开云体育

When I simulate the circuit using KiCAD V7.99, it is successful. However, when I export the netlist file and simulate it using the ngspice, the simulation fails. Steps for ngspice simulation: 1.

When I simulate the circuit using KiCAD V7.99, it is successful. However, when I export the netlist file and simulate it using the ngspice, the simulation fails. Steps for ngspice simulation: 1.

I just received an email from groups.io to say that, because one of their servers had been labelled as a spam sender by anti-spam service spamhaus, some members of the group will have to reverify

And also use this 50 mil grid when building new components, otherwise, the same "error" will occur.

Thank you Steve! After finding this alignment tool I updated my grid settings to 0.05" and realigned everything. It was set one step smaller. I don't seem to have lost any connections when doing this

Please check your grid settings (View menu -> Grid Properties). I recommend using 0.05 inches (1.27 mm) because the components in the libraries are all aligned on that grid. If you have it set very

Thank you Tony (and the others of course!) How could I miss that option? I really looked for something similar... Anyway, now I'm back on track again :o)

Select everything on the schematic. Place cursor over an object, Right-click > Align elements to grid. -- Regards, Tony

When I used to use Cadence Capture two things could cause this... * The first was if you changed snap to grid to free form... * The other was if you used a very small grid and switched from mils to

Never noticed that behaviour. Maybe have a look at the source file to see if the coordinates of all components are off grid? Or maybe there is a (accidental) keyboard shortcut to set the grid to a

I have a reoccurring problem. From time to time all components and wires are slightly displaced on the grid making attaching new wires to the pins impossible without realigning everything one

Interesting Steve, although it is now way past being even historical, but when did this higher voltage version become available? My unpleasant run-in with it was in the latter half of the 90's and

If you are trying to drive I2C over long distances, consider using a PCA9600 on each end of the run.? It is a lot harder to blow up than some other buffer chips (e.g. PCA9617).? You can also use

Unless you're getting your board made in Joe's workshop under the railway arches, you shouldn't need to worry about the manufacturability of boards with 0.2mm tracks. They're routinely used in PC

Tell that to a now defunct maker of a quite expensive device used to synchronize a satellite signal which may have doppler effects from the satellite drifting around in its orbital "box" that takes

This is all going very off-topic, but I understand the main problem is ending up with edges on the I2C bus that have an RC time constant that is too slow, so one needs to drop the pull-up resistance,

Yeah, but if you have a 'transmission line' you would avoid needing to vary the track width or doing other things to create impedance bumps. And using I2C to go 40-50 feet is taking it way beyond

On 1/11/24 13:52, Alan Pearce via groups.io wrote: > I wouldn't have thought you would need to treat I2C lines as > transmission lines, the data rate is quite slow (even at high speed > I2C you are

Sorry Gene, I was attempting to start a new discussion. Is there more context required? I'll expand a bit more in case that's helpful. If you are not familiar with the "MicroMod" system it combines a