开云体育

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 开云体育

Price of the IC-7000


Buck \(N4PGW\)
 

Hello to all and thank you to the moderator of this reflector.

Ever since I have seen the IC-7000, I have been reading and talking about
it. Like most of us here, I have considered it the new IC-706 radio but
after all I have read and seen, I have begun to think that 7000 is to the
706 what the 756 pro is to the 746 pro.

What weighs most strongly is the fact that it will use electronic filtering
rather than the crystal lattice filter. If I recall, isn't this the same
filtering technology used in the IC-7800, the $10,000 radio?

From what I gather, the 706 is the most popular mobile HF radio on the
market with sales greatly exceeding its runner-up. Right now it sells for
about $800 US. I realize that the cost of technology drops over time, and
with inflation, prices rise a bit, but at this point I am wondering if the
rig might not be priced considerably higher than the 706. Around here, a
few hams are thinking it will be in the $1500 US range.

What do you all think?

Buck
N4PGW


 

Buck,

DSP filtering and demodulation/modulation is also used in Ten Tec receivers and transceivers from the $329 RX-320D to the $3300 Orion. DSP filtering is not necessarily better that crystal lattice filtering; it depends the receiver design, on the processing powerof the DSP chip (or chips) and the dynamic range of the A/D converter. The Orion uses more powerful DSP's than the RX-320D. As a matter of fact, the Main receiver of the Orion uses crystal filters for the front end roofing filtering.

The more powerful DSP's are more expensive and consume more power, but the price and power consumption comes down as newer generations of IC's are introduced. It's a tradeoff on price, performance and power dissipation. Let's see what ICOM comes up with...

73,

Mike N2MS

-------------- Original message --------------



What weighs most strongly is the fact that it will use electronic filtering
rather than the crystal lattice filter. If I recall, isn't this the same
filtering technology used in the IC-7800, the $10,000 radio?


Paul Manuel
 

--- "Buck (N4PGW)" <na4fm-list@...> wrote:
I realize that the cost of technology drops over time, and
with inflation, prices rise a bit, but at this point I am wondering if
the rig might not be priced considerably higher than the 706. Around
here, a few hams are thinking it will be in the $1500 US range.
My first inclination was to say aroung $1300--didn't the 706 hover in
about that range for a while? However, $1500 puts it in the 746PRO price
range, which I don't think they'll want to do. Even $1300 puts it quite a
bit above its competitors in the mobile rig arena. I'm guessing about
$1100--a little higher than the TS-480 series, $300 or so above the
FT-857. It may start out higher, but drop fairly soon.

All this info comes from a cracked crystal ball, of course...hi.
73,
Paul K4PDM


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around


Buck &#92;(N4PGW&#92;)
 

Hmm, I think that's the same with mine. Maybe we should inform the
distributor that he needs to pack them better.

Thanks for the comments. It makes sense. I don't know what price the 706
came out as, but what they retail for now. I do know they went up in price
for a while. (I guess the dollar fell).

73,
Buck N4PGW

-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Manuel [mailto:k4pdm@...]
All this info comes from a cracked crystal ball, of course...hi.
73,
Paul K4PDM


 

Buck, I agree. The new rig could be 2 - 3 times more than a 706 (I hope not). Just like the Pro3 is 3 times the price of a 746Pro. This is only conjecture on my part, but is based on the price of other new radios they have come out with. I guess we iwll not know until it happens.

Mike, W4KTX


From: "Buck &#92;(N4PGW&#92;)" <na4fm-list@...>
Date: 2005/02/16 Wed AM 08:58:14 EST
To: <ic7000@...>
Subject: [ic7000] Price of the IC-7000


 

Hi Buck,

Yes, the IC-7000 will use DSP filtering in the final IF. This is the same
technology as used in the IC-756Pro series, the IC-746Pro/7400 and the
IC-7800.



The ultimate performance of the DSP-IF subsystem - dynamic range, noise
floor, filter shape factors, noise reduction etc. is a function of the ADC
(analogue/digital converter) which is the interface between the analogue
RF/IF chain and the DSP. The faster the DSP chip, the better the filter
shape factors, NR etc. are likely to be. All the current Icom DSP-based
radios use a 24-bit ADC and DAC and a 32-bit floating-point DSP. The 756Pro
series uses the ADI SHARC, whilst the 746Pro and 7800 use faster TI devices.
The ADC used in the 756Pro series has a slightly better noise floor than
that of the 746Pro. The 7800 uses very high-quality ADC's which are rather
costly.

