开云体育

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 开云体育

Issues with the ibmpension board


ctlittlejohn
 

The description of this board says "A place to talk about issues with the ibmpension board." I have some issues with the ibmpension board. My biggest issue is about one of the things that is written in the description section of that board:

"Posts will be deleted if: ... 3) They denigrate other people."

During the last several days there have been a high percentage of posts that denigrate other people. That is my opinion and others may disagree with me and I welcome comments from others who do disagree with me. I say that if denigration of other people is allowed the description should be changed to eliminate the false claim that it is not allowed.

Other opinions about this? Does anyone agree? Does anyone disagree?


namremf
 

Agree-My advice would be to leave the board; moderation is very inconsistent, and one of the moderators participates way too much.

And, they don't really discuss the IBM pension Plan all that often.
And there's always the meaningless Boeing discussion that has no effect on the IBM Pension Plan!

Use the same time you waste there in some volunteer work, exercise etc.!

--- In ibmpensionissues@..., ctlittlejohn <no_reply@...> wrote:

The description of this board says "A place to talk about issues with the ibmpension board." I have some issues with the ibmpension board. My biggest issue is about one of the things that is written in the description section of that board:

"Posts will be deleted if: ... 3) They denigrate other people."

During the last several days there have been a high percentage of posts that denigrate other people. That is my opinion and others may disagree with me and I welcome comments from others who do disagree with me. I say that if denigration of other people is allowed the description should be changed to eliminate the false claim that it is not allowed.

Other opinions about this? Does anyone agree? Does anyone disagree?


ctlittlejohn
 

I have given serious thought to leaving the ibmpension board but have not yet made that leap. I did a search on the ibmpension board and found several posts that you made there recently but did not find your ID in the members list. Did you leave recently?

--- In ibmpensionissues@..., namremf <no_reply@...> wrote:

Agree-My advice would be to leave the board; moderation is very inconsistent, and one of the moderators participates way too much.

And, they don't really discuss the IBM pension Plan all that often.
And there's always the meaningless Boeing discussion that has no effect on the IBM Pension Plan!

Use the same time you waste there in some volunteer work, exercise etc.!

--- In ibmpensionissues@..., ctlittlejohn <no_reply@> wrote:

The description of this board says "A place to talk about issues with the ibmpension board." I have some issues with the ibmpension board. My biggest issue is about one of the things that is written in the description section of that board:

"Posts will be deleted if: ... 3) They denigrate other people."

During the last several days there have been a high percentage of posts that denigrate other people. That is my opinion and others may disagree with me and I welcome comments from others who do disagree with me. I say that if denigration of other people is allowed the description should be changed to eliminate the false claim that it is not allowed.

Other opinions about this? Does anyone agree? Does anyone disagree?


namremf
 

Yes, for sure! Life is freaking great!

--- In ibmpensionissues@..., ctlittlejohn <no_reply@...> wrote:

I have given serious thought to leaving the ibmpension board but have not yet made that leap. I did a search on the ibmpension board and found several posts that you made there recently but did not find your ID in the members list. Did you leave recently?


Russ
 

开云体育

This seems to be information specifically aimed at other BOD members and not something intended for the general IBM retiree population. How about taking it off-line with those concerned and leave us out of it. By the way, I’m sorry to hear the BOD is not operating in a professional manner. That does not sound like it would be very rewarding.

?

RW Boehm

IBM Boulder, Co.

?

From: ibmpensionissues@... [mailto:ibmpensionissues@...] On Behalf Of ctlittlejohn
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2013 4:46 AM
To: ibmpensionissues@...
Subject: [ibmpensionissues] Issues with the ibmpension board

?

?

The description of this board says "A place to talk about issues with the ibmpension board." I have some issues with the ibmpension board. My biggest issue is about one of the things that is written in the description section of that board:

"Posts will be deleted if: ... 3) They denigrate other people."

During the last several days there have been a high percentage of posts that denigrate other people. That is my opinion and others may disagree with me and I welcome comments from others who do disagree with me. I say that if denigration of other people is allowed the description should be changed to eliminate the false claim that it is not allowed.

Other opinions about this? Does anyone agree? Does anyone disagree?


 

I'm not going to disagree with most of what has been said, but I don't think you should leave the board. I think October may be very interesting with regards to health care. I am a bit on edge about what IBM may do this year now that the exchanges will begin to appear, at least in some states. The ibmpension board could be a good source of information to keep on top of what's happening and how to make sense of it all. BTW, totally and vehemently agree about the Boeing stuff.

--- In ibmpensionissues@..., namremf <no_reply@...> wrote:

Agree-My advice would be to leave the board; moderation is very inconsistent, and one of the moderators participates way too much.

And, they don't really discuss the IBM pension Plan all that often.
And there's always the meaningless Boeing discussion that has no effect on the IBM Pension Plan!

Use the same time you waste there in some volunteer work, exercise etc.!

--- In ibmpensionissues@..., ctlittlejohn <no_reply@> wrote:

The description of this board says "A place to talk about issues with the ibmpension board." I have some issues with the ibmpension board. My biggest issue is about one of the things that is written in the description section of that board:

"Posts will be deleted if: ... 3) They denigrate other people."

During the last several days there have been a high percentage of posts that denigrate other people. That is my opinion and others may disagree with me and I welcome comments from others who do disagree with me. I say that if denigration of other people is allowed the description should be changed to eliminate the false claim that it is not allowed.

Other opinions about this? Does anyone agree? Does anyone disagree?


Steve
 

Does anybody care?
Grow up.

--- In ibmpensionissues@..., ctlittlejohn <no_reply@...> wrote:

The description of this board says "A place to talk about issues with the ibmpension board." I have some issues with the ibmpension board. My biggest issue is about one of the things that is written in the description section of that board:

"Posts will be deleted if: ... 3) They denigrate other people."

During the last several days there have been a high percentage of posts that denigrate other people. That is my opinion and others may disagree with me and I welcome comments from others who do disagree with me. I say that if denigration of other people is allowed the description should be changed to eliminate the false claim that it is not allowed.

Other opinions about this? Does anyone agree? Does anyone disagree?


 

开云体育

Really Steve...

From: Steve
Sent: 13/06/2013 18:02
To: ibmpensionissues@...
Subject: [ibmpensionissues] Re: Issues with the ibmpension board

?

Does anybody care?
Grow up.

--- In ibmpensionissues@..., ctlittlejohn wrote:
>
> The description of this board says "A place to talk about issues with the ibmpension board." I have some issues with the ibmpension board. My biggest issue is about one of the things that is written in the description section of that board:
>
> "Posts will be deleted if: ... 3) They denigrate other people."
>
> During the last several days there have been a high percentage of posts that denigrate other people. That is my opinion and others may disagree with me and I welcome comments from others who do disagree with me. I say that if denigration of other people is allowed the description should be changed to eliminate the false claim that it is not allowed.
>
> Other opinions about this? Does anyone agree? Does anyone disagree?
>