开云体育

--- In Crestron@..., "mrcaseyb" <casey@...> wrote:

Bless your heart Brian, I was about to reinstall windows but instead started uninstalling programs and now it works.
Unfortunately I did not do a 1 by 1 uninstall and test. Here is a list of what I unisntalled before testing that it works.

Gui FX Copilot
Easy tether
Airfoil
Apple updater
Bonjour
Guifx software

I will try re installing these 1 by 1 but do any coincide with software you may have had?



--- In Crestron@..., "btrujillo4343" <btrujillo4343@> wrote:

I was having the same issue a couple of weeks ago. Turns out it had something to do with other software I installed days earlier. It was somehow conflicting with SIMPL+/SIMPLWindows. Take a look at anything you've installed since the last time it was working and uninstall it. That worked for me... TB couldn't explain what or why the software was conflicting.

Brian
--- In Crestron@..., "mrcaseyb" <casey@> wrote:

I forgot to add, this was on all modules, I even created empty modules with little or no code in it and I still had the same problem.

--- In Crestron@..., "mrcaseyb" <casey@> wrote:

I can compile Simpl+ for 2 series but anytime I check the option for 3 series, I get "Cannot retrieve total number of NVRam in module" I was running latest software according to Master Installer.

I tried uninstall, reboot,registry cleaner, reboot re-install everything with UAC Off, no anti-virus software installed, and all installers set to run as Admin.
Made sure no directories or registry entries for Cygnus or Coldfire.
Re-downloaded my installers just in case.

I have a case open with TB Support but thought I would ask all of you guys.

--- In Crestron@..., "btrujillo4343" <btrujillo4343@...> wrote:

I was having the same issue a couple of weeks ago. Turns out it had something to do with other software I installed days earlier. It was somehow conflicting with SIMPL+/SIMPLWindows. Take a look at anything you've installed since the last time it was working and uninstall it. That worked for me... TB couldn't explain what or why the software was conflicting.

Brian
--- In Crestron@..., "mrcaseyb" <casey@> wrote:

I forgot to add, this was on all modules, I even created empty modules with little or no code in it and I still had the same problem.

--- In Crestron@..., "mrcaseyb" <casey@> wrote:

I can compile Simpl+ for 2 series but anytime I check the option for 3 series, I get "Cannot retrieve total number of NVRam in module" I was running latest software according to Master Installer.

I tried uninstall, reboot,registry cleaner, reboot re-install everything with UAC Off, no anti-virus software installed, and all installers set to run as Admin.
Made sure no directories or registry entries for Cygnus or Coldfire.
Re-downloaded my installers just in case.

I have a case open with TB Support but thought I would ask all of you guys.

--- In Crestron@..., "mrcaseyb" <casey@...> wrote:

I forgot to add, this was on all modules, I even created empty modules with little or no code in it and I still had the same problem.

--- In Crestron@..., "mrcaseyb" <casey@> wrote:

I can compile Simpl+ for 2 series but anytime I check the option for 3 series, I get "Cannot retrieve total number of NVRam in module" I was running latest software according to Master Installer.

I tried uninstall, reboot,registry cleaner, reboot re-install everything with UAC Off, no anti-virus software installed, and all installers set to run as Admin.
Made sure no directories or registry entries for Cygnus or Coldfire.
Re-downloaded my installers just in case.

I have a case open with TB Support but thought I would ask all of you guys.

--- In Crestron@..., "mrcaseyb" <casey@...> wrote:

I can compile Simpl+ for 2 series but anytime I check the option for 3 series, I get "Cannot retrieve total number of NVRam in module" I was running latest software according to Master Installer.

I tried uninstall, reboot,registry cleaner, reboot re-install everything with UAC Off, no anti-virus software installed, and all installers set to run as Admin.
Made sure no directories or registry entries for Cygnus or Coldfire.
Re-downloaded my installers just in case.

I have a case open with TB Support but thought I would ask all of you guys.

--- In Crestron@..., Nick Mitchell <nick@...> wrote:

Rdp. No it works great. Like I said the only drawback is only 1 person can
have vt pro open at a time. But simpl windows works fine running multiple
copies by multiple users.

Nick

Sent from my iPhone

On Apr 23, 2012, at 2:05 PM, mlafayette2350 <michael.lafayette@...>
wrote:



How are you connecting to the server remotely? I would imagine an RDP
session would be brutal with VTPro.

--- In Crestron@..., Nick Mitchell <nick@> wrote:

We use a Windows 2008 server for development located in our office. It's

an

HP dl360 server with 10gb of memory and dual processor 2.33 ghz Xeon quad
core. Very fast and always available when onsite or from home or the
office. Even if my laptop is misbehaving remote desktop usually works
great.

