¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Date

Re: AL80-A

Harold Mandel
 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

All you need to do is study the management philosophy and practices of WalMart.

?

WalMart dictates the selling price to their suppliers, and when they say to WalMart that they cannot

supply a product at what WalMart wants to pay, WalMart directs them to an overseas supplier of labor

or parts, or parts and labor. If the supplier wishes to stay in business they follow orders.

?

There are no television manufacturers left in America.

?

There were never, not one, ever, facsimile machine manufacturers in America.

?

American business has chosen to divert monies to volumetric production schemes to lower consumer prices
and to increase selling stock, and to increase cellular coverage for more immediate return on investment than

in research and development. The Japanese still devote a large portion of their manufacturing revenue into

R&D. That is why they have surpassed the United States.

?

Our cellular telephone providers would rather sink money into radio systems increasing bandwidth and coverage volume than they would on hardening the system with backup generators, towers that are not at the 85% windload factor and battery plants that serve anything more than noise filters, as it would take a 100% increase in capacity to afford any sort of uninterruptible backup.

?

Find out who goes to medical schools these days.

?

Is it our sons and daughters who have studied hard and achieved academic excellence in their

baccalaureate endeavors?

?

Or is it mostly off-shore students whose parents can afford to fund a chair?

?

Mike, you are entirely correct. RF amplifiers are too expensive to build here. Look at the latest

edition that was touted on the reflector. Kilobucks.? Even the offshore amplifier companies are

outrageous, like Emtron. The Ameritron might be our last chance. Alpha sure won¡¯t be the last bastion

because their targeted market is so narrow. It¡¯s going to be Joe Ham that keeps Ameritron in the running,

and Ameritron will need to contend with the competition FROM China for the last remaining component resources as the supply dwindles.

?

Hal Mandel

W4HBM

?


From: ham_amplifiers@... [mailto:ham_amplifiers@...] On Behalf Of Mike(W5UC) & Kathy(K5MWH)
Sent: Friday, December 29, 2006 10:14 AM
To: ham_amplifiers@...
Subject: Re: [ham_amplifiers] Re: AL80-A

?

At 08:42 AM 12/29/2006, you wrote:

After WW-
II, Dr. Deming was invited to Japan to give lectures on how to go
about making high quality things that people will want to buy.

cheers, Jim


Isn't that amazing?? And now American automobile mfrs wonder why the mind set in this country (including me) is to buy Japanese cars. Now GM is struggling to regain it's reputation, and the labor unions are still wanting to price themselves out of a job and GM out of the market.

I wonder what percentage of ham amplifier products are made in the US?? If they are being made off-shore, how much labor would it cost to build a quality product. Did you ever wonder what happened to Hallicrafters & Hammarlund? If someone knows what caused the demise of these two I would like to hear the story.? I still miss my HQ-129X. (No I didn't sell it.? It went under in 6 feet of salt water in Hurricane Carla in 1961)

73,
Mike, W5UC





"age & treachery will overcome youth & skill"


Re: AL80-A

Mike(W5UC) & Kathy(K5MWH)
 

At 08:42 AM 12/29/2006, you wrote:
After WW-
II, Dr. Deming was invited to Japan to give lectures on how to go
about making high quality things that people will want to buy.

cheers, Jim

Isn't that amazing?? And now American automobile mfrs wonder why the mind set in this country (including me) is to buy Japanese cars. Now GM is struggling to regain it's reputation, and the labor unions are still wanting to price themselves out of a job and GM out of the market.

I wonder what percentage of ham amplifier products are made in the US?? If they are being made off-shore, how much labor would it cost to build a quality product. Did you ever wonder what happened to Hallicrafters & Hammarlund? If someone knows what caused the demise of these two I would like to hear the story.? I still miss my HQ-129X. (No I didn't sell it.? It went under in 6 feet of salt water in Hurricane Carla in 1961)

73,
Mike, W5UC




"age & treachery will overcome youth & skill"


Re: TL-922 parts:

 

thanks, Frank


On Dec 28, 2006, at 7:44 PM, FRANCIS CARCIA wrote:

Home Depot sells copper flashing by the foot. I think it is about 1 foot wide.

pentalab <jim.thomson@...> wrote:


R. L. Measures, AG6K, 805.386.3734
r@..., rlm@..., www.somis.org


Re: AL80-A

 

On Dec 28, 2006, at 10:31 AM, pentalab wrote:

--- In ham_amplifiers@..., R L Measures <r@...> wrote:


On Dec 27, 2006, at 5:32 PM, Mike(W5UC) & Kathy(K5MWH) wrote:

I'm not familiar with this amp, but a good guess is that I
would look for a shorted diode or diodes in the power supply.

RICH SEZ....If a HV rectifier diode shorts, and the electrolytics
are not protected from AC by reverse diodes, the electrolytics are
DOA.

### agreed. Which is why I always install at least one reverse
connected 6A10 [1 kv-6A CCS-400A surge] diode across each HV
electrolytic. Now Ameritron isn't the only ones who leave out the
RVS connected diode across each lytic...they all do. I don't see
any RVS connected diodes across caps in alpha's, qro, Command
technology, heath, dentron, amp supply, or anybody else. They are
all on the..... "get cheap program".
** In 50-yrs of Hamming, I have had one case of electrolytics that were damaged by a bad rectifier.

### I'm tellin u fellows.... if these manufacturer's of ham gear
can eliminate just one diode, screw, washer, or anything else, they
will do it in a heart beat.... to enhance profits.
** .. and it also keeps the service department busy.

### Rauch keeps bragging about how Ameritron pays very little for
parts in bulk. Have u any idea what a diode cost... when ur buying
100,000 to 500,000+ of em at one shot ?
** Currently we are paying about 15-cents each for a reel of 1400, 1N5408s. (rated: 3A-avg, 200a-recurrent peak, 1000piv, typically test at c. 1400piv) Thus, protecting a typical electrolytic filter bank would cost c. $1.20 plus the cost of labor.

### So here's yet another potential case of 8x expensive lytics
down the toilet..
** Or maybe kerblam, slam up against the ceiling.
cuz some bonehead conveniently forgot to install
16 cents worth of diodes at the factory. Can u imagine smoking
20-30 x 2000-5200 uf lytics in a real HV supply ?

