|
I'm pretty sure I've seen a video of someone with a DRO installed on a shaper fence. Might be interesting to install one on my F700z.
?
Any info?
?
Thank you!
|
I have plans but not done it yet. So, interested in seeing as well.
I have some concerns about repeatability as there is some play in the fence - significant when measuring at 0.001” scale. This does not show on the micro adjust as the hood and the micro adjust move together.
Still want to try it as I don’t like walking around to see the micro adjust scale and splitting lines.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Mar 22, 2025, at 2:25?AM, JDhm via groups.io <Jdanohm@...> wrote: ? I'm pretty sure I've seen a video of someone with a DRO installed on a shaper fence. Might be interesting to install one on my F700z.
?
Any info?
?
Thank you!
|
I belive Bryce has added one to his shaper fence, on of the M503's
-Karl
|
I already posted photos of a DRO conversion on the shaper fences.
Brian Lamb blamb11@... lambtoolworks.com
On Friday, March 21, 2025 at 11:25:06 PM MST, JDhm via groups.io <jdanohm@...> wrote:
I'm pretty sure I've seen a video of someone with a DRO installed on a shaper fence. Might be interesting to install one on my F700z.
?
Any info?
?
Thank you!
|
That's brilliant Brian,
Way more elegant than my solution, & i'm sure more accurate due to where you have the reader head etc. mounted.
Imran,
There is a repeatability issue as far as taking the hood off and putting it back on, at least how i have mine set up. I was just looking at Brian's photos, and that looks like a way better way of doing it. (Might have to find the time and copy it) I am not concerned with whether the DRO reads the same or not when remounting the hood though, as i primarily use the DRO by zeroing it in to a particular projection of the cutterhead, then adjusting the hood according to that. I don't use it everytime i use the shaper, but when i do use it, it does make setup faster than without it.
Regards,
Bryce
?
?
--
https://www.brycecomerwoodworks.com/
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCHdrRaAZd_pOa7wwbdNPUEw
|
Hi Bryce,
My repeatability concern is not with hood being replaced rather with creeping on to the desired fence setting. Every time I lock down my hood, I push back first as it has play. My concern is, I figure out that ?I need to move fence by 0.010”. I unclamp the hood and move it by 0.010” per the DRO. I push it back and clamp the hood. Do I get the desired change?
Does your hood work the same way or mine is messed up?
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Mar 22, 2025, at 11:32?AM, Bryce Comer via groups.io <bryce@...> wrote: ? That's brilliant Brian,
Way more elegant than my solution, & i'm sure more accurate due to where you have the reader head etc. mounted.
Imran,
There is a repeatability issue as far as taking the hood off and putting it back on, at least how i have mine set up. I was just looking at Brian's photos, and that looks like a way better way of doing it. (Might have to find the time and copy it) I am not concerned with whether the DRO reads the same or not when remounting the hood though, as i primarily use the DRO by zeroing it in to a particular projection of the cutterhead, then adjusting the hood according to that. I don't use it everytime i use the shaper, but when i do use it, it does make setup faster than without it.
Regards,
Bryce
?
?
--
https://www.brycecomerwoodworks.com/
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCHdrRaAZd_pOa7wwbdNPUEw
|
Imran,?
I've learned over time that play in the hood (or other devices where backlash play is an issue) is best handled by always engaging the the final movement "toward the action". On the F700, I recall also lock-down clamps slightly dragging for fine tuning before locking down fully.?
The DRO in Brian's photos was for my machine (which I have since sold). It worked better than I expected, reliably. Alternatively, a creative application of Lamb Tool Works parallel guides might be a better use of funds that would also add versatility for other purposes including being able to offset split fences for infeed/outfeed and use for adjusting and aligning outboard fence contraptions, bonus points for mounting to Aigner? rails bolted to shaper table edges.
Hi Bryce,
My repeatability concern is not with hood being replaced rather with creeping on to the desired fence setting. Every time I lock down my hood, I push back first as it has play. My concern is, I figure out that ?I need to move fence by 0.010”. I unclamp the hood and move it by 0.010” per the DRO. I push it back and clamp the hood. Do I get the desired change?
Does your hood work the same way or mine is messed up? ? That's brilliant Brian,
Way more elegant than my solution, & i'm sure more accurate due to where you have the reader head etc. mounted.
