?

Just use Instance ID Tags instead of the DSP assigned tags. Then as long as the control gets the correct instance ID tag, then it'll work no matter what the instance ID is. I don't remember the last time I used the assigned instance id.

On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 2:53 PM, cyberbri24@... [Crestron] <Crestron@...> wrote:

?

I Like Biamp for its customization, Have yet to use the Forte but like the idea of the USB for the capability for adding Skype/Lync.... Hate how the instance ID can be lost if a tech deletes a control, then adds it back.

I Like Polycom SS, never had any issues.

I Love Clearone, from a control standpoint. Its nice to get realtime feedback and if you use Macros for control, it can be a rock solid solution. Just deployed about 50 of these in the summer with no issues or calls. Techs can go in after and tweak input/output/mixer levels and adjust a macro for even more control and it never effects the integrated controls. I actually have a standard DSP that can be loaded into a 840T and 880T. Started using Processing buss A, B, C, & D, Faders 1, 2, 3, & 4. This way if the job has a need for more than 8 sets of controls or levels to be tracked, I have the engineer make sure the system adds the 880T which allows for more processing. ?

--
In Him,
Andrew Welker