Keyboard Shortcuts
Likes
- Kicad-Users
- Messages
Search
Re: Mounting hole problem
开云体育Yes, you did, and I am grateful for all help, but you wrote this: Just add them to the schematic as symbols, as others have
said.? So, with the Schematic screen open, I look for symbols for
mounting holes and I don't find them. Do you see that there is a
single crucial piece of data missing? I'm beginning to deduce that
they have to be added as pads, but until just now, I think that
no-one has said so explicitly, and there is still a question
whether that's the best, or the only, way to do it. On 2024-08-30 18:51, Robert via
groups.io wrote:
I answered that in my email sent at 11:50 ... and I've answered it -- OOO - Own Opinions Only Best Wishes John Woodgate Keep trying |
Re: Mounting hole problem
I answered that in my email sent at 11:50 ... and I've answered it
before, not so long ago. Additionally there may also be special symbols in one of the supplied symbol libraries, but I stopped using those long ago. Regards, Robert. * Plain text email - safe, readable, inclusive. * On 30/08/2024 18:43, John Woodgate via groups.io wrote: But how do you add mounting holes to a schematic? It seems impossible to-- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com |
Re: Mounting hole problem
开云体育I always use pads with cooper. The pads may be connected to a net or not.Regards, Jean-Paul Site : Le 2024-08-30 à 19:43, John Woodgate a
écrit?:
|
Re: Mounting hole problem
开云体育But how do you add mounting holes to a
schematic? It seems impossible to get to a Mounting hole library
from the Schematic screen. Do they have to be added as pads,
adjusted to have no copper? On 2024-08-30 18:11, Alan Pearce via
groups.io wrote:
As you say, screws should be on the BOM, and the way to do this is add them to the schematic as mechanical parts, which have a footprint of a mounting hole. The mounting hole then gets automatically added to the footprints in the layout. -- OOO - Own Opinions Only Best Wishes John Woodgate Keep trying |
Re: Mounting hole problem
开云体育Unfortunately, the REF** is only a symptom of
the real problem. On 2024-08-30 18:19, Brian via
groups.io wrote:
-- OOO - Own Opinions Only Best Wishes John Woodgate Keep trying |
Re: Searching for an existing footprint
Cherrytree leaves everything else standing IMHO
You don't have to "tag" anything Just one tree pane and the rest is open for the work. You can search the entire tree or just nodes. Searching the entire tree is where things get slow if the file is big Which is why I would like to have separate notebooks on different tabs. It looks a bit dated old fashioned in it's interface but it works. It also has basic programming interfaces not something I use, but the ability to cut and paste text and images is very good. You can export nodes to text, html and pdf. Another big advantage is that it's all local, no fancy cloud setups or whatever. I've been using it for many years, and never found anything better. (despite looking every so often) Available for both Linux , mac and windows. Worth looking at if you are not happy with your current notebook system. Click on "stable" for the downloads. Andy On Fri, 30 Aug 2024 12:35:18 -0400 "John Hudak" <jjhudak@...> wrote: Yes note taking cannot be overstated. Never heard of Cherrytree...how does |
Re: Mounting hole problem
"But I see no way of changing the 'REF**' text for the mounting holes in the PCB."
"So you need to click on the component properties, and uncheck the "visible" flag on the "reference" field."
?
If it helps any, another way to switch the 'REF**'? 'visible' flag to 'off' is to hit 'Delete' after clicking on it.? Most projects do not need a RefDes label on the silk for mounting holes- especially if you are already tight for space.
?
Kind regards,
Brian |
Re: Mounting hole problem
As you say, screws should be on the BOM, and the way to do this is add them to the schematic as mechanical parts, which have a footprint of a mounting hole. The mounting hole then gets automatically added to the footprints in the layout. On Fri, 30 Aug 2024 at 06:03, dvalin via <dvalin=[email protected]> wrote:
|
Re: Searching for an existing footprint
Yes note taking cannot be overstated.? Never heard of Cherrytree...how does it compare to Joplin? On Fri, Aug 30, 2024 at 10:24?AM Andy via <andygio=[email protected]> wrote: On Fri, 30 Aug 2024 05:33:56 +0000 |
Re: Searching for an existing footprint
On Fri, 30 Aug 2024 05:33:56 +0000
"dvalin via groups.io" <dvalin@...> wrote: On 24.08.24 16:07, Andy wrote:I use cherrytree as a notebook system Nearly 60Mb now. Getting so big thatRecord the steps -? no one does that :-)It can be sanity-preserving. In 30 years of embedded development, I made in some cases cherrytree can't really cope but it's about the only thing out there that works well enough for me. The are 637 nodes each node can be many pages long What it needs is a way to split things down into separate notebooks in their own tab, that is a often requested feature, but not implemented as yet. All of the other notebooks I've looked at seem to think that "markdown" is what everyone wants. When I've tried them they turn out to be so convoluted that I have to give up on them. Andy |
Re: Mounting hole problem
开云体育In a distant past, I used two separate masses/grounds, which is easy in Kicad. But it's been a long time since I used only one.Regards, Jean-Paul
Site : Le 2024-08-30 à 14:11, Robert via
groups.io a écrit?:
Just a warning to remember to take into account creepage distance when |
Re: Mounting hole problem
开云体育I don't agree with that, and I am involved in
safety standards. Even if signal ground jumps to a high voltage
due to a fault, the metal case is connected to chassis ground,
which (in Class 1 equipment) is connected to the building safety
