Re: SG - hide leading zero in formatted text

[email protected]

#211277

Thanks for the swift response Jeremy,

I forgot about the raw format - duh.

That worked a treat.

Cheers

-s

SG - Air guage (theme editable?)

[email protected]

#211276

Before I go to the extent of downloading the behemoth that is Studio...

Do you guys know if I can edit the Air Gauge object?

I have had no real need up until now to edit any SG objects but the need is becoming all to pressing now for just a few items.

Much as I would love to splash out 500 quid on Theme Creator it is beyond my budget right now.

How much control do I have over the gauge background and indicator?

I need to create a Nest type indicator and find it surprising that Crestron do not allow more user defined attributes in some of the SG objects. I mean the Air Gauge is bloody ugly.

Cheers

-s

Re: SG - hide leading zero in formatted text

#211275

5s -- no need to provide a format if you don't want it.? Search for "cipa" in the help file for the details.? Always good to know how to edit the labels manually.? I avoid the HTML Editor whenever possible.

Show quoted text

On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 8:17 AM, slip.cougan@... [Crestron] <Crestron@...> wrote:

?

Is there a way of hiding a leading zero for an analog value in a formatted text field?
Currently the field is:
A$5?%2u s

I simply need the field to display one of two values either 5s or 60s.
If I initialise the field with 5d then I get 05s and 60d gives me 60s.
The leading zero is really doing my OCD.
Cheers
-slip

SG - hide leading zero in formatted text

[email protected]

#211274

Is there a way of hiding a leading zero for an analog value in a formatted text field?

Currently the field is:

I simply need the field to display one of two values either 5s or 60s.

If I initialise the field with 5d then I get 05s and 60d gives me 60s.

The leading zero is really doing my OCD.

Cheers

-slip

Re: Crestron App set up questions

#211273

You get one CIP port per processor, configured in Ethernet Addressing.? Default is 41794.? Different devices don't need and shouldn't have different ports configured, just different IP IDs.? I doubt the port numbers in the IP table do anything since they're just pointed to 127.0.0.1 (CIP gateway, by Crestron's weird conventions)

Show quoted text

On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 10:47 PM, mark.bagshaw@... [Crestron] <Crestron@...> wrote:

?

Hi folks,

I'm not a Crestron programmer but have been maintaining and enhancing my Crestron system (AV2) for years and have "reasonable" skills in Simpl, VT-Pro, etc.

I have been using the Crestron App on a number of devices (previously iPhones, currently android smart phones and tablet and a Surface Pro 4). I have just added the android tablet but can't get it to connect. Having now explored my ethernet settings in Toolbox to get it to connect, I'm now really confused, particularly about port numbers.

The Crestron App devices are on IP IDs 03 to 06 as shown . I have configured the CIP port numbers for each device in the Crestron App starting at 41794 for ID03 up to 41797 for ID06. These configurations settings are working for ID03, ID04 and ID05, but the android tablet on ID06 won't connect (I get the message "connecting to control system", then "attempting reconnect", but it never connects).

My confusion here is related to the port numbers. As shown , I have set up ethernet addressing in the control system with CIP port 41794 and CTP port 41795 (I'm using 8081 as the HTTP due to a conflict with another program on my network). But, as shown ?in the IP Table Set up, all of the devices are connecting at Port 41794 (including the old x-panel connection on ID08). I would have thought the CIP port numbers in the IP table would have corresponded with the port numbers I used in the app configurations on the devices.

My questions are:
why don't these port numbers correspond?
It's been a long time since I originally set this up, so I can't remember how I allocated, for example, CIP port number 41794 to the Galaxy Note that is on ID03, and I can't see anything in any of the configurations settings in either Simpl or VT-Pro to do that.
Given that port 41795 is defined as an CTP port in ethernet addressing, and that I can't see where 41796 and 41797 are defined at all, how come they are working (apart from the new android tablet)?
Any help will be greatly appreciated,

Mark

Re: Control of a Blackmagic Design ATEM 1 M/E Production Switcher

#211272

This is the only officially-supported solution, using the SDK provided by Blackmagic.? I'm surprised they still don't have an IP API for it.? Thanks for sharing your experience with Skaarhoj, Lincoln, I've always been curious about how well that works.

Show quoted text

On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 3:58 AM, 'Ron Yahoo' Ron.Gillen@... [Crestron] <Crestron@...> wrote:

?

