开云体育

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
  1. Crestron
  2. Messages
Expanded Topics Messages Polls
Date
Re: ONVIF IP Camera Control command format help

 

ONVIF is a protocol standard. It would be more helpful to know what the
camera type is since we are more likely to have specific modules than the
generic protocol.

B

From: Crestron@... [mailto:Crestron@...] On Behalf
Of maheksamani
Sent: Friday, March 22, 2013 1:43 AM
To: Crestron@...
Subject: [Crestron] ONVIF IP Camera Control command format help


Hello All,

I was wondering if someone who had already worked with the PTZ IP Camera
with ONVIF protocol.

could you please guide me with the how to control the camera from the
touch panel.

I am Able to stream the camera feed with MJPEG. but need to control the
camera moves.

Thanks a Zillion in advance .

-Mahek
Re: door locks recommendation

 

Correct, make sure the manufacture says it has firmware revision 3 (most do). If you read the Crestron help file, it explains this.

--- In Crestron@..., "kevin" <k_krussell@...> wrote:

The Leviton Controller, that's the VRCOP you are using correct? Thinking of doing this as well!!

--- In Crestron@..., "Trey Chamrad - Hometunes" <trey@> wrote:

Ken - thank you very much!



From: Crestron@... [mailto:Crestron@...] On Behalf
Of Ken Brunner
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 4:22 PM
To: Crestron@...
Subject: [Crestron] Re: door locks recommendation





Yes, your issue with battery life is due to the module you are using, I am
assuming the Crestron one. It polls the locks extremely often. These locks
give unsolicited feedback after any event. If you open the module and change
the polling of the lock as I have, once every 24 hours, simply to query the
battery life, you will see the locks last 4-5 months of average use. Then
you can just invest on two sets of rechargeable batteries.

--- In Crestron@... <mailto:Crestron%40yahoogroups.com> , "Trey
Chamrad - Hometunes" <trey@> wrote:

my latest response from Crestron rep from TB:

"Sorry for the delayed response, I was researching and getting up to date
info. The Yale lock has been Crestron Certified and the module has been
completed. See attached, these are the locks which will be Crestron
Connected. We are currently deciding the distribution channel. This will
be
announced for resale shortly 鈥� Date is TDB."

I have also used Kwikset with Leviton Zwave controller. My issue was
battery life, it would only last 10 days. the feedback could be seen every
15s, my thought was that was causing the shortened life. I RMAs the
kiwkset
lock 3 times to come to this conclusion. Other than that, the feedback,
control, integration with MC3, Mobile Pro, MTX3, MLX3 was seemless.

Please let me know if you have a hint of help on the battery life I have
experienced. the customer has decided to wait for the Vale, but I could
try
and get back over there to try something if you guys have a hint.

Thanks!
Trey

-----Original Message-----
From: Crestron@... <mailto:Crestron%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:Crestron@... <mailto:Crestron%40yahoogroups.com> ] On
Behalf
Of Georges Khalil
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 11:02 AM
To: Crestron@... <mailto:Crestron%40yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: [Crestron] Re: door locks recommendation

Hasn't Yale released deadbolts that include InfinitEX? Anyone has any news
on those?


--
Georges Khalil, M.Sc.A.

Directeur de l'ing茅nierie
Engineering Manager

Design Homesync Inc.
www.homesync.ca
T : 514 360-3414


On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Ken Brunner <kenbrunner69@>wrote:

**


Kwikset Zwave with the leviton Zwave controller has exceeded my
expectations. Long battery life, feedback including manual operation and
battery level, and easy to install.


--- In Crestron@... <mailto:Crestron%40yahoogroups.com> ,
"wes_lim88" <wes_lim88@> wrote:

what door locks do you find easy to integrate with Crestron?

i need feedback. when the door is manually locked/unlocked it shows in
the panel and the same time i can lock/unlock through crestron panel.






------------------------------------

*
****

Check out the Files area for useful modules, documents, and drivers.

A contact list of Crestron dealers and programmers can be found in the
Database area.
*
****Yahoo! Groups Links
Re: Tandberg Buffer Overflow error

 

I am curious what people have to say about this as well. With the Tandberg module, I pretty much had to remove/comment out all the Crestron written feedback portion of the module, and just write my own code for the feedback I needed.