### At least they should offer two versions of any amp.... the 2nd
one costing $5.00 more.... that's designed and built right.
** In "The Nearly Perfect Amplifier" (January, 1994 *QST*), I listed the cost of each improvement. The total worked to about a 10% cost increase -- mostly due to the cost of the high-speed vacuum relay. This was apparently what caused the most tight jaws among amplifier manufactures. To me, this is crazy. If a manufacturer did his homework, he would realize that most people will gladly pay more for a quality product that will give good service. As I see it, a QST ad for an amplifier that listed the specific reasons it was better would sell amplifiers.
Example: During WW-II, Japanese engineers and manufacturers were taken with the remarkably high quality of American airplanes that crash-landed. Some of the more intact American airplanes even went on tour around Japan. During the war, one of the Americans who was responsible for this quality was Dr. W. Edwards Deming. After WW- II, Dr. Deming was invited to Japan to give lectures on how to go about making high quality things that people will want to buy.

cheers, Jim

R. L. Measures, AG6K, 805.386.3734
r@..., rlm@..., www.somis.org


Re: TL-922 parts:

 

On Dec 28, 2006, at 1:01 PM, pentalab wrote:

--- In ham_amplifiers@..., R L Measures <r@...> wrote:

Jim -- How long is the grid grounding strap for a 3-500Z ?

#### The AL-82...and it's little bastard brother.. the AL-80BX
are
two of the most parasitic prone amps in existence.... which is
why
the east coast guys call em the "fire cracker". So even though
both
have their grids tied directly to chassis... Ameritron has still
managed to screw em both up.
RICH SEZ... The VHF suppressors in the SB-220, AL-82, and the TL-
922 have a Q of 4.5 to 5.5 at 100MHz,and all have a reputation for
squirreliness. If direct-grounding the grids is the sure cure for
VHF instability, why isn't the one with direct-grounded grids
stable?

### Simple... cuz Ameritron obviously has a layout problem some
where in those 2 x amps.
** What is this obvious problem?

They also have an internal bandswitch
resonance problem.[hence switching in caps between bandswitch
contacts] Things like placement of plate choke,lead length's,
whether plate block caps are separate.. or mounted to rfc can all
make an amp squirelly. Having to pad a tune cap via the bandswitch
for 160m is asking for more trbl.
** Why? The 922 does it with no problems once the 120MHz parasite problem is taken care of.

Throw in distance between
cabinet side and top tid to tank components will make a big
difference. Then their t/r relays are not sequenced right either...
u can easily have drive applied to the cathode of an al80/82 b4 the
ant is connected.... which is an invite to a disaster.
** Good point. RF-actuated T/R bias undoubtedly isn't good engineering practice.

### Anybody who buys an Ameritron AL80/82 is virtually guaranteed
to have flames spitting out of the bandswitch.
** Bandswitches should not arc from RF-actuated bias switching.

...
### I think the straps I used in my L4B's are 1/2" wide cu... and
as short as practical. I can name u 12 guys I know who directly
grounded the grid's on TL-922's.... and all reported the same
results... and 100+ more who directly grounded the grids on SB-
220/221's. ..same deal.... same results. Rock stable.... and 20-
25 watts less drive required.... using stock suppressors. And
don't
feed us this crap about a 200 pf disc ceramic having less L than a
1/2" wide solid CU strap.... it doesn't.
Rich sez... A 200pF cap with short, shorted leads dips at c. 130MHz.
### That would depend on the lead lengths of the 26 ga ...
** #22

IOW... ur saying with one
particular config... one cap is series resonant at 130 mhz.

At 100MHz, it has a small amount of negative reactance.

### Now ur saying the above single 200 pf cap... with leads long
enough to series resonate at 130 mhz... will exhibit capacitive
reactance at a lower freq.
** Correct, Jim. And above series-resonance, capacitors exhibit inductive reactance (positive j-ohms).

At 100MHz, a 1/2" wide Cu strap 1" long has c. 65-ohms of positive
reactance. At 100MHz, which has more inductive reactance, the cap
or the strap?

### The cap.
** Below resonance, caps exhibit capacitive reactance, or negative j-ohms. At 100MHz or 1MHz, a 1" long strap has inductive reactance, or positive j-ohms.


### Why the grid resonance doesn't change much... who knows.
RICH SEZ... It doesn't change much because 1/2" (12.7mm) strap does
Not have half the inductance per unit length that 1/4" (6.35mm)
strap has. According to Terman, inductance is a logarithmic
function of width. Thus, if Terman is right, there is not a lot of
difference in inductance between 10" (254mm) of #14 Cu wire and 10"
of 2"-wide Cu strap.

### I guess Terman is wrong then.
** chortle

What test gear was Terman using
back in the 30's ??
** guffaw

I can't even measure any uh on my B+K 875a/b
LCR.. with a 3' length of 3/4" wide CU strap.... but I can easily
measure .65 uh on a 2' length of 18 ga wire.

### 2" wide copper strap...12" long will read zero uh.
** Does that mean it has zero L ? According to Fred Terman, it has L. I did not get off my lazy posterior and calculate L but my guess is c. 1.5nH -- which would resonate with 100pF c. 450MHz.

To experimentally see the difference, one can alternately connect
10" of #14, and 10" of 2" strap across a 50 to 100 pF doorknob cap
and measure each resonant frequency with a dipmeter. From these
measurements, one can calculate the inductance of the #14 and the
inductance of the 2" strap. I have the needed materials to
perform this experiment. Would anyone like to venture a guess as
to how much less L the 2" strap exhibits than the #14 wire?

