Re: ECPSVM under Hyperion
Spinhawk is (obsolete) Hercules 3.x.? Prior to Hercules Helper, it was Spinhawk was fair easier to to build. It's a Bloom County quote (in response to a congressional subpoena). -ahd-
By
Drew Derbyshire
·
#6157
·
|
Re: ECPSVM under Hyperion
Hello! And Spinhawk is the development branch name for the regular example of Hercules? Yes? And Pluto is what besides Mr. Mouse's dog, and a dwarf planet? ----- Gregg C Levine gregg.drwho8@...
By
Gregg Levine
·
#6156
·
|
Re: #VMCE #rexx EE goes XEDIT - compiling a wish list
#VMCE
#rexx
A repeatable profile will be included as a demo in the next bleeding edge preview. Martin */* REXX */ / * ** ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
By
Martin Scheffler
·
#6155
·
|
Re: ECPSVM under Hyperion
Drew, There were issues with the floating point code. It looks like the fixes for these were added to the Develop branch in May https://github.com/SDL-Hercules-390/hyperion/issues/382 but the last
By
Dave Wade
·
#6154
·
|
ECPSVM under Hyperion
The last time I tried to use ECPSVM assists, it was under Spinhawk; it didn't go well and I retreated to Pluto. How is useful ECPSVM under Hyperion?? It doesn't need to be 100% functional, but if I
By
Drew Derbyshire
·
#6153
·
|
Updated Wiki Page: Reserved CP Modification Numbers
#wiki-notice
The wiki page Reserved CP Modification Numbers ( /g/h390-vm/wiki/37734/211259 ) has been updated by William Denton <williamedenton@...>. Compare Revisions (
By
Group Notification <noreply@...>
·
#6152
·
|
Updated Wiki Page: Reserved CMS Modification Numbers
#wiki-notice
The wiki page Reserved CMS Modification Numbers ( /g/h390-vm/wiki/37735/211258 ) has been updated by William Denton <williamedenton@...>. Compare Revisions (
By
Group Notification <noreply@...>
·
#6151
·
|
Re: #VMCE #rexx EE goes XEDIT - compiling a wish list
#VMCE
#rexx
I will check if the current snapshot is stable enough to show another bleeding edge preview. There are a lot of exciting new features and capabilities, at least as a Proof of Concept. Implementation
By
Martin Scheffler
·
#6150
·
|
Re: #VMCE #rexx EE goes XEDIT - compiling a wish list
#VMCE
#rexx
Well - me too. Ren¨¦.
By
[email protected]
·
#6149
·
|
Re: Support for 3066 Graphic Terminal
William, I think more than that, looking at the Functional Characteristics manuals for these from BitSavers https://bitsavers.org/pdf/ibm/370/funcChar/ and I was interested to read some had a light
By
Dave Wade
·
#6148
·
|
Re: Reserving Modification Numbers
Perfect!! Thanks!! -- William
By
William Denton
·
#6147
·
|
Re: #VMCE #rexx EE goes XEDIT - compiling a wish list
#VMCE
#rexx
Personally, I would like to see efforts on EE going into creating a rich enough REXX integration that would allow the "side modes" to be implemented in REXX.like IBM did. cheers, William
By
William Denton
·
#6146
·
|
Re: What is special about the 3066?
From a programming standpoint, the 3066 had different geometry (80x33), different set of buffer orders, and completely different CCWs, interrupts, and sense data. I think IBM only put software support
By
William Denton
·
#6145
·
|
Re: Support for 3066 Graphic Terminal
The /168 console (like the 158 & later) didn't have very many blinky lights. As I recall, just the five above the Interrupt, Start, Stop, Load buttons. So, the "not" microfiche viewer was the
By
William Denton
·
#6144
·
|
Re: #VMCE #rexx EE goes XEDIT - compiling a wish list
#VMCE
#rexx
How important are the "side modes" of EE like FSLIST and FSVIEW ? I did not care of these up to now. I have reworked EE focussed on XEDIT as it was in VM/SP 1 (that means no FILELIST, RDRLIST ...).
By
Martin Scheffler
·
#6143
·
|
Re: Support for 3066 Graphic Terminal
By
Dave Wade
·
#6142
·
|
Re: Support for 3066 Graphic Terminal
Dave Wade wrote: [...] You don't?! Wow. Just... wow. Which, when eliminated, would free up those registers for other uses. Which, when replaced with relative instructions that don't need base
By
Fish Fish
·
#6141
·
|
Re: Support for 3066 Graphic Terminal
By
Dave Wade
·
#6140
·
|
Re: What is special about the 3066?
[email protected]> wrote: It was interesting from both the hardware and software points of view. I understand that the hardware was based on a stripped down 2250 with no actual graphics
By
Tony Harminc
·
#6139
·
|
Re: Support for 3066 Graphic Terminal
Dave Wade wrote: Yes, you're right: it would. Oh well. Just a thought. -- "Fish" (David B. Trout) Software Development Laboratories http://www.softdevlabs.com mail: fish@...
By
Fish Fish
·
#6138
·
|