开云体育

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 开云体育

US screws - name


 

开云体育

Hello

?

On my Drake amplifier, I would like to install additional hardware using existing threaded rods (3-500Z support spacers). If I measure the thread diameter, I get a reading of 3.3 mm (1/7 inch). The existing nuts measure 6.1 mm (1/4 inch) across the flat.

?

Can you tell me the US thread size for this type of thread?

?

--

F1AMM

Fran?ois


 

Are you referring to the screws that mount the tube sockets?? Common thread sizes are 6-32, 8-32 and 10-32 or 10-24 . Mike

On Sunday, March 16, 2025 at 05:32:41 AM EDT, Fran?ois via groups.io <18471@...> wrote:


Hello

?

On my Drake amplifier, I would like to install additional hardware using existing threaded rods (3-500Z support spacers). If I measure the thread diameter, I get a reading of 3.3 mm (1/7 inch). The existing nuts measure 6.1 mm (1/4 inch) across the flat.

?

Can you tell me the US thread size for this type of thread?

?

--

F1AMM

Fran?ois


 

It's? 6-32 hardware.? ?6-32 has a? .138" diameter thread (3.51 mm).? ? The 32 means it has 32 threads per inch.?


 

开云体育

> It's? 6-32 hardware.? ?6-32 has a? .138" diameter thread (3.51 mm).? ? The 32 means it has 32 threads per inch.?

?

Thank you very much for the information. I'll be able to purchase the nuts.

?

In Canada, do you commonly use US or metric screws (like everyone else :)?

?

To answer, I circled the nut in the attached image.

--

F1AMM

Fran?ois

De la part de Jim VE7RF via groups.io
贰苍惫辞测é?: dimanche 16 mars 2025 12:38
_._,_._,_


 

In Canada, we use both SAE and Metric.? I use strictly SAE for machine screws,? nuts and bolts, and hardware for ant stuff etc, etc.? ?I avoid metric like the plague.?
However,? cars are all metric, including cars built in the usa.?

Metric came out in Canada, after I had left school.? ?I still can't relate to it.? ? I have to mentally convert it for everything.? ?80 kmh ?? ?Oh, that's 51 mph, ok, I know how fast I'm going.? ?20C? is? 68F.... ok, now I know how warm / cold it is.? ?Fuel milage is? Liters per 100 km...(62 miles) ..... instead of miles per imperial / US gallon.?

?100 mm? = 10 cm =? aprx 4".? 25.4 mm = 1"? ? 1/4" = 6.35 mm.?

I asked my son one day to get me a short length of? 2x4.? ?(A 2x4? is a piece of wood that is 1.5"? thick x 3.5"? wide).? ?He comes back with a 12" square piece of? 1/2" thick plywood.? WTF ?? "What the hell are u doing"? ? He sez......' How many CM is that ? '? ?F#@K, I don't know Josh.? ? I wasn't abt to convert 1.5"? to cm....and ditto with 3.5"? to? cm.??


 

开云体育

In Canada, we use both SAE and Metric. […] However,? cars are all metric, including cars built in the usa.?

When you mix the two, it must be terrible. And yet the US'OM counts wavelengths in meters.

?

How do you calculate a surface area when the dimensions are like 27 1/4 inches?

?

Strange about cars. At home, I have gardening equipment with Briggs & Stratton engines; they're US screws. In France, they're called "imperial size."

?

It's a pain, and even then, when it comes to screws, the choice is limited, but when you use tubes...

--

F1AMM

Fran?ois

De la part de Jim VE7RF via groups.io
贰苍惫辞测é?: mardi 18 mars 2025 20:58


 

Surface area =? length x width.? 27 1/4"? = 27.25"?
5/16 = .315"
7/8" = .875"?
etc, etc.


 

开云体育

Surface area =? length x width.? 27 1/4"? = 27.25"?
5/16 = .315"

7/8" = .875"?

etc, etc.

?

Ah, ok.

You convert the mixed numbers into decimals and you get "? (square inches).

?

5/16 = .315"

7/8" = .875"

?

Do you have these correspondences in your head like the multiplication tables?

?

5

7

16

8

0,3125

0,875

?

--

F1AMM

Fran?ois

De la part de Jim VE7RF via groups.io
贰苍惫辞测é?: jeudi 20 mars 2025 05:15


 

开云体育

On 3/19/2025 11:06 PM, Fran?ois via groups.io wrote:

Surface area =? length x width.? 27 1/4"? = 27.25"?
5/16 = .315"

7/8" = .875"?

etc, etc.