I picked up the server off of eBay for about 800$ and it supports a couple
of programmers and some office staff. The biggest downfall is we can only
have one copy of vt pro running at a time but with just two programmers it
really hasn't been that big of a deal.

Best part is we can use cheap little disposable laptops and still have the
power of quad core and 10gb of memory available to us.

Nick

Sent from my iPhone

On Apr 22, 2012, at 8:18 AM, Mark <markrkaye@> wrote:



i use an ASUS G73S
very good cooling

mark

--- In Crestron@..., "oldspunky" <paul@> wrote:

For the past 5 or 6 years the laptops I use for program development have

been dying (about 1 a year). I have tried Toshiba, Lenovo, HP, and
Panasonic Toughbooks. So this time I tried a Mac Powerbook (with VMware
Fusion and Windows 7. Now the Mac is getting clunky too.

I am probably overloading them, but when I have several copies of Simpl

Windows, Vtpro-e, Autocad, xpanel, Toolbox, and probably a Clearone or
Biamp configuration file (and perhaps Photoshop) all open at the same time
the laptops get pretty hot. Unfortunately I usually need all those things
when working on a program or bringing up a system.

I do a lot of my programming on the road so using a desktop is probably

not an option.

I have been using Radioshack fans and they seem to help, but my Mac is

still getting hot enough to fry eggs or my hands. Any ideas? Or should I
just accept this and budget a new laptop (and software) every year or so.?

Thanks,
Paul

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

-----Original Message-----
From: Crestron@... [mailto:Crestron@...] On
Behalf Of Nick Mitchell
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2012 3:35 PM
To: Crestron@...
Subject: Re: [Crestron] Re: Off Topic - killing laptops - any advice?

Rdp. No it works great. Like I said the only drawback is only 1 person
can
have vt pro open at a time. But simpl windows works fine running
multiple
copies by multiple users.

Nick
On Apr 23, 2012, at 2:05 PM, mlafayette2350
<michael.lafayette@...>
wrote:



How are you connecting to the server remotely? I would imagine an RDP
session would be brutal with VTPro.

--- In Crestron@..., Nick Mitchell <nick@...> wrote:

We use a Windows 2008 server for development located in our office.

It's
an

HP dl360 server with 10gb of memory and dual processor 2.33 ghz Xeon

quad

core. Very fast and always available when onsite or from home or the
office. Even if my laptop is misbehaving remote desktop usually works
great.

I picked up the server off of eBay for about 800$ and it supports a

couple

of programmers and some office staff. The biggest downfall is we can

only

have one copy of vt pro running at a time but with just two

programmers it

really hasn't been that big of a deal.

Best part is we can use cheap little disposable laptops and still have

the

power of quad core and 10gb of memory available to us.

Nick

Sent from my iPhone

On Apr 22, 2012, at 8:18 AM, Mark <markrkaye@...> wrote:



i use an ASUS G73S
very good cooling

mark

--- In Crestron@..., "oldspunky" <paul@> wrote:

For the past 5 or 6 years the laptops I use for program development

have

been dying (about 1 a year). I have tried Toshiba, Lenovo, HP, and
Panasonic Toughbooks. So this time I tried a Mac Powerbook (with

VMware

Fusion and Windows 7. Now the Mac is getting clunky too.

I am probably overloading them, but when I have several copies of

Simpl

Windows, Vtpro-e, Autocad, xpanel, Toolbox, and probably a Clearone or
Biamp configuration file (and perhaps Photoshop) all open at the same

time

the laptops get pretty hot. Unfortunately I usually need all those

things

when working on a program or bringing up a system.

I do a lot of my programming on the road so using a desktop is

probably

not an option.

I have been using Radioshack fans and they seem to help, but my Mac

is

still getting hot enough to fry eggs or my hands. Any ideas? Or should

I

just accept this and budget a new laptop (and software) every year or

so.?

Thanks,
Paul

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

**
***

Check out the Files area for useful modules, documents, and drivers.

A contact list of Crestron dealers and programmers can be found in the
Database area.
**
***Yahoo! Groups Links

On Apr 23, 2012, at 2:05 PM, mlafayette2350 <michael.lafayette@...>
wrote:



How are you connecting to the server remotely? I would imagine an RDP
session would be brutal with VTPro.

--- In Crestron@..., Nick Mitchell <nick@...> wrote:

We use a Windows 2008 server for development located in our office. It's

an

HP dl360 server with 10gb of memory and dual processor 2.33 ghz Xeon quad
core. Very fast and always available when onsite or from home or the
office. Even if my laptop is misbehaving remote desktop usually works
great.