Imran,
There is a repeatability issue as far as taking the hood off and putting it back on, at least how i have mine set up. I was just looking at Brian's photos, and that looks like a way better way of doing it. (Might have to find the time and copy it) I am not concerned with whether the DRO reads the same or not when remounting the hood though, as i primarily use the DRO by zeroing it in to a particular projection of the cutterhead, then adjusting the hood according to that. I don't use it everytime i use the shaper, but when i do use it, it does make setup faster than without it.
Regards,
Bryce
?
?
--
-- Brett Wissel Saint Louis Restoration 1831 S Kingshighway Blvd (at Shaw Blvd) St Louis, MO 63110 314.772.2167 brett@...
|
I haven't noticed an issue like you have described Imran. As Brett said, always good to go slightly past, then come back to the measurement you're after. I guess there could be some creep when tightening down the hood, but it should show on the DRO if that was the case, and i haven't yet seen that on mine.
Regards,
Bryce
--
https://www.brycecomerwoodworks.com/
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCHdrRaAZd_pOa7wwbdNPUEw
|
Hi Brett and Bryce,
The play I am talking about is in the hood. As I mentioned, it would not show on the microadjust or on the DRO placed therein but it could affect the cut. I am not concerned about removing and replacing the hood either.
As stated earlier, I push the hood back before securing the hood but since it has this play (video attached) I am not sure if it goes back to the exact same spot every time I secure the hood. Obviously, one has to loosen the hood to make any adjustment to the fence.
Maybe it will irritate me that DRO has not improved the overall situation much. I will still be relying on the test cuts as before. What I really I like to know if this play is normal.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Mar 23, 2025, at 1:30?AM, Bryce Comer via groups.io <bryce@...> wrote: ? I haven't noticed an issue like you have described Imran. As Brett said, always good to go slightly past, then come back to the measurement you're after. I guess there could be some creep when tightening down the hood, but it should show on the DRO if that was the case, and i haven't yet seen that on mine.
Regards,
Bryce
--
https://www.brycecomerwoodworks.com/
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCHdrRaAZd_pOa7wwbdNPUEw
|
I'm a little confused Imran,
Obviously you haven't got the hood tightened up at that point in the video you show. I will have to pop the hood on the shaper this morning when i get to work and see if i can make it do the same. If this is play in the locating pin, then you're right, the DRO won't be accurate. If it's just play in the hood itself prior to being tightened, then the DRO should still be accurate.?
As always, test first then run your material.?
I'll let you know when i get to work.
Bryce
--
https://www.brycecomerwoodworks.com/
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCHdrRaAZd_pOa7wwbdNPUEw
|
Imran, some amount of sloppy hood registration as shown in your video is normal for that Shaper Fence 230. The alignment plate that registers the fence to the cast iron top has two pins that mate with holes in the top (p 117 is Survival Guide), and that interface is non-precision and has play in it. ?The mounting plate to hood connection is also non-precision. ?Have you checked to ensure the mounting plate to shaper hood attachment is solid and that the micro-adjust is locked and secured with the Kipp lever? ? Adding a DRO to the shaper hood is not going to improve repeatability and eliminate the need to take test cuts unless the sloppiness of the mounting platform is resolved as part of the DRO mechanical structure. ? David Best - via mobile phone?
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Mar 23, 2025, at 8:24?AM, imran via groups.io <imranwoodshop@...> wrote:
? Hi Brett and Bryce,
The play I am talking about is in the hood. As I mentioned, it would not show on the microadjust or on the DRO placed therein but it could affect the cut. I am not concerned about removing and replacing the hood either.
As stated earlier, I push the hood back before securing the hood but since it has this play (video attached) I am not sure if it goes back to the exact same spot every time I secure the hood. Obviously, one has to loosen the hood to make any adjustment to the fence.
Maybe it will irritate me that DRO has not improved the overall situation much. I will still be relying on the test cuts as before. What I really I like to know if this play is normal.
On Mar 23, 2025, at 1:30?AM, Bryce Comer via groups.io <bryce@...> wrote:
? I haven't noticed an issue like you have described Imran. As Brett said, always good to go slightly past, then come back to the measurement you're after. I guess there could be some creep when tightening down the hood, but it should show on the DRO if that was the case, and i haven't yet seen that on mine.
Regards,
Bryce
--
https://www.brycecomerwoodworks.com/
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCHdrRaAZd_pOa7wwbdNPUEw
<Video.mov>
|
Hi David,
Yes the micro-adjust is tightened and so are the fence plates. The hood is machined perfectly, allowing no perceptible movement. Thanks to this discussion, I measured the play in the micro-adjust and it is ~0.005” (video attached). This multiplies over 26 inches, the way I have the fence plates right now, for a router bit. This will get worse with a larger shaper cutter.
