Re: Linbpq, Winlink Express, and Kenwood D710 won't connect
Try setting max frame to 1, the built in tnc has limited buffer space as I recall. 73 jim KI0BK
By
Jim - KI0BK
·
#42297
·
|
Re: New Versions
I do not see the new BPQ32 or BPQMail, only BPQ32.dll dated 10/06 in the beta folder. The most recentfiles beyond that are dated 08/27. Am I looking in the wrong place?? Best regards, Gary, K7EK
By
Gary - K7EK
·
#42296
·
|
Re: Modernizing the HTML control panel
Yes, that sounds like it. I'll have a go with Firefox. 73, John
By
John G8BPQ
·
#42295
·
|
Re: Modernizing the HTML control panel
I just tried in Chrome and the request to /api/request_token fails with the following error: Access to XMLHttpRequest at 'http://192.168.0.109:9123/api/request_token' from origin 'null' has been
By
Rik M7GMT
·
#42294
·
|
Re: Modernizing the HTML control panel
That's very strange, John. I've attached a couple of screenshots of the Firefox developer console, and a .har file which you can import into your own browser console so that you can click around on
By
Rik M7GMT
·
#42293
·
|
Re: Modernizing the HTML control panel
Thanks, Rik. I've traced the data stream between the Browser and BPQ and am not seeing an OPTIONS message. If I install your code in the BPQ HTML folder the token request is accepted. The api request
By
John G8BPQ
·
#42292
·
|
Re: New Versions
This update seems to have fixed my problem with HA routing. I reran routing on all my messages and it picked up @USA AND @NA messages and properly routed them. BBS Version 6.0.24.45 241006 16:18:33 ?
By
Eric H. Christensen
·
#42291
·
|
Re: BBS Forwarding RF/AXIP
What's sad is that most people either don't want to learn from past documentation, like the NEDA quarterlies/annuals, or they are not aware that information does exist somewhere. As for routing via
By
Charles Hargrove
·
#42290
·
|
Re: New Versions
What is the best procedure for updating? Em dom., 6 de out. de 2024, 04:30, John G8BPQ via groups.io <john.wiseman= [email protected]> escreveu:
By
Mauro Veiga
·
#42289
·
|
Re: BBS Forwarding RF/AXIP
Hi, Charles: Thank you for the response. This may be getting 'off-topic', but that definition sounds much like a Point-to-point link wherein 2 stations have exclusive access to a channel (without
By
Chuck Gelm
·
#42288
·
|
Re: BBS Forwarding RF/AXIP
This means that you have only one forwarding partner on an RF link, typically 220 or 440, at 1k2, 9k6 or higher. This drops the possibility of having collisions or hidden transmitter syndrome.
By
Charles Hargrove
·
#42287
·
|
Re: Modernizing the HTML control panel
Sure. This pages tries to fetch the node list, but fails - see the developer console in your browser (right click on the page, choose "Inspect", then go to the Network tab). The form expects the
By
Rik M7GMT
·
#42286
·
|
Re: BBS Forwarding RF/AXIP
Me too, 1988-2000, now 2019-> I feel that Hierarchical Routing is the same whether RF or not. I have always been confused about the word 'dedicated' as in /"dedicated RF links"/. Start here:
By
Chuck Gelm
·
#42285
·
|
New Versions
I've uploaded new versions of BPQ32, BPQMail and linbpq to my beta site. This should fix the problem with SendPToMultiple forwarding messages that have reached their target BBS. It adds the BBS HA to
By
John G8BPQ
·
#42284
·
|
Re: Modernizing the HTML control panel
Could you send me a page that shows this in action so I can see exactly what is received by the server in the OPTIONS request? Thanks, John
By
John G8BPQ
·
#42283
·
|
Re: BBS Forwarding RF/AXIP
Hi Jon, I'd be happy to setup an AXIP link and BBS forwarding. My MAP: VE3CGR-7 ve3cgr.dyndns.org UDP 10093 B My HA: VE3CGR.#SCON.ON.CAN.NOAM Ron VE3CGR
By
Ron Gibson
·
#42282
·
|
BBS Forwarding RF/AXIP
I have just recently setup a new linbpq installation, and would like to provide good "old-fashion" BBS access. It has been MANY years since I helped maintain a packet BBS system (mid 90s). I remember
By
Jon Simonds
·
#42281
·
|
Re: Modernizing the HTML control panel
The access token mechanism is there for future use when I add calls to change information and to keep a session state between requests. Neither is needed for the currently implemented requests, but I
By
John G8BPQ
·
#42280
·
|
Re: Modernizing the HTML control panel
Ok, I'll look into the implications of doing that. 73, John
By
John G8BPQ
·
#42279
·
|
Re: Modernizing the HTML control panel
I've hit a snag. While requests to the API will work when using curl, NodeJS, Python, etc, they won't work from within a browser. This is because browsers make an OPTIONS request before the main
By
Rik M7GMT
·
#42278
·
|