¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Date

Re: Which is the best 4-1000 2 holer or the GU84B amp

Robert B. Bonner
 

What bites is when the manufacturer purposely keeps it out of stock to make it look like it is a good thing and drive the price up.

BOB DD

-----Original Message-----
From: ham_amplifiers@... [mailto:ham_amplifiers@...] On Behalf Of Peter Voelpel
Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2007 5:39 PM
To: ham_amplifiers@...
Subject: RE: [ham_amplifiers] Re: Which is the best 4-1000 2 holer or the GU84B amp



A reliable and not too expensive solution might be this version of 3CX6000A7 by Svetlana:


"Better mechanical rigidity and long lasting concentricity of the filament is obtained from the improved mesh filament design contributing to a longer life. Flexible leads connect to the filament terminals and a flange is connected to the grid. The flange provides a convenient way to mount the tube."

Product ID: SKU15665

Price: €594.94
including VAT 19% (€94.99)
[plus shipping]


Unfortunately not in stock at the moment

73
Peter


________________________________

From: ham_amplifiers@... [mailto:ham_amplifiers@...] On Behalf Of Robert B. Bonner

The trend is for cheap reliable power.




Yahoo! Groups Links


Re: Which is the best 4-1000 2 holer or the GU84B amp

Robert B. Bonner
 

Yeah Peter,

For some reason, the good stuff is never in stock.

BOB

-----Original Message-----
From: ham_amplifiers@... [mailto:ham_amplifiers@...] On Behalf Of Peter Voelpel
Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2007 5:39 PM
To: ham_amplifiers@...
Subject: RE: [ham_amplifiers] Re: Which is the best 4-1000 2 holer or the GU84B amp



A reliable and not too expensive solution might be this version of 3CX6000A7 by Svetlana:


"Better mechanical rigidity and long lasting concentricity of the filament is obtained from the improved mesh filament design contributing to a longer life. Flexible leads connect to the filament terminals and a flange is connected to the grid. The flange provides a convenient way to mount the tube."

Product ID: SKU15665

Price: €594.94
including VAT 19% (€94.99)
[plus shipping]


Unfortunately not in stock at the moment

73
Peter


________________________________

From: ham_amplifiers@... [mailto:ham_amplifiers@...] On Behalf Of Robert B. Bonner

The trend is for cheap reliable power.




Yahoo! Groups Links


Re: Which is the best 4-1000 2 holer or the GU84B amp

Peter Voelpel
 

A reliable and not too expensive solution might be this version of 3CX6000A7 by Svetlana:


"Better mechanical rigidity and long lasting concentricity of the filament is obtained from the improved mesh filament design contributing to a longer life. Flexible leads connect to the filament terminals and a flange is connected to the grid. The flange provides a convenient way to mount the tube."

Product ID: SKU15665

Price: €594.94
including VAT 19% (€94.99)
[plus shipping]


Unfortunately not in stock at the moment

73
Peter


________________________________

From: ham_amplifiers@... [mailto:ham_amplifiers@...] On Behalf Of Robert B. Bonner

The trend is for cheap reliable power.


Re: Which is the best 4-1000 2 holer or the GU84B amp

"Robert B. Bonner
 

The trend is for cheap reliable power. A couple 8877's will make moderate power at medium risk. A couple 3CX1200A7's will make almost as much power with low risk. Their limit to maximum power is its plate dissapation. Too bad Eimac didn't widely release the 1500 dissapation (YU whatever) version. It sounds like a great tube. No matter what a guy does. Whether it is a 6L6, 811A or an X2159 if you run it consurvatively with safeguards it will last forever. Push it and watch it go Bye-Bye. BOB DD
Sent From Mobile Device

-----Original Message-----
From: "hbmandel" <ka1xo@...>
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 22:52:43
To:ham_amplifiers@...
Subject: [ham_amplifiers] Re: Which is the best 4-1000 2 holer or the GU84B amp

[snip]
Seems to be alot of hams going to the GU84B tubes for their Big
amps over the 8877 or even the old 4-1000.
[snip]

I agree. Here's the breakdown:

The 8877 tube is hellishly expensive and
has a filament that is extremely sensitive
to shortened life because of a few hundredths
of an overvoltage. Additionally, its 25 watt
Grid Dissipation rating makes it vulnerable
if not sutably protected, to damage from
mistuning and arcs.