#### I dont have have any 2" wide strap in the shop. I usually buy
it and get it chopped into 1" wide strips... and 3/4" wide. It
comes in 3' x 7' sheets. I get it chopped into 3' lenght's. Why
even mess with a grid dip meter ?? Just measure the damn thing with
a LCR meter.
** A dip-meter is indirectly capable of measuring inductances that are too small to measure resolutely with typical LCR-meters. To perform such measurements with a dip-meter, one needs a 50 - 100pF or so C with c. 25mm leads for a reference. (time out: attach a paper tag the cap, and solder small Cu clips on the reference-C leads) Next one needs to determine the L and C of the reference-capacitor . Clip it to a C meter, measure C, and record the value on the tag. To determine the L of the ref-C, clip the clips together to short it, and measure resonance with Tom's infernal, eternal enemy, the dip- meter. Calculate L using the std. resonance formula. Record the value of L on the tag.
To measure an unknown L, clip the ref.-C to the item, and measure the new, lower, dip frequency. Calculate total L, subtract the L of the ref-C, and the result is the L of the unknown whatever. For added accuracy, measure the dip-meter's freq. of oscillation with a counter.

### You will have more internal inductance inside the 100 pf
doorknob cap.. than the 2" wide strap alone !
** I will wager one, whole, any topping, Costco pizza that a 100pF doorknob cap has less L than 10" of 2" wide Cu strap.

... IF somebody was
gonna rf grnd the grids... the correct component would be a 200-
1000 pf TX ceramic doorknob cap. ... just like u would use for a
screen bypass cap on a metal tetrode.
** Nobody in their right mind uses these suckers to bypass an 8170 screen.

You don't see anybody
using disc ceramic caps for screen bypass caps on a metal tetrode.
** True, and folks who know don't use doorknobs either.

### measuring inductance of 12" long piece of 14 ga wire is
easy.... just stuff it directly into the LCR meter.. and measure
it. The formulae in the ARRL hand book for calculating inductance
of straight pieces of wire is very accurate. I'll measure 12" of
14 ga wire tonight.. and report my results. I'm guessing it will be
about .20 uh. The 2" wide CU strap of course will be zero
uh.
** I hope Jim likes surprises as much as I like pizza.

Strap has a bigger circumference to it... since it has two
sides.. way more surface area on a piece of 2" wide strap... than
the circumference of 14 ga wire. I think 14 ga wire is only
abt .083" diam... and circumference would only be .26" vs 4" for
the 2" wide strap !
** Is circumference directly proportional to L?


Why the drive requirements drop 20-25 watts on every band....
who knows.

RICH SEZ... Unless there is zero reflected power and the power meter
has recently been calibrated, power meter measurements are
untrustworthy.

### BS.. In all cases reflected power IS zero... both before and
after grids are directly grnded. Even if any reflected power is
indicated... u just subtract the rvs power reading from the forward
power reading.. to read net real forward power... which is what both
bird/cd says ....and is correct.
** What g-g amplifier has a 1.00 to 1 input SWR?



... Why u insist on semi floating the grids on a GG amp is
beyond me.
RICH SEZ... The grids are not floating at 100MHz with cap-
grounding. Because the cap's negative reactance cancels some of
the grid's inductance, the grids have a less +j-ohms path to ground
at 100MHz than is afforded by Cu straps. Thus, cap-grounding
slightly increases the grid's resonant frequency and allows for
grid fusing.

### I don't buy that for a second.
** Do you have access to a dip-meter?

If that was the case... the 3-
500z' would be more stable using caps... and they are not.
** Correct. There is virtually no difference because the root of the VHF oscillation problem is not in the grid circuitry, it's between the anode and the Tune-C.

What is
accounting for the the extra 20-25 watts of drive requirement when
using cap grnding ?? The IMD gets WORSE with cap grnding as well.
** With C grid-grounding, a SB-220 measures something better than 38db down. What transceiver did you use to make this measurement?

Cap grnding doesn't provide any NFB at all.
** Agreed. Orr didn't have his oars in the water on this one.

### and u won't see anybody semi floating the grids of a metal
triode either... that's just an invite to parasitic hell.
** According to Eimac's 8877 development team, the 8877 exhibited an occasional "oscillation condition" (possibly UHF) during the testing phase, and it seems likely to me that they were using an Eimac 8877 grid-grounding collet. [ref. W. B. Foote]

### You can STILL use grid fusing with wide CU straps...... just
install a rear mount 3agc fuse holder... and wire between chassis
and lower end of grid shunt if a multi meter us used.... or between
chassis and neg terminal of a dedicated grid meter. Use a super
fast 3agc fuse... and when it blows open it shuts off BOTH tubes
asap.
** Good engineering practice --- provided some schlub doesn't replace a blown fuse with a 20A-slowblow .
...


R. L. Measures, AG6K, 805.386.3734
r@..., rlm@..., www.somis.org


Re: TL-922 parts:

FRANCIS CARCIA
 

Home Depot sells copper flashing by the foot. I think it is about 1 foot wide.

pentalab wrote:

--- In ham_amplifiers@yahoogroups.com, R L Measures wrote:
>
> Jim -- How long is the grid grounding strap for a 3-500Z ?
> >
> > #### The AL-82...and it's little bastard brother.. the AL-80BX
are
> > two of the most parasitic prone amps in existence.... which is
why
> > the east coast guys call em the "fire cracker". So even though
both
> > have their grids tied directly to chassis... Ameritron has still
> > managed to screw em both up.

RICH SEZ... The VHF suppressors in the SB-220, AL-82, and the TL-
922 have a Q of 4.5 to 5.5 at 100MHz,and all have a reputation for
squirreliness. If direct-grounding the grids is the sure cure for
VHF instability, why isn't the one with direct-grounded grids
stable?

### Simple... cuz Ameritron obviously has a layout problem some
where in those 2 x amps. They also have an internal bandswitch
resonance problem.[hence switching in caps between bandswitch
contacts] Things like placement of plate choke,lead length's,
whether plate block caps are separate.. or mounted to rfc can all
make an amp squirelly. Having to pad a tune cap via the bandswitch
for 160m is asking for more trbl. Throw in distance between
cabinet side and top tid to tank components will make a big
difference. Then their t/r relays are not sequenced right either...
u can easily have drive applied to the cathode of an al80/82 b4 the
ant is connected.... which is an invite to a disaster.

### Anybody who buys an Ameritron AL80/82 is virtually guaranteed
to have flames spitting out of the bandswitch. The AL-82BX is the
most piss poor designed amp available these days. We won't even
discuss anything made by Dentron... those belong straight into the
trash heap... no useable parts inside any of em.