This has been my concern over the utility of adding a DRO. Because of this, I always check squareness, using Lamb Tool’s big triangle, if using the xcut fence.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Mar 23, 2025, at 12:01?PM, David P. Best via groups.io <dbestworkshop@...> wrote: ? Imran, some amount of sloppy hood registration as shown in your video is normal for that Shaper Fence 230. The alignment plate that registers the fence to the cast iron top has two pins that mate with holes in the top (p 117 is Survival Guide), and that interface is non-precision and has play in it. ?The mounting plate to hood connection is also non-precision. ?Have you checked to ensure the mounting plate to shaper hood attachment is solid and that the micro-adjust is locked and secured with the Kipp lever? ? Adding a DRO to the shaper hood is not going to improve repeatability and eliminate the need to take test cuts unless the sloppiness of the mounting platform is resolved as part of the DRO mechanical structure. ? David Best - via mobile phone? On Mar 23, 2025, at 8:24?AM, imran via groups.io <imranwoodshop@...> wrote:
? Hi Brett and Bryce,
The play I am talking about is in the hood. As I mentioned, it would not show on the microadjust or on the DRO placed therein but it could affect the cut. I am not concerned about removing and replacing the hood either.
As stated earlier, I push the hood back before securing the hood but since it has this play (video attached) I am not sure if it goes back to the exact same spot every time I secure the hood. Obviously, one has to loosen the hood to make any adjustment to the fence.
Maybe it will irritate me that DRO has not improved the overall situation much. I will still be relying on the test cuts as before. What I really I like to know if this play is normal.
On Mar 23, 2025, at 1:30?AM, Bryce Comer via groups.io <bryce@...> wrote:
? I haven't noticed an issue like you have described Imran. As Brett said, always good to go slightly past, then come back to the measurement you're after. I guess there could be some creep when tightening down the hood, but it should show on the DRO if that was the case, and i haven't yet seen that on mine.
Regards,
Bryce
--
https://www.brycecomerwoodworks.com/
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCHdrRaAZd_pOa7wwbdNPUEw
<Video.mov>
|
Imran, you only need to square the shaper fence to the crosscut fence if you are clamping material down to the sliding table during the cutting operation - like for cope/stick profiling. ?If you are moving the material through the shaper with the power feeder or by hand, and keeping the material against the shaper fence plates, it does not matter if the shaper fence is square to the crosscut fence. ?Unfortunately, the “wiggling” registration at the micro-adjust means this particular shaper hood is not ideal for a DRO conversion. ?This sloppiness of the hood mounting was one of the reasons I upgraded to the Profil 45Z with a shaper hood that has enough rigidity to stay aligned when it’s repositioned, and it has an integral electronic DRO on the infeed side and a mechanical DRO on the outfeed fence plate side.
David Best
DBestWorkshop@...
https://www.flickr.com/photos/davidpbest/collections/
https://www.youtube.com/@David_Best
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Mar 23, 2025, at 10:11?AM, imran via groups.io <imranwoodshop@...> wrote:
Hi David,
Yes the micro-adjust is tightened and so are the fence plates. The hood is machined perfectly, allowing no perceptible movement. Thanks to this discussion, I measured the play in the micro-adjust and it is ~0.005” (video attached). This multiplies over 26 inches, the way I have the fence plates right now, for a router bit. This will get worse with a larger shaper cutter.
This has been my concern over the utility of adding a DRO. Because of this, I always check squareness, using Lamb Tool’s big triangle, if using the xcut fence.
On Mar 23, 2025, at 12:01?PM, David P. Best via groups.io <dbestworkshop@...> wrote:
? Imran, some amount of sloppy hood registration as shown in your video is normal for that Shaper Fence 230. The alignment plate that registers the fence to the cast iron top has two pins that mate with holes in the top (p 117 is Survival Guide), and that interface is non-precision and has play in it. ?The mounting plate to hood connection is also non-precision. ?Have you checked to ensure the mounting plate to shaper hood attachment is solid and that the micro-adjust is locked and secured with the Kipp lever? ? Adding a DRO to the shaper hood is not going to improve repeatability and eliminate the need to take test cuts unless the sloppiness of the mounting platform is resolved as part of the DRO mechanical structure. ? David Best - via mobile phone? On Mar 23, 2025, at 8:24?AM, imran via groups.io <imranwoodshop@...> wrote:
? Hi Brett and Bryce,
The play I am talking about is in the hood. As I mentioned, it would not show on the microadjust or on the DRO placed therein but it could affect the cut. I am not concerned about removing and replacing the hood either.