The 4-1000A being a Tetrode, is happiest being
Grid-Driven, but few amateurs have the inclination
to design and experiment with driving and neutralization
techniques, so many of these tubes end up Grounded Grid
at a miserable efficiency.

Additionally, the 4-1000A, with a 6KV at 1 Amp
anode requirement needs a power supply to suit, and
while transformers and diodes are plentiful, adequate
filter caps are not, and those that are available are
hellishly expensive once the array is gathered to
afford low ripple at maximum amperage.

Hal Mandel
W4HBM




Yahoo! Groups Links


Re: Which is the best 4-1000 2 holer or the GU84B amp

hbmandel
 

[snip]
Seems to be alot of hams going to the GU84B tubes for their Big
amps over the 8877 or even the old 4-1000.
[snip]

I agree. Here's the breakdown:

The 8877 tube is hellishly expensive and
has a filament that is extremely sensitive
to shortened life because of a few hundredths
of an overvoltage. Additionally, its 25 watt
Grid Dissipation rating makes it vulnerable
if not sutably protected, to damage from
mistuning and arcs.

The 4-1000A being a Tetrode, is happiest being
Grid-Driven, but few amateurs have the inclination
to design and experiment with driving and neutralization
techniques, so many of these tubes end up Grounded Grid
at a miserable efficiency.

Additionally, the 4-1000A, with a 6KV at 1 Amp
anode requirement needs a power supply to suit, and
while transformers and diodes are plentiful, adequate
filter caps are not, and those that are available are
hellishly expensive once the array is gathered to
afford low ripple at maximum amperage.

Hal Mandel
W4HBM


Which is the best 4-1000 2 holer or the GU84B amp

alphasxsignal
 

Seems to be alot of hams going to the GU84B tubes for their Big
amps over the 8877 or even the old 4-1000.


Re: New file uploaded to ham_amplifiers

pentalab
 

--- In ham_amplifiers@..., FRANCIS CARCIA <carcia@...>
wrote:

Check the old RCA transmitting tube handbook showing how to apply RF
negative feedback to quad 811s

### The file I uploaded has nothing to do with 811's.

### W5CUL and myself wrote it last spring.[6 x months to write and
research it, and test everything] Although not directly related to
Amps.... not too many have seen it. And it was thought it may well
be interesting reading to some yaesu MK-V owner's. At least it's
squeaky clean after I got through with it.

### Hopefully my next PDF file depicting all the 3x6 schematics will
be as professional looking as the MK-V document. Stay tuned... it's a
time consuming, tedious process.

Later... Jim VE7RF


Re: New file uploaded to ham_amplifiers

FRANCIS CARCIA
 

Check the old RCA transmitting tube handbook showing how to apply RF negative feedback to quad 811s

ham_amplifiers@... wrote:


Hello,

This email message is a notification to let you know that
a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the ham_amplifiers
group.

File : /mkvmods1_0.pdf
Uploaded by : pentalab <jim.thomson@telus.com>
Description : Yaesu MK-V ESSB mod document

You can access this file at the URL:


To learn more about file sharing for your group, please visit:


Regards,

pentalab <jim.thomson@telus.com>




New file uploaded to ham_amplifiers

 

Hello,

This email message is a notification to let you know that
a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the ham_amplifiers
group.

File : /mkvmods1_0.pdf
Uploaded by : pentalab <jim.thomson@...>
Description : Yaesu MK-V ESSB mod document

You can access this file at the URL:


To learn more about file sharing for your group, please visit:


Regards,

pentalab <jim.thomson@...>


Re: Real Yahoo amp on Ebay...