--- In Crestron@..., "coolaiddrinker" <coolaiddrinker@...> wrote:

Hi Guys,

I am starting to get buffer overflow issues from Tandberg MXP Full Control module (crestron written). I opened the module to see where the issue is indicated, I can see they have put remove command so technically the buffer shouldn't overflow. Should I just put a clearbuffer command at the end of change event to rid me of this issue.

here is what i am receiving in the error logs

ystem log:

1. Notice: CIP device 12: back ONLINE
TimeStamp: 20:23:56 3-20-13 UpTime: 0 days 00:01:08.15 Task: UDP_Serv
2. Error: Overflow on Buffer Input __TANDBERGRX$ on Module: S-3.3:S-32. New = 1007, Max = 1000
TimeStamp: 20:28:35 3-20-13 UpTime: 0 days 00:05:48.36 Task: EvD0004
3. Error: Overflow on Buffer Input __TANDBERGRX$ on Module: S-3.3:S-32. New = 1021, Max = 1000
TimeStamp: 20:28:35 3-20-13 UpTime: 0 days 00:05:48.39 Task: EvD0004
4. Error: Overflow on Buffer Input __TANDBERGRX$ on Module: S-3.3:S-32. New = 1022, Max = 1000
TimeStamp: 20:28:35 3-20-13 UpTime: 0 days 00:05:48.41 Task: EvD0004
5. Error: Overflow on Buffer Input __TANDBERGRX$ on Module: S-3.3:S-32. New = 1011, Max = 1000
TimeStamp: 20:28:35 3-20-13 UpTime: 0 days 00:05:48.43 Task: EvD0004
6. Error: Overflow on Buffer Input __TANDBERGRX$ on Module: S-3.3:S-32. New = 1002, Max = 1000
TimeStamp: 20:28:35 3-20-13 UpTime: 0 days 00:05:48.44 Task: EvD0004
7. Error: Overflow on Buffer Input __TANDBERGRX$ on Module: S-3.3:S-32. New = 1013, Max = 1000
TimeStamp: 20:28:35 3-20-13 UpTime: 0 days 00:05:48.46 Task: EvD0004
8. Error: Overflow on Buffer Input __TANDBERGRX$ on Module: S-3.3:S-32. New = 1002, Max = 1000
TimeStamp: 20:28:35 3-20-13 UpTime: 0 days 00:05:48.48 Task: EvD0004
9. Error: Overflow on Buffer Input __TANDBERGRX$ on Module: S-3.3:S-32. New = 1024, Max = 1000
TimeStamp: 20:28:35 3-20-13 UpTime: 0 days 00:05:48.58 Task: EvD0004
Total Errors Logged = 9


just for curiosity, how do you guys fix these issues as i experience them with clearone/Biamp(sometimes) modules and some others(all crestron modules) as well?

Thanks in advance.
Re: Core 3.......ya

 

The gauges have a little animation to them... Crestron calls it their "Bouncy Scrolly," trying to make things more "Apple Like."

I would also try the same example on a dedicated network, a noisy network can cause "hickups."

Jeff

--- In Crestron@..., "Sean" <seanzombie56@...> wrote:

Anyone have issues displaying an analog gauge in core 3?

Specifically the analog feedback seems to update slowly. I tested with just an analog ramp and two buttons to ramp up/down. The analog gauge ramps up and down but slowly and keeps ramping visually after I release the buttons.

Same program/ buttons/ analog ramp/ analog gauge - work fine and update correctly on a standard panel / XPanel.


Sean
Re: TSW series a lot to learn and ask...

 

I've haven't been experiencing many crashes in VTPro-e lately, working on Core 3 projects seems to be pretty stable. One thing that crashes the heck out of VTPRO-e is trying to save as to the same file name.

My advise with Core 3 would be to start from the groud up, instead of trying to use a complicated example to learn from. Once you learn your way around the property grid things become a lot easier. I'm not doing a lot of the fancy stuff, mostly just buttons, analogs and text strings, so your experience may not be as good if you are playing with Smart Objects and Smart Applications.

My customers have been really thrilled with the quality of graphics I can whip up using the built-in Core3 stuff. Don't try to get wrapped up in making a Core 3 panel look exactly like an existing GUI that was done for a synapse panel, I think that is where a lot of people got hung up in the beginning.

