Keyboard Shortcuts
Likes
- Kicad-Users
- Messages
Search
Re: Sharing a KiCad project with a friend
The -cache.lib file should have local copies of the component resources.? That'll be referenced in your schematic, and should be in the same directory (no path).
The .net file doesn't need to be shared - that can be regenerated from the schematic by the user (and in 5.x seems unneeded for use WITHIN KiCAD ecosystem - someone else can confirm). If you have an fp-lib-table or fp-info-cache, and sym-lib-table files, those will generally have local paths in them - best to define a variable for those, and mention it in the readme. Out of curiosity - why is the PCB so large? |
Re: Sharing a KiCad project with a friend
Greetings KiCad Gurus,
I have uploaded KiCad 5.0.2 files to GitHub at: These files are for a Capacitive Touch Key (Morse code). I do not know if these files (SCH & PCB) can be used by another person? It seems that some of the files contain a $PATH to files that are on my PC hard drive. The Gerbers can be used. Here is a short video clip of a newly soldered and wired OSH Park PCB being used: So is what I have uploaded to GiHub sufficient to share this project with a friend? If anyone tries these files, what problems are you having trying to view the project? What suggestions can be made for doing this better? Am I even asking the right questions? Thanks in advance. KM4NFQ |
Re: Fuses
This sort of thing has come up in the past.
BOM's are a very specialised and complex application, and companies pay a lot of money for them as they usually integrate stock control as well. What is within kicad is useful, but it's very far from the needs of any real production. The best thing to do is to ensure that each component has a unique identifier, that matches whatever production system you use, and then extract that from the kicad BOM, feed it into a database or other system that will expand it into a comprehensive component list. e.g. your fuse could be part number 1234, feed that into a database and it will spit out 2 x clips, 1 x fuse. Getting down to this sort of level takes a lot of work and care. Andy On Thu, 26 Dec 2019 14:11:28 -0500 "Mac" <macdroid53@...> wrote: Thanks. |
Re: Fuses
Thanks. Yeah I saw the symbol and that's fine. The footprint though, is for a leaded through hole fuse. In this case I would like 2 clips and a cartridge fuse to show up in the BOM. I created a symbol for?the clip and a footprint and a step model. I also created a step model for the fuse and selected it when assigning footprints. Not sure that's the best way...but, it appears to work. On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 9:20 PM Andy Eskelson <andygio@...> wrote: On Mon, 23 Dec 2019 10:21:12 -0500 |
Re: Best way to reuse layout or approximate a hierarchical layout capability
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýThanks for the pointer. This looks like an excellent plug-in, though I haven't yet had a chance to dig to far into it.Regards Doug On 12/24/2019 1:01 AM, grauseba via
Groups.Io wrote:
|
Re: ex-pCad dos 5v2
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýHi? ? R on the keyboard?? moves the part ?90 degrees . You can open the symbol? in the symbol editor and make a version the way you like it for example? this symbol? puts + on the bottom and negative? on the top Guess how I had the? voltages? in my sch? before I checked it? ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ? for me 4 needs to be on top 11 on the bottom ?one ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ????????????????????????????????????? ? ? In my case I can just mirror top to bottom but I just moves gnd? and 3.3v I advise not to do it or save it in a lib with a different name and a different part name ?that way you will not mess any circuit using the original symbol. I do not know if you can local edit the part but? that? also can cause? problems . If you update the sheet? of add a second part to avoid. I have a moto murphy was a optimist so work correct ways when designing can save you from unintentional? damage ? Arie ? ? ? From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of barry sandeman ? HI all, |
Re: Best way to reuse layout or approximate a hierarchical layout capability
I use this 3rd party Action plug in, that does exactly what you want:? The only thing to remember is, that you'll have to design the schematics with reuse in mind. But that seems a fairly good thing to do anyways.? Doug McKnight <doug@...> schrieb am Di., 24. Dez. 2019, 03:24: Hi, |
Re: Where did all the libraries go?