Randy
 

1800 Toll Free wrote:
change a couple caps to make the harmonic-o-meter swing farther to the right, and call it 'your' design.
Wouldn't that be pronounced a "harmonica-meter" or "monicatometer" or"harmonomominer" on 11M?


One day, given some technological strides, with DSP the 11M op will be able
to completely remove the original signal, leaving only THD to swing the
Harmonc-o-meter.

If only the Old Man had known, he'd have designed a wouff hong just for
what would happen on what *used to be* our 11M band.

73,
Randy
KZ4RV


Re: Harmonic-o-Meter

pentalab
 

--- In ham_amplifiers@..., 1800 Toll Free
<TollFree1800@...> wrote:

It's something like this:



Voltage sampler, 1N series diode detector based 10Kw RMS meters.


Then, take the negative feedback off one side of a popular two
transistor
amp (2X2290, Texas Star DX250) and see > 500 watts PEP.

The 350 model (twin 2879s) will show near 1000 watts, PEP on
these
harmonicomoeters.

People actually do this, and put the B+ lead to the amp on some
type of
switch / solenoid... "Thing won't unkey, but hey, it's doin a
thousand!!!!!!.. I put this here foot switch in the positive lead
(read
this as old style headlight dimmer, footboard based) and use it to
unkey
the thing. Man, I never had a two pill doin a gran before!!!".


Make sense?
### why not just use a PEP reading wattmeter ?? Everybody and
their dog makes pep boards for the bird/CD wattmeter's. Those
depicted on the photo page are entirely HB.... 4 of em.. for all 4
x line sections.

### BTW.... Jay at Array Solutions now makes his new wattmeter with
couplers for 3-10-20 kw. They are extremely accurate........
unlike the bird [ 5% on average, 8% on pep] or the Coaxial
Dynamics wattmeter's [5% on average, 7% on pep]

### The trbl with both the bird /CD meter's is this... they are
ONLY +/- 5% of full scale... ANYWHERE ON THE SCALE !!

### IE: with a 1 kw slug.... and meter indicating say 100 w......
real power could be 50w... and meter is reading 50w too high [100
% error]...... OR.... real power could be 150 w.... and meter is
reading 100w.... or 50 W too low. [way off]

### ONLY time u get 5% accuracy is when meter is pegged. IE: 1
kw slug used.... indicates 1000 w. Real power could be 950w
or 1050 w.

### Point is this.... anything below full scale.. and accuracy
drops like a rock. ... so use the smallest slug u can get away
with.. for a given power level.

### The other problem with the bird/CD 7/8" line sections.. AND
also the 1 5/8" line sections is this. The 7/8" line sections are
use QC connectors.... which have this floozy small diam 1/8" pin
on the back end..... meanwhile, their is a 3/8" diam tube running
the entire length of the line section... dead center... inside the
7/8" ID tube. Remove the slug... and u can see the 3/8" tube
urself. The 3/8" tube will handle GLOBS of RF.... the QC
connector's won't.

### On the 1 5/8" line sections..... same deal.... except u need an
adaptor plate to use the QC connectors. same deal.... QC
connectors have this small 1/8" pin on back end.... embedded in
solid teflon cylinder. [same deal on 7/8" line sections]

### 11m ops tell me they can actually melt the teflon... runs out on
the table like molten candle wax !!

### U don't have that kind of mickey mouse on the array solutions
couplers.... trbl is... they gotta be ordered with one type of
connector only..... no big deal.... order em with 7-16 Dins...since
nobody is gonna run 15 kw with a SO-239 /Type N anyway.


### The Array solutions wattmeter's hold their 3% accuracy across
the spectrum. They are so fast... that just ONE.. "dit" sent at 60
WPM... will cause the digital numerical display to read... "14,250
w" The numerical display will hold it for how long u want... up to
2 seconds. You can do other cool stuff... with a PC... like graph
swr across the entire band, just by talking on ssb... and spinning
the dial. It will also show u stuff about ur xcvr u don't wanna
know... like typ overshoots.