--- In Crestron@..., "gsusmood" <audioandnetartist@...> wrote:

Guys I might need to venture into this series, but as we all know their C3 only. I just created a test project, (i dont have a unit with me). and downloaded the Conference room example. Just trying to figure out Dump stuff like background??? another thing I wonder about Radio Ra2, I use them a lot and I want to really understand this layout. One last thing. My Mac just crashed in one of the moment exploring the example. is this a sign of whats ahead to me? LOL happy Friday I Guess!
Tandberg Buffer Overflow error

 

Hi Guys,

I am starting to get buffer overflow issues from Tandberg MXP Full Control module (crestron written). I opened the module to see where the issue is indicated, I can see they have put remove command so technically the buffer shouldn't overflow. Should I just put a clearbuffer command at the end of change event to rid me of this issue.

here is what i am receiving in the error logs

ystem log:

1. Notice: CIP device 12: back ONLINE
TimeStamp: 20:23:56 3-20-13 UpTime: 0 days 00:01:08.15 Task: UDP_Serv
2. Error: Overflow on Buffer Input __TANDBERGRX$ on Module: S-3.3:S-32. New = 1007, Max = 1000
TimeStamp: 20:28:35 3-20-13 UpTime: 0 days 00:05:48.36 Task: EvD0004
3. Error: Overflow on Buffer Input __TANDBERGRX$ on Module: S-3.3:S-32. New = 1021, Max = 1000
TimeStamp: 20:28:35 3-20-13 UpTime: 0 days 00:05:48.39 Task: EvD0004
4. Error: Overflow on Buffer Input __TANDBERGRX$ on Module: S-3.3:S-32. New = 1022, Max = 1000
TimeStamp: 20:28:35 3-20-13 UpTime: 0 days 00:05:48.41 Task: EvD0004
5. Error: Overflow on Buffer Input __TANDBERGRX$ on Module: S-3.3:S-32. New = 1011, Max = 1000
TimeStamp: 20:28:35 3-20-13 UpTime: 0 days 00:05:48.43 Task: EvD0004
6. Error: Overflow on Buffer Input __TANDBERGRX$ on Module: S-3.3:S-32. New = 1002, Max = 1000
TimeStamp: 20:28:35 3-20-13 UpTime: 0 days 00:05:48.44 Task: EvD0004
7. Error: Overflow on Buffer Input __TANDBERGRX$ on Module: S-3.3:S-32. New = 1013, Max = 1000
TimeStamp: 20:28:35 3-20-13 UpTime: 0 days 00:05:48.46 Task: EvD0004
8. Error: Overflow on Buffer Input __TANDBERGRX$ on Module: S-3.3:S-32. New = 1002, Max = 1000
TimeStamp: 20:28:35 3-20-13 UpTime: 0 days 00:05:48.48 Task: EvD0004
9. Error: Overflow on Buffer Input __TANDBERGRX$ on Module: S-3.3:S-32. New = 1024, Max = 1000
TimeStamp: 20:28:35 3-20-13 UpTime: 0 days 00:05:48.58 Task: EvD0004
Total Errors Logged = 9


just for curiosity, how do you guys fix these issues as i experience them with clearone/Biamp(sometimes) modules and some others(all crestron modules) as well?

Thanks in advance.
Re: OT: Multi-room amplifiers

 

Sorry, I should have said... same power, features and quality as the Sonnex 24x8, but less expensive.

--- In Crestron@..., "jcdigitalmethod" <j.j.cunningham@...> wrote:


Any of the ADA ptm series amps. PTM-850 is 1 space 8 channel tank, stable down to 2 ohms if you dare.

--- In Crestron@..., "Etienne" <etienne@> wrote:

Hi,

I love using Crestron Sonnex, but for some projects it is just to expensive. The AAE's aren't bad, but sometimes they are "too light" for some projects.

What do the rest of you use if you require more power than AAE's, but at a budget? I need a unit with at least 8 zones (16 channels), full and reliable control, pre-amp and amplifier in one or separates, BUT cost less than Sonnex 24x8.

Thanks!
Re: Brand Spankin New Processor with Program Loaded - WTF?

 

Sometimes the person who check the product at crestron forgot to
reinitialize device.