?

Ah, ok.

You convert the mixed numbers into decimals and you get "? (square inches).

?

5/16 = .315"

7/8" = .875"

?

Do you have these correspondences in your head like the multiplication tables?

Many of them, I do, yes. Many of us who have done very much "homebrewing" of chassis, panels, etc. through the years have sorta memorized those fractions of inches. At the least, you will almost always find charts posted on our workshops showing those fractions in large print so we can easily read it across the shop (when we can't remember one right off the bat). And yes, we also sometimes more-formally call our system of inches and feet the "imperial" measurement system; although more often, we call it the SAE system, which stands for Society of Automotive Engineers, which in years past, used to "champion" the use of inches and feet especially in American automobiles.

Also, approximating converting mm to inches isn't very difficult: just remember that 1 mm is just a little bit less than 0.04" (0.039371", to be more exact). Therefore, you're almost always "close enough" to just use 0.040" as the length of 1 mm. The easy way to imagine 0.04" is that it's just a little bit wider than the gap of olden time automotive spark plugs used to be set at (which was almost always 0.032", sometimes as wide as 0.038"; but more recently with the use of high performance electronic ignition systems, 0.045" or even 0.060").

Thus, 3.5 mm is 3 times 0.04", plus half of another 0.04" or 0.02"; and so 3.5mm = 0.12 + 0.02 = a total of about 0.14", compared to 0.13779535" if you use all the least significant digits of the exact measurement. You would only be off by a bit more than 0.002" which is less than the thickness of a sheet of tissue paper. As the saying goes, "close enough for government work" 8-)

It's fairly easy to imagine 3mm since that's just a little bit less than 1/8" (which is actually 0.125").

Similarly, 1 inch is 2.54cm; just to get in the ballpark, simply use 2.5. Thus, 20" = 20 x 2.5 or 50cm, then that little bit extra is 20 x 0.04 = 0.8. And so adding all that together, you get 50.8cm.

Converting meters in inches becomes more difficult since you have a much larger portion of a whole to account for, 39.38" = 1 meter; that 0.38 becomes significant and makes it a bit more difficult just to "guess" the total. Typically, we might "guess" and add a third plus a bit more for that 0.38. Or sometimes simply multiply by 39.4 instead of 39.38, then subtract just a tiny bit.

For another but wholly different type of "approximate-guesswork": say you want to know approximately how long a hunk of coax is. First you estimate the diameter of the cable when rolled up; then count the number of turns in the coil of cable, and simply multiply that times 3, then add in a bit more (because circumference = diameter times Pi, or 3.14).

Say you have 30 turns of coax in a coil that's roughly 1 foot in diameter; then it's "at least" 30 times 3 feet long = 90 feet, more probably about 95 feet or so altogether when you add in that portion needed for the 0.14. If you cheat and use your calculator instead, it says your coil of cable is actually 94.2 feet long: once again, "close nuff fer guvmint work" 8-).

Steve K0XP


 

开云体育

I have lost my 10mm socket.

W4DNR


On 2025-03-20 2:33 am, Steve wrote:

On 3/19/2025 11:06 PM, Fran?ois via groups.io wrote:

Surface area =? length x width.? 27 1/4"? = 27.25"?
5/16 = .315"

7/8" = .875"?

etc, etc.

?

Ah, ok.

You convert the mixed numbers into decimals and you get "? (square inches).

?

5/16 = .315"

7/8" = .875"

?

Do you have these correspondences in your head like the multiplication tables?

Many of them, I do, yes. Many of us who have done very much "homebrewing" of chassis, panels, etc. through the years have sorta memorized those fractions of inches. At the least, you will almost always find charts posted on our workshops showing those fractions in large print so we can easily read it across the shop (when we can't remember one right off the bat). And yes, we also sometimes more-formally call our system of inches and feet the "imperial" measurement system; although more often, we call it the SAE system, which stands for Society of Automotive Engineers, which in years past, used to "champion" the use of inches and feet especially in American automobiles.

Also, approximating converting mm to inches isn't very difficult: just remember that 1 mm is just a little bit less than 0.04" (0.039371", to be more exact). Therefore, you're almost always "close enough" to just use 0.040" as the length of 1 mm. The easy way to imagine 0.04" is that it's just a little bit wider than the gap of olden time automotive spark plugs used to be set at (which was almost always 0.032", sometimes as wide as 0.038"; but more recently with the use of high performance electronic ignition systems, 0.045" or even 0.060").