### The Coaxial Dynamics 25 kw slug has each increment at 500
w... but u can easily visualize... and split into 250 w .

## The bird/cd may well have been the standard.... but imo... they
have now been well surpassed. The latest software for the array
solutions wattmeter's will indicate percentage of modulation for
AM broadcast use... or amateur use. Throw in the high swr shut
down... it's a total package.

Check it out.

later... Jim VE7RF


--Toll_Free




Re: Harmonic-o-Meter

 

It's something like this:



Voltage sampler, 1N series diode detector based 10Kw RMS meters.


Then, take the negative feedback off one side of a popular two transistor amp (2X2290, Texas Star DX250) and see > 500 watts PEP.

The 350 model (twin 2879s) will show near 1000 watts, PEP on these harmonicomoeters.

People actually do this, and put the B+ lead to the amp on some type of switch / solenoid... "Thing won't unkey, but hey, it's doin a thousand!!!!!!.. I put this here foot switch in the positive lead (read this as old style headlight dimmer, footboard based) and use it to unkey the thing. Man, I never had a two pill doin a gran before!!!".


Make sense?


--Toll_Free

On Tue, 16 Jan 2007 10:48:30 -0800, Harold Mandel <ka1xo@...> wrote:

[snip]
Take an amp, change a couple caps to make the harmonic-o-meter swing
farther to the right, and call it 'your' design.
[snip]


The snippet above implies a device to measure harmonic
content. Where can I get one?

If let's say I run across a 25KW (Bird Watts) amp,
and I can get one of these harmonicometers, will it
SUM the energy in, let's say the First through Thirteenth
harmonic so I can show it to my 11M eyeball-QSO
drinking buddies as maybe being 50 or 60 KW?

Oooooo, the possibilities here for more "commercial"
sales.

Hal
6L6GB

--



*Ratings are for transistors, tubes have guidelines*


Re: Harmonic-o-Meter

 

I propose we have a new class of amplifier for the 11 meter crowd...

As it sits, we now have

A
AB1
AB2
B
C
etc.


Shouldn't somewhere, there be a class CB.....


:)



./End open can.of.worms



==Toll_Free


Re: Harmonic-o-Meter

FRANCIS CARCIA
 

like a dispersive and compressive delay line in a radar system. What a cool idea run square wave and reconstruct. Class I amplifier (for idiot mode)

Harold Mandel wrote:

[snip]
Take an amp, change a couple caps to make the harmonic-o-meter swing
farther to the right, and call it 'your' design.
[snip]

The snippet above implies a device to measure harmonic
content. Where can I get one?

If let's say I run across a 25KW (Bird Watts) amp,
and I can get one of these harmonicometers, will it
SUM the energy in, let's say the First through Thirteenth
harmonic so I can show it to my 11M eyeball-QSO
drinking buddies as maybe being 50 or 60 KW?

Oooooo, the possibilities here for more "commercial"
sales.

Hal
6L6GB



Harmonic-o-Meter

Harold Mandel
 

[snip]
Take an amp, change a couple caps to make the harmonic-o-meter swing
farther to the right, and call it 'your' design.
[snip]


The snippet above implies a device to measure harmonic
content. Where can I get one?

If let's say I run across a 25KW (Bird Watts) amp,
and I can get one of these harmonicometers, will it
SUM the energy in, let's say the First through Thirteenth
harmonic so I can show it to my 11M eyeball-QSO
drinking buddies as maybe being 50 or 60 KW?

Oooooo, the possibilities here for more "commercial"
sales.

Hal
6L6GB


Re: Real Yahoo amp on Ebay...

 

I wonder if Sonny was the last person to work on it, so they are claiming it is a "sonny" built box.


That's the latest trend of 11 meter 'techs'... Take an amp built by someone else, change a couple caps to make the harmonic-o-meter swing farther to the right, and call it 'your' design.

Sonny built some nice stuff... He mentored under Dennis O for quite some time. Last I heard, he was more into the strip club and biker bar business than he was into 11 meter stuff. Most of his regular customers where looking elsewhere for repairs and new stuff.



