开云体育

Hi Rob, Ordinarily I would agree with you 100% (ahem, sorry), except that's the spec. 100% humidity is represented by a zero in the telemetry. From a user perspective, the APRS frame decoder in the

Fortran, haven't thought about that since engineering school (long ago).? Well maybe a touch with antenna modeling, but not really. I am not a fan of switching 100% to Zero.? Makes no sense to

Hi Rob, I was just hacking at it and once it seemed to be working I left it. I should know (and do) better, as I used to actually write code for a living. Bad coder! No biscuit! The APRS spec does

Excellent. So how about the issue of one client crashing its entire computer (ex.: someone kicked the power cord out), so there is nothing to send "port closed" ICMP errors back to DireWolf on a

I noticed the check is not as described exactly:?? if data['outHumidity'] < 0 or 100 <= data['outHumidity']: That's < 0 (negative) or >= 100. What I'd suggest (not a python coder either):??? if

The network KISS and AGW interfaces can handle 3 simultaneous client connections each. In extreme cases, where you need more, the limit can be increased by modifying a header file and rebuilding.

According to the Direwolf manual (4.3 AGW TCPIP socket interface):??? Dire Wolf provides a server function with the "AGW TCPIP Socket Interface" on port 8000.??? Up to 3 different client

Greg, Awesome! Thanks, that is something I can Siri with. That makes great sense, no humidity - not a good packet! I’ll chew on this and get to work. Thanks again! Sent from my iPhone 11 Max Pro

Greetings. I was wondering how many different client programs can connect simultaneously to one instance of DireWolf and all get complete copies of the inbound packet traffic. I was thinking of an

Found the cwxn.py code that I hacked... It's an older version (# $Id: cwxn.py 1280 2015-03-01 17:01:56Z mwall $), but perhaps still relevant. Both changes - null records and format change - were all

Hello, Yes, all the logs look clean. I looked at all the syslogs, messages, kernel messages, etc, and nothing stands out. Sure, I wouldn’t mind liking at your .py if you have it to see how you

With my Acurite station, I had to filter out (not write to wxnow.txt) the bad records. I tested for humidity=0 as the indicator. I also fixed a small formatting bug with something else, where the

Further, are you running the latest 0.4 version of the plugin? You may want to see this thread and switch your binding to "archive" in your weewx.conf file:

How do your Weewx logs (in debug) look? It's been awhile since I've looked at the code but I think all the plugin does is query the database for the last readings from your weather station. I'm

I’ve tried everything I could think of and still getting charts that look like a zigsaw. I’m wondering now if it just isn’t creating the wxnow file fast enough. Using just my original RPi1B for

It seems the issue is getting Zeros for readings (maybe sampling too fast).The script could easily be modified to "not write" to wxnow.txt if certain value(s), which you know should always have valid

Hi, Thanks! I appreciate it. Actually, I think I may know what is going on and might know how to get it stable — but it stems from another question I have — however, let me let this run for a

I suggest you have weewx generate a wxnow.txt file, then have Direwolf send it as a comment in a position beacon, as stated in section 9.9.1 of the users guide. Patrick (N3TSZ)

Do you have logging cranked up on Weewx? To me it's sounding like Weewx may not be getting data from the station and I'm wondering what Weewx's logs are saying. There are fixes out there for cwxn.py

Shoot, I spoke too soon. CWXN isn’t working reliable. I think it just might not be processing the data correctly. Thinking — since I’m uploading to both Wunderground and MyAcurite anyway —