I made a Simpl+ module for the Atem, but it talks to a Windows app via i.p. which in turn talks to the ATEM.
We hid the app on a windows digital signage machine, been working like a dream, but I do not have the rights to the application. I can put you in touch with the person that does if it helps.
?
Of course it’s useless if the windows machine were to go offline.?
?
From: Crestron@... [mailto:Crestron@...]
Sent: Saturday, February 13, 2016 2:20 PM
To: Crestron@...
Subject: [Crestron] Re: Control of a Blackmagic Design ATEM 1 M/E Production Switcher
?
?
champ were you ever able to make a S# module work?? I'm also about to dive off into the Skaarhoj / Arduino route.? It would definitely be cool not to have to have a seperate box.
?
--KG

Re: Max Signals

#211271

That would be 0-65535 ;-) ( == 65536 discrete integer values )

The reason for this seemingly random number is simply 2^16 (2 to the power 16) or 16-bits.

connecting remote with cellular data

[email protected]

#211270

I have a crestron system setup in my house. When I'm connected to the internet in our office, I am able to remotely control my crestron system in the house. However, when using my cellular data 3g, it says project "Project file could not be downloaded."

I noticed that this occurs only in cellular data. When I connect to Wi-Fi, i am able to remotely connect to my crestron system in the house.

What could be the problem?

Re: Max Signals

#211269

开云体育

This is the total number of analog steps that you can reach, that is from 0 to 65534.

You have to include the zero in the count.

Em 28 de jan de 2016, às 16:23, crestron_programmer@... [Crestron] <Crestron@...> escreveu:

Show quoted text

?

Ok cool. Thanks Steve. I thought someone once said 65535 is the limit but it's not so, cool!

Thank you,

Re: Crestron App set up questions

#211268

Hire a pro and problem solved.

Re: Photoshop Alterntive

#211267

Beware of GimpShop- Even when you do Advanced installation and uncheck all the crapware it wants to install, it STILL installs some spyware on your machine. Akami browser mods, some other crapware as well. So install with caution. I am in the midst of removing the crap now...

Re: home elements?

#211266

开云体育

No March is what was posted in labs

Show quoted text

On Feb 14, 2016, at 10:04 AM, wes_lim88@... [Crestron] <Crestron@...> wrote:

?

is the home elements already officially released?

Re: Crestron Samsung EX-LINK Issues

#211265

I was using Crestron's UN55ES8000 module.? I am still looking for the ROM for the client furnished gear.? The Samsungs were consumer (cheap) models.

Re: Autonomics, Sonos....

Jayson Small

#211264

There are some 3rd party modules out there. ?Do a quick google search and several will pop up.

Jayson

From: <Crestron@...> on behalf of "Sean Lee seanlee31@... [Crestron]" <Crestron@...>
Reply-To: <Crestron@...>
Date: Saturday, February 13, 2016 at 10:31 PM
To: <Crestron@...>
Subject: Re: [Crestron] Autonomics, Sonos....

is there anyway to control Sonos directly from ?Crestron?

Regards

Sean

0162128118

Show quoted text

On 14 Feb 2016, at 10:39 AM, Mark Conde mcjaran@... [Crestron] <Crestron@...> wrote:

?

In the end and based on all the replies, i gather that Autonomics is still a good bank for the buck despite it's price point.

Can't thank you all enough for sharing your opinion.

Cheers!

On Saturday, February 13, 2016 8:56 AM, "Joe Vossen jkvossen@... [Crestron]" <Crestron@...> wrote:

?

We have install a few Autonomic units, clients love them

On Feb 12, 2016, at 9:51 PM, mcjaran@... [Crestron] <Crestron@...> wrote:

Is Autonomics MMS2 or 5 still a good player for the money??
I don't want to offer my clients a product that has been replaced by newer more cost effective technology.
It seems that besides from the Crestron Integration part, even Sonos can give Autonomics a run for a lot less money.
Your opinion will be very much appreciated.
Thank you in advance!

home elements?

[email protected]

#211263

is the home elements already officially released?

Re: Autonomics, Sonos....

Mark Conde

#211262

By now someone should have come up with a way to do so but not that I am aware of..

On Saturday, February 13, 2016 11:05 PM, "Sean Lee seanlee31@... [Crestron]" wrote:

is there anyway to control Sonos directly from ?Crestron?

Regards

Sean

0162128118

Show quoted text

On 14 Feb 2016, at 10:39 AM, Mark Conde mcjaran@... [Crestron] <Crestron@...> wrote:

?

In the end and based on all the replies, i gather that Autonomics is still a good bank for the buck despite it's price point.