The demands placed on the DAC (digital/analogue converter are rather less
than those which the ADC has to meet, although the DAC plays an important
role in setting the dynamic range of the transmitter. The ADC is the key to
the receiver; if it degrades the incoming IF signal, all that information is
lost forever and cannot be recovered.

There are a number of articles covering these topics (and others) on my Icom
page.



Cheers for now, 73,
Adam VA7OJ/AB4OJ

-----Original Message-----
From: Buck (N4PGW) [mailto:na4fm-list@...]
Sent: 16 February 2005 05:58
To: ic7000@...
Subject: [ic7000] Price of the IC-7000


Hello to all and thank you to the moderator of this reflector.

Ever since I have seen the IC-7000, I have been reading and talking about
it. Like most of us here, I have considered it the new IC-706 radio but
after all I have read and seen, I have begun to think that 7000 is to the
706 what the 756 pro is to the 746 pro.

What weighs most strongly is the fact that it will use electronic filtering
rather than the crystal lattice filter. If I recall, isn't this the same
filtering technology used in the IC-7800, the $10,000 radio?

From what I gather, the 706 is the most popular mobile HF radio on the
market with sales greatly exceeding its runner-up. Right now it sells for
about $800 US. I realize that the cost of technology drops over time, and
with inflation, prices rise a bit, but at this point I am wondering if the
rig might not be priced considerably higher than the 706. Around here, a
few hams are thinking it will be in the $1500 US range.

What do you all think?

Buck
N4PGW




Scanned by WinProxy


 

Adam, does the 756ProIII not have a more powerfull DSP than the
ProII?

--- In ic7000@..., Adam Farson <farson@s...> wrote:
Hi Buck,

Yes, the IC-7000 will use DSP filtering in the final IF. This is
the same
technology as used in the IC-756Pro series, the IC-746Pro/7400 and
the
IC-7800.



The ultimate performance of the DSP-IF subsystem - dynamic range,
noise
floor, filter shape factors, noise reduction etc. is a function
of the ADC
(analogue/digital converter) which is the interface between the
analogue
RF/IF chain and the DSP. The faster the DSP chip, the better the
filter
shape factors, NR etc. are likely to be. All the current Icom DSP-
based
radios use a 24-bit ADC and DAC and a 32-bit floating-point DSP.
The 756Pro
series uses the ADI SHARC, whilst the 746Pro and 7800 use faster
TI devices.
The ADC used in the 756Pro series has a slightly better noise
floor than
that of the 746Pro. The 7800 uses very high-quality ADC's which
are rather
costly.

The demands placed on the DAC (digital/analogue converter are
rather less
than those which the ADC has to meet, although the DAC plays an
important
role in setting the dynamic range of the transmitter. The ADC is
the key to
the receiver; if it degrades the incoming IF signal, all that
information is
lost forever and cannot be recovered.

There are a number of articles covering these topics (and others)
on my Icom
page.



Cheers for now, 73,
Adam VA7OJ/AB4OJ


-----Original Message-----
From: Buck (N4PGW) [mailto:na4fm-list@t...]
Sent: 16 February 2005 05:58
To: ic7000@...
Subject: [ic7000] Price of the IC-7000


Hello to all and thank you to the moderator of this reflector.

Ever since I have seen the IC-7000, I have been reading and
talking about
it. Like most of us here, I have considered it the new IC-706
radio but
after all I have read and seen, I have begun to think that 7000 is
to the
706 what the 756 pro is to the 746 pro.

What weighs most strongly is the fact that it will use electronic
filtering
rather than the crystal lattice filter. If I recall, isn't this
the same
filtering technology used in the IC-7800, the $10,000 radio?

From what I gather, the 706 is the most popular mobile HF radio on
the
market with sales greatly exceeding its runner-up. Right now it
sells for
about $800 US. I realize that the cost of technology drops over
time, and
with inflation, prices rise a bit, but at this point I am
wondering if the
rig might not be priced considerably higher than the 706. Around
here, a
few hams are thinking it will be in the $1500 US range.

What do you all think?

Buck
N4PGW




Scanned by WinProxy


Dan Gagnon
 

Hi group, Dan here.(N1GXC) It looks like a nice rig and I'm going to
wait to see what the story is instead of buying a Yaesu 897-D or
other radio. I'd like it to be around $850-$1000 but I'll probably
choke on that one. I'm going to be doing some serious DXpeditions
this year so we'll see.

Dan


Oba
 

Hi,

It reminds me of an ICOM engineer saying in an interview that IC-746
would be the last transceiver that uses conventional crystal filters
for IF.