Thus, 3.5 mm is 3 times 0.04", plus half of another 0.04" or 0.02"; and so 3.5mm = 0.12 + 0.02 = a total of about 0.14", compared to 0.13779535" if you use all the least significant digits of the exact measurement. You would only be off by a bit more than 0.002" which is less than the thickness of a sheet of tissue paper. As the saying goes, "close enough for government work" 8-)

It's fairly easy to imagine 3mm since that's just a little bit less than 1/8" (which is actually 0.125").

Similarly, 1 inch is 2.54cm; just to get in the ballpark, simply use 2.5. Thus, 20" = 20 x 2.5 or 50cm, then that little bit extra is 20 x 0.04 = 0.8. And so adding all that together, you get 50.8cm.

Converting meters in inches becomes more difficult since you have a much larger portion of a whole to account for, 39.38" = 1 meter; that 0.38 becomes significant and makes it a bit more difficult just to "guess" the total. Typically, we might "guess" and add a third plus a bit more for that 0.38. Or sometimes simply multiply by 39.4 instead of 39.38, then subtract just a tiny bit.

For another but wholly different type of "approximate-guesswork": say you want to know approximately how long a hunk of coax is. First you estimate the diameter of the cable when rolled up; then count the number of turns in the coil of cable, and simply multiply that times 3, then add in a bit more (because circumference = diameter times Pi, or 3.14).

Say you have 30 turns of coax in a coil that's roughly 1 foot in diameter; then it's "at least" 30 times 3 feet long = 90 feet, more probably about 95 feet or so altogether when you add in that portion needed for the 0.14. If you cheat and use your calculator instead, it says your coil of cable is actually 94.2 feet long: once again, "close nuff fer guvmint work" 8-).

Steve K0XP


 

Loews, Menards, Autozone sells sockets :)

On Thursday, March 20, 2025 at 10:16:57 AM EDT, Don Roden <donroden@...> wrote:


I have lost my 10mm socket.

W4DNR


On 2025-03-20 2:33 am, Steve wrote:

On 3/19/2025 11:06 PM, Fran?ois via groups.io wrote:

Surface area =? length x width.? 27 1/4"? = 27.25"?
5/16 = .315"

7/8" = .875"?

etc, etc.

?

Ah, ok.

You convert the mixed numbers into decimals and you get "? (square inches).

?

5/16 = .315"

7/8" = .875"

?

Do you have these correspondences in your head like the multiplication tables?

Many of them, I do, yes. Many of us who have done very much "homebrewing" of chassis, panels, etc. through the years have sorta memorized those fractions of inches. At the least, you will almost always find charts posted on our workshops showing those fractions in large print so we can easily read it across the shop (when we can't remember one right off the bat). And yes, we also sometimes more-formally call our system of inches and feet the "imperial" measurement system; although more often, we call it the SAE system, which stands for Society of Automotive Engineers, which in years past, used to "champion" the use of inches and feet especially in American automobiles.

Also, approximating converting mm to inches isn't very difficult: just remember that 1 mm is just a little bit less than 0.04" (0.039371", to be more exact). Therefore, you're almost always "close enough" to just use 0.040" as the length of 1 mm. The easy way to imagine 0.04" is that it's just a little bit wider than the gap of olden time automotive spark plugs used to be set at (which was almost always 0.032", sometimes as wide as 0.038"; but more recently with the use of high performance electronic ignition systems, 0.045" or even 0.060").

Thus, 3.5 mm is 3 times 0.04", plus half of another 0.04" or 0.02"; and so 3.5mm = 0.12 + 0.02 = a total of about 0.14", compared to 0.13779535" if you use all the least significant digits of the exact measurement. You would only be off by a bit more than 0.002" which is less than the thickness of a sheet of tissue paper. As the saying goes, "close enough for government work" 8-)

It's fairly easy to imagine 3mm since that's just a little bit less than 1/8" (which is actually 0.125").

Similarly, 1 inch is 2.54cm; just to get in the ballpark, simply use 2.5. Thus, 20" = 20 x 2.5 or 50cm, then that little bit extra is 20 x 0.04 = 0.8. And so adding all that together, you get 50.8cm.