> >
> > ### I think the straps I used in my L4B's are 1/2" wide cu... and
> > as short as practical. I can name u 12 guys I know who directly
> > grounded the grid's on TL-922's.... and all reported the same
> > results... and 100+ more who directly grounded the grids on SB-
> > 220/221's. ..same deal.... same results. Rock stable.... and 20-
> > 25 watts less drive required.... using stock suppressors. And
don't
> > feed us this crap about a 200 pf disc ceramic having less L than
a
> > 1/2" wide solid CU strap.... it doesn't.
>
>Rich sez... A 200pF cap with short, shorted leads dips at c. 130MHz.

### That would depend on the lead lengths of the 26 ga wires
hanging out each end of the cap. IOW... ur saying with one
particular config... one cap is series resonant at 130 mhz.

At 100MHz, it has a small amount of negative reactance.

### Now ur saying the above single 200 pf cap... with leads long
enough to series resonate at 130 mhz... will exhibit capacitive
reactance at a lower freq.

At 100MHz, a 1/2" wide Cu strap 1" long has c. 65-ohms of positive
reactance. At 100MHz, which has more inductive reactance, the cap
or the strap?

### The cap.

> >
> > ### Why the grid resonance doesn't change much... who knows.
>
>
RICH SEZ... It doesn't change much because 1/2" (12.7mm) strap does
Not have half the inductance per unit length that 1/4" (6.35mm)
strap has. According to Terman, inductance is a logarithmic
function of width. Thus, if Terman is right, there is not a lot of
difference in inductance between 10" (254mm) of #14 Cu wire and 10"
of 2"-wide Cu strap.

### I guess Terman is wrong then. What test gear was Terman using
back in the 30's ?? I can't even measure any uh on my B+K 875a/b
LCR.. with a 3' length of 3/4" wide CU strap.... but I can easily
measure .65 uh on a 2' length of 18 ga wire.

### 2" wide copper strap...12" long will read zero uh.

To experimentally see the difference, one can alternately connect
10" of #14, and 10" of 2" strap across a 50 to 100 pF doorknob cap
and measure each resonant frequency with a dipmeter. From these
measurements, one can calculate the inductance of the #14 and the
inductance of the 2" strap. I have the needed materials to
perform this experiment. Would anyone like to venture a guess as
to how much less L the 2" strap exhibits than the #14 wire?

#### I dont have have any 2" wide strap in the shop. I usually buy
it and get it chopped into 1" wide strips... and 3/4" wide. It
comes in 3' x 7' sheets. I get it chopped into 3' lenght's. Why
even mess with a grid dip meter ?? Just measure the damn thing with
a LCR meter.

### You will have more internal inductance inside the 100 pf
doorknob cap.. than the 2" wide strap alone ! There is also a
big difference between 100 pf 5 kv TX ceramic doorknob caps.. with
machine screws on each end.... and 200 pf disc ceramics.. with 24-
26 ga long wire leads.... apples and oranges. IF somebody was
gonna rf grnd the grids... the correct component would be a 200-
1000 pf TX ceramic doorknob cap. ... just like u would use for a
screen bypass cap on a metal tetrode. You don't see anybody
using disc ceramic caps for screen bypass caps on a metal tetrode.

### measuring inductance of 12" long piece of 14 ga wire is
easy.... just stuff it directly into the LCR meter.. and measure
it. The formulae in the ARRL hand book for calculating inductance
of straight pieces of wire is very accurate. I'll measure 12" of
14 ga wire tonight.. and report my results. I'm guessing it will be
about .20 uh. The 2" wide CU strap of course will be zero
uh. Strap has a bigger circumference to it... since it has two
sides.. way more surface area on a piece of 2" wide strap... than
the circumference of 14 ga wire. I think 14 ga wire is only
abt .083" diam... and circumference would only be .26" vs 4" for
the 2" wide strap !

>
> > Why
> > the drive requirements drop 20-25 watts on every band.... who
> > knows.

RICH SEZ... Unless there is zero reflected power and the power meter
has recently been calibrated, power meter measurements are
untrustworthy.

### BS.. In all cases reflected power IS zero... both before and
after grids are directly grnded. Even if any reflected power is
indicated... u just subtract the rvs power reading from the forward
power reading.. to read net real forward power... which is what both
bird/cd says ....and is correct.

>
> > ... Why u insist on semi floating the grids on a GG amp is
> > beyond me.
>
>RICH SEZ... The grids are not floating at 100MHz with cap-
grounding. Because the cap's negative reactance cancels some of
the grid's inductance, the grids have a less +j-ohms path to ground
at 100MHz than is afforded by Cu straps. Thus, cap-grounding
slightly increases the grid's resonant frequency and allows for
grid fusing.

### I don't buy that for a second. If that was the case... the 3-
500z' would be more stable using caps... and they are not. What is
accounting for the the extra 20-25 watts of drive requirement when
using cap grnding ?? The IMD gets WORSE with cap grnding as well.
Cap grnding doesn't provide any NFB at all.

### and u won't see anybody semi floating the grids of a metal
triode either... that's just an invite to parasitic hell.

### You can STILL use grid fusing with wide CU straps...... just
install a rear mount 3agc fuse holder... and wire between chassis
and lower end of grid shunt if a multi meter us used.... or between
chassis and neg terminal of a dedicated grid meter. Use a super
fast 3agc fuse... and when it blows open it shuts off BOTH tubes
asap. Input swr rises to infinity.. and xcvr shuts down. With NO
path for dc grid current.. amp can't be driven... and you will see
zero watts on output wattmeter. A rear mount 3agc grid fuse can be
replaced in 3 seconds... after you determine what took out the fuse
in the 1st place !

later... Jim VE7RF

>
> ...
> R. L. Measures, AG6K, 805.386.3734
> r@..., rlm@..., www.somis.org
>



Re: TL-922 parts:

pentalab
 

--- In ham_amplifiers@..., R L Measures <r@...> wrote:

Jim -- How long is the grid grounding strap for a 3-500Z ?