ground. There is no electric shock hazard. If something has a
metal case, it should be either Class 1 or Class 3 (powered by
extra-low voltage). Class 2 ('double insulated') boxes should be
non-conducting, even if they require an internal conductive
coating or an internal foil shield for EMC reasons. On 2024-08-30 13:11, Robert via
groups.io wrote:
For example, typically on the -- OOO - Own Opinions Only Best Wishes John Woodgate Keep trying |
Re: Mounting hole problem
Just a warning to remember to take into account creepage distance when
you have chassis ground on board. In other words, the distance between chassis ground and all the other copper is typically greater than the spacing used generally in order to maintain safety during faults (and therefore electrical safety testing). For example, typically on the boards I design I use 0.2 mm spacing, but with chassis ground (when present) I make the spacing 0.85 mm. That way, if the internal circuitry suddenly finds itself at a high voltage relative to chassis ground during a fault, anyone touching the metal casing at the time wont have their socks blown off. Now in some respects having bolt holes connected to chassis ground in the schematic will help you here, because in the board layout you just make the chassis ground track spacing the relevant amount (in my case 0.85 mm), and Kicad does the rest. However, there is a gotcha. I've not found a way to tell Kicad to maintain a safe distance /through/ the board. That means one has to manually maintain the distance between chassis ground and the layers beneath it ... and that's really easy to screw up. Does anyone know a way to automate that? Regards, Robert. * Plain text email - safe, readable, inclusive. * -- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com |
Re: Mounting hole problem
开云体育Merci. On 2024-08-30 12:50, jpgendner via
groups.io wrote:
Exemple of how I do in schematic. Trou_fixation = Mounting hole. -- OOO - Own Opinions Only Best Wishes John Woodgate Keep trying |
Re: Mounting hole problem
开云体育Exemple of how I do in schematic. Trou_fixation = Mounting hole.Regards, Jean-Paul
Site : Le 2024-08-30 à 13:14, John Woodgate a
écrit?:
|
Re: Mounting hole problem
开云体育Thank you. Yes, I do need to ground two of the
mounting holes. These things are simple when you know how, but
not if you don't. There are several steps to get exactly right. On 2024-08-30 11:50, Robert via
groups.io wrote:
Kicad has always understood mounting holes, and it really is very -- OOO - Own Opinions Only Best Wishes John Woodgate Keep trying |
Re: Mounting hole problem
Kicad has always understood mounting holes, and it really is very
simple. Just add them to the schematic as symbols, as others have said. It's always been possible to make your own symbols, or make use of something out of the supplied libraries such as a single pin connector symbol. If you want them to relate to specific screws, put the part number for the screw in the Value field of the schematic symbol, and the relevant hole in the Footprint field (eg M3-HOLE). Now when you export the BOM, it will be complete with part numbers for the screws. Note that by placing mounting holes in the schematic, you can optionally connect them electrically to something, such as chassis ground (filtering components are often connected to chassis ground rather than signal ground). The schematic is very much the place to have the mounting holes defined. Regards, Robert. * Plain text email - safe, readable, inclusive. * -- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com |
Re: Searching for an existing footprint
On 24.08.24 16:07, Andy wrote: > Record the steps -? no one does that :-) It can be sanity-preserving. In 30 years of embedded development, I made 460 pages of notes in Vim, folded to a single TOC page, expanding and searchable, with keywords for quicker hits. After a few decades, it can be hard to remember long unused command-line option details, and self discovered good stuff. (And now, after diversion to do a 3-year rural owner-build, an 18 month in-town pre-sale renovation, and a DIY 27 kW/ 46 kWh off-grid solar design & installer supervision, I couldn't remember any Kicad keyboard shortcuts learnt in initial experiments.) > The footprints library, providing you are talking about YOUR personal > footprints library then yes put it anywhere. ... Many thanks for the suggested steps. (I'll record them once I've made the workflow work for me. ;-) Erik (At age 70, notes are good, but need to be written before you forget.) |
Re: Mounting hole problem
On 28.08.24 19:26, John Woodgate wrote: > I'm in trouble again. I added four mounting holes to my board and the come > with? text 'REF**'. Update PCB describes them as 'unused' and proposes to > delete them, which is obviously wrong. I can't find a way to change REF** to > something else. Please advise. While I'm still transitioning from Eagle, I found similar nonsense in Kicad 5, so I just deleted them and used vias instead. It was trivial to set the drill to 3.2 mm, and diameter to 3.8 mm. Fixed. The two designs went out to Seeed a few hours ago. A bit of plating isn't going to hurt the mounting screws a great deal, I figure. Nevertheless, I'll update to the latest Kicad when my new PC arrives. Having Kicad understand mounting holes is a most welcome improvement. Screws could be included in the BOM, but holes cannot be a schematic component, I assert - they are only a drill datum, with no circuit function at all. Kicad seems about 5 times easier to learn than Eagle was in its day, but I do rely on google & YT, rather than the documentation. I fail to find most answers in that. So I make short-form notes in Vim, so they're searchable. Erik (Eagerly awaiting my first Kicad boards in the flesh.) |