate Hi Dennis ... What you say is true if you operate CW with the transceiver in semi (vox-type) break-in mode where the relays are held closed throughout the duration of the transmission. ?It is not true if you operate the transceiver in full QSK break-in mode where the relays need to close during element/character transmission but need to open inbetween them. ? In this case an external electronic T/R switch is mandatory unless you want an early demise to your amp’s relays. As clearly stated in the operating manual, the LA-1K is not designed to be a QSK-capable amp. 73, Kent ?K9ZTV
|
I can agree with you Chuck that it is possible for the amp to be responding to antenna issues, and it would be great to know what they are so we can all fix them at our sites. That being said, I wonder if there is some commonality of our antennas. I am using a MyAntenna end fed long wire of about 125 feet. What are others using? I am especially curious if anyone is seeing this issue with a naturally resonant well tuned dipole configuration? Also I wonder why this event is coming back through my HF-AUTO? If I had the antenna connected directly to the amp (which I have tried and also fails) it would be more understandable. All we can do is keep investigating. I think my next step will be to try using my current wire at one of it's resonant points (based on my RigExpert 600), and then put up some form of simple dipole to test with.
Also of note - I had a nice call with my HRO technical support guy (who is great!!), and he has very good access to Palstar people. He did not get any silver bullets from Paul on this item, but he did get a commitment to have the web site updated with the latest version of the firmware when Mark gets back Wednesday (?), so we can all use the same version and eliminate any possible differences based on that. I think it is important to be using the current firmware whenever I am trying to resolve an issue. I believe I have mentioned it before, but I am not doing CW, but rather one of the digital modes from fldigi. I have the levels set up so there is NO ALC indications on my rig ever, and I am providing about 5W of drive to get about 100W out of the amp. It will sometimes fail by just using the tune feature, which simply puts an audio tone out to trigger things like tuning? ;-} and it will fail on termination of the transmission. In the case of a real message it fails during the message after about 5 to 10 seconds most of the time. |
Chuck Scott
开云体育Al: I was using my Mosley PRO67B beam for field day since I was running 1D due to being restricted in my travels this year for chemo treatment. The antenna normally works fine and I don't notice any issues with it or the feed lines. That said, I did run 100+ SSB contacts in some 40 minutes before I started to run out of steam. It was later in that run that some issues started to crop up. Normally when I'm just casually chasing DX I use the HF-Auto App
and let the tuner pick stored settings or go to bypass on it's own
based on band, antenna, and frequency. I generally don't notice
anything when I'm doing that. Not generating a lot of heat that
way though. For field day I was running the tuner in bypass and
staying on frequencies the antenna should be fine with. My RF plumbing from the tuner goes through a power sensor for a
MeterBuilder MB-1 (another piece of equipment that is pretty fast
to detect SWR spikes) and when I did take a look at it I was
seeing some odd spikes there at times, which again indicates there
was something going on outside of the Palstar equipment. After
that it goes through my ground panel and protector, then a run up
to the top of the tower and finally a short ultra-flex jumper to
the antenna. When I changed it to go straight from the amp to the
line coming from the tower without the tuner I of course saw less
indication of a problem till the amp tripped. So I would have to say that in my case there must be an issue with cables or connectors of so sort. The cable is all LMR-400 or LMR-400 UltraFlex. Those all had standard solder/clamp connectors (as I mentioned) and I've since become less than convinced of their reliability. Since moving most things to solder (center pin) / crimp (shield) there seems to be better reliability, but the cabling to the PRO67B beam hasn't been upgraded for that yet.? If things go well with chemo this time around I'll probably do that this fall. Having said all of that, the symptoms at the HF-AUTO and LA-1K are still similar to those that have otherwise been reported except that I have other equipment giving me a bit more information, like the MB-1. In other words, I know something is going on, but it's so fast that I don't generally see it at the amp when it trips. What kinds of things that might show this kind of fast SWR spike on the transmission lines and antennas is probably a good thing for discussion and I'm sure there's quite a list of possibilities. I also do have a folded dipole I use, but I run that at lower power and don't think I've ever seen any such issues using that. One comment about "end fed long wire" antennas. First of there
isn't really such a thing as an "end-fed" antenna when you get
down to it. Most of the time the end-fed is really balanced
against transmission line, a ground stake, or counterpoise wire,
or some such thing. However, there can be some really high Z
points where things might be supported at certain frequencies,
particularly if it's running as a 1/2 wave. At that point, high
voltage discharges might not be a surprise. Chuck - N8DNX
On 7/13/2020 3:51 PM, Al Womelsdorf via
groups.io wrote:
I can agree with you Chuck that it is possible for the amp to be responding to antenna issues, and it would be great to know what they are so we can all fix them at our sites. That being said, I wonder if there is some commonality of our antennas. I am using a MyAntenna end fed long wire of about 125 feet. What are others using? I am especially curious if anyone is seeing this issue with a naturally resonant well tuned dipole configuration? Also I wonder why this event is coming back through my HF-AUTO? If I had the antenna connected directly to the amp (which I have tried and also fails) it would be more understandable. All we can do is keep investigating. I think my next step will be to try using my current wire at one of it's resonant points (based on my RigExpert 600), and then put up some form of simple dipole to test with. |
What are you using as a protector? ?A month or so ago the group found that PolyPhaser arrestors have issues with SWR spikes that Alpha Delta arrestors dont. Bill Grover, N3EYF
|
Chuck Scott
开云体育Bill: I am using a Polyphaser. They work fine if they are selected for
the proper frequency and power range. There also needs to be
consideration for the amount of SWR that is expected on the line
since higher SWR translates to higher voltage peaks. The reason some protectors don't have problems is that they may
not be sensitive enough to protect at the needed level. As with
many things, it's a trade-off that you make when you select one.
There's other protector manufacturers that do a great job and lots
that are useless. Stay away from any that can't give you proper
specifications. That of course doesn't mean that a properly selected protector can't be having problems either from previous hits, moisture, or otherwise. I need to pull mine and service it. You can get parts for the Polyphasers. Chuck - N8DNX
On 7/13/2020 6:20 PM, Bill Grover
wrote:
|