{Paf}
Le 22 mars 2013 08:40, "jcdigitalmethod" <j.j.cunningham@...> a
閏rit :

**


Just opened a new DMPS-300-C and found a program already loaded on it.
Anyone else see this? 2nd one I've seen like this in a year. Are they
taking refurbed boards and throw them in new chassis? I thought they are
legally supposed to disclose refurbished product as "refurbished product"
not new.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
TSW series a lot to learn and ask...

gsusmood
 

Guys I might need to venture into this series, but as we all know their C3 only. I just created a test project, (i dont have a unit with me). and downloaded the Conference room example. Just trying to figure out Dump stuff like background??? another thing I wonder about Radio Ra2, I use them a lot and I want to really understand this layout. One last thing. My Mac just crashed in one of the moment exploring the example. is this a sign of whats ahead to me? LOL happy Friday I Guess!
Re: OT: Multi-room amplifiers

 

Any of the ADA ptm series amps. PTM-850 is 1 space 8 channel tank, stable down to 2 ohms if you dare.

--- In Crestron@..., "Etienne" <etienne@...> wrote:

Hi,

I love using Crestron Sonnex, but for some projects it is just to expensive. The AAE's aren't bad, but sometimes they are "too light" for some projects.

What do the rest of you use if you require more power than AAE's, but at a budget? I need a unit with at least 8 zones (16 channels), full and reliable control, pre-amp and amplifier in one or separates, BUT cost less than Sonnex 24x8.

Thanks!
Re: subpage z-order ft-tps4

 

Yeah, that sounds easy enough... :-)

--- On Friday, March 22, 2013 at 6:23 AM, 搁补辫丑补毛濒 Thiffault wrote:

Submitting that problem to crestron to get a fix on next release will be
the best solution.


Le 21 mars 2013 23:00, "jaaronart" <jaaron7@...> a 茅crit :



Thanks for responding. The changelog for VTPro mentions enabling the
z-order features for other panels, so it seems like an oversight to
me, like someone forgot to set that flag in the database.

In fact, if I save the project as a TPS4L project, I can set the
z-order option, compile, and upload to the FT, and the project works
just the way I wanted. Just annoying that I would have to resort to a
"hack" like that.

I've emailed TB, see they respond with anything useful.

--- In Crestron@..., "fabiodaubermann" <fdaubermann@...>
wrote:


Been there, done that... The flip-top simply doesn't have that option.
Which tells me that probably a separate team of engineers worked on
the flip top model than the 4L. Other than that, I can't imagine why
the hardware would be different between the two models.

Weak...

The last triggered subpage is what always shows up. You will have to
do
some tricks with delayed pulses or something...
Fabio


--- In Crestron@..., "jaaronart" <jaaron7@> wrote:

Does the flip-top TPS4 not have the option for sub-page z-order?
I've
always preferred the option for "Follow subpage-reference Z-order" for
my projects, so I can always be sure of how the subpages will display.
The
C2N-FT-TPS4 doesn't have that Compile option, but the TPS4L does.

I can't recall if the option was there before and has disappeared
or
if I'm just thinking of other touchpanels that I've used.

Can someone confirm if this option was ever available for the ft-
tps4?

I just updated everything with Master Installer last night, so I'm
wondering if a recent update may have done away with it.






------------------------------------




Check out the Files area for useful modules, documents, and drivers.

A contact list of Crestron dealers and programmers can be found in the
Database area.

Yahoo! Groups Links
Re: OT: Multi-room amplifiers

Paul Cunningham
 

AudioControl amplifiers. They're not the cheapest, but they are small (3U), relatively cool, rock-solid*, and powerful. They can withstand some serious abuse, including multiple 2-ohm loads on a single amp. As to control, there are multiple options involving dry contacts and 12V which work as expected. The DSP/EQ on thusly-equipped models is easy to set up. They ventilate passively bottom-up, and you can stack up to 3 of them together for a "chimney" effect with no problems.

Just put your matrix/preamp of choice in front - PAD8/BIPAD, Extron, etc.

*The D3200 has proven unreliable on the Ethernet side; I have high hopes for the upcoming D3400 & D4400 but nothing to report just yet. The *1 amplifiers suffer from the same Ethernet problems.

-----Original Message-----
From: Crestron@... [mailto:Crestron@...] On Behalf Of Etienne
Sent: Friday, March 22, 2013 7:19 AM
To: Crestron@...
Subject: [Crestron] OT: Multi-room amplifiers

Hi,

I love using Crestron Sonnex, but for some projects it is just to expensive. The AAE's aren't bad, but sometimes they are "too light" for some projects.

What do the rest of you use if you require more power than AAE's, but at a budget? I need a unit with at least 8 zones (16 channels), full and reliable control, pre-amp and amplifier in one or separates, BUT cost less than Sonnex 24x8.