Can't thank you all enough for sharing your opinion.

Cheers!

On Saturday, February 13, 2016 8:56 AM, "Joe Vossen jkvossen@... [Crestron]" <Crestron@...> wrote:

?

We have install a few Autonomic units, clients love them

On Feb 12, 2016, at 9:51 PM, mcjaran@... [Crestron] <Crestron@...> wrote:

Is Autonomics MMS2 or 5 still a good player for the money??
I don't want to offer my clients a product that has been replaced by newer more cost effective technology.
It seems that besides from the Crestron Integration part, even Sonos can give Autonomics a run for a lot less money.
Your opinion will be very much appreciated.
Thank you in advance!

Re: Control of a Blackmagic Design ATEM 1 M/E Production Switcher

#211261

开云体育

I made a Simpl+ module for the Atem, but it talks to a Windows app via i.p. which in turn talks to the ATEM.

We hid the app on a windows digital signage machine, been working like a dream, but I do not have the rights to the application. I can put you in touch with the person that does if it helps.

?

Of course it’s useless if the windows machine were to go offline.?

?

Show quoted text

From: Crestron@... [mailto:Crestron@...]
Sent: Saturday, February 13, 2016 2:20 PM
To: Crestron@...
Subject: [Crestron] Re: Control of a Blackmagic Design ATEM 1 M/E Production Switcher

?

champ were you ever able to make a S# module work? ?I'm also about to dive off into the Skaarhoj / Arduino route. ?It would definitely be cool not to have to have a seperate box.

?

--KG

Crestron App set up questions

#211259

Hi folks,

I'm not a Crestron programmer but have been maintaining and enhancing my Crestron system (AV2) for years and have "reasonable" skills in Simpl, VT-Pro, etc.

I have been using the Crestron App on a number of devices (previously iPhones, currently android smart phones and tablet and a Surface Pro 4). I have just added the android tablet but can't get it to connect. Having now explored my ethernet settings in Toolbox to get it to connect, I'm now really confused, particularly about port numbers.

The Crestron App devices are on IP IDs 03 to 06 as shown . I have configured the CIP port numbers for each device in the Crestron App starting at 41794 for ID03 up to 41797 for ID06. These configurations settings are working for ID03, ID04 and ID05, but the android tablet on ID06 won't connect (I get the message "connecting to control system", then "attempting reconnect", but it never connects).

My confusion here is related to the port numbers. As shown , I have set up ethernet addressing in the control system with CIP port 41794 and CTP port 41795 (I'm using 8081 as the HTTP due to a conflict with another program on my network). But, as shown ?in the IP Table Set up, all of the devices are connecting at Port 41794 (including the old x-panel connection on ID08). I would have thought the CIP port numbers in the IP table would have corresponded with the port numbers I used in the app configurations on the devices.

My questions are:

why don't these port numbers correspond?
It's been a long time since I originally set this up, so I can't remember how I allocated, for example, CIP port number 41794 to the Galaxy Note that is on ID03, and I can't see anything in any of the configurations settings in either Simpl or VT-Pro to do that.
Given that port 41795 is defined as an CTP port in ethernet addressing, and that I can't see where 41796 and 41797 are defined at all, how come they are working (apart from the new android tablet)?

Any help will be greatly appreciated,

Mark

Re: Autonomics, Sonos....

#211260

开云体育

is there anyway to control Sonos directly from ?Crestron?

Regards

Sean

0162128118

Show quoted text

On 14 Feb 2016, at 10:39 AM, Mark Conde mcjaran@... [Crestron] <Crestron@...> wrote:

?

In the end and based on all the replies, i gather that Autonomics is still a good bank for the buck despite it's price point.

Can't thank you all enough for sharing your opinion.

Cheers!

On Saturday, February 13, 2016 8:56 AM, "Joe Vossen jkvossen@... [Crestron]" <Crestron@...> wrote:

?

We have install a few Autonomic units, clients love them

On Feb 12, 2016, at 9:51 PM, mcjaran@... [Crestron] <Crestron@...> wrote:

Is Autonomics MMS2 or 5 still a good player for the money??
I don't want to offer my clients a product that has been replaced by newer more cost effective technology.
It seems that besides from the Crestron Integration part, even Sonos can give Autonomics a run for a lot less money.
Your opinion will be very much appreciated.
Thank you in advance!

Re: Crestron Samsung EX-LINK Issues

#211258

I will have to open the program and look at the module.  The display was a consumer grade with an exlink in, no out.  I could of used the MDC module.