As stated earlier, I push the hood back before securing the hood but since it has this play (video attached) I am not sure if it goes back to the exact same spot every time I secure the hood. Obviously, one has to loosen the hood to make any adjustment to the fence.
Maybe it will irritate me that DRO has not improved the overall situation much. I will still be relying on the test cuts as before. What I really I like to know if this play is normal.
On Mar 23, 2025, at 1:30?AM, Bryce Comer via groups.io <bryce@...> wrote:
? I haven't noticed an issue like you have described Imran. As Brett said, always good to go slightly past, then come back to the measurement you're after. I guess there could be some creep when tightening down the hood, but it should show on the DRO if that was the case, and i haven't yet seen that on mine.
Regards,
Bryce
--
https://www.brycecomerwoodworks.com/
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCHdrRaAZd_pOa7wwbdNPUEw
<Video.mov>
|
Hi David,
You are correct. As mentioned,?
I always check squareness, using Lamb Tool’s big triangle, if using the xcut fence.
On Mar 23, 2025, at 1:46?PM, David P. Best via groups.io <dbestworkshop@...> wrote:
? Imran, you only need to square the shaper fence to the crosscut fence if you are clamping material down to the sliding table during the cutting operation - like for cope/stick profiling. ?If you are moving the material through the shaper with the power feeder or by hand, and keeping the material against the shaper fence plates, it does not matter if the shaper fence is square to the crosscut fence. ?Unfortunately, the “wiggling” registration at the micro-adjust means this particular shaper hood is not ideal for a DRO conversion. ?This sloppiness of the hood mounting was one of the reasons I upgraded to the Profil 45Z with a shaper hood that has enough rigidity to stay aligned when it’s repositioned, and it has an integral electronic DRO on the infeed side and a mechanical DRO on the outfeed fence plate side.
David Best
DBestWorkshop@...
https://www.flickr.com/photos/davidpbest/collections/
https://www.youtube.com/@David_Best
On Mar 23, 2025, at 10:11?AM, imran via groups.io <imranwoodshop@...> wrote:
Hi David,
Yes the micro-adjust is tightened and so are the fence plates. The hood is machined perfectly, allowing no perceptible movement. Thanks to this discussion, I measured the play in the micro-adjust and it is ~0.005” (video attached). This multiplies over 26 inches, the way I have the fence plates right now, for a router bit. This will get worse with a larger shaper cutter.
This has been my concern over the utility of adding a DRO. Because of this, I always check squareness, using Lamb Tool’s big triangle, if using the xcut fence.
On Mar 23, 2025, at 12:01?PM, David P. Best via groups.io <dbestworkshop@...> wrote:
? Imran, some amount of sloppy hood registration as shown in your video is normal for that Shaper Fence 230. The alignment plate that registers the fence to the cast iron top has two pins that mate with holes in the top (p 117 is Survival Guide), and that interface is non-precision and has play in it. ?The mounting plate to hood connection is also non-precision. ?Have you checked to ensure the mounting plate to shaper hood attachment is solid and that the micro-adjust is locked and secured with the Kipp lever? ? Adding a DRO to the shaper hood is not going to improve repeatability and eliminate the need to take test cuts unless the sloppiness of the mounting platform is resolved as part of the DRO mechanical structure. ? David Best - via mobile phone? On Mar 23, 2025, at 8:24?AM, imran via groups.io <imranwoodshop@...> wrote:
? Hi Brett and Bryce,
The play I am talking about is in the hood. As I mentioned, it would not show on the microadjust or on the DRO placed therein but it could affect the cut. I am not concerned about removing and replacing the hood either.
As stated earlier, I push the hood back before securing the hood but since it has this play (video attached) I am not sure if it goes back to the exact same spot every time I secure the hood. Obviously, one has to loosen the hood to make any adjustment to the fence.
Maybe it will irritate me that DRO has not improved the overall situation much. I will still be relying on the test cuts as before. What I really I like to know if this play is normal.
On Mar 23, 2025, at 1:30?AM, Bryce Comer via groups.io <bryce@...> wrote:
? I haven't noticed an issue like you have described Imran. As Brett said, always good to go slightly past, then come back to the measurement you're after. I guess there could be some creep when tightening down the hood, but it should show on the DRO if that was the case, and i haven't yet seen that on mine.