--Toll_Free

On Tue, 16 Jan 2007 02:39:02 -0800, craxd <craxd@...> wrote:

--- In ham_amplifiers@..., "Mike Sawyer" <w3slk@...>
wrote:

A fellow from another BB asked the seller about it. He said that
there is no
way that "thing" is going to pump out 36KW. She told him he was not
qualified to make that statement and that question and his bid
would be
rejected!

It don't look like any "real" human being has bid on this yet. If
they did, they're a fool. Most CBr's I know have better sense than
that. I personally wouldn't give no more that $150 to $200 for it
just for parts.

I guess she or he thinks that nobody knows where those Tennessee
Walkers are made at either. It sure isn't in Michigan like they
claim. What makes me wonder is why the one selling it wasn't killed
by electrocution as dumb as they sound to be.


Mod-U-Lator,
Mike(y)
W3SLK
Best,

Will
--



*Ratings are for transistors, tubes have guidelines*


Re: hi power mobile

Harold Mandel
 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

The cost of inverters that approach a sine wave rises as the quality of

the output waveform approaches ¡°linearity.¡±

?

It¡¯s the same sort of exercise as the digital photography evolution.

?

A single frame of 35mm emulsion (analog) film has trillions of

silver particles that can be affected by light. Digital images fill up

the electronic CCD chip that in today¡¯s cameras have let¡¯s say

6 mega-pixels to be affected.

?

In olden days of digital photography where the CCD pixel count

was low, the photograph would eventually display digital artifacts,

or little square blocks of contrasting info, these blocks becoming smaller

and smaller as the technology progressed towards higher CCD resolutions, but

at some point, the little artifacts were still there.

?

This is the same phenomenon as a.c. inverter technology. Seen from a distance,

the output waveform resembles a sine wave. Getting closer, e.g., dividing the

time base into smaller and smaller segments, the little square-wave stepping blocks become

apparent.

?

As our radio technology improves, our radio¡¯s microprocessor and signal processor departments

divide time into smaller and smaller segments.

?

This is why the pure analog sine wave remains the best, as the switching transient noise, generated

when the voltage waveform ¡°clicks¡± into the next higher or lower segment, produces a transient that

more modern radios may not filter.

?

As Will says, in the tube days, a vibrator component produced the high voltage a.c., but

if you remember those radios, you could hear the vibrator in the receive audio.

?

I don¡¯t know if I can afford the type of inverter that would be able to

not make artifacts my radios could pick up.

?

The bigger computer installations still use Motor-Generator sets where battery power

runs rotary alternators, for those brief moments waiting for the emergency alternators

connected to diesel engines, kick in.

?

Smaller installations using UPS plants have solid state inverters run by the battery,

but as the speed of the servers goes up and up, the inverter supplies end up being

upgraded to finer and finer pseudosinusoidal waveforms.

?

Hal Mandel

W4HBM

?


From: ham_amplifiers@... [mailto:ham_amplifiers@...] On Behalf Of FRANCIS CARCIA
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2007 10:11 AM
To: ham_amplifiers@...
Subject: Re: [ham_amplifiers] Re: hi power mobile

?

You can get a clean output from a converter if the sample frequency is high enough. I run tube and solid state PDM AM and make clean audio running a 75 KHz. sample frequency.

You also need a good filter / integrator after the PDM. My sidebands are a good 75 dB down.

Modern aircraft use solid state converters to convert 270 VDC to 400 hz 3 phase 115VAC.

This eliminates the constant speed PTO off the motor. gfz

craxd net> wrote:

--- In ham_amplifiers@yahoogroups.com, "Harold Mandel"
wrote:
>
> Sirs,
>
>
>
> Only a rotating armature easily produces a sine wave.

Hals correct. An alternator less the rectifier stack produces the
best sine wave possible. It is as pure an AC 3 phase current as
delivered by the power company.