#### The AL-82...and it's little bastard brother.. the AL-80BX
are
two of the most parasitic prone amps in existence.... which is
why
the east coast guys call em the "fire cracker". So even though
both
have their grids tied directly to chassis... Ameritron has still
managed to screw em both up.
RICH SEZ... The VHF suppressors in the SB-220, AL-82, and the TL-
922 have a Q of 4.5 to 5.5 at 100MHz,and all have a reputation for
squirreliness. If direct-grounding the grids is the sure cure for
VHF instability, why isn't the one with direct-grounded grids
stable?

### Simple... cuz Ameritron obviously has a layout problem some
where in those 2 x amps. They also have an internal bandswitch
resonance problem.[hence switching in caps between bandswitch
contacts] Things like placement of plate choke,lead length's,
whether plate block caps are separate.. or mounted to rfc can all
make an amp squirelly. Having to pad a tune cap via the bandswitch
for 160m is asking for more trbl. Throw in distance between
cabinet side and top tid to tank components will make a big
difference. Then their t/r relays are not sequenced right either...
u can easily have drive applied to the cathode of an al80/82 b4 the
ant is connected.... which is an invite to a disaster.

### Anybody who buys an Ameritron AL80/82 is virtually guaranteed
to have flames spitting out of the bandswitch. The AL-82BX is the
most piss poor designed amp available these days. We won't even
discuss anything made by Dentron... those belong straight into the
trash heap... no useable parts inside any of em.





### I think the straps I used in my L4B's are 1/2" wide cu... and
as short as practical. I can name u 12 guys I know who directly
grounded the grid's on TL-922's.... and all reported the same
results... and 100+ more who directly grounded the grids on SB-
220/221's. ..same deal.... same results. Rock stable.... and 20-
25 watts less drive required.... using stock suppressors. And
don't
feed us this crap about a 200 pf disc ceramic having less L than
a
1/2" wide solid CU strap.... it doesn't.
Rich sez... A 200pF cap with short, shorted leads dips at c. 130MHz.
### That would depend on the lead lengths of the 26 ga wires
hanging out each end of the cap. IOW... ur saying with one
particular config... one cap is series resonant at 130 mhz.




At 100MHz, it has a small amount of negative reactance.

### Now ur saying the above single 200 pf cap... with leads long
enough to series resonate at 130 mhz... will exhibit capacitive
reactance at a lower freq.




At 100MHz, a 1/2" wide Cu strap 1" long has c. 65-ohms of positive
reactance. At 100MHz, which has more inductive reactance, the cap
or the strap?

### The cap.



### Why the grid resonance doesn't change much... who knows.
RICH SEZ... It doesn't change much because 1/2" (12.7mm) strap does
Not have half the inductance per unit length that 1/4" (6.35mm)
strap has. According to Terman, inductance is a logarithmic
function of width. Thus, if Terman is right, there is not a lot of
difference in inductance between 10" (254mm) of #14 Cu wire and 10"
of 2"-wide Cu strap.

### I guess Terman is wrong then. What test gear was Terman using
back in the 30's ?? I can't even measure any uh on my B+K 875a/b
LCR.. with a 3' length of 3/4" wide CU strap.... but I can easily
measure .65 uh on a 2' length of 18 ga wire.

### 2" wide copper strap...12" long will read zero uh.



To experimentally see the difference, one can alternately connect
10" of #14, and 10" of 2" strap across a 50 to 100 pF doorknob cap
and measure each resonant frequency with a dipmeter. From these
measurements, one can calculate the inductance of the #14 and the
inductance of the 2" strap. I have the needed materials to
perform this experiment. Would anyone like to venture a guess as
to how much less L the 2" strap exhibits than the #14 wire?

#### I dont have have any 2" wide strap in the shop. I usually buy
it and get it chopped into 1" wide strips... and 3/4" wide. It
comes in 3' x 7' sheets. I get it chopped into 3' lenght's. Why
even mess with a grid dip meter ?? Just measure the damn thing with
a LCR meter.

### You will have more internal inductance inside the 100 pf
doorknob cap.. than the 2" wide strap alone ! There is also a
big difference between 100 pf 5 kv TX ceramic doorknob caps.. with
machine screws on each end.... and 200 pf disc ceramics.. with 24-
26 ga long wire leads.... apples and oranges. IF somebody was
gonna rf grnd the grids... the correct component would be a 200-
1000 pf TX ceramic doorknob cap. ... just like u would use for a
screen bypass cap on a metal tetrode. You don't see anybody
using disc ceramic caps for screen bypass caps on a metal tetrode.

### measuring inductance of 12" long piece of 14 ga wire is
easy.... just stuff it directly into the LCR meter.. and measure
it. The formulae in the ARRL hand book for calculating inductance
of straight pieces of wire is very accurate. I'll measure 12" of
14 ga wire tonight.. and report my results. I'm guessing it will be
about .20 uh. The 2" wide CU strap of course will be zero
uh. Strap has a bigger circumference to it... since it has two
sides.. way more surface area on a piece of 2" wide strap... than
the circumference of 14 ga wire. I think 14 ga wire is only
abt .083" diam... and circumference would only be .26" vs 4" for
the 2" wide strap !






Why
the drive requirements drop 20-25 watts on every band.... who
knows.
RICH SEZ... Unless there is zero reflected power and the power meter
has recently been calibrated, power meter measurements are
untrustworthy.

### BS.. In all cases reflected power IS zero... both before and
after grids are directly grnded. Even if any reflected power is
indicated... u just subtract the rvs power reading from the forward
power reading.. to read net real forward power... which is what both
bird/cd says ....and is correct.




... Why u insist on semi floating the grids on a GG amp is
beyond me.
RICH SEZ... The grids are not floating at 100MHz with cap-
grounding. Because the cap's negative reactance cancels some of
the grid's inductance, the grids have a less +j-ohms path to ground
at 100MHz than is afforded by Cu straps. Thus, cap-grounding
slightly increases the grid's resonant frequency and allows for
grid fusing.

### I don't buy that for a second. If that was the case... the 3-
500z' would be more stable using caps... and they are not. What is
accounting for the the extra 20-25 watts of drive requirement when
using cap grnding ?? The IMD gets WORSE with cap grnding as well.
Cap grnding doesn't provide any NFB at all.

