Re: Ground strap
Hi Andy
Thank you, will try in morning. Let you know how I get on.
I'm in Cape town
Barry
By
barry sandeman
·
#23530
·
|
Re: Ground strap
It's generally a pain to do things without a schematic, especially as it
takes so little time to draw up a circuit to keep the
system happy.
If you want to do so then, turn off all DRC functions and
By
Andy
·
#23529
·
|
Re: Ground strap
Hi All, retired 72 young grew up with pCad 5 For dos?
Is it possible to manually enter a ratsnest to start a PCB without a
schematic?
PS kicad by
Thanks
Barry
By
barry sandeman
·
#23528
·
|
Re: Ground strap
Hi
Don't reinvent the wheel.
There are "net-tie" libraries for Kicad.
If you can't find it your installation you can try this one: https://kicad.github.io/footprints/NetTie
HIH
Best
By
Jorge Ferreira
·
#23527
·
|
Re: Ground strap
First, if folks haven't checked docs.kicad.org recently, I recommend doing
so. The net tie thing isn't documented there, but many other things that I
commonly see people asking about on forums
By
Jon Evans
·
#23526
·
|
Re: Ground strap
I understand how hacks/workarounds get implemented. Unfortunatly it is harder for users to find them.
Glad to hear that documentation is getting attention. My biggest trouble with a lot of open
By
Dan Kemppainen
·
#23525
·
|
Re: KiCad 4.0.7 does not have a release file error
I agree with the VM recommendation. KiCad does an amazingly good job of opening older files, but there can be some discrepancies.
Here are screenshots of the gerbers of a design that was originally
By
Steven A. Falco
·
#23524
·
|
Re: Ground strap
At the moment, some of these features are only discoverable by asking how
to do a certain thing in a community of other users (or seeing it done on a
forum post / video / etc). We definitely need
By
Jon Evans
·
#23523
·
|
Re: Ground strap
Thanks. I didn't know about this feature, but I tried it in 6.0.9, and it does work.
The other method of a "Common" net class with a zero clearance rule I described in another message also works and
By
Tony Casey
·
#23522
·
|
Re: Ground strap
It's always worth checking the Gerbers. Best is if you use a viewer that is unrelated to the layout program you're using.
By
Tony Casey
·
#23521
·
|
Re: Ground strap
Thanks, that is exactly what I needed.
By
russ95462
·
#23520
·
|
Re: Ground strap
This appears to be? the field you need.
By
russ95462
·
#23519
·
|
Re: Ground strap
So, for someone with zero KiCad experience, how do you learn of:
...adding the keywords "net tie"...
There are some subtle features/settings that are hard to pickup. How do you get up to speed with
By
Dan Kemppainen
·
#23517
·
|
Re: Ground strap
You haven't stated what problem you actually had, but what I suspect happened is that one of the zones didn't connect to one of the pads of your net-tie "frigged component". This is perfectly
By
Tony Casey
·
#23516
·
|
Re: Ground strap
The "net tie" KiCad feature is how you make a footprint that shorts two
nets without the DRC complaining.
In stable KiCad, you create one by adding the keywords "net tie" at the
start of the keywords
By
Jon Evans
·
#23515
·
|
Re: Ground strap
Not so much being uncritical as unhelpful!. DRC checks should have picked it up I had about ten different boards for hobby use, double sided, and its just not worth looking at gerber files manually
By
russ95462
·
#23514
·
|
Re: Ground strap
That's what I had created and it worked before but now it does not.
By
russ95462
·
#23513
·
|
Re: KiCad 4.0.7 does not have a release file error
Yes, upgrade to 5 then 6, but in m experience they will have issues with symbol libraries because of changes. I would advise keeping an archived virtual machine with the original version 4 for those
By
Mike Willis
·
#23512
·
|
Re: Ground strap
Hi
A "net-tie" is not a Kicad feature!
Its a PCB design feature/technique to be used when one needs to tie 2 nets in a specific point of the board.
It's more common and easy to understand usage is
By
Jorge Ferreira
·
#23511
·
|
Re: Ground strap
If I understand what you're trying to do correctly, I think all you need is
a net tie footprint.
By
Jon Evans
·
#23510
·
|