Most inverters produce either a square wave or a modified (quasi-
sine) sine wave. The quasi-sine wave is actually a square wave but is
in a stair step fashion where the steps would fit within the arc of
of 1/2 of a sine wave. The negative cycle is a mirror image of the
positive 1/2 cycle. Of course a pure square wave is merely like the
on and off function of flipping a switch. The quasi-wave has to have
a wave shaping circuit. It supposed to match a sine wave more closely
which in turn goes into figuring the power transformers
specifications. The transformers form factor is what changes over
this. For mobile use, a transformer ran from an alternator or other
AC source uses 4.44 for the form factor where a square wave uses 4.0.
The form factor is figured from the rms and average values of a sine
wave (4 x 1.11 = 4.44). I can't remember what the quasi-square wave
uses.

The old sweep tube mobile amps used square wave switching supplies
with several different transformer schemes. The old automobile radios
used this too. The first ones used vibrators, then they switched to
solid state square wave inverters. These are not hard to design as
the transformer itself is what determines the oscillation frequency.
The primary is two 12V windings. The transistor switching windings
supply around 3 to 5 vdc to the base of the switching transistors.
The secondary is designed like any other. Theoretically, one could
get by without a filter C on the output of the bridge rectifier on
the secondary since it's a square wave, but that's not a good idea.

>
>
>
> Most inverters produce square waves, but some expensive types
>
> produce a "modified sine wave."
>
>
>
> If you were to visit a power plant you will see the main dynamo is
>
> a D.C. generator that energizes a set of rotary alternators,
spinning
>
> at 60 Hertz in America and at 25 Hertz in the subways of NYC..

There was some 40 Hz used up there somewhere, but I heard the last of
it was finally torn out and replaced with 60 Hz. It was an old hydro
plant somewhere, maybe Niagra?

>
>
>
> Hal Mandel
>
> W4HBM
>
>
>
> _____
>
> From: ham_amplifiers@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:ham_amplifiers@yahoogroups.com]
> On Behalf Of Robert B. Bonner
> Sent: Monday, January 15, 2007 5:15 PM
> To: ham_amplifiers@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: RE: [ham_amplifiers] hi power mobile
>
>
>
> I was looking this over, I noticed it is 50 Hz power. Dometic
sells massive
> quantities of product in the USA. I have some of it on my RV.
>
>
>
> The 7KW unit is not that small, look at the photos it is a HV 3
Phase at
> least 230V alternator the size of a 200 AMP 12V unit.
>
>
>
> The "BOX" is a inverter or external regulator. They say it
provides solid
> sine wave power. SO you wont get that from a spinning alternator,
so it is
> electrically making the sine wave in the box.
>
>
>
> Where's 60 CYCLE???? I'd buy one. I mean I suppose I could use 50
HZ power
> but really.?
>
>
>
> BOB DD
>
>
>
> _____
>
> From: ham_amplifiers@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:ham_amplifiers@yahoogroups.com]
> On Behalf Of PA3DUV
> Sent: Monday, January 15, 2007 3:43 PM
> To: ham_amplifiers@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Norton AntiSpam] [ham_amplifiers] hi power mobile
>
>
>
> This looks like the solution:
>
>
>
>
> <>
> com/templates/ProductCategory.aspx?id=1420
>
>
>
> The 7 kW version really appeals to me.
>
> Although too small to reach my final goal (10 kW out /m) ist brings
me a
> good step further.
>
> Amazing how they squeeze 7 kW out of a compact alternator.
>
>
>
> Cheers, Dick
>
> PA3DUV
>

Best,

Will

?


Re: hi power mobile

FRANCIS CARCIA
 

You can get a clean output from a converter if the sample frequency is high enough. I run tube and solid state PDM AM and make clean audio running a 75 KHz. sample frequency.
You also need a good filter / integrator after the PDM. My sidebands are a good 75 dB down.
Modern aircraft use solid state converters to convert 270 VDC to 400 hz 3 phase 115VAC.
This eliminates the constant speed PTO off the motor. gfz

craxd wrote:

--- In ham_amplifiers@yahoogroups.com, "Harold Mandel"
wrote:
>
> Sirs,
>
>
>
> Only a rotating armature easily produces a sine wave.