### and u won't see anybody semi floating the grids of a metal
triode either... that's just an invite to parasitic hell.

### You can STILL use grid fusing with wide CU straps...... just
install a rear mount 3agc fuse holder... and wire between chassis
and lower end of grid shunt if a multi meter us used.... or between
chassis and neg terminal of a dedicated grid meter. Use a super
fast 3agc fuse... and when it blows open it shuts off BOTH tubes
asap. Input swr rises to infinity.. and xcvr shuts down. With NO
path for dc grid current.. amp can't be driven... and you will see
zero watts on output wattmeter. A rear mount 3agc grid fuse can be
replaced in 3 seconds... after you determine what took out the fuse
in the 1st place !

later... Jim VE7RF





...
R. L. Measures, AG6K, 805.386.3734
r@..., rlm@..., www.somis.org


Re: AL80-A

pentalab
 

--- In ham_amplifiers@..., R L Measures <r@...> wrote:


On Dec 27, 2006, at 5:32 PM, Mike(W5UC) & Kathy(K5MWH) wrote:

I'm not familiar with this amp, but a good guess is that I
would look for a shorted diode or diodes in the power supply.

RICH SEZ....If a HV rectifier diode shorts, and the electrolytics
are not protected from AC by reverse diodes, the electrolytics are
DOA.

### agreed. Which is why I always install at least one reverse
connected 6A10 [1 kv-6A CCS-400A surge] diode across each HV
electrolytic. Now Ameritron isn't the only ones who leave out the
RVS connected diode across each lytic...they all do. I don't see
any RVS connected diodes across caps in alpha's, qro, Command
technology, heath, dentron, amp supply, or anybody else. They are
all on the..... "get cheap program".

### I'm tellin u fellows.... if these manufacturer's of ham gear
can eliminate just one diode, screw, washer, or anything else, they
will do it in a heart beat.... to enhance profits.

### Rauch keeps bragging about how Ameritron pays very little for
parts in bulk. Have u any idea what a diode cost... when ur buying
100,000 to 500,000+ of em at one shot ?

### So here's yet another potential case of 8x expensive lytics
down the toilet.. cuz some bonehead conveniently forgot to install
16 cents worth of diodes at the factory. Can u imagine smoking
20-30 x 2000-5200 uf lytics in a real HV supply ?

### At least they should offer two versions of any amp.... the 2nd
one costing $5.00 more.... that's designed and built right.

Later... Jim VE7RF






...
R. L. Measures, AG6K, 805.386.3734
r@..., rlm@..., www.somis.org


Re: TL-922 parts:

 

On Dec 27, 2006, at 5:27 PM, pentalab wrote:

--- In ham_amplifiers@..., R L Measures <r@...> wrote:


On Dec 27, 2006, at 12:24 PM, pentalab wrote:
### Owner's can avoid the parasitic problem altogether by simply
removing the 2 x rf chokes from the gid pins... plus the 6 x 200pf
caps from the same grid pins..... and then directly ground the
6 grid pins
with wide strap. Then the stock suppressor's will work
just fine.

## By semi-floating the grids you are just asking for parasitic
trbl.

RICH SEZ... According to my dipmeter, directly-grounding a 3-500Zs
grid pins makes little difference in the grid's resonant frequency.
The AL-82 is as unstable as are the TL-922 and SB-220, yet the
AL-82 has directly-grounded grids.

Jim -- How long is the grid grounding strap for a 3-500Z ?
#### The AL-82...and it's little bastard brother.. the AL-80BX are
two of the most parasitic prone amps in existence.... which is why
the east coast guys call em the "fire cracker". So even though both
have their grids tied directly to chassis... Ameritron has still
managed to screw em both up.
The VHF suppressors in the SB-220, AL-82, and the TL-922 have a Q of 4.5 to 5.5 at 100MHz,and all have a reputation for squirreliness. If direct-grounding the grids is the sure cure for VHF instability, why isn't the one with direct-grounded grids stable?

### I think the straps I used in my L4B's are 1/2" wide cu... and
as short as practical. I can name u 12 guys I know who directly
grounded the grid's on TL-922's.... and all reported the same
results... and 100+ more who directly grounded the grids on SB-
220/221's. ..same deal.... same results. Rock stable.... and 20-
25 watts less drive required.... using stock suppressors. And don't
feed us this crap about a 200 pf disc ceramic having less L than a
1/2" wide solid CU strap.... it doesn't.
A 200pF cap with short, shorted leads dips at c. 130MHz. At 100MHz, it has a small amount of negative reactance. At 100MHz, a 1/2" wide Cu strap 1" long has c. 65-ohms of positive reactance. At 100MHz, which has more inductive reactance, the cap or the strap?

### Why the grid resonance doesn't change much... who knows.
It doesn't change much because 1/2" (12.7mm) strap does Not have half the inductance per unit length that 1/4" (6.35mm) strap has. According to Terman, inductance is a logarithmic function of width. Thus, if Terman is right, there is not a lot of difference in inductance between 10" (254mm) of #14 Cu wire and 10" of 2"-wide Cu strap. To experimentally see the difference, one can alternately connect 10" of #14, and 10" of 2" strap across a 50 to 100 pF doorknob cap and measure each resonant frequency with a dipmeter. From these measurements, one can calculate the inductance of the #14 and the inductance of the 2" strap. I have the needed materials to perform this experiment. Would anyone like to venture a guess as to how much less L the 2" strap exhibits than the #14 wire?

Why
the drive requirements drop 20-25 watts on every band.... who
knows.
Unless there is zero reflected power and the power meter has recently been calibrated, power meter measurements are untrustworthy.

... Why u insist on semi floating the grids on a GG amp is
beyond me.
The grids are not floating at 100MHz with cap-grounding. Because the cap's negative reactance cancels some of the grid's inductance, the grids have a less +j-ohms path to ground at 100MHz than is afforded by Cu straps. Thus, cap-grounding slightly increases the grid's resonant frequency and allows for grid fusing.