I picked up the server off of eBay for about 800$ and it supports a couple
of programmers and some office staff. The biggest downfall is we can only
have one copy of vt pro running at a time but with just two programmers it
really hasn't been that big of a deal.

Best part is we can use cheap little disposable laptops and still have the
power of quad core and 10gb of memory available to us.

Nick

Sent from my iPhone

On Apr 22, 2012, at 8:18 AM, Mark <markrkaye@...> wrote:



i use an ASUS G73S
very good cooling

mark

--- In Crestron@..., "oldspunky" <paul@> wrote:

For the past 5 or 6 years the laptops I use for program development have

been dying (about 1 a year). I have tried Toshiba, Lenovo, HP, and
Panasonic Toughbooks. So this time I tried a Mac Powerbook (with VMware
Fusion and Windows 7. Now the Mac is getting clunky too.

I am probably overloading them, but when I have several copies of Simpl

Windows, Vtpro-e, Autocad, xpanel, Toolbox, and probably a Clearone or
Biamp configuration file (and perhaps Photoshop) all open at the same time
the laptops get pretty hot. Unfortunately I usually need all those things
when working on a program or bringing up a system.

I do a lot of my programming on the road so using a desktop is probably

not an option.

I have been using Radioshack fans and they seem to help, but my Mac is

still getting hot enough to fry eggs or my hands. Any ideas? Or should I
just accept this and budget a new laptop (and software) every year or so.?

Thanks,
Paul

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

--- In Crestron@..., "jrw_96" <jrw_96@...> wrote:

Can anyone suggest a decent freeware that will properly convert to the "8-bit PCM, mono, 8khz sampling rate"?

TIA
JRW

--- In Crestron@..., Jay Basen <jay.m.basen@...> wrote:

Alan

there is an example program for the MLX-3 on the crestron web site. It includes an example iPod interface. You can adopt this to other devices such as a squeezebox without a lot of trouble.

Personally, I've always tied an MLX-3 remote to a given room as nobody likes to go searching around the house for the TV remote. But, it wouldn't be hard to program a room selection list and then just drive the source selection based on a room.

Hope this helps

Jay

----- Original Message -----

From: "Audible Solutions" <crestronprogrammer.1@...>
To: Crestron@...
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2012 11:17:22 AM
Subject: [Crestron] HELP WITH MLX-3





I've been playing with this remote over the weekend. It's been specified into a job and it's the first time I've coded one.
r
My preliminary testing suggests that if I seed the unit with serial text and the size of the list dynamically it works rather well using the built in scroll wheel and feedback.

But the unit does allow you to use your own scrolling list outside of the remote.

Anyone know of any advantage to using the built-in scrolling functionality vs external, roll your own list logic?

I don't have an issue coding the list external to the remote. It just seems unnecessary, based upon my testing. Being a lone coder, I may be missing something so I figured I'd take advantage of the board's experience to confirm or challenge my conclusion.

Secondarily, how have others solved the problem of page up and down with devices such as Squeezebox, the Autonomic MMS or an iPod that requires page up/down commands? I've chosen to provide an extra 2 buttons, one at the top for page up, and the other at the end of the list for page down. Within those 2 fixed button strings the dynamic text resides.

I removed the channel presets from the DVR page, substituting missing buttons such as page up/down and day up/down.

For BD I followed a path above, including buttons such as home, audio, subtitle that are not on the remote.

Anyone coding this as a global control device? I suspect it's inevitable that sales will demand this, even if the iPad is a better UI for global control. I've found HVAC and shades relatively easy to make global, lighting has been a problem in terms of seeding the page flip from the room crosspoint. A scrolling list of rooms connecting to a list of sources sounds rather familiar to those of us coding the Adagio.

I just cannot fathom why someone would offer this UI as anything but a single room control device.

Anyway, any thoughts on the first part, using the built-in scrolling list on the remote vs using code external to the remote, would be appreciated.

TIA,

Alan





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

--- In Crestron@..., "pstphane@..." <pstphane@...> wrote:

Hi guys,

I'm relatively new to crestron programming...

I've done some SB and SIMPL... SIMPL+ also.

So far so good... I'm working on a Home Theatre for a friend ... It'll be a pro2 with an Ipad... His home was done with KNX and there is a crestron knx gateway fully programmed on a QM-RMC... I'd like to integrate the hometheatre part with the KNX part (already done)... we asked about the sources files for the QM-RMC... But i've received an archive with a BAK extension...

Where do i open this kind of file ?

I went on TB but didn't find an answer... maybe they talked about it during training but i forgot... So I thought about the forum and decided to give it a try...

Can someone please tell me how to open the bak file ?