Hals correct. An alternator less the rectifier stack produces the
best sine wave possible. It is as pure an AC 3 phase current as
delivered by the power company.

Most inverters produce either a square wave or a modified (quasi-
sine) sine wave. The quasi-sine wave is actually a square wave but is
in a stair step fashion where the steps would fit within the arc of
of 1/2 of a sine wave. The negative cycle is a mirror image of the
positive 1/2 cycle. Of course a pure square wave is merely like the
on and off function of flipping a switch. The quasi-wave has to have
a wave shaping circuit. It supposed to match a sine wave more closely
which in turn goes into figuring the power transformers
specifications. The transformers form factor is what changes over
this. For mobile use, a transformer ran from an alternator or other
AC source uses 4.44 for the form factor where a square wave uses 4.0.
The form factor is figured from the rms and average values of a sine
wave (4 x 1.11 = 4.44). I can't remember what the quasi-square wave
uses.

The old sweep tube mobile amps used square wave switching supplies
with several different transformer schemes. The old automobile radios
used this too. The first ones used vibrators, then they switched to
solid state square wave inverters. These are not hard to design as
the transformer itself is what determines the oscillation frequency.
The primary is two 12V windings. The transistor switching windings
supply around 3 to 5 vdc to the base of the switching transistors.
The secondary is designed like any other. Theoretically, one could
get by without a filter C on the output of the bridge rectifier on
the secondary since it's a square wave, but that's not a good idea.

>
>
>
> Most inverters produce square waves, but some expensive types
>
> produce a "modified sine wave."
>
>
>
> If you were to visit a power plant you will see the main dynamo is
>
> a D.C. generator that energizes a set of rotary alternators,
spinning
>
> at 60 Hertz in America and at 25 Hertz in the subways of NYC..

There was some 40 Hz used up there somewhere, but I heard the last of
it was finally torn out and replaced with 60 Hz. It was an old hydro
plant somewhere, maybe Niagra?

>
>
>
> Hal Mandel
>
> W4HBM
>
>
>
> _____
>
> From: ham_amplifiers@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:ham_amplifiers@yahoogroups.com]
> On Behalf Of Robert B. Bonner
> Sent: Monday, January 15, 2007 5:15 PM
> To: ham_amplifiers@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: RE: [ham_amplifiers] hi power mobile
>
>
>
> I was looking this over, I noticed it is 50 Hz power. Dometic
sells massive
> quantities of product in the USA. I have some of it on my RV.
>
>
>
> The 7KW unit is not that small, look at the photos it is a HV 3
Phase at
> least 230V alternator the size of a 200 AMP 12V unit.
>
>
>
> The "BOX" is a inverter or external regulator. They say it
provides solid
> sine wave power. SO you wont get that from a spinning alternator,
so it is
> electrically making the sine wave in the box.
>
>
>
> Where's 60 CYCLE???? I'd buy one. I mean I suppose I could use 50
HZ power
> but really.?
>
>
>
> BOB DD
>
>
>
> _____
>
> From: ham_amplifiers@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:ham_amplifiers@yahoogroups.com]
> On Behalf Of PA3DUV
> Sent: Monday, January 15, 2007 3:43 PM
> To: ham_amplifiers@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Norton AntiSpam] [ham_amplifiers] hi power mobile
>
>
>
> This looks like the solution:
>
>
>
>
> <>
> com/templates/ProductCategory.aspx?id=1420
>
>
>
> The 7 kW version really appeals to me.
>
> Although too small to reach my final goal (10 kW out /m) ist brings
me a
> good step further.
>
> Amazing how they squeeze 7 kW out of a compact alternator.
>
>
>
> Cheers, Dick
>
> PA3DUV
>

Best,

Will



Re: Real Yahoo amp on Ebay...

craxd
 

--- In ham_amplifiers@..., "Mike Sawyer" <w3slk@...>
wrote:

A fellow from another BB asked the seller about it. He said that
there is no
way that "thing" is going to pump out 36KW. She told him he was not
qualified to make that statement and that question and his bid
would be
rejected!