...
R. L. Measures, AG6K, 805.386.3734
r@..., rlm@..., www.somis.org


Re: AL80-A

 

On Dec 27, 2006, at 5:32 PM, Mike(W5UC) & Kathy(K5MWH) wrote:

I'm not familiar with this amp, but a good guess is that I would look for a shorted diode or diodes in the power supply.
If a HV rectifier diode shorts, and the electrolytics are not protected from AC by reverse diodes, the electrolytics are DOA.
...
R. L. Measures, AG6K, 805.386.3734
r@..., rlm@..., www.somis.org


Re: AL80-A

 

On Dec 27, 2006, at 5:27 PM, Vernon J. Kunes, Jr. wrote:

The problem at this time is that the amp takes out the 10 amp fuses
when I turn it on. High voltage problem?
Probably. With the tube in or out?

R. L. Measures, AG6K, 805.386.3734
r@..., rlm@..., www.somis.org


Re: AL80-A

Mike(W5UC) & Kathy(K5MWH)
 

I'm not familiar with this amp, but a good guess is that I would look for a shorted diode or diodes in the power supply.

73,
Mike, W5UC



At 07:27 PM 12/27/2006, you wrote:

The problem at this time is that the amp takes out the 10 amp fuses
when I turn it on. High voltage problem?

--- In ham_amplifiers@..., R L Measures wrote:
>
>
> On Dec 27, 2006, at 12:31 PM, Tony King - W4ZT wrote:
>
> > The AL-80A manual can be downloaded from
> > <> or a paper copy can be obtained
> > directly from Ameritron.
> >
> > pentalab wrote:
> > > --- In ham_amplifiers@..., R L Measures wrote:
> > >> Hi, Vernon
> > >> .
> > >> 6. inspect the 10m and 15m L, plus the 80m & 160m Tune-C-padder
> > >> bandswitch contacts.
> > >
> > > ##### Rich.... do they actually pad the C1 tune cap on 160 + 80m
> > > on a AL-80 B ??? I can understand maybe padding the C1 cap on
> > > 160m... but not 80m.
> >
> > The schematic shows padding C1 on 160 meters only but padding C2 on
> > 160,
> > 80 and 40 meters.
>
> Sorry, Jim. My mistake.
> >
> > >
> > > ### I think they pull the same stunt on the TL-922 on at least
> > 160m ?
> > >
>
> The 922 uses Tune-C padders on 160m and 80m.
> > > ## I can see now where these amps could easily give plenty of trbl.
> > > There is one heluva lot of RF on a tune cap as is.
> > >
> > > ### padding a load cap is no big deal... padding a tune cap is a
> > > big deal.
>
> agreed
> > >
> > > Later... Jim VE7RF
> > >
> >
>
> R. L. Measures, AG6K, 805.386.3734
> r@..., rlm@...,
>

"age & treachery will overcome youth & skill"


Re: TL-922 parts:

pentalab
 

--- In ham_amplifiers@..., R L Measures <r@...> wrote:


On Dec 27, 2006, at 12:24 PM, pentalab wrote:
### Owner's can avoid the parasitic problem altogether by simply
removing the 2 x rf chokes from the gid pins... plus the 6 x 200
pf
caps from the same grid pins..... and then directly ground the 6
x
grid pins with wide strap. Then the stock suppressor's will work
just fine.

## By semi-floating the grids you are just asking for parasitic
trbl.
RICH SEZ... According to my dipmeter, directly-grounding a 3-500Zs
grid pins makes little difference in the grid's resonant frequency.
The AL-82 is as unstable as are the TL-922 and SB-220, yet the
AL-82 has directly-grounded grids.

Jim -- How long is the grid grounding strap for a 3-500Z ?
#### The AL-82...and it's little bastard brother.. the AL-80BX are
two of the most parasitic prone amps in existence.... which is why
the east coast guys call em the "fire cracker". So even though both
have their grids tied directly to chassis... Ameritron has still
managed to screw em both up.

### I think the straps I used in my L4B's are 1/2" wide cu... and
as short as practical. I can name u 12 guys I know who directly
grounded the grid's on TL-922's.... and all reported the same
results... and 100+ more who directly grounded the grids on SB-
220/221's. ..same deal.... same results. Rock stable.... and 20-
25 watts less drive required.... using stock suppressors. And don't
feed us this crap about a 200 pf disc ceramic having less L than a
1/2" wide solid CU strap.... it doesn't.

### Why the grid resonance doesn't change much... who knows. Why
the drive requirements drop 20-25 watts on every band.... who
knows. All I know from repeated tests... and having done it
umpteen times is [a] drive drops 22 watts [b] stabilty is
enhanced [c] IMD is improved.... then improved again.. since xcvr
output can be reduced by 20-25 watts.

### I'm 100% convinced that parasitic stability starts with how
well the grids are bonded to the chassis. I'd bond the grids to
chassis... then if amp is still squirelly... proceed with a fix....
whether that involves using a small globar.. or nichrome.. is a moot
point. It's worth it just for the decreased drive.

### The TL-922 owner's who had nichrome suppressor's in em...
reported they could replace em with stock kenwood suppressors... and
the amp was stable. .... provided the grids were directly
grounded. Why u insist on semi floating the grids on a GG amp is
beyond me.

Jim VE7RF




Later... Jim VE7RF
R. L. Measures, AG6K, 805.386.3734
r@..., rlm@..., www.somis.org


Re: AL80-A

Vernon J. Kunes, Jr.
 

The problem at this time is that the amp takes out the 10 amp fuses
when I turn it on. High voltage problem?

--- In ham_amplifiers@..., R L Measures <r@...> wrote:


On Dec 27, 2006, at 12:31 PM, Tony King - W4ZT wrote:

The AL-80A manual can be downloaded from
<> or a paper copy can be obtained
directly from Ameritron.

pentalab wrote:
--- In ham_amplifiers@..., R L Measures <r@...> wrote:
Hi, Vernon
.
6. inspect the 10m and 15m L, plus the 80m & 160m Tune-C-padder
bandswitch contacts.
##### Rich.... do they actually pad the C1 tune cap on 160 + 80m
on a AL-80 B ??? I can understand maybe padding the C1 cap on
160m... but not 80m.
The schematic shows padding C1 on 160 meters only but padding C2 on
160,
80 and 40 meters.
Sorry, Jim. My mistake.


