开云体育

That would be _great_! The code comes from http://www.rxtx.org. It's what Mike Davison set up for comms on Linux. I've been working with the 1.4 version 15 from rxtx-1.4-15.tar.gz on their download

I have got a long custom HotSync cable for my Palm to do something with Java and JMRI on it. I wondered about just displaying a throttle Widget on the Palm with most of the work being done on the

Got a URL for this one - I may be able to have a look, we have the MSDN kit at work with _all_ the MS dev tools and libraries. Only problem is your machine just isn't the same after you load it

I have a loptop that won't set teh correct serial port speed for JMRI either. It does run the MS100 correctly using WINLOK. Dale. apps? this.

Sounds like an interesting project. Although I've not looked at it in any detail, I think most of the communications stuff should go over pretty cleanly. So you'll be able to talk to the various DCC

The LocoBuffer will almost certainly work. It uses standard serial speeds. I've never heard of somebody having trouble with those. The MS100 needs a non-standard speed, or a specific alternate. On

Greg, You need to check the settings for the port. It is probably defaulting to 9600 speed, and just needs to be reset to a higher maximum setting. Assuming you have Windoze installed, look at

My hunch is that this is an operating system rather than a hardware issue. PC serial ports have been doing 56K for man years. I assume you're using Windows. I know nothing about Windows so I can't

Bob: Would "Typical" work for "General"? Jim Hanna

widget. Maybe a scrollable list of decoder names, with up to 10 showing? That would make it clear that there are multiple choices, because you could see the alternatives. The scroll bars would

I think there are several causes of confusion that are really different. Maybe it would help to think about them seperately? a) "The Ident button picked the wrong decoder!" Some of these are

Well, I installed JMRI on my 1 year old laptop and it says that my COM port can only be set to 9600. I don't understand the reasons why. Anyway, if this is true for JMRI, what about other loconet

I've already ordered my Zephyr with the guy who did the obsolete Digitrax list. He doesn't take CC's you need to send a check. I think this is probably the best deal out there. Paste from his

I've heard that it has a Chief-style programming track which can both read and write. That would be a really good alternative to the PR1, esp. if they can hit their price point. I'll be interesting

same micro-code for his line of "Silent Running" decoders. They all contain the same program, hence the same version number. The only thing that changes is the PC card, which can vary in shape/size,

Thanks for catching that! I've fixed the originals. That's an example of a "family" of decoders. Jim Scorse uses the same micro-code for his line of "Silent Running" decoders. They all contain the

the above needed category? Unfortunantly, I'm not a Java Developer. Actually, I don't get to develop code much at all these days - I've evolved into more of a "Professional Meeting Attendee" and

CV8 seems to be the most reliable data but I'm not sure what they do when a decoder is subcontracted like say Digitrax makes a decoder for Atlas or similar. One of the very large problems I

Bob, What about by Manufacturer, Scale, Model Example: Digitrax, N, DN142 or North Coast Engineering, HO, D13SR Al Silverstein

'Family' seems like a rather confusing category. Dividing the list by manufacturer is a good idea. In other words, I agree with Robin. Mike