Regards,
Bryce
--
https://www.brycecomerwoodworks.com/
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCHdrRaAZd_pOa7wwbdNPUEw
<Video.mov>
|
Since I only remove the shaper hood when putting on the bowmouldmaster and in future maybe ?a tenoning hood I thought I check if shim-ing the micro adjust pin holes would help.
I greatly reduced the play by just placing a plasticized paper clipping on the opposite sides of each hole. I can certainly refine this with UHMW tape or something else more durable.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Mar 23, 2025, at 2:07?PM, Imran Malik <imranwoodshop@...> wrote: ? Hi David,
You are correct. As mentioned,?
I always check squareness, using Lamb Tool’s big triangle, if using the xcut fence.
On Mar 23, 2025, at 1:46?PM, David P. Best via groups.io <dbestworkshop@...> wrote:
? Imran, you only need to square the shaper fence to the crosscut fence if you are clamping material down to the sliding table during the cutting operation - like for cope/stick profiling. ?If you are moving the material through the shaper with the power feeder or by hand, and keeping the material against the shaper fence plates, it does not matter if the shaper fence is square to the crosscut fence. ?Unfortunately, the “wiggling” registration at the micro-adjust means this particular shaper hood is not ideal for a DRO conversion. ?This sloppiness of the hood mounting was one of the reasons I upgraded to the Profil 45Z with a shaper hood that has enough rigidity to stay aligned when it’s repositioned, and it has an integral electronic DRO on the infeed side and a mechanical DRO on the outfeed fence plate side.
David Best
DBestWorkshop@...
https://www.flickr.com/photos/davidpbest/collections/
https://www.youtube.com/@David_Best
On Mar 23, 2025, at 10:11?AM, imran via groups.io <imranwoodshop@...> wrote:
Hi David,
Yes the micro-adjust is tightened and so are the fence plates. The hood is machined perfectly, allowing no perceptible movement. Thanks to this discussion, I measured the play in the micro-adjust and it is ~0.005” (video attached). This multiplies over 26 inches, the way I have the fence plates right now, for a router bit. This will get worse with a larger shaper cutter.
This has been my concern over the utility of adding a DRO. Because of this, I always check squareness, using Lamb Tool’s big triangle, if using the xcut fence.
On Mar 23, 2025, at 12:01?PM, David P. Best via groups.io <dbestworkshop@...> wrote:
? Imran, some amount of sloppy hood registration as shown in your video is normal for that Shaper Fence 230. The alignment plate that registers the fence to the cast iron top has two pins that mate with holes in the top (p 117 is Survival Guide), and that interface is non-precision and has play in it. ?The mounting plate to hood connection is also non-precision. ?Have you checked to ensure the mounting plate to shaper hood attachment is solid and that the micro-adjust is locked and secured with the Kipp lever? ? Adding a DRO to the shaper hood is not going to improve repeatability and eliminate the need to take test cuts unless the sloppiness of the mounting platform is resolved as part of the DRO mechanical structure. ? David Best - via mobile phone? On Mar 23, 2025, at 8:24?AM, imran via groups.io <imranwoodshop@...> wrote:
? Hi Brett and Bryce,
The play I am talking about is in the hood. As I mentioned, it would not show on the microadjust or on the DRO placed therein but it could affect the cut. I am not concerned about removing and replacing the hood either.
As stated earlier, I push the hood back before securing the hood but since it has this play (video attached) I am not sure if it goes back to the exact same spot every time I secure the hood. Obviously, one has to loosen the hood to make any adjustment to the fence.
Maybe it will irritate me that DRO has not improved the overall situation much. I will still be relying on the test cuts as before. What I really I like to know if this play is normal.
On Mar 23, 2025, at 1:30?AM, Bryce Comer via groups.io <bryce@...> wrote:
? I haven't noticed an issue like you have described Imran. As Brett said, always good to go slightly past, then come back to the measurement you're after. I guess there could be some creep when tightening down the hood, but it should show on the DRO if that was the case, and i haven't yet seen that on mine.
Regards,
Bryce
--
https://www.brycecomerwoodworks.com/
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCHdrRaAZd_pOa7wwbdNPUEw
<Video.mov>
|
That's great Imran,
I did check my shaper hood at work today, and there is also some play in mine, so at least you needn't feel like you're the only one! :)?
Sounds like you're sorting it out though.?