### I think they pull the same stunt on the TL-922 on at least
160m ?
The 922 uses Tune-C padders on 160m and 80m.
## I can see now where these amps could easily give plenty of trbl.
There is one heluva lot of RF on a tune cap as is.

### padding a load cap is no big deal... padding a tune cap is a
big deal.
agreed

Later... Jim VE7RF
R. L. Measures, AG6K, 805.386.3734
r@..., rlm@..., www.somis.org


Re: AL80-A

 

On Dec 27, 2006, at 12:31 PM, Tony King - W4ZT wrote:

The AL-80A manual can be downloaded from
<> or a paper copy can be obtained
directly from Ameritron.

pentalab wrote:
--- In ham_amplifiers@..., R L Measures <r@...> wrote:
Hi, Vernon
.
6. inspect the 10m and 15m L, plus the 80m & 160m Tune-C-padder
bandswitch contacts.
##### Rich.... do they actually pad the C1 tune cap on 160 + 80m
on a AL-80 B ??? I can understand maybe padding the C1 cap on
160m... but not 80m.
The schematic shows padding C1 on 160 meters only but padding C2 on 160,
80 and 40 meters.
Sorry, Jim. My mistake.


### I think they pull the same stunt on the TL-922 on at least
160m ?
The 922 uses Tune-C padders on 160m and 80m.
## I can see now where these amps could easily give plenty of trbl.
There is one heluva lot of RF on a tune cap as is.

### padding a load cap is no big deal... padding a tune cap is a
big deal.
agreed

Later... Jim VE7RF
R. L. Measures, AG6K, 805.386.3734
r@..., rlm@..., www.somis.org


Re: TL-922 parts:

 

On Dec 27, 2006, at 12:24 PM, pentalab wrote:

--- In ham_amplifiers@..., R L Measures <r@...> wrote:

? As I understand it, Trio-Kenwood has stopped selling bandswitches
for the TL-922. The stock TL-922 uses VHF parasitic suppressors with
a Q of c. 5.5 @ 100MHz. Since the the TL-922's original suppressors
with a pair of fresh 3-500Zs can produce intermittent oscillations
c.
120MHz which can arc, melt & even evaporate the 10m and 15m L
contacts on the bandswitch, owners can avoid the problem by either
switching to lower-Q VHF suppressors to lower VHF-gain, or by using
worn-out 3-500Zs to do the same.
- end
### Owner's can avoid the parasitic problem altogether by simply
removing the 2 x rf chokes from the gid pins... plus the 6 x 200 pf
caps from the same grid pins..... and then directly ground the 6 x
grid pins with wide strap. Then the stock suppressor's will work
just fine.

## By semi-floating the grids you are just asking for parasitic
trbl.
According to my dipmeter, directly-grounding a 3-500Zs grid pins
makes little difference in the grid's resonant frequency.
The AL-82 is as unstable as are the TL-922 and SB-220, yet the
AL-82 has directly-grounded grids.

Jim -- How long is the grid grounding strap for a 3-500Z ?

Later... Jim VE7RF
R. L. Measures, AG6K, 805.386.3734
r@..., rlm@..., www.somis.org


Re: source for GU-95B / 4CX5000 data sheet ?

Peter Voelpel
 

Except being a tetrode with same anode dissipation there is nothing
equivalent

73
Peter

________________________________

From: ham_amplifiers@... [mailto:ham_amplifiers@...]
On Behalf Of R L Measures

As I understand it, the GU-95B is equivalent to the 5cx5000A / 8170.


Re: AL80-A

Tony King - W4ZT
 

The AL-80A manual can be downloaded from <> or a paper copy can be obtained directly from Ameritron.

pentalab wrote:
--- In ham_amplifiers@..., R L Measures <r@...> wrote:
Hi, Vernon
.
6. inspect the 10m and 15m L, plus the 80m & 160m Tune-C-padder bandswitch contacts.
##### Rich.... do they actually pad the C1 tune cap on 160 + 80m on a AL-80 B ??? I can understand maybe padding the C1 cap on 160m... but not 80m.
The schematic shows padding C1 on 160 meters only but padding C2 on 160, 80 and 40 meters.

### I think they pull the same stunt on the TL-922 on at least 160m ?
## I can see now where these amps could easily give plenty of trbl. There is one heluva lot of RF on a tune cap as is.
### padding a load cap is no big deal... padding a tune cap is a big deal. Later... Jim VE7RF
73, Tony W4ZT


Re: TL-922 parts:

pentalab
 

--- In ham_amplifiers@..., R L Measures <r@...> wrote:

? As I understand it, Trio-Kenwood has stopped selling
bandswitches
for the TL-922. The stock TL-922 uses VHF parasitic suppressors
with
a Q of c. 5.5 @ 100MHz. Since the the TL-922's original
suppressors
with a pair of fresh 3-500Zs can produce intermittent oscillations
c.
120MHz which can arc, melt & even evaporate the 10m and 15m L
contacts on the bandswitch, owners can avoid the problem by
either
switching to lower-Q VHF suppressors to lower VHF-gain, or by
using
worn-out 3-500Zs to do the same.
- end
### Owner's can avoid the parasitic problem altogether by simply
removing the 2 x rf chokes from the gid pins... plus the 6 x 200 pf
caps from the same grid pins..... and then directly ground the 6 x
grid pins with wide strap. Then the stock suppressor's will work
just fine.

## By semi-floating the grids you are just asking for parasitic
trbl.

Later... Jim VE7RF




R. L. Measures, AG6K, 805.386.3734
r@..., rlm@..., www.somis.org


Re: AL80-A

pentalab
 

--- In ham_amplifiers@..., R L Measures <r@...> wrote:

Hi, Vernon
.
6. inspect the 10m and 15m L, plus the 80m & 160m Tune-C-padder
bandswitch contacts.
##### Rich.... do they actually pad the C1 tune cap on 160 + 80m
on a AL-80 B ??? I can understand maybe padding the C1 cap on
160m... but not 80m.

### I think they pull the same stunt on the TL-922 on at least 160m ?

## I can see now where these amps could easily give plenty of trbl.
There is one heluva lot of RF on a tune cap as is.

### padding a load cap is no big deal... padding a tune cap is a
big deal.

Later... Jim VE7RF