73 de JA7UDE Oba


--- In ic7000@..., Adam Farson <farson@s...> wrote:
Hi Buck,

Yes, the IC-7000 will use DSP filtering in the final IF. This is
the same
technology as used in the IC-756Pro series, the IC-746Pro/7400 and
the
IC-7800.



The ultimate performance of the DSP-IF subsystem - dynamic range,
noise
floor, filter shape factors, noise reduction etc. is a function of
the ADC
(analogue/digital converter) which is the interface between the
analogue
RF/IF chain and the DSP. The faster the DSP chip, the better the
filter
shape factors, NR etc. are likely to be. All the current Icom DSP-
based
radios use a 24-bit ADC and DAC and a 32-bit floating-point DSP.
The 756Pro
series uses the ADI SHARC, whilst the 746Pro and 7800 use faster TI
devices.
The ADC used in the 756Pro series has a slightly better noise floor
than
that of the 746Pro. The 7800 uses very high-quality ADC's which are
rather
costly.

The demands placed on the DAC (digital/analogue converter are
rather less
than those which the ADC has to meet, although the DAC plays an
important
role in setting the dynamic range of the transmitter. The ADC is
the key to
the receiver; if it degrades the incoming IF signal, all that
information is
lost forever and cannot be recovered.

There are a number of articles covering these topics (and others)
on my Icom
page.



Cheers for now, 73,
Adam VA7OJ/AB4OJ


 

Yes I did read this too. But IC-718 and IC-703 came after the IC-746
and still had the conventional filter concept.

--- In ic7000@..., "Oba" <ja7ude@g...> wrote:

Hi,

It reminds me of an ICOM engineer saying in an interview that IC-
746
would be the last transceiver that uses conventional crystal
filters
for IF.

73 de JA7UDE Oba


--- In ic7000@..., Adam Farson <farson@s...> wrote:
Hi Buck,

Yes, the IC-7000 will use DSP filtering in the final IF. This is
the same
technology as used in the IC-756Pro series, the IC-746Pro/7400
and
the
IC-7800.



The ultimate performance of the DSP-IF subsystem - dynamic
range,
noise
floor, filter shape factors, noise reduction etc. is a function
of
the ADC
(analogue/digital converter) which is the interface between the
analogue
RF/IF chain and the DSP. The faster the DSP chip, the better the
filter
shape factors, NR etc. are likely to be. All the current Icom
DSP-
based
radios use a 24-bit ADC and DAC and a 32-bit floating-point DSP.
The 756Pro
series uses the ADI SHARC, whilst the 746Pro and 7800 use faster
TI
devices.
The ADC used in the 756Pro series has a slightly better noise
floor
than
that of the 746Pro. The 7800 uses very high-quality ADC's which
are
rather
costly.

The demands placed on the DAC (digital/analogue converter are
rather less
than those which the ADC has to meet, although the DAC plays an
important
role in setting the dynamic range of the transmitter. The ADC is
the key to
the receiver; if it degrades the incoming IF signal, all that
information is
lost forever and cannot be recovered.

There are a number of articles covering these topics (and
others)
on my Icom
page.



Cheers for now, 73,
Adam VA7OJ/AB4OJ


 

Hi Peter,

As far as I can determine without the schematics, the 756Pro3 uses the same
DSP, ADC and DAC as the 756Pro2. It has been reported that the noise
reduction is superior to that of the Pro2; this may suggest a slightly
faster DSP.

Cheers for now, 73,
Adam VA7OJ/AB4OJ

-----Original Message-----
From: Peter [mailto:hb9pjt@...]
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 13:40
To: ic7000@...
Subject: [ic7000] Re: Price of the IC-7000




Adam, does the 756ProIII not have a more powerfull DSP than the
ProII?

--- In ic7000@..., Adam Farson <farson@s...> wrote:
Hi Buck,

Yes, the IC-7000 will use DSP filtering in the final IF. This is
the same
technology as used in the IC-756Pro series, the IC-746Pro/7400 and
the
IC-7800.



The ultimate performance of the DSP-IF subsystem - dynamic range,
noise
floor, filter shape factors, noise reduction etc. is a function
of the ADC
(analogue/digital converter) which is the interface between the
analogue
RF/IF chain and the DSP. The faster the DSP chip, the better the
filter
shape factors, NR etc. are likely to be. All the current Icom DSP-
based
radios use a 24-bit ADC and DAC and a 32-bit floating-point DSP.
The 756Pro
series uses the ADI SHARC, whilst the 746Pro and 7800 use faster
TI devices.
The ADC used in the 756Pro series has a slightly better noise
floor than
that of the 746Pro. The 7800 uses very high-quality ADC's which
are rather
costly.