If you really get stuck and the other suggestions don't work, there is
normally a couple of cache files in the project directory of all the symbols you have used. You can extract these and get things working from there. I also make very sure that kicad points ONLY to my own set of libs. I usually delete all of the paths in the table and replace them with my own. That has kept the temper in check so often... Andy On Mon, 23 Dec 2019 16:59:43 +0000 "Rob Frohne" <rob.frohne@...> wrote: Hi All, |
Best way to reuse layout or approximate a hierarchical layout capability
Hi,
I have a vague recollection that this is planned for the future, but I would love to have some type of hierarchical layout capability. For instance, I have an output driver that is replicated 6 times. The hierarchical schematic is perfect for this sort of task, and a tweak to the design is faithfully replicated among all the "instances". For layout, I have an evil hack that I've used which is to lay out one of the blocks, then move the components out of the way with "exact move" then "array" the wires to duplicate them, then "exact move" the components back and move the rest of the rats-nest components onto the copied wires. That approach does save some time, but any changes need to be made to each copy. What's the best way to achieve something closer to true hierarchical layout? A related problem is how to reuse nice chunks of layout. For example, I have a nice power supply design that I'd like to reuse. I can get the schematic into the hierarchical schematic by selecting the correct file name when I create a hierarchical schematic sheet, but how can I "drop in" the appropriate chunk of layout? Thanks for any suggestions, Doug |
Re: Fuses
On Mon, 23 Dec 2019 10:21:12 -0500
"Mac" <macdroid53@...> wrote: Hi,symbol is in device / fuse (there are several types there) the footprint, I guess you will have to modify an existing footprint Fuse / sunfuse 6hp looks a good starting point. Andy I'm guessing I just don't know what to call it? |
Re: Where did all the libraries go?
As well as what Pedro said, I would recommend copying any library files you use from the github (or whatever repository) location into your own space. This prevents others' "updates" or "fixes" to the repository from breaking your project!
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Donald. -- *Plain Text* email -- it's an accessibility issue () no proprietary attachments; no html mail /\ <> On 2019-12-23 11:59 a.m., Rob Frohne wrote:
Hi All, |
Re: Where did all the libraries go?
Hi Rob,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Using Ubuntu matters. Ubuntu has independent packages for the application and the libraries. For example, I have installed the application but not the libraries. I download the libraries from github and keep them in my home disk. There are 2 ways to solve your problem. 1. Download the official libraries from github and make your projects point to these libraries. Use Manage symbol libraries or Manage footprint libraries from the menu. 2. Install the libraries from the ppa with apt-get, synaptic, etc. There is a third possibility: the libraries are installed but on a different directory. In this case you must change the paths on the library tables. In any case I recommend to install the last stable v5.1.5 Cheers. Pedro. El 23/12/19 a las 17:59, Rob Frohne escribi¨®:
Hi All, |
Where did all the libraries go?
Hi All,
I went to open an old project built in kicad 5 last year about this time, and when I open the schematic I get an incredibly long string of "Library /usr/share/kicad/library/... not found"? Use the Manage Symbol Libraries dialog to fix the path (or remove the library).? Sure enough if I look for the missing library in /usr/share/kicad/library/ it is not there.? When I want to add a power to my schematic, there are none there except my local ones. I'm not sure, but I suspect that the libraries are getting updated or something and leaving my year old project in the dust.? What is the best way to solve my problem?? I'm using ubuntu if it matters. Thanks, Rob -- Rob Frohne, Ph.D. P.E. E. F. Cross School of Engineering Walla Walla University 100 SW 4th Street College Place, WA 99362 (509) 527-2075 |
documentation & footprint fields default parameters
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýThe footprint and the documentation fields are visible per
default in the libs, does someone know how to edit a group (or
all) of the symbols contained in an eeschema sheet, hierarchical
or flat to toggle the visibility (or more i.e; character size,
...) ? The embedded tool "Edit Symbol Fields" doesn't allow to
touch the fields parameters besides their contents. |
Re: Cloning Projects
I agree with Andy regarding a "copy project"? command. (Or a 'save as'). I went through all this with MPLAB years ago and it was a huge amount of trouble for everybody until they implemented such a command. Solving the problem with yet more software archival tools seems like overkill to my naive mind.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Being able to make copies of projects for a host of reasons is very fundamental and I was quite surprised that it did not exist. Isnt' that after all the whole purpose of "computer aided" design as opposed to using paper and pencil?? I am a new user and within a week I already have 5 boards laid out here that fit various sensors but are about 90% very similar. It is laborious to redraft all 50 parts of each one just to make incremental changes to fit various situations. Thanks for all the attention to this- Fritz On 12/17/2019 12:51 PM, Andy Eskelson wrote:
Mmm.. when I tested.. |
Re: eeschema: flip command confusing
Huh, that's interesting. I don't have a strong opinion but I actually like the long name. It's completely clear and not at all confusing to me. To me, "Flip Horizontally" isn't 100% clear, but I don't really care because if it didn't do what I wanted, I would just "undo" and do the other one.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Regards Doug On 12/18/2019 2:01 PM, Simon Claessen wrote:
Hi All. |
eeschema: flip command confusing
Hi All.
I opened a bug report about the naming of the flip command in eeschema. I find it confusing that a Flip Horizontally is named the very long and confusing "Flip around Vertical (y) axis". If you feel the same, please add a comment on that report. Up till now I got a rather negative response about the technical correctness of the command name. -- Met vriendelijke Groet, Simon Claessen drukknop.nl |