开云体育

Hi Chris, did you ever come across a 32 bit windows version of FBB? I found LinFBB but I'm not a Linux guy. In any case? I'm jealous of you: I find configuring FBB highly complex and admire anybody

Now that I have DOSFBB running nicely with Dos BPQ4.09, I have moved on to Atari TOS :D I have been playing with DPBOX for a couple of years now, and I thought I would give digipoint (t's predecessor

Hi, It's been a while since I revisited this, but has there been any status updates on freedv and bpq? Last I visited this the freedv dev said they were working with G8BPQ to get the API and BPQ

Some drivers need a longer wait, So i would try to place a PAUSE 30 or PAUSE 60 after the ELSE. I notice that its not consistent on drivers, so drivers like VARA dont need those, but if you use

Hi all, I have been experimenting with a newly-added KAM port (#6). It looks to me that after an outgoing call was tried in G-tor mode (either from QtTermTCP or from within a forwarding script) the

Hi Everyone Can someone please advise, running linbpq on Ubuntu 24.2 What is the max chars used for IDMSG and BTMSG, and is the any chars I must not use and last, when I update any of these message

Hi Glenn, Can you copy/paste your radio port config that you changed?? I'd like to do the same to mine.? I have a feeling my SESSIONTIMELIMIT isn't working, since I'm using the old rig-control

FIXED: Confirmed it is working fine now!

Thank you everyone! Made the change John BPQ starts with no errors.

Hi Rich, At one time I had 3 interlocked ports with no rig control in place at all. It was because I was on one band on one dial frequency 7x24. When I added rig control, I understood at the time

Hi Lee, It was curious to learn that your use of the new / current method worked for you WITHOUT a "RADIO n" reference in a port config section. I assume it was required. With John's clarification

Thank-you very much. That sounds familiar, and sure enough, it has been stated previously in this group. I should have done a search for it. 73, Lee [email protected]> wrote:

RADIO and INTERLOCK do the same thing. With the new method of defining rigcontrol it seemed sensible to use RADIO to link the radio definition with the ports but INTERLOCK still works for

I thought the whole point of INTERLOCK was that you want them to lock each other out, i.e. as soon as one port is in use with its specific modem or TNC, other ports that share the same radio are

I don't use INTERLOCK with the new RADIO method.? They seem to lock each other out. But I only have one radio sharing multiple ports. Just maybe you will not need any interlock

Hi All, I've been using the new/current rig control method ever since adding rig control to linbpq a little over a year ago. I only have one HF radio for now, and I've never needed?a "RADIO 1"

Sorry, ADDR must come first in the CONFIG section. 73, John

Hi Glenn, Your config looks like a mix of the old RIGCONTROL style with the newer RADIO style. Per https://www.cantab.net/users/john.wiseman/Documents/RigControl.html choose one OR the other method

Here it is currently John. PORT PORTNUM=5 ID=VARA HF(20/40) & 80 DRIVER=VARAHF INTERLOCK=1 CONFIG SESSIONTIMELIMIT 5 ADDR 192.168.86.34 ?8351 PTT CAT PATH RIGCONTROL Remote 192.168.86.34:8500 ICOM

If you are using RIGCONTROL I don't thenk RADIO 1 is necessary.? You shouldn't use both. If you do not have a... Radio 1 xxxxxx xxxxxx **** block at the top of your config to define the rig