The demands placed on the DAC (digital/analogue converter are
rather less
than those which the ADC has to meet, although the DAC plays an
important
role in setting the dynamic range of the transmitter. The ADC is
the key to
the receiver; if it degrades the incoming IF signal, all that
information is
lost forever and cannot be recovered.

There are a number of articles covering these topics (and others)
on my Icom
page.



Cheers for now, 73,
Adam VA7OJ/AB4OJ


-----Original Message-----
From: Buck (N4PGW) [mailto:na4fm-list@t...]
Sent: 16 February 2005 05:58
To: ic7000@...
Subject: [ic7000] Price of the IC-7000


Hello to all and thank you to the moderator of this reflector.

Ever since I have seen the IC-7000, I have been reading and
talking about
it. Like most of us here, I have considered it the new IC-706
radio but
after all I have read and seen, I have begun to think that 7000 is
to the
706 what the 756 pro is to the 746 pro.

What weighs most strongly is the fact that it will use electronic
filtering
rather than the crystal lattice filter. If I recall, isn't this
the same
filtering technology used in the IC-7800, the $10,000 radio?

From what I gather, the 706 is the most popular mobile HF radio on
the
market with sales greatly exceeding its runner-up. Right now it
sells for
about $800 US. I realize that the cost of technology drops over
time, and
with inflation, prices rise a bit, but at this point I am
wondering if the
rig might not be priced considerably higher than the 706. Around
here, a
few hams are thinking it will be in the $1500 US range.

What do you all think?

Buck
N4PGW




Scanned by WinProxy





Yahoo! Groups Links








Scanned by WinProxy


 

Thanks Adam. IC-756proII has not a very powerfull DSP. We will see.

73, Peter

--- In ic7000@..., Adam Farson <farson@s...> wrote:
Hi Peter,

As far as I can determine without the schematics, the 756Pro3 uses
the same
DSP, ADC and DAC as the 756Pro2. It has been reported that the
noise
reduction is superior to that of the Pro2; this may suggest a
slightly
faster DSP.

Cheers for now, 73,
Adam VA7OJ/AB4OJ




-----Original Message-----
From: Peter [mailto:hb9pjt@u...]
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 13:40
To: ic7000@...
Subject: [ic7000] Re: Price of the IC-7000




Adam, does the 756ProIII not have a more powerfull DSP than the
ProII?

--- In ic7000@..., Adam Farson <farson@s...> wrote:
Hi Buck,

Yes, the IC-7000 will use DSP filtering in the final IF. This is
the same
technology as used in the IC-756Pro series, the IC-746Pro/7400
and
the
IC-7800.



The ultimate performance of the DSP-IF subsystem - dynamic range,
noise
floor, filter shape factors, noise reduction etc. is a function
of the ADC
(analogue/digital converter) which is the interface between the
analogue
RF/IF chain and the DSP. The faster the DSP chip, the better the
filter
shape factors, NR etc. are likely to be. All the current Icom
DSP-
based
radios use a 24-bit ADC and DAC and a 32-bit floating-point DSP.
The 756Pro
series uses the ADI SHARC, whilst the 746Pro and 7800 use faster
TI devices.
The ADC used in the 756Pro series has a slightly better noise
floor than
that of the 746Pro. The 7800 uses very high-quality ADC's which
are rather
costly.

The demands placed on the DAC (digital/analogue converter are
rather less
than those which the ADC has to meet, although the DAC plays an
important
role in setting the dynamic range of the transmitter. The ADC is
the key to
the receiver; if it degrades the incoming IF signal, all that
information is
lost forever and cannot be recovered.

There are a number of articles covering these topics (and others)
on my Icom
page.



Cheers for now, 73,
Adam VA7OJ/AB4OJ


-----Original Message-----
From: Buck (N4PGW) [mailto:na4fm-list@t...]
Sent: 16 February 2005 05:58
To: ic7000@...
Subject: [ic7000] Price of the IC-7000


Hello to all and thank you to the moderator of this reflector.

Ever since I have seen the IC-7000, I have been reading and
talking about
it. Like most of us here, I have considered it the new IC-706
radio but
after all I have read and seen, I have begun to think that 7000
is
to the
706 what the 756 pro is to the 746 pro.

What weighs most strongly is the fact that it will use electronic
filtering
rather than the crystal lattice filter. If I recall, isn't this
the same
filtering technology used in the IC-7800, the $10,000 radio?