Thanks!



------------------------------------



Check out the Files area for useful modules, documents, and drivers.

A contact list of Crestron dealers and programmers can be found in the Database area.
Yahoo! Groups Links
Re: Brand Spankin New Processor with Program Loaded - WTF?

 

I've seen it several times over the years. Early QM stuff mostly and qmrmcs coming in eslave mode etc.

--- In Crestron@..., "jcdigitalmethod" <j.j.cunningham@...> wrote:

Just opened a new DMPS-300-C and found a program already loaded on it. Anyone else see this? 2nd one I've seen like this in a year. Are they taking refurbed boards and throw them in new chassis? I thought they are legally supposed to disclose refurbished product as "refurbished product" not new.
Re: TPMC-10 battery

 

Interesting. Did you charge the battery fully first, and then try to power it from battery?

I had 2 batteries refurbed by batteryfill.com with great success, although it took 2-3 charge cycles for the battery life to read correctly in the panel.

Marty

--- In Crestron@..., Marc Nield <nieldm@...> wrote:

I used batteryrefill.com for a TPMC10 and it didn't work from the moment I plugged the new battery in (constant reboot loop). Even if I take the battery out and run it only from mains, the same thing happens. It worked perfectly before I sent the battery away. I am not blaming the battery but it's certainly a coincidence.

On 21 Mar 2013, at 12:10, mm24all <martinp@...> wrote:

+1 on batteryrefill.com

--- In Crestron@..., "robbie_ray" <rlray@> wrote:

I never could find a replacement but I was able to have new cells put into it.

We used these guys:



--- In Crestron@..., PatM Gmail <pat.molettieri@> wrote:

If you have a Batteries Plus around you they can make 1 for you.

Pat M


From: cheinemann605 <cheinemann@>
Reply-To: <Crestron@...>
Date: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 5:03 PM
To: <Crestron@...>
Subject: [Crestron] TPMC-10 battery

does anybody know where I can get a replacement battery for a TPMC-10?
Brand Spankin New Processor with Program Loaded - WTF?

 

Just opened a new DMPS-300-C and found a program already loaded on it. Anyone else see this? 2nd one I've seen like this in a year. Are they taking refurbed boards and throw them in new chassis? I thought they are legally supposed to disclose refurbished product as "refurbished product" not new.
Re: Lutron QS Request Command <--Please someone help!!

 

I am not 100% certain on this, but am pretty sure that the query command is "?OUTPUT,1&#92;n".

The Action number is only for actual commands:
For example, Action 1 is set output level
#OUTPUT,1,1,80,4,1&#92;n - this will set unit ID 01 to 80%, 4 sec fade, 1 sec delay
#OUTPUT,1,2&#92;n - will just raise the level of unit ID 01
... and so on.

The query command does not use the Action number, I believe.

--- In Crestron@..., "sevenstarokawari" <tabata@...> wrote:

I am glad to get kind reply from you.
OK,,, i will try with "?OUTPUT,ALL_DEVICES,1"

Do you know what's the meaning of the last "1"
According to the manual, it says "Action Number"
I can't understand...


--- In Crestron@..., Eric Williams <ewilliams0305@> wrote:

Its been a while but instead of "1" try the commands using "ALL_DEVICES" as your integration Id. It will definitely work for polling not sure about setting levels.

-----Original Message-----
From: "sevenstarokawari" <tabata@>
Sent: 芒鈧�&#65533;3/芒鈧�&#65533;21/芒鈧�&#65533;2013 9:09 PM
To: "Crestron@..." <Crestron@...>
Subject: [Crestron] Re: Lutron QS Request Command <--Please someone help!!




--- In Crestron@..., "sevenstarokawari" <tabata@> wrote:

Would someone advise me the command to get all zone's brightness of Lutron QS simultaneously?
Actually I sent"?OUTPUT,1,1<CR><LF>", but nothing happens.
The Lutron QS ID of mine is "1"


Regards,



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
OT: Multi-room amplifiers

 

Hi,

I love using Crestron Sonnex, but for some projects it is just to expensive. The AAE's aren't bad, but sometimes they are "too light" for some projects.

What do the rest of you use if you require more power than AAE's, but at a budget? I need a unit with at least 8 zones (16 channels), full and reliable control, pre-amp and amplifier in one or separates, BUT cost less than Sonnex 24x8.