Converting meters in inches becomes more difficult since you have a much larger portion of a whole to account for, 39.38" = 1 meter; that 0.38 becomes significant and makes it a bit more difficult just to "guess" the total. Typically, we might "guess" and add a third plus a bit more for that 0.38. Or sometimes simply multiply by 39.4 instead of 39.38, then subtract just a tiny bit.

For another but wholly different type of "approximate-guesswork": say you want to know approximately how long a hunk of coax is. First you estimate the diameter of the cable when rolled up; then count the number of turns in the coil of cable, and simply multiply that times 3, then add in a bit more (because circumference = diameter times Pi, or 3.14).

Say you have 30 turns of coax in a coil that's roughly 1 foot in diameter; then it's "at least" 30 times 3 feet long = 90 feet, more probably about 95 feet or so altogether when you add in that portion needed for the 0.14. If you cheat and use your calculator instead, it says your coil of cable is actually 94.2 feet long: once again, "close nuff fer guvmint work" 8-).

Steve K0XP


 

yes, I have em all memorized in my head.?


 

开云体育

Better try your big toe nail size socket, then…!!!!

On 20 Mar 2025, at 10:16?pm, Don Roden via groups.io <donroden@...> wrote:

?

I have lost my 10mm socket.

W4DNR


On 2025-03-20 2:33 am, Steve wrote:

On 3/19/2025 11:06 PM, Fran?ois via groups.io wrote:

Surface area =? length x width.? 27 1/4"? = 27.25"?
5/16 = .315"

7/8" = .875"?

etc, etc.

?

Ah, ok.

You convert the mixed numbers into decimals and you get "? (square inches).

?

5/16 = .315"

7/8" = .875"

?

Do you have these correspondences in your head like the multiplication tables?

Many of them, I do, yes. Many of us who have done very much "homebrewing" of chassis, panels, etc. through the years have sorta memorized those fractions of inches. At the least, you will almost always find charts posted on our workshops showing those fractions in large print so we can easily read it across the shop (when we can't remember one right off the bat). And yes, we also sometimes more-formally call our system of inches and feet the "imperial" measurement system; although more often, we call it the SAE system, which stands for Society of Automotive Engineers, which in years past, used to "champion" the use of inches and feet especially in American automobiles.

Also, approximating converting mm to inches isn't very difficult: just remember that 1 mm is just a little bit less than 0.04" (0.039371", to be more exact). Therefore, you're almost always "close enough" to just use 0.040" as the length of 1 mm. The easy way to imagine 0.04" is that it's just a little bit wider than the gap of olden time automotive spark plugs used to be set at (which was almost always 0.032", sometimes as wide as 0.038"; but more recently with the use of high performance electronic ignition systems, 0.045" or even 0.060").

Thus, 3.5 mm is 3 times 0.04", plus half of another 0.04" or 0.02"; and so 3.5mm = 0.12 + 0.02 = a total of about 0.14", compared to 0.13779535" if you use all the least significant digits of the exact measurement. You would only be off by a bit more than 0.002" which is less than the thickness of a sheet of tissue paper. As the saying goes, "close enough for government work" 8-)

It's fairly easy to imagine 3mm since that's just a little bit less than 1/8" (which is actually 0.125").

Similarly, 1 inch is 2.54cm; just to get in the ballpark, simply use 2.5. Thus, 20" = 20 x 2.5 or 50cm, then that little bit extra is 20 x 0.04 = 0.8. And so adding all that together, you get 50.8cm.

Converting meters in inches becomes more difficult since you have a much larger portion of a whole to account for, 39.38" = 1 meter; that 0.38 becomes significant and makes it a bit more difficult just to "guess" the total. Typically, we might "guess" and add a third plus a bit more for that 0.38. Or sometimes simply multiply by 39.4 instead of 39.38, then subtract just a tiny bit.

For another but wholly different type of "approximate-guesswork": say you want to know approximately how long a hunk of coax is. First you estimate the diameter of the cable when rolled up; then count the number of turns in the coil of cable, and simply multiply that times 3, then add in a bit more (because circumference = diameter times Pi, or 3.14).

Say you have 30 turns of coax in a coil that's roughly 1 foot in diameter; then it's "at least" 30 times 3 feet long = 90 feet, more probably about 95 feet or so altogether when you add in that portion needed for the 0.14. If you cheat and use your calculator instead, it says your coil of cable is actually 94.2 feet long: once again, "close nuff fer guvmint work" 8-).

Steve K0XP