Keyboard Shortcuts
ctrl + shift + ? :
Show all keyboard shortcuts
ctrl + g :
Navigate to a group
ctrl + shift + f :
Find
ctrl + / :
Quick actions
esc to dismiss
Likes
- Crestron
- Messages
Search
|
Re: Samsung IP control in a post 200 Database world
#samsung
that's an interesting service. It's good if I can't find any other solution.
|
|
Re: Issues with Sonos & Crestron
Well I was remoting into a site yesterday that Sonos was broken and tried the new firmware and guess what? Still doesnt work. Rebooted Sonos units, rebooted CP3 several times. No favorites had been set either. Just getting in the logs now (when dedug is enabled):
2020-10-28 13:14:25.0 [COMM] SonosLogger - Sonos 1 - ConnectSync Websocket
2020-10-28 13:14:25.0 [COMM] SonosLogger - Sonos 1 -? Websocket URL: wss://10.126.10.91/websocket/api - Host: 10.126.10.91:1443
2020-10-28 13:14:25.0 [EXCEPTION] SonosLogger - Sonos 1 - Exception occured when connecting to the Sonos device.
2020-10-28 13:14:25.0 [EXCEPTION] SonosLogger - Websocket client connectex: Exception Thrown = (Websocket client connect: Exception Thrown = (InvalidOperationException))
2020-10-28 13:14:25.0 [EXCEPTION] SonosLogger -?
? ?at Crestron.SimplSharp.CrestronWebSocketClient.WebSocketClient.ConnectEx()
? ?at SonosProLibrary.Connection.Impl.WebSocketConnectionImpl.ConnectSync(String url, String hostHeader)
? ?at SonosProLibrary.API.Impl.SonosLibraryDriverImpl.ConnectSync()
? ?at SonosProLibrary.System.Discovery.Impl.SonosDiscoveryManager.GetGroupConfigurationForAllDiscoveredHouseholds(List`1 households)
? ?at SonosProLibrary.System.Discovery.Impl.SonosDiscoveryManager.WhenDiscoveryTimerElapsed(Object unused)
? ?at Crestron.SimplSharp.CTimer.a(Object A_0)
? ?at System.Threading.Timer.ring()
and: Notice: splusmanagerapp.exe [App 1] # 2020-10-28 13:12:55? # Sonos - The system state changed to "Not Connected".
Notice: splusmanagerapp.exe [App 1] # 2020-10-28 13:13:00? # Sonos - The primary device is changed to Sonos 1.
Notice: splusmanagerapp.exe [App 1] # 2020-10-28 13:13:00? # Sonos - The primary device(Sonos 1) connection is succesful.
Notice: splusmanagerapp.exe [App 1] # 2020-10-28 13:13:00? # Sonos - The primary device(Sonos 1) favorites event subscription state changed to "Not Registered".
Notice: splusmanagerapp.exe [App 1] # 2020-10-28 13:13:00? # Sonos - The primary device(Sonos 1) group configuration event subscription state changed to "Not Registered".
Notice: splusmanagerapp.exe [App 1] # 2020-10-28 13:13:00? # Sonos - The system state changed to "Connected to Primary Device".
Notice: splusmanagerapp.exe [App 1] # 2020-10-28 13:13:01? # Sonos - The primary device(Sonos 1) state is changed to "connecting".
Notice: splusmanagerapp.exe [App 1] # 2020-10-28 13:13:01? # Sonos - The primary device(Sonos 1) state is changed to "not connected".
Notice: splusmanagerapp.exe [App 1] # 2020-10-28 13:13:01? # Sonos - The primary device(Sonos 1) connection failure resaon changed to "Connect Error".
Notice: splusmanagerapp.exe [App 1] # 2020-10-28 13:13:01? # Sonos - The system state changed to "Not Connected".
Notice: splusmanagerapp.exe [App 1] # 2020-10-28 13:13:01? # SonosSystemConnectionFailureReasonChangSonos - The system connection failure reason changed to "No Online Devices Found".edToNoOnlineDevicesFound
Notice: splusmanagerapp.exe [App 1] # 2020-10-28 13:13:01? # Sonos - The primary device is changed to .
Notice: splusmanagerapp.exe [App 1] # 2020-10-28 13:13:01? # Sonos - The primary device() favorites event subscription state changed to "Not Registered".
Notice: splusmanagerapp.exe [App 1] # 2020-10-28 13:13:01? # Sonos - The primary device() group configuration event subscription state changed to "Not Registered".
This is ridiculous.? |
|
Re: Lutron integration issue
Firmware blocking the telnet port is not the problem. You need a Lutron 3rd party lighting license from Crestron. They are free now just have to submit your processor info to them. If you look in your error log after a boot it will have a message about certain MAC addresses that need a license.?
|
|
Re: Lutron integration issue
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýIf Lutron interface is on the same subnet as the Crestron processor and you¡¯re using a device purchased after the licensing change was announced, a license is required for IP control of Lutron if you¡¯re running with firmware from after the change. ? As of several to many months ago there is not a charge for the license but it is still required and must be requested/¡±ordered¡± from Crestron. ? -- Lincoln King-Cliby, CTS, DMC-E-4K/T/D ? From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of Amjad Ali via groups.io
Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2020 4:44 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [crestron] Lutron integration issue ? we are doing integration with lutron QS System using r04 modules? |
|
Lutron integration issue
Amjad Ali
we are doing integration with lutron QS System using r04 modules?
