开云体育

It appears you've swallowed the bait. Good luck and enjoy the weekend.

There are not different sets of facts, Sam - you can keep repeating your assertion that we're using different facts like a spoiled child, but repitition won't make it magically become true. There's

I did no such thing. I've ONLY been directly responding to other's dishonest and/or disingenuous postings on this topic. As such, accusing ME of turning it into a political discussion isn't fair or

Once again your facts are not the same as mine. So I agree to disagree. Simple as that and a much simpler response.It appears you are trying to justify your arguement by talking us to death. Have a

It isn't something to "agree" with or disagree with - it's a fact, and as has been REPEATEDLY explained to you and others, no one is entitled to their own facts!!! He didn't say, first off, that

You've watered down the conversation now to a political discussion. I have no interest in playing the political game. The benefits or failings of the ACA will be demonstrated in the cost and quality

Do you REALLY think that you can argue that I provided TOO MANY FACTS to refute your argument - that attacking the length of my post is a valid debate tactic? Really? I didn't "ramble" at all. But

I originally responded to rick b cool's append, because he claimed that ACA was a Republican invention. I still don't agree with this characterization and still believe that much of what he posts is

Yeah, but see, unlike you, who wasn't aware of the Republican-genesis of healthcare reform, we already knew that no Republicans voted for it. But what we ALSO know is that politicians not voting for

OK no problem , you believe your facts and I'll believe mine. I know mine are correct but not sure of yours. I'd rather choose who/what I give my money to but unfortunately the crooks in government

My first reaction was: "An article from the **opinion** pages of the New York Times, one of the most liberal newspapers in the country? How objective, factual and convincing could it be?" After

boomer4199, See my response to stevek_99sub in: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ibmpensionissues/message/296 I also just switched you from Individual Emails to Daily Digest. You might try it for a few

There are 2 options that you may like better than the Individual Emails message option you subscribed with: 1. Daily Digest. This option sends you a single email each day with a summary of the

You'll need to type this comment again if you want me to be able to reply to it. I have no idea what your point is when you wrote "Whether you vote for something or don't vote for something, one is

If you find one please let me know. ?This is getting annoying? ________________________________ To: ibmpensionissues@... Sent: Friday, July 26, 2013 8:26 AM Subject: [ibmpensionissues]

Facts are facts. If your data source isn't correct, then what you get from them isn't a fact, so no, it doesn't matter what your data source is - it matters whether or not what you get from them is

One should not be considered to be on the left simply because they present facts and expose lies. I know it seems fitting considering the behavior of the Republican leadership and some radical

No, the facts are that it is quite dominated by one political party - and that party is not the Democrats. I can provide 3 undeniable examples - you, and others, should stop with the nonsense that

No, Kevin, facts are facts. No one owns "facts". They're available for everyone. And while someone's feelings might be hurt when another exposes their dishonesty, it's not an insult to call a liar a

You make a good point. Just why did not a single Republican vote for that which they invented? Oh, that answer is quite obvious. It's not very nice. It reflects on Republicans in Congress extremely