Thanks!
Re: Lutron QS Request Command <--Please someone help!!

 

In the QS protocol you are specifying the command, the integration ID of the device you want to control, and the action you want the device to perform. Some actions also have optional parameters that follow as well.

If you look at p93 of the document, for example, it shows how to use the OUTPUT command on a Maestro dimmer. The OUTPUT command has 4 actions that are possible:
1 = set/get dimming level (with some parameter options)
2 = start raising
3 = start lowering
4 = stop raising/lowering

So when you send the command "?OUTPUT,1,1<CR><LF>" you are getting the current dimming level of device 1.

When controlling a keypad the actions available are:
3 = press
4 = release
9 = get/set LED state

Hope that helps!

--- In Crestron@..., "sevenstarokawari" <tabata@...> wrote:

I am glad to get kind reply from you.
OK,,, i will try with "?OUTPUT,ALL_DEVICES,1"

Do you know what's the meaning of the last "1"
According to the manual, it says "Action Number"
I can't understand...


--- In Crestron@..., Eric Williams <ewilliams0305@> wrote:

Its been a while but instead of "1" try the commands using "ALL_DEVICES" as your integration Id. It will definitely work for polling not sure about setting levels.

-----Original Message-----
From: "sevenstarokawari" <tabata@>
Sent: 芒鈧�&#65533;3/芒鈧�&#65533;21/芒鈧�&#65533;2013 9:09 PM
To: "Crestron@..." <Crestron@...>
Subject: [Crestron] Re: Lutron QS Request Command <--Please someone help!!




--- In Crestron@..., "sevenstarokawari" <tabata@> wrote:

Would someone advise me the command to get all zone's brightness of Lutron QS simultaneously?
Actually I sent"?OUTPUT,1,1<CR><LF>", but nothing happens.
The Lutron QS ID of mine is "1"


Regards,



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: Recover .vtz file from MTX3/PTX3, possible?

 

If you can connect to toolbox, have you try the file manager option.
Extract all the gui folder and send it to the remote.

I have done that in the past for some panel but not sure if it's works on
those remote

{Paf}
Le 21 mars 2013 23:12, "Jon" <fueler1@...> a 閏rit :

**


Hi all,

I have a client that we don't have the code for that ruined their PTX3
remote. I think I can still connect with toolbox, but is there a way to get
the compiled file out of it to load to a new remote?

WE don't have the VTP to recompile and do not want to change anything,
just replace the remote.

Any ideas about console command to get the file?

I looked at the project tab in toolbox on my own PTX3 and don't see any
option for extract or recover. I swear I have seen that option on either
processors or other touchpanels.

Any tips or tricks to try to get the compiled code to reload on
replacement?

Thanks
Jon



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: subpage z-order ft-tps4

 

Submitting that problem to crestron to get a fix on next release will be
the best solution.

{Paf}
Le 21 mars 2013 23:00, "jaaronart" <jaaron7@...> a 閏rit :

**




Thanks for responding. The changelog for VTPro mentions enabling the
z-order features for other panels, so it seems like an oversight to me,
like someone forgot to set that flag in the database.

In fact, if I save the project as a TPS4L project, I can set the z-order
option, compile, and upload to the FT, and the project works just the way I
wanted. Just annoying that I would have to resort to a "hack" like that.

I've emailed TB, see they respond with anything useful.

--- In Crestron@..., "fabiodaubermann" <fdaubermann@...>
wrote:


Been there, done that... The flip-top simply doesn't have that option.
Which tells me that probably a separate team of engineers worked on the
flip top model than the 4L. Other than that, I can't imagine why the
hardware would be different between the two models.

Weak...

The last triggered subpage is what always shows up. You will have to do
some tricks with delayed pulses or something...
Fabio


--- In Crestron@..., "jaaronart" <jaaron7@> wrote:

Does the flip-top TPS4 not have the option for sub-page z-order? I've
always preferred the option for "Follow subpage-reference Z-order" for my
projects, so I can always be sure of how the subpages will display. The
C2N-FT-TPS4 doesn't have that Compile option, but the TPS4L does.

I can't recall if the option was there before and has disappeared or
if I'm just thinking of other touchpanels that I've used.

Can someone confirm if this option was ever available for the ft-tps4?

I just updated everything with Master Installer last night, so I'm
wondering if a recent update may have done away with it.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
80421 - 80440 of 256492