Keyboard Shortcuts
Likes
Search
Core 3 Animation vs Dynamic Graphic
Heath Volmer
Before I go experimenting: I'm working with some image objects that have 250+ icons, and there are several of these on a page. Needless to say, it is choking VTPro - It's like VTPro thinks that it has to analyze every last little detail of the thing each time I click on it. If I click on one, it takes 5+ seconds to select. Well, I just had to select 12 of them and after waiting a minute for VTPro to catch up I'm left wondering if there is a better way.
These icons are mostly static during runtime - for channel preset selection. If I stored them all on the processor's webserver, and loaded them when they were needed, would I get reasonable performance? Does a panel cache anything or will it be a fresh load each time the URL is sent to the image? My concern is: because I'm sharing joins via crosspoints for several different satellite or cable sources - and if for some reason they have different preset lists - when switching from one source to another the icons might be confused until the images update. Probably not a big deal... Any experiences? I'll probably only be loading 12 or so at a time. Heath |
Kool-Aid Drinker
Not only do the Chore-3 panels not cache images internally, but they
actively resist external caching by adding a randomized query parameter to their HTTP requests. The processor's web server can handle up to 15 (?) connections simultaneously -- any more get a '503 Service Unavailable' response. With 12 images on the page, if two panels update at the same time? I've no clue how a panel would react to a 503... On Thu, 31 Oct 2013 12:42:21 -0600, Heath Volmer <hvolmer@...> wrote: Before I go experimenting: I'm working with some image objects that have 250+ icons, and |
Heath Volmer
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýHmm. ? I'll just have to make a point of not touching these animations unless I have time for coffee in between selections. ?Or get my desktop software up-to-date, which has a bit more power to drive this monstrosity that is Core 3. ?Yay Flash! On Oct 31, 2013, at 1:46 PM, Kool-Aid Drinker <herald@...> wrote:
|
"Flash! ?? Aaaaa-aaaah!" ? - Chip ---In Crestron@..., <crestron@...> wrote: Hmm. ? I'll just have to make a point of not touching these animations unless I have time for coffee in between selections. ?Or get my desktop software up-to-date, which has a bit more power to drive this monstrosity that is Core 3. ?Yay Flash!
|
Savior of the Universe! On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 1:15 PM, <cfm@...> wrote:
|
Heath Volmer
|
BAHAHAHA. that is just too funny. ---In crestron@..., <hvolmer@...> wrote: You both suck. ? That's gonna stick in my head. |