It don't look like any "real" human being has bid on this yet. If
they did, they're a fool. Most CBr's I know have better sense than
that. I personally wouldn't give no more that $150 to $200 for it
just for parts.

I guess she or he thinks that nobody knows where those Tennessee
Walkers are made at either. It sure isn't in Michigan like they
claim. What makes me wonder is why the one selling it wasn't killed
by electrocution as dumb as they sound to be.


Mod-U-Lator,
Mike(y)
W3SLK
Best,

Will


Re: hi power mobile

craxd
 

--- In ham_amplifiers@..., "Harold Mandel" <ka1xo@...>
wrote:

Sirs,



Only a rotating armature easily produces a sine wave.

Hals correct. An alternator less the rectifier stack produces the
best sine wave possible. It is as pure an AC 3 phase current as
delivered by the power company.

Most inverters produce either a square wave or a modified (quasi-
sine) sine wave. The quasi-sine wave is actually a square wave but is
in a stair step fashion where the steps would fit within the arc of
of 1/2 of a sine wave. The negative cycle is a mirror image of the
positive 1/2 cycle. Of course a pure square wave is merely like the
on and off function of flipping a switch. The quasi-wave has to have
a wave shaping circuit. It supposed to match a sine wave more closely
which in turn goes into figuring the power transformers
specifications. The transformers form factor is what changes over
this. For mobile use, a transformer ran from an alternator or other
AC source uses 4.44 for the form factor where a square wave uses 4.0.
The form factor is figured from the rms and average values of a sine
wave (4 x 1.11 = 4.44). I can't remember what the quasi-square wave
uses.

The old sweep tube mobile amps used square wave switching supplies
with several different transformer schemes. The old automobile radios
used this too. The first ones used vibrators, then they switched to
solid state square wave inverters. These are not hard to design as
the transformer itself is what determines the oscillation frequency.
The primary is two 12V windings. The transistor switching windings
supply around 3 to 5 vdc to the base of the switching transistors.
The secondary is designed like any other. Theoretically, one could
get by without a filter C on the output of the bridge rectifier on
the secondary since it's a square wave, but that's not a good idea.





Most inverters produce square waves, but some expensive types

produce a "modified sine wave."



If you were to visit a power plant you will see the main dynamo is

a D.C. generator that energizes a set of rotary alternators,
spinning

at 60 Hertz in America and at 25 Hertz in the subways of NYC..

There was some 40 Hz used up there somewhere, but I heard the last of
it was finally torn out and replaced with 60 Hz. It was an old hydro
plant somewhere, maybe Niagra?





Hal Mandel

W4HBM



_____

From: ham_amplifiers@...
[mailto:ham_amplifiers@...]
On Behalf Of Robert B. Bonner
Sent: Monday, January 15, 2007 5:15 PM
To: ham_amplifiers@...
Subject: RE: [ham_amplifiers] hi power mobile



I was looking this over, I noticed it is 50 Hz power. Dometic
sells massive
quantities of product in the USA. I have some of it on my RV.



The 7KW unit is not that small, look at the photos it is a HV 3
Phase at
least 230V alternator the size of a 200 AMP 12V unit.



The "BOX" is a inverter or external regulator. They say it
provides solid
sine wave power. SO you wont get that from a spinning alternator,
so it is
electrically making the sine wave in the box.



Where's 60 CYCLE???? I'd buy one. I mean I suppose I could use 50
HZ power
but really.?



BOB DD



_____

From: ham_amplifiers@...
[mailto:ham_amplifiers@...]
On Behalf Of PA3DUV
Sent: Monday, January 15, 2007 3:43 PM
To: ham_amplifiers@...
Subject: [Norton AntiSpam] [ham_amplifiers] hi power mobile



This looks like the solution:



.
<>
com/templates/ProductCategory.aspx?id=1420



The 7 kW version really appeals to me.

Although too small to reach my final goal (10 kW out /m) ist brings
me a
good step further.

Amazing how they squeeze 7 kW out of a compact alternator.



Cheers, Dick

PA3DUV

Best,

Will