First the integration was working well... but after I updated the Pro3 to the latest firmware the connection with lutron processors missed and it always waiting,? unknown and sometimes connected .. but we cannot control lutron anymore? I found that the new firmware blocks the telent port 23? and can not be enabled again .. the true blue support mentioned that I need to generate a license... I am not sure if this will fix the problem or not ...? then I tried to use rmc3 processor with the old firmware and purchased after jul 2019 ... but the same no connection available with lutron ...? can any one help what are we missing out here ?? |
|
Re: Compiler Error "Local"
#simplwindows
#crestron
#lighting
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Oct 29, 2020, at 3:01 AM, Ivan Wild <c_rezz@...> wrote:
|
|
Compiler Error "Local"
#simplwindows
#crestron
#lighting
Ivan Wild
Hi guys,
I have a strange compiler error... "failure - signal label Local" I have searched the whole program for a signal "Local" but cannot find one.? It is listed in the extended signal list. I cannot figure out how to rename, delete, relabel or fix this issue.? |
|
Re: Samsung IP control in a post 200 Database world
#samsung
I avoid IP control of Samsungs, specifically for this reason, and because of the many similar complaints from other programmers.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
FYI, should be able to update the module for 200+ compatibility, even if you don't have the S# source. --- On Wednesday, October 28, 2020 at 7:30 PM, ftvenezia wrote: |
|
Re: Lexicon MC-10
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýMan I feel dumb. ?How did I miss that module? I actually pulled the command protocol from the site and started building my own¡
|
|
Re: Samsung QE series & Samsung IP Display v1.3 driver
#samsung
Hi
?
With which processor do you want to use this module?
?
I use this module but not for the same Samsung reference and it works on the other hand, I had a problem when I wanted to use it with a PMC3 : it can't work. You need a series 3.
?
The module works strangely: the analog FB of the selected input is incorrectly returned either by the Samsung or by the module.
?
It is a pity that there is no documentation on the information exchanged between the module and the Samsung. Manu. |
|
Re: Interlogix alternative
So are you saying that HAI is no longer available?? It has been a while since I integrated one in a new project but I too have always like HAI products.? Seems like most security panels come with there own app nowadays so we seldom add Security panels to a Crestron systems anymore.
Thanks, Steve @johnmax 12/19/19 ? #233164??
I never found HAI to be unreliable at all. Those things are solid and we will miss them. But like you we are in the same boat need need something more custom than Honeywell. Our company owner was holding on to hope that there would be something on the Bosch-Crestron front but it appears they have stopped development so looks like we only have a few options.?
|
|
Samsung IP control in a post 200 Database world
#samsung
What is everyone doing for IP control of Samsung? The Samsung IP driver from the application market isn't being updated to work with the new database. Has everyone switched to certified drivers? I really don't like them as they are allot to deal with, but I need a solution to replace that module if / when I update these programs. Has anyone tried the Creston Connected models, it doesn't help me with older TVs but just curious?
|
|
Re: Interlogix alternative
+1 for Elk I even installed one at my own house.? I don't really need an alarm system per se but it is a great way to define whether the home is occupied or not (armed away vs. armed stay or disarmed) along with an inexpensive way of integrating a wide range of sensors. Jay On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 4:23 PM Brian Matson <bmatson@...> wrote: We use ELK, and it is extremely reliable.? I've been |
|
Re: Interlogix alternative
We use ELK, and it is extremely reliable.? I've been
Lately, I've been hounding Crestron to add it to Home as a supported system. I believe that it will be integrated with that soon. We don't use Home very often, but it would be a nice addition. Most of our projects are SIMPL, and the ELK systems work perfectly. They can be integrated via Serial or IP and the protocol is identical for each (just need a TCP/IP client symbol). Modules have been available for a long, long time. It supports up to 208 zones, 8 partitions, 205 outputs (relay/voltage) and is easily programmed with their ELK RP software. There's a really nice custom rules engine built into their software. I've installed both Honeywell and ELK for many years, and the ELK is so much more "friendly" to install and program. Also, if your replacing a Interlogix system with wireless, they have a 319.5MHz wireless receiver that is compatible with Interlogix sensors. Probably the best thing about them is that you can get a human on the phone in no time should you ever have a question! |
|
Re: Lexicon MC-10
There are MC-10 modules available. Got them from their site.? There is both an RS232 module and an IP module.? I installed one about 3 months ago.? FYI you can not simultaneously have the ethernet port available and control via RS232.? It is one or the other.? So if you plan on controlling via RS232 you will need to do the CAL before changing the control option.? I just switched the client to RS232 because the PRO2 stop controlling via IP for some reason.
|
|
Re: Interlogix alternative
SB2000AM is required for Concord series.? There is a module in the DB.? The problem is getting one.? GE stopped manufacturing in December and Distys have not had GE/ITI parts since then.? There are 3rd party wireless peripherals available and they are just OK.? We have moved on to DSC Power series with the IT100 and it has been solid.? Not as quick to setup a system as GE, but not much more involved.? I hoping that without the goto of GE that Crestron would have more drive to integrate the NEO, but nothing yet.
|
Michael Benignus
Manu
to navigate to use esc to dismiss