Regards,
Bryce
--
https://www.brycecomerwoodworks.com/
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCHdrRaAZd_pOa7wwbdNPUEw
|
Thanks Bryce. Good to know. Would be nice to not have to check square every time when using xcut fence for cross profiling.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Mar 23, 2025, at 8:13?PM, Bryce Comer via groups.io <bryce@...> wrote: ? That's great Imran,
I did check my shaper hood at work today, and there is also some play in mine, so at least you needn't feel like you're the only one! :)?
Sounds like you're sorting it out though.?
Regards,
Bryce
--
https://www.brycecomerwoodworks.com/
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCHdrRaAZd_pOa7wwbdNPUEw
|
Imran, I can confirm another 700 series fence with that annoying?small amount of slop. Spent many hours thinking how to introduce?a fixed DRO successfully?and haven't?come up with a fixed solution. My solution for now is a portable DRO fixed to a block/board, then referencing of the cast iron bed, repeatability is good.
Thanks Bryce. Good to know. Would be nice to not have to check square every time when using xcut fence for cross profiling. ? That's great Imran,
I did check my shaper hood at work today, and there is also some play in mine, so at least you needn't feel like you're the only one! :)?
Sounds like you're sorting it out though.?
Regards,
Bryce
--
-- Kindest Regards
Jonathan Samways
Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener información privilegiada o confidencial. Si no es vd.el destinatario indicado, queda notificado de que la utilización, divulgación y/o copia sin autorización está prohibida en virtud de la legislación vigente. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y proceda a su destrucción. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee and may contain information that is confidential and protected by professional privilege.If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, copy or disclosure of this communication is strictly prohibited by law. If this message has been received in error, please immediately notify us via e-mail and delete it.
|
Thanks Jonathan. Can you share some pics when you get a chance.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Mar 24, 2025, at 3:21?AM, jontathan samways via groups.io <jonathansamways@...> wrote: ? Imran, I can confirm another 700 series fence with that annoying?small amount of slop. Spent many hours thinking how to introduce?a fixed DRO successfully?and haven't?come up with a fixed solution. My solution for now is a portable DRO fixed to a block/board, then referencing of the cast iron bed, repeatability is good.
Thanks Bryce. Good to know. Would be nice to not have to check square every time when using xcut fence for cross profiling. ? That's great Imran,
I did check my shaper hood at work today, and there is also some play in mine, so at least you needn't feel like you're the only one! :)?
Sounds like you're sorting it out though.?
Regards,
Bryce
--
-- Kindest Regards
Jonathan Samways
Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener información privilegiada o confidencial. Si no es vd.el destinatario indicado, queda notificado de que la utilización, divulgación y/o copia sin autorización está prohibida en virtud de la legislación vigente. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y proceda a su destrucción. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee and may contain information that is confidential and protected by professional privilege.If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, copy or disclosure of this communication is strictly prohibited by law. If this message has been received in error, please immediately notify us via e-mail and delete it.
|
Imran, this one reference's off the slider. ? Kindest Regards
Jonathan Samways
Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener información privilegiada o confidencial. Si no es vd.el destinatario indicado, queda notificado de que la utilización, divulgación y/o copia sin autorización está prohibida en virtud de la legislación vigente. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y proceda a su destrucción. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee and may contain information that is confidential and protected by professional privilege.If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, copy or disclosure of this communication is strictly prohibited by law. If this message has been received in error, please immediately notify us via e-mail and delete it.
Thanks Jonathan. Can you share some pics when you get a chance.
On Mar 24, 2025, at 3:21?AM, jontathan samways via <jonathansamways= [email protected]> wrote: ? Imran, I can confirm another 700 series fence with that annoying?small amount of slop. Spent many hours thinking how to introduce?a fixed DRO successfully?and haven't?come up with a fixed solution. My solution for now is a portable DRO fixed to a block/board, then referencing of the cast iron bed, repeatability is good.
Thanks Bryce. Good to know. Would be nice to not have to check square every time when using xcut fence for cross profiling. ? That's great Imran,
I did check my shaper hood at work today, and there is also some play in mine, so at least you needn't feel like you're the only one! :)?
Sounds like you're sorting it out though.?
Regards,
Bryce
--
-- Kindest Regards
Jonathan Samways
Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener información privilegiada o confidencial. Si no es vd.el destinatario indicado, queda notificado de que la utilización, divulgación y/o copia sin autorización está prohibida en virtud de la legislación vigente. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y proceda a su destrucción. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee and may contain information that is confidential and protected by professional privilege.If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, copy or disclosure of this communication is strictly prohibited by law. If this message has been received in error, please immediately notify us via e-mail and delete it.
|
imran
Bryce Comer
David P. Best