Thank you,

S.

--- In Crestron@..., Nick Mitchell <nick@...> wrote:

We use a Windows 2008 server for development located in our office. It's an
HP dl360 server with 10gb of memory and dual processor 2.33 ghz Xeon quad
core. Very fast and always available when onsite or from home or the
office. Even if my laptop is misbehaving remote desktop usually works
great.

I picked up the server off of eBay for about 800$ and it supports a couple
of programmers and some office staff. The biggest downfall is we can only
have one copy of vt pro running at a time but with just two programmers it
really hasn't been that big of a deal.

Best part is we can use cheap little disposable laptops and still have the
power of quad core and 10gb of memory available to us.

Nick

Sent from my iPhone

On Apr 22, 2012, at 8:18 AM, Mark <markrkaye@...> wrote:



i use an ASUS G73S
very good cooling

mark

--- In Crestron@..., "oldspunky" <paul@> wrote:

For the past 5 or 6 years the laptops I use for program development have

been dying (about 1 a year). I have tried Toshiba, Lenovo, HP, and
Panasonic Toughbooks. So this time I tried a Mac Powerbook (with VMware
Fusion and Windows 7. Now the Mac is getting clunky too.

I am probably overloading them, but when I have several copies of Simpl

Windows, Vtpro-e, Autocad, xpanel, Toolbox, and probably a Clearone or
Biamp configuration file (and perhaps Photoshop) all open at the same time
the laptops get pretty hot. Unfortunately I usually need all those things
when working on a program or bringing up a system.

I do a lot of my programming on the road so using a desktop is probably

not an option.

I have been using Radioshack fans and they seem to help, but my Mac is

still getting hot enough to fry eggs or my hands. Any ideas? Or should I
just accept this and budget a new laptop (and software) every year or so.?

Thanks,
Paul

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

--- In Crestron@..., "Mark" <markrkaye@...> wrote:

i use an ASUS G73S
very good cooling

mark

--- In Crestron@..., "oldspunky" <paul@> wrote:

For the past 5 or 6 years the laptops I use for program development have been dying (about 1 a year). I have tried Toshiba, Lenovo, HP, and Panasonic Toughbooks. So this time I tried a Mac Powerbook (with VMware Fusion and Windows 7. Now the Mac is getting clunky too.

I am probably overloading them, but when I have several copies of Simpl Windows, Vtpro-e, Autocad, xpanel, Toolbox, and probably a Clearone or Biamp configuration file (and perhaps Photoshop) all open at the same time the laptops get pretty hot. Unfortunately I usually need all those things when working on a program or bringing up a system.

I do a lot of my programming on the road so using a desktop is probably not an option.

I have been using Radioshack fans and they seem to help, but my Mac is still getting hot enough to fry eggs or my hands. Any ideas? Or should I just accept this and budget a new laptop (and software) every year or so.?

Thanks,
Paul

----- Original Message -----

From: "Audible Solutions" <crestronprogrammer.1@...>
To: Crestron@...
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2012 11:17:22 AM
Subject: [Crestron] HELP WITH MLX-3





I've been playing with this remote over the weekend. It's been specified into a job and it's the first time I've coded one.
r
My preliminary testing suggests that if I seed the unit with serial text and the size of the list dynamically it works rather well using the built in scroll wheel and feedback.

But the unit does allow you to use your own scrolling list outside of the remote.

Anyone know of any advantage to using the built-in scrolling functionality vs external, roll your own list logic?

I don't have an issue coding the list external to the remote. It just seems unnecessary, based upon my testing. Being a lone coder, I may be missing something so I figured I'd take advantage of the board's experience to confirm or challenge my conclusion.

Secondarily, how have others solved the problem of page up and down with devices such as Squeezebox, the Autonomic MMS or an iPod that requires page up/down commands? I've chosen to provide an extra 2 buttons, one at the top for page up, and the other at the end of the list for page down. Within those 2 fixed button strings the dynamic text resides.

I removed the channel presets from the DVR page, substituting missing buttons such as page up/down and day up/down.

For BD I followed a path above, including buttons such as home, audio, subtitle that are not on the remote.

Anyone coding this as a global control device? I suspect it's inevitable that sales will demand this, even if the iPad is a better UI for global control. I've found HVAC and shades relatively easy to make global, lighting has been a problem in terms of seeding the page flip from the room crosspoint. A scrolling list of rooms connecting to a list of sources sounds rather familiar to those of us coding the Adagio.

I just cannot fathom why someone would offer this UI as anything but a single room control device.

Anyway, any thoughts on the first part, using the built-in scrolling list on the remote vs using code external to the remote, would be appreciated.

TIA,

Alan