From what I gather, the 706 is the most popular mobile HF radio
on
the
market with sales greatly exceeding its runner-up. Right now it
sells for
about $800 US. I realize that the cost of technology drops over
time, and
with inflation, prices rise a bit, but at this point I am
wondering if the
rig might not be priced considerably higher than the 706. Around
here, a
few hams are thinking it will be in the $1500 US range.

What do you all think?

Buck
N4PGW




Scanned by WinProxy





Yahoo! Groups Links








Scanned by WinProxy


 

Do you remember the pricing of the 706 when it was first announced?
Many who don't would be suprised at its high level, compared to the
sub $800 that it has been available for the pase couple of years. And
of course that was the original 706 without all the improvements and
features of the latest version. Taking into consideration the changes
in the valuation of the dollar/yen down the road, one might expect
similar price changes from the introduction period ( it apears the
feeding frenzy has already begun), on through its mass production/
distribution period. Time will tell. All I know is that my $800 now
days, buys a heck of a lot more radio for the buck than what its
equivalent did back in the mid 60's when I was first licensed. Wether
or not one would want to make an investment in 'new' gear in this day
and age of possible BPL interferance is another matter.

Enjoy it while we can.

73.....Mark/W8VNZ

--- In ic7000@..., "Buck &#92;(N4PGW&#92;)" <na4fm-list@t...>
wrote:
Hello to all and thank you to the moderator of this reflector.

Ever since I have seen the IC-7000, I have been reading and talking
about
it. Like most of us here, I have considered it the new IC-706 radio
but
after all I have read and seen, I have begun to think that 7000 is
to the
706 what the 756 pro is to the 746 pro.

What weighs most strongly is the fact that it will use electronic
filtering
rather than the crystal lattice filter. If I recall, isn't this the
same
filtering technology used in the IC-7800, the $10,000 radio?

From what I gather, the 706 is the most popular mobile HF radio on
the
market with sales greatly exceeding its runner-up. Right now it
sells for
about $800 US. I realize that the cost of technology drops over
time, and
with inflation, prices rise a bit, but at this point I am wondering
if the
rig might not be priced considerably higher than the 706. Around
here, a
few hams are thinking it will be in the $1500 US range.

What do you all think?

Buck
N4PGW


Keith LaBorde - K4KAL
 

$1395.00 is what I remember for the first Icom 706.
I actually paid $1195.00 for a 706MKII in later years.
Then again later $995.00, and $795.00 for a 706MKIIG.

Keith, K4KAL

----- Original Message -----
From: wa8vnz
To: ic7000@...
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2005 9:08 AM
Subject: [ic7000] Re: Price of the IC-7000



Do you remember the pricing of the 706 when it was first announced?
Many who don't would be suprised at its high level, compared to the
sub $800 that it has been available for the pase couple of years. And
of course that was the original 706 without all the improvements and
features of the latest version. Taking into consideration the changes
in the valuation of the dollar/yen down the road, one might expect
similar price changes from the introduction period ( it apears the
feeding frenzy has already begun), on through its mass production/
distribution period. Time will tell. All I know is that my $800 now
days, buys a heck of a lot more radio for the buck than what its
equivalent did back in the mid 60's when I was first licensed. Wether
or not one would want to make an investment in 'new' gear in this day
and age of possible BPL interferance is another matter.

Enjoy it while we can.

73.....Mark/W8VNZ

--- In ic7000@..., "Buck &#92;(N4PGW&#92;)" <na4fm-list@t...>
wrote:
> Hello to all and thank you to the moderator of this reflector.
>
> Ever since I have seen the IC-7000, I have been reading and talking
about
> it. Like most of us here, I have considered it the new IC-706 radio
but
> after all I have read and seen, I have begun to think that 7000 is
to the
> 706 what the 756 pro is to the 746 pro.
>
> What weighs most strongly is the fact that it will use electronic
filtering
> rather than the crystal lattice filter. If I recall, isn't this the
same
> filtering technology used in the IC-7800, the $10,000 radio?
>
> From what I gather, the 706 is the most popular mobile HF radio on
the
> market with sales greatly exceeding its runner-up. Right now it
sells for
> about $800 US. I realize that the cost of technology drops over
time, and
> with inflation, prices rise a bit, but at this point I am wondering
if the
> rig might not be priced considerably higher than the 706. Around
here, a
> few hams are thinking it will be in the $1500 US range.
>
> What do you all think?
>
> Buck
> N4PGW





------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:


b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
ic7